THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think









There is today appearing on our TV's daily, the most amazing display of gutter level hypocrisy ever witnessed in the history of America. And what is equally amazing, is that Americans have grown so calloused to a continual diet of such blatant and grandiose hypocrisy from these people, they do not even notice it anymore, as anything unusual? So of course, let's back the bus up and take a look at the latest Vatican doctrine, Rome's "pay per do", apostate Evangelical political leaders are busy prostituting themselves and selling out America and it's Constitution, over now. In order to find creative ways to hate their United States President, they have resorted to "sounding the alarm" over the "evils" of "contraception" or "birth control" medicine, that might get indirectly provided to someone in their employment in their vast financial empire in America. Decrying the horrible fact, that when the Vatican chooses to run "for profit" institutions in America (as 501c3) "businesses" (which charge fees for professional services rendered as Businesses) and simultaneously receive over 1 Billion dollars a year in United States, federal U.S. tax-payer money, (most of which comes from Protestants) to pay for their Vatican operations in the U.S., they are asked to provide the standard "Health insurance" to their employees, that everyone else in America is required to provide, and might cover a "birth-control pill" somewhere at some time in the privacy of a Doctors office for one of their millions of employees.


1Ti 4:1-3

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.

Rome's heresy, invented by it's false prophet vegetarian desert Gnostics, (1) who taught the Roman Caesar and his Pope that Christ and Antichrist were the same thing, (2) that the Whore of Babylon and the Bride of Christ were the same thing, (3) and that the tower of Babel and the Church were the same thing, (4) also taught that a sperm cell and a human were the same thing, so naturally, when a man ejaculates "millions of souls" perish. That is also why they thought sex was "evil" and to be a "godly" person, you should be a "celibate" (never guilty of "murdering millions of souls" in an ejaculation). And of course this very philosophy, and it's practice of celibacy, and even it's desert location, were all prophesied in the New Testament... and described as "false prophets", "seducing spirits" and "doctrines of demons". These "demons" are the ones that "Tony Perkins" at "Focus on the Vatican" has "endorsed", because evidently these "demons" are in him too. ("Focus on the Family" is what he fraudulently calls it), unless of course, he is referring to Rome's mafia "family". His use of the phrase "family values" should never go by without a simultaneous mental visual of "Tony Soprano", because that's pretty much all that he means by these terms. (More "opposite-speak") "Family Values" like shooting doctors and blowing up health clinics and fighting anything that is not consistent with Mussolini-Republicanism, or in servitude of the Vatican. Those kind of "family Values". The kind that endorse deceit, disinformation, political thuggery, election rigging, high infant mortality rates, poisoned water, dependency on foreign and fossil-fuel oil, predatory capitalism, war in far away countries over things that have nothing to do with Americans or America, those kinds of "family values". [And of course any reader could probably continue adding to the list from the slave labor and sex-slavery of Chinese workers in Pacific Island territories forced to actually have abortions in order to continue working as slaves, to all the various scandals and hypocrisies that have piled up over the years, too numerous to keep mentioning], all of which "supported" by these people, as long as it had the right "dog tag" around it's neck that said "conservative" on it, even if it was the Antichrist, Satan or Hitler wearing it.


Mat 6:23-24

But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Now naturally, the Vatican being asked to provide standard American health care coverage to it's employees, considers that an awful "injustice", since the Vatican should never be asked to do anything by anybody, including pay for human labor in the form of wages in conformity to anyone's "laws" , which is considers itself far above by imperial decree [you know the Pope is God therefore submitting to anything other than himself is a "humiliation"], but since the Vatican wishes to occupy the land with Business operations that generate billions of dollars in profits, it should naturally obey the laws of the land that govern such profit making business operations in America, like everyone else. (And that of course is the "problem") The Vatican doesn't think it should. It sees itself above "law", meaning anyone's "law", even including God's law. How can God be subject to God's law? And thus why we have Catholic priests suspected of murder, enjoying golf on the courses in Arizona with complete impunity, beyond anyone's "law", because of it's "Diplomatic immunity", as a result of America violating it's own Constitution (against JFK's own counsel) and recognizing the "Vatican" (a 100 acre religious compound in Rome) as a "State".  He died of "natural causes" at the ripe old age of 84, after decades of a life of leisure on a gold course in Arizona beyond the reach of European homicide investigators, courtesy of the United States.


Italy's BANKRUPTCY has an undercurrent story that is never reported in the media. If you ever get a chance, take a vacation to Rome and visit Vatican city. They need the money and Protestants need the education. You will see why Rome is so proud of itself, why it feels "entitled" to own and rule your world, and why it feels it "ought" to be the owner of your government. And of course, you will enjoy seeing all the rotting corpses of dead Popes encased in glass, littered all over Saint Peter's basilica, for the entertainment of the "tourists". Nothing like a dead Pope in Rome to cheer your day. (At least for some strange reason that seems to be the case for most of it's Catholic tourists) But one of the most amazing things you will learn on your guided tour if you take one, is that the Vatican is the greatest place on earth (not surprisingly). In fact, it is so great, it is the largest employer in all of Rome. The most coveted Jobs in Italy, are working for THE VATICAN! And of course, since the Vatican is it's own STATE, none of the Italians that work there, PAY ANY TAXES TO ITALY. Despite the fact, they along with the Vatican itself, utilize all of Italy's "government services" (which consequently GO UNPAID FOR) This isn't lamented of course, it's bragged about. And thus one of the reasons why Italy has gone BANKRUPT.  And of course, the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States is "helping" to bail them out with "undisclosed" loans and grants.  Isn't that nice?  The predominately Protestant United States, even gets to help bail them out.  At least you have to admire the Vatican.  But of course, people like Tony Perkins who have done this to America (and is STILL DOING IT), and his "political front" organization, "Focus on the Vatican" should be run out of Dodge on the first wagon leaving, not just by patriotic Americans, but by every "real" Christian left in the country.(All 12 of them). 

And it is no surprise that the Vatican drags this corrupt policy of civil thievery and financial corruption to America's GOP, and passes it off to unsuspecting "Christian Conservatives" as some kind of a "Republican" political doctrine. Well, it's "Republican" if you mean "Mussolini Republican", which Italy along with it's BANKRUPTCY, has now re-installed as it's official "elected government" (a party which doesn't believe in elections? Elected?) The Mussolini fascists were re-installed into power in Italy, and if you listen closely to America's "religious-reich" rhetoric, you will recognize where most of it is emanating from (complete with it's conscience-less commitment to openly use deceit) , and it is as far away from Abraham Lincoln as Washington D.C. is to Rome.


Does your "Church" get a 1.3 Billion dollars a year donation to your missionaries from the U.S. Treasury? (To then use that same money to undermine the U.S. Government?) So your "Church" can "take over" and "remove the separation of Church and State", so your "Church" can run everything under your "leader"? Why not?

Does your Church have a farm in Tennessee or Ohio or California with 100 Acres on it that the U.S. Government calls a "State" and grants all your "ministers" "Diplomatic immunity" if they work at your demonination's headquarters in Nashville, Tenn or Ohio or California?  Why not?

Does the U.S. government have an "Ambassador" to your denominational headquarters somewhere in the country? Why Not? (Oh that's right, it's not Constitutional.. for you anyway)

Well, if you are a Protestant and you don't have any of these things, but support people like Tony Perkins, or Pat Robertson, or any of the other Religious-Right Vatican sycophants that are literally giving your country away to a foriegn power whose stated aims are the destruction of your country as you now know it, for a Vatican state, in which you will live as a 2nd or 3rd class citizen if you are lucky and the Vatican is in a good mood are simply dumber than rocks. (And deserve what you are getting)

The only problem of course, is that all the rest of us, are getting it too, because you are so incredibly, pitifully stupid and follow and support men (you egregiously call "leaders") who are even worse than you. May God have mercy on us all. Selah

Anyway, back to Vatican business.  If the Vatican took no money from the U.S. Government (say their billion dollar a year donation?), or if they weren't so busy trying to run profit making Businesses here in this country, there naturally would be no point in asking them to obey any of our laws concerning the operation of a Business as an "employer". But since they wish to run an empire of financial operations in the U.S., commandeering the U.S. Treasury at their personal disposal, and simultaneously ask Protestant Christians (which make up 70% of the country) to fund their Vatican operations with that Billion dollar a year donation from largely "Protestant tax-payers" (while they work feverishly to remove the 1st Amendment and pass compulsory Religious laws, such as the federal institutionalization of Rome's Solar-mass, or the compulsory federalization and state observance of it's "Saint Days"?), it is pretty amazing they are "screaming foul" over a law that "violates their freedom of conscience", (1) when they have openly claimed there are intentionally and willfully working to nullify everyone else's and (2) since "religious Freedom" is precisely the very doctrine, they have been running around in Evangelical circles CONDEMNING? And there are actually Protestants, in this country, that are so stupid they are letting this happen to them!!!

So apparently now, the Vatican, would like to avail itself what it simultaneously wishes to remove for everyone else? And no one says anything about it to them? The fact this can even be put forward from the same mouth (such as Rick Santorum) in the very same interviews where he declares he wanted to "vomit" as a result of hearing JFK, respectfully and rightfully, explain his agreement with the American public to honor it's Constitutional laws of separation of Church and State for everyone's protections including those of Catholic persuasion, despite his Catholic doctrine. Kennedy laid the groundwork conceptually in this speech for a united America which was healthy for both Protestants and Catholics, but most of all created a healthy civic environment where matters of state and public office could be conducted without partisan and sectarian religions driving government policy (and ultimately victimizing Americans).

If Rick Santorum (and his "Focused on the Vatican" supporter Tony Perkins) had affirmed from the beginning the values of Kennedy's speech to the Baptist ministers in 1960, then perhaps his complaints about "religious freedom" might at least sound "sane", at least consistent with what would be coming out of his own mouth 10 minutes later. But when you claim that when you hear a Catholic, United States President, and one that was very esteemed, explain he not only honors America's political laws and traditions and history of "Separation of Church and State", he fought for them in World War 2 against the Nazis.... and this makes you want to "vomit"? (because you don't believe in America's Constitutional laws that do provide the very protection you now hypocritically cite?) To excuse your "Church's" compliance to America's federal laws? ...? Hello? Anyone home here?

                                                                      Job 27:8 For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he hath gained, when God taketh away his soul?

So, what is the "key learning" in this situation? Religious freedom is a good thing, and there needs to be much more of it than we have. Religious profiteering by the Vatican in the U.S. that now owns what some have estimated to be nearly 10% of the total land mass of the United States, and receives over a billion dollars a year for "Catholic Charities" from the U.S. Tax payers, which go to fund things like "resisting immigration laws" and "political activities" aimed at destroying United States sovereignty, and institutionalizing Roman religious ritual and dominance in our society, is pretty searing hypocrisy to complain you are asked to comply with it's laws of the land, that govern your commercial and subterfuge political activities?


Ovulation occurs within a female on one day a month. There is a 3 day window according to most sources that pregnancy is possible around this time (out of a month). Christians who know the real Christ, do not approach sex without first praying (just as they are taught to do about all things including their marital relations). When they feel they have been "led" to have intimate relations, they should know, and often do know, the outcome of that moment before it occurs. That's the way Protestants should be living a spirit-filled, spirit-led life of prayer. It is not uncommon to have heard personal accounts of how the Lord spoke prior to the conception of children, their genders, their future physical descriptions, etc. Most if ever at all, quickly outgrow the need or interest in contraception for a more spiritual lifestyle of faith in God's leading and speaking. Naturally when this is done, the conception of a Child becomes the product of both the will of God and the word of God in a person's life.

Spiritual Protestants ideally should have no particular need of contraception (nor any particular need to condemn anyone's freedom to use it) But even Protestant/Evangelical Christian women do have these medications prescribed for medical conditions, for women who have severe cramps and menstrual irregularities. This is simply a medical fact. And public policy is not all about "Christian" women, it's about "women" (all of them). But what an employee has prescribed for them at their doctors office, while in the employ of one of the Vatican's many businesses run gratuitously in America, or one of their many government funded hospitals, or educational institutions in America, between the woman at her doctor's office and her physician, not some fat bald headed Roman-Catholic bureaucrat guy at the Vatican in Rome. And it is HER religious freedom which is just as important as that of the Vatican's. In fact, her's is MORE important. Because she's AN AMERICAN, and the Vatican is a foreign power (with an EMBASSY for crying out loud!). That's NOT a religion, that's a STATE.


Whenever it is pointed out that the "opposite-speak" employed here defines "religious-freedom" as EXCLUSIVELY the RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF THE VATICAN, Well, it is said, go work somewhere else! That would be fine, but since the Vatican has decided to use the U.S. Treasury to fund it's take over of America, it runs everything in many places in America now. Some places, the only hospital granted a charter granted by our own government, belongs to the Vatican. You can't just "start a hospital", you have to "have permission" in the form of a "Charter", and those are "territorial permission slips" handed out by discretion to only those who are permitted to run the local hospital, whatever it is.

If you work "in the hospital", it many places in America, it will be the one the Vatican owns. So... let's find a happy middle ground. You don't take over our country, don't eliminate the 1st Amendment of our Constitution, don't work to sabotage our form of government, don't take a billion dollars a year in "Tax-payer" money from predominantly Protestant tax-payers and use it to mock and marginalize them, and destroy their freedoms, don't monopolize the hospital industry and hog hospital charters , don't loot our banking system and our national treasury, don't rigg our elections, don't outsource American jobs to other countries, don't infiltrate our religious institutions and stock them with religious frauds and political saboteurs, don't bust our unions, don't work to install the 3rd reich in American culture and politics so you can "restore your empire" at our expense, don't violate Geneva conventions, don't promote your torture from the inquisitions that never happened because it is so "effective", stop confiscating U.S. land mass and avoiding taxes by fronting as a 501c3 when really you are a business empire, and you can be treated like a "religion" the 1st Amendment was intended to "protect"? Deal? If you did that, There would be other places they could go and work, which I'm sure many would then do. But when no choices are given, there are no choices possible, and that's the whole point of "Religious-reich" politics, is it not? "Freedom must be condemned? Right? {Sixtus III}



Mat 7:2ff 

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? 


Some one who says they don't believe in Religious Freedom,

Shouldn't complain when theirs is the first to go.

In fact, they should be the FIRST to TO GIVE IT UP.

(Get the BEAM out of your eye, Mr. Santorum)


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T  U   V   W   X   Y   Z


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T  U   V   W   X   Y   Z






The Republicans refuse to do anything with democrats pretty much anywhere in the country, over anything, at any time, for anyone.  No matter that homeless wander the streets aimlessly, children are living under bridges, thousands of family homes are foreclosed on and entire families displaced, war veterans stand at corners begging for money for food, people are literally dying because they cannot afford their drugs or medical treatments, but .... get a low-life democrat from a Catholic university to introduce a religious compulsion bill, and suddenly the Republicans make him their best friend, despite the fact he's a felon, a crook, and a con artist, not to mention the wrong ethnicity for the general Obama-hating Republican Bubba.  But my oh my, proposing to force people to mouth religious confessions for the state, and the Republicans get so excited they can't remember a single election speech about "government intrusion" and "personal freedom" and "smaller government" and "individual rights" or the "Constitution" to save their ever-loving mind. Nope. They are so happy, they don't even care if it is coming from a felon, a crook or even an African-American Democrat.  They are IN LOVE.  Any chance they get to ignore all their speeches and vote away rights for American citizens is always appreciated, and never as much as when it is religious compulsion for the Vatican.

So now enter the "Bi-Partisan" miracle, Gary Siplin.  A Florida Senator for the 19th district willing to abuse his power as a state Senator in order to force everyone's lips to move in exactly the prescribed motion, creating precisely the correct phraseology, to mouth words affirming the worship of the Sun as "Christ" through an act of legislation in the Florida Senate.  Florida Republicans are so excited they forgot who Tom Foley was.

Senate Resolution 320 — The “Merry Christmas” bill. by FLORIDA SENATOR GARY SIPLIN (D)

WHEREAS, Christmas, a holiday of great significance to most Americans and many other cultures and nationalities, is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and the world, and

WHEREAS, on December 25 of each calendar year, American Christians observe Christmas, the holiday celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ, and

WHEREAS, popular modern customs of the holiday include gift-giving, music, the exchange of greeting cards, a special meal, church celebrations, and the display of Christmas trees, lights, and nativity scenes, and

WHEREAS, many Christians and non-Christians throughout the United States and the rest of the world celebrate Christmas as a time to cherish and serve others,

NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Senate of the State of Florida:

That “Merry Christmas” is recognized as the State of Florida’s official greeting for December 25.

Siplin, enjoyed support from leaders in both political parties. In addition to members of the Democratic Party, Florida Senate President Ken Pruitt, a Republican, refused to call for the expulsion of Siplin from the Legislature until his appeals were exhausted. On December 28, 2007, the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed his convictions and remanded the case to the trial court with directions that Siplin be acquitted of the felony charge, and that prosecutors be given permission to retry him on the misdemeanor charge. - WIKIPEDIA

DECEMBER 23, 2010
Updated: Gary Siplin introduces "Merry Christmas" legislation
Just in time for the holidays, state Sen. Gary Siplin, a Democrat from Orlando, filed legislation yesterday that would make "Merry Christmas" Florida's official greeting on Dec. 25. Of course, as it's just a resolution, there are no penalties associated with using "Happy holidays and seasons greetings," as CFO Alex Sink did in an official holiday message she tweeted and e-mailed today. Senate President Mike Haridopolos and Gov.-elect Rick Scott went with Merry Christmas in their messages. U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio covered both his bases, offering up a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.

Siplin said he came up with idea after talking to another elected official who complained that so many people kept referring to Christmas vaguely as a holiday.“A lot of people just want to say Christmas," he said. "So why not make it an official greeting from Florida."

Plus, the week between Christmas and New Year's is one of the busiest tourist weeks of the year. The state should do this for them, he said. “When I go through the stores people say, 'Happy Holidays,' but we all know why people exchange gifts. We all know it’s going to be Christmas, Jesus’ birth, on Saturday. Why not say Merry Christmas for that day and not camouflage it?" he said. “We have the key lime pie, the mockingbird and now we should have an official Christmas greeting we can all be proud of." 

Gary Siplin: Legislating ‘Merry Christmas’ 
Political Insider — posted by scottmaxwell on January, 21 2011 4:47 PM

In my recent look at foolish bills, I focused primarily on the state house because … well, that’s often where foolishness is bred. But in doing do, I missed one splendid bit of time-wasting nonsense that I just now discovered: Senate Resolution 320 — The “Merry Christmas” bill.  This one was introduced by none other than Orlando’s own Gary Siplin — the Democrat whom you may remember from his valiant (and failed) effort to pass “droopy drawers” bill. (Trying to legislate hiked-up britches among the youth.) Well, Siplin’s new bill would do the following: ’Recognizes ‘Merry Christmas’ as the State of Florida’s official greeting for December 25.”  Thank goodness! Without a government law or resolution, I wouldn’t know how to greet my friends and family that day.

Senator, I realize that Democrats are so insignificant in Tallahassee nowadays that they can barely pass gas, much less legislation. But if you could at least fake like you’re focused on the real issues, it’d be greatly appreciated.


One is tempted to borrow the language of an Atheist to describe the filth of this action politically, but that would not be possible without becoming an Atheist first, , so perhaps it's better left unsaid and even better unthought.  But what can be said politely is that here's a  better suggestion;

Hey Mr. Siplin, here's a "Bill" you might want to think about "passing" as legislation in your FLORIDA SENATE that actually lying Republican hypocrites should be supporting, and you as a Democrat ought to be proposing; .  It goes like this....

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Whereas since our founding fathers instructed us that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of RELIGION,

We hereby resolve not to abuse our office of public trust in a State capacity to undermine the intent and design of our great Republic,

By passing resolutions to force Americans to mouth religious phrases for our own selfish personal liking, satisfaction and gratification,

Even if bribed to do so by malicious and powerful political forces or foreign powers that work continuously and contrary,

Against the letter, intent and spirit of our hallowed U.S. Constitution, and the historic indigenous Protestant faiths of it's original peoples.

Because we as the senators and representatives of the Great State of Florida, 

Hereby are actually attempting to sincerely be what we claim to be when running for our sacred offices,

That being Public Servants, defenders of the defenseless, and patriotic civil Americans.

Whereas, that whatever the free American people choose to greet each other with during the holidays is nobody's darn business but their own, and 

Whereas, especially not the government's, be it on a State or Federal level and this  includes our own great State of Florida even on December 25 and

Whereas,  even if they are public sector employees, because as the Christians we also claim to be to our constituents, (when running for our sacred offices)  

Whereas, we know that we should do as Christ commanded us, and do unto others as we would have them do unto us, and

Whereas, the last thing we would want done to us, is to be forced to offer words of worship to someone else's god, deity or devil in order to keep our employment, or to simply remain in the good graces of those who have authority over us, 

Whereas, we would never do this to anyone else. especially not to our own constituents and citizens, and

Whereas, not desiring to be complete and total bogus hypocrites concerning sacred matters of conscience,

We resolve that this year, instead of offering vain lips service to empty religious sloganeering that we have no interest in actually meaning,

We will actually intend to make a sincere effort to practice "peace on earth, good will toward men", even those with whom we disagree,

Instead of abusing and insulting our fellow humanity with religious compulsions, stigmatization and harassment, that are offensive and unnecessary,

And we will act in such a way that it, at least appears to be, through our civility and sensitivity, our real and actual intent.

NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Senate of the State of Florida:

Right. Who would actually vote to pass a resolution for "peace and goodwill toward men" at "Christmass". (and actually mean it) Of course not.  You would have more luck getting Orange Juice to squirt out of a Cows tit in a Minnesota winter, than get Republicans to vote for personal liberty with smaller government, or Democrats to vote for a civil right that won't make them a celebrity or generate large corporate donations.  Oh well.  it was nice pretending for a few moments.

Memo to Florida Citizens: Please do yourself, and the country a big favor, and vote for whoever is running against this guy in the next election.  He would sell your grandmother to a Siberian labor camp if he thought he could get 3 dollars for it.











It is no surprise that THE MORMON CHURCH is as fanatically driven to force people to worship "Rome's Image" of Apollyon born on December 25th through COMPULSION as Rome's own NICOLAITANS are.  But very few people realize that this very kinship of Apollyon worship produced an Amazing Secret relationship between HITLER and the MORMON CHURCH in BERLIN (Who came to be respected unlike all other religious minorities in Germany as "Full Partners" in the Nazi Riech.  Why? Because of it's RACIST THEOLOGY, and it's iconic non-historical Ayrian Apollo-Christ it shared with HITLER.  It is also NO SURPRISE that following George Bush's 2 unelected terms in Office as America's first non-elected President, the Prescott Bush, Nazi dynasty in the GOP has anointed a MORMON, with German ancestry, to follow in their wake.

The following information on the relationship between HITLER'S THIRD REICH and the MORMON CHURCH are reproduced below, from Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6

"Hitler enjoyed at least as much popularity among German Saints as he did among the population in general. His apparent dynamism and self-confidence seemed to show a way out of the chaos and weakness of the Weimar years. Moreover, as ‘good Germans,' the Mormons were acutely aware that Hitler had risen to power through legal channels... Some Church members even saw Hitler as God’s instrument, preparing the world for the millennium. Superficial parallels were drawn between the Church and the Nazi party with its emphasis on active involvement by every member... The vital importance of ‘Aryan’ ancestry gave new significance to genealogical research. And the Fuhrer himself, the non-smoking, non-drinking vegetarian who yielded to no one in his desire for absolute law and order, seemed to embody many of the most basic LDS virtues."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"... [S]ympathy [for some of the Nazi goals] was apparently shared by some members of the [Mormon] Church leadership. The Church's German magazine, Der Stern, reminded its readers in 1935 that Senator Reed Smoot had long been a friend of Germany, and this attitude seemed to receive official sanction during President Grant's 1937 visit. The message to the German Saints was clear: Stay here. Keep the Commandments. Try to get along the best you can, even under some limitations. We want to keep the Church intact and the missionaries working.”

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"The German Saints were not eager for a confrontation with their national government and they were happy to follow President Grant's advice. By and large, the Mormons and the Nazis coexisted comfortably."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"In their eagerness to coexist with the [Nazi] government, American officials of the German Church resorted to public relation efforts . . . Probably the clearest example of this tendency is an article by West German Mission President Alfred C. Rees entitled 'In the Land of the Mormons.' The article appeared in a special issue of the Nazi Party organ Der Volkische Beobachter dated April 14 1937. In the Editor's Preface to the article, President Rees is called 'the representative of the Church in Germany,' who 'paints for our readers a portrait of Mormonism today, a church which views the New Germany with sympathy and friendship.' Whether President Rees originally wrote the article in German or not, the language of the piece abounds in such loaded terms as Volk and Rasse (race), and a picture of Brigham Young bears the caption, 'Fuhrer der historischen Mormonenpioniere.' But the significance of these linguistic gaffes is magnified by hindsight. More disturbing is the way President Rees blatantly parallels Mormonism with Nazism. As Rees warms to his topic, Mormonism begins to sound like a fulfillment of Nazi teachings, providing 'the practical realization of the German ideal: "the common good takes precedence over the individual good."' Rees concluded by assuring his readers that 'Mormons are people who put this healthy doctrine into action.' Reading articles such as this, it would have been easy for a German Saint to mistakenly conclude that the seal of official Church approval had been placed on the Nazi regime."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"[The Mormon] policy of appeasing the Nazis worked well until the war broke out. Despite the classification of Mormonism as a sect 'dangerous to the state…' according to Gestapo reports, the Church was not summarily dissolved as many others were. The missionaries remained; the Church continued. Even during the war, Mormon life was disrupted more by bombing raids, supply shortages, and travel restrictions than by official harassment. By and large, the German Saints lived through the Thousand-Year Reich much like the rest of their countrymen."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"Some Church members even saw Hitler as God's instrument, preparing the world for the millennium."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"Superficial parallels were drawn between the Church and the Nazi Party, with its emphasis on active involvement by every member. The women's auxiliary of the Party and the Hitler Youth were regarded by some as secular equivalents to the Church's Relief Society, MIA, and the Scouting programs."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"The vital importance of ‘Aryan' ancestry gave new significance to genealogical research."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

"... [T]he Fuhrer himself, the non-smoking, non-drinking vegetarian who yielded to no one in his desire for absolute law and order, seemed to embody many of the most basic LDS virtues."

- Alan F. Keele and Douglas F. Tobler, “The Fuhrer’s New Clothes: Helmuth Huebner and the Mormons in the Third Reich,” Sunstone, v. 5, no. 6, pp. 20-29

“If the Deseret News is careful not to offend [Nazi] Germany, and I gather … that it is falling backwards on the attempt, it is my guess that first of all the Church is afraid of complete banishment.”

- Fawn M. Brodie to Dean Brimhall, June 14, 1939, Brimhall Papers, Special Collections, Marriott Library

Hitler was "baptized" by Mormons on September 30, 1993, and "endowed" on April 27, 1994, in the Jordan River Temple, Utah. 

Eva Anna Paula Braun, born in Munich, Bavaria, Germany, on February 7, 1912, was "baptized" by Mormons on October 16, 1964, and "endowed" on February 5, 1965, in the Los Angeles Temple. She had been "sealed" to her parents some time prior to 1970.


Mormon scripture: God curses bad races with black skin

2 Nephi 5:21
"And the Lord had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them."

Alma 3: 6
"And the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob, and Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men."

3 Nephi 2:14-15
" And it came to pass that those Lamanites who had united with the Nephites were numbered among the Nephites; And their curse was taken from them, and their skin became white like unto the Nephites."

Moses 7:22
" And Enoch also beheld the residue of the people which were the sons of Adam; and they were a mixture of all the seed of Adam save it was the seed of Cain, for the seed of Cain were black, and had not place among them."

Abraham 1:21-24,27
"Now this king of Egypt was a descendant from the loins of Ham, and was a partaker of the blood of the Canaanites by birth. From this descent sprang all the Egyptians, and thus the blood of the Canaanites was preserved in the land."

"The land of Egypt being first discovered by a woman, who was the daughter of Ham, and the daughter of Egyptus, which in the Chaldean signifies Egypt, which signifies that which is forbidden; When this woman discovered the land it was under water, who afterward settled her sons in it; and thus, from Ham, sprang that race which preserved the curse in the land."

"Now, Pharaoh being of that lineage by which he could not have the right of Priesthood, notwithstanding the Pharaohs would fain claim it from Noah, through Ham, therefore my father was led away by their idolatry"

Official LDS Church Publications Explain Racist LDS Scriptures

"The Book of Abraham is rich both in doctrine and in historical incidents. Of the latter the fact of the large influence (if not identity) of Egyptian religious ideas in Chaldea in the days of Abraham is established; the descent of the black race, Negro, from Cain, the first murderer; the preservation of that race through the flood by the wife of Ham--"Egyptus," which in the Chaldean signifies "Egypt," "which signifies that which is forbidden"--the descendants of "Egyptus" were cursed as pertaining to the priesthood--that is, they were barred from holding that divine power; the origin also of the Egyptians--these things, together with the account of Abraham migrating from Chaldea to Egypt, constitute the chief historical items that are contained in the book."
- Comprehensive History of the Church, Vol.2, Ch.47, Pg.128

“From this it is very clear that the mark which was set upon the descendants of Cain was a skin of blackness, and there can be no doubt that this was the mark that Cain himself received; in fact, it has been noticed in our day that men who have lost the spirit of the Lord, and from whom His blessings have been withdrawn, have turned dark to such an extent as to excite the comments of all who have known them.”
- Juvenile Instructor, vol. 26, page 635

"We will first inquire into the results of the approbation or displeasure of God upon a people, starting with the belief that a black skin is a mark of the curse of heaven placed upon some portions of mankind. Some, however, will argue that a black skin is not a curse, nor a white skin a blessing. In fact, some have been so foolish as to believe and say that a black skin is a blessing, and that the negro is the finest type of a perfect man that exists on the earth; but to us such teachings are foolishness. We understand that when God made man in his own image and pronounced him very good, that he made him white. We have no record of any of God's favored servants being of a black race....every angel who ever brought a message of God's mercy to man was beautiful to look upon, clad in the purest white and with a countenance bright as the noonday sun.”
- The Juvenile Instructor, Vol. 3, page 157

“For instance, the descendants of Cain cannot cast off their skin of blackness, at once, and immediately, although every soul of them should repent,... Cain and his posterity must wear the mark which God put upon them; and his white friends may wash the race of Cain with fuller's soap every day, they cannot wash away God's mark;...”
- LDS Publication, The Millennial Star, vol. 14, page 418

"Their skin is quite black, their hair woolly and black, their intelligence stunted, and they appear never to have arisen from the most savage state of barbarism.”
- The Juvenile Instructor, Vol. 3, page 157

"Is or is it not apparent from reason and analogy as drawn from a careful reading of the Scriptures, that God causes the saints, or people that fall away from his church to be cursed in time, with a black skin? Was or was not Cain, being marked, obliged to inherit the curse, he and his children, forever? And if so, as Ham, like other sons of God, might break the rule of God, by marrying out of the church, did or did he not, have a Canaanite wife, whereby some of the black seed was preserved through the flood, and his son, Canaan, after he laughed at his grandfather's nakedness, heired three curses: one from Cain for killing Abel; one from Ham for marrying a black wife, and one from Noah for ridiculing what God had respect for? Are or are not the Indians a sample of marking with blackness for rebellion against God's holy word and holy order? And can or can we not observe in the countenances of almost all nations, except the Gentile, a dark, sallow hue, which tells the sons of God, without a line of history, that they have fallen or changed from the original beauty and grace of father Adam?"
- LDS Messenger and Advocate (Mar 1835), Pg.82

"History and common observation show that these predictions have been fulfilled to the letter. The descendants of Ham, besides a black skin which has ever been a curse that has followed an apostate of the holy priesthood, as well as a black heart, have been servants to both Shem and Japheth, and the abolitionists are trying to make void the curse of God, but it will require more power than man possesses to counteract the decrees of eternal wisdom."
- Times and Seasons, Vol.6, Pg.857

The LDS Church's racism isn't just from some isolated quote from one or two church leaders. The racist teaching from the Mormon pulpit is prolific and consistent over time. If God didn't agree with his prophets teaching these things in His church, then why did they continue over generations?

There's a big difference between folklore and Mormon scripture. When the president and prophet of the church stands at the pulpit and teaches the laws of God, that isn't folklore.

The list of "inspired" LDS Prophets that have taught racist doctrine from the pulpit is too large to cite here. But here's a sampling:

Some church members make the mistake of dismissing the racist statements of 19th-century Mormon leaders as "their own opinion," "not official doctrine," "products of their times," etc.

Those same church members assert that the only "official doctrine" is the Standard Works and official statements of the First Presidency, and that if some leaders said something that didn't come from those sources, it isn't "binding on the membership," and it isn't "canon" or "official doctrine."

However, an official statement of the LDS Church First Presidency issued on August 17, 1951, reads:

"The position of the LDS Church regarding the Negro may be understood when another doctrine of the church is kept in mind, namely, that the conduct of spirits in the pre-mortal existence has some determining effect upon the conditions and circumstances under which these spirits take on mortality, and that while the details of this principle have not been made known, the principle itself indicates that the coming to this earth and taking on mortality is a privilege that is given to those who maintained their first estate; and that the worth of the privilege is so great that spirits are willing to come to earth and take on bodies no matter what the handicap may be as to the kind of bodies they are to secure; and that among the handicaps, failure of the right to enjoy in mortality the blessings of the priesthood is a handicap which spirits are willing to assume in order that they might come to earth. Under this principle there is no injustice whatsoever involved in this deprivation as to the holding of the priesthood by the Negroes....."

"Man will be punished for his own sins and not for Adam's transgression. If this is carried further, it would imply that the Negro is punished or alloted to a certain position on this earth, not because of Cain's transgression, but came to earth through the loins of Cain because of his failure to achieve other stature in the spirit world."
- William E. Berrett's "The Church and the Negroid People," pp. 16-17

Since it's obvious from this official First Presidency statement that church leaders taught and believed that people are born as Negroes because of their behavior in the pre-existence---

---as well as being from the lineage of the "accursed" Cain---

---and the "sign" of Cain's curse was the black skin and flat nose, according to church leaders---

---then the fact that Negroes are still being born by the tens of thousands every day tells us that the God of Mormonism has never lifted the "curse of Cain," despite having the priesthood ban rescinded.

Church members are terribly mistaken when they say that the "curse of Cain" teachings were "folklore" and "not official doctrine."

NICOLAITANISM runs amok in the GOP


  • Republican presidential campaign official Matthew Joseph Elliott was convicted of sexual exploitation of a child.
  • Republican Party Chairman Donald Fleischman was charged with two counts of child enticement, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a child and a single charge of exposing himself to a child.
  • Republican prosecutor John David Roy Atchison was arrested for soliciting sex from a 5-year old girl, then killed himself three weeks later. At the time of his arrest, Atchison was an "assistant" appointed by President Bush's attorney general.
  • Republican city councilman John Bryan killed himself after police beganinvestigating allegations that he had molested three girls, including two of his adopted daughters, ages 12 and 15.
  • Republican legislator Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.
  • Republican County Commissioner Patrick Lee McGuire surrendered to police after allegedly molesting girls between the ages of 8 and 13.
  • Republican prosecutor Larry Corrigan was arrested for soliciting sex from 13-year old girls.
  • Republican Mayor Jeffrey Kyle Randall was sentenced to 275 days in jail for molesting two boys -- ages ten and 12 -- during a six-year period.
  • Republican Congressman Mark Foley abruptly resigned from Congress after"sexually explicit" emails surfaced showing him flirting with a 16-year old boy.
  • Republican executive Randall Casseday of the conservative Washington Times newspaper pleaded guilty to soliciting sex from a 13-year old girl on the internet.
  • Republican chairman of the Oregon Christian Coalition Lou Beres confessed to molesting a 13-year old girl.
  • Republican County Constable Larry Dale Floyd pleaded guilty to charges of soliciting sex from an 8-year old girl. Floyd has repeatedly won elections for Denton CountyTexas, constable.
  • Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.
  • Republican Party leader Bobby Stumbo was arrested for having sex with a 5-year old boy.
  • Republican petition drive manager Tom Randall pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 14, one of them the daughter of an associate in the petition business.
  • Republican County Chairman Armando Tebano pleaded guilty to fondling a 14-year-old girl.
  • Republican teacher and former city councilman John Collins pleaded guilty to sexually molesting 13 and 14 year old girls.
  • Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
  • Republican Mayor Tom Adams was arrested for distributing child pornography over the internet.
  • Republican Mayor John Gosek was arrested on charges of soliciting sex from two 15-year old girls.
  • Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
  • Republican Committeeman John R. Curtin was convicted of molesting an underage teenage boy and sentenced to serve six to 18 months in prison.
  • Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.
  • Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
  • Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
  • Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.
  • Republican advertising consultant Carey Lee Cramer was sentenced to six years in prison for molesting two 8-year old girls, one of whom appeared in an anti-Gore television commercial.
  • Republican fundraiser Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
  • Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
  • Republican Congressman Donald "Buz" Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
  • Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
  • Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.
  • Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.
  • Republican Judge Ronald C. Kline pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer.
  • Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
  • Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
  • Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. "Republican Marty"), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
  • Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
  • Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.
  • Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced prison after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
  • Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing his genitals to an 11 year old girl.
  • Republican anti-gay activist Earl "Butch" Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.
  • Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.
  • Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two yearsprobation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
  • Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
  • Republican legislator Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).
  • Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
  • Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.
  • Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
  • Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.
  • Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found in his possession.
  • Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin Vanderwallwas convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.
  • Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a "good military man" and "church goer," was convicted of repeatedly having sex with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
  • Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including his daughter.
  • Republican campaign worker, police officer and self-proclaimed reverend Steve Aiken was convicted of having sex with two underage girls.
  • Republican director of the "Young Republican Federation" Nicholas Elizondomolested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in prison.
  • Republican president of the New York City Housing Development Corp. Russell Harding pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer.
  • Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A. Dasen Sr., was found guilty of raping a 15-year old girl. Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
  • Republican Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld authorized the rape of children in Iraqi prisons in order to humiliate their parents into providing information about the anti-American insurgency. See excerpt of one prisoner's report here and his full report here.



Although the national media have focused on pedophilia and abuse committed by Catholic priests in the Boston area and elsewhere, the media have consistently suppressed an even more explosive and related story.

For years, former Nebraska State Sen. John DeCamp has spearheaded an inquiry into a massive pedophile ring with a base of operations in Omaha, Nebraska, that has been linked to high-ranking political figures in Washington.  Recently, DeCamp won a $1 million civil judgment against former big-name Republican Party figure Larry King (an Omaha credit union founder) on behalf of a young man, Paul Bonacci, who charged that King had molested him and brought him into the pedophile ring.

DeCamp was the guest on the February 24 broadcast of Radio Free America, the weekly talk forum sponsored by AFP (American Free Press) with host Tom Valentine.  Valentine’s questions are in boldface. DeCamp’s responses are in regular text. Caller’s comments are in italics.

When your client, Paul Bonacci, filed a law suit against Larry King of the Franklin Credit Union in Omaha, you also named the Catholic Arch diocese of Omaha as a co-defendant. Why?

The reason was that my client said that it was because of a couple of Catholic priests there started doing improper things to him at a very young age that started him into the tragic life that he led. The federal judge ruled that it was not possible to name the archdiocese—that it couldn’t possibly be guilty of anything, because how would they know what individual priests had been doing. In other words: “How would the bishop have known anything to stop it?”

This sounds just like the current controversy in Boston, except this happened long before the Boston scandal.

That’s right. It was exactly like Boston. I took it so seriously at the time that I went to Rome and met with Cardinal Ratzinger.  He’s the one who has been in charge of this systemic problem in the church of priests involved in pedophilia. Ratzinger is now in the limelight over this issue, but he couldn’t get anyone to do anything 12 or 13 years ago when I was writing about this and filing my lawsuit.

I appealed the decision removing the diocese from my lawsuit. I went before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and they upheld the judge’s decision in favor of removal of the diocese.

I went on to win the rest of the lawsuit against Larry King, but I was always bitter because I knew that I was right. This problem of priests abusing their position and abusing young children was a serious problem and not being properly dealt with by the church.

Of course, there have been some major cases in recent years, but these cases trace back to events many years ago. So now we have the Catholic Archdiocese in Boston paying out millions to settle claims. But my case in Omaha was thrown out.

When in the course of your investigations did you begin to realize that Boys Town in Omaha was essentially a “farm” for what you determined to be a national network of pedophiles that extended well beyond pedophilic priests?

When the children I was representing—and in the course of interviewing others—brought the role of Boys Town up as a central point. At least certain elements of Boys Town were being improperly used.

How did you get the British Broadcasting Company [BBC] interested in coming over and doing the explosive documentary that they produced on Boys Town (but which was never aired)?

I did nothing to get them interested. Somehow the BBC got a copy of an early edition of my book. They sent over a preliminary team and, for whatever reason unknown to me, the BBC sent over an entire investigative mission. Over a period of nine months or so they produced the program entitled Conspiracy of Silence. It was scheduled in all of the TV guides to appear on the Discovery Channel on a particular date and at the last minute it was pulled and never saw daylight.

I called the individual who handles the Discovery Channel programming and he told me that the program had been bought up and sealed and was never to be seen. However, a copy of the video was sent to me from parties unknown, who were obviously concerned that the program was not going to be aired.

Some $500,000 was paid to buy the airtime for the program. So, whoever bought it at the last minute was able to prevent it from being shown. However, the copies of the videotape are out there and are being widely distributed.*

Now you have picked up a new client and it ties directly into Boys Town.

My client is the former head of Boys Town. He was the head longer than anyone in the history of Boys Town. His name is Monsignor Robert Hupp. In 1976, he was appointed as a U.S. delegate to the United Nations, the only clergyman ever appointed to that position.

He contacted me. He’s 87 years old. I met with him and he needed some help. He felt, I guess, at his advanced age that he wanted to correct some problems and abuses that he had tried to years ago. Just after I was asked to represent him, he completed a major recorded deposition in the presence of many church lawyers, and also attorneys for a number of altar boys who had been abused by priests.

Did he come to you because there were suits against Boys Town?

There were lawsuits against the Catholic Archdiocese of Omaha and Boys Town is a part of the archdiocese. The position of the church, which was very public, was that they knew nothing about the abuse and, if they had known, they would have done something about it.

That’s very important to understand. They are saying, “We didn’t know, so how can we be held responsible. If we had known, we would have done something about it.”

However, the essence of what Monsignor Hupp asked me to do was to help get the true story out, because what he had to say was rather shocking and would totally disprove that claim here in Omaha and probably in a lot of other places.

I made the arrangements so that he could get his story out under oath. The deposition that he gave in this case may be sealed, but one way or another the story he had to tell will come out.

Let me give you some background on Monsignor Hupp so that it will all probably make sense. In 1969, Hupp became was what is called the “vicar general” of the Catholic Archdiocese of Omaha. A vicar general is the second-in-command, just below the bishop. When the bishop is gone, the vicar general acts in his place. He held this post until 1973.

During that time he became aware of the problem of sexual abuse. He officially notified the bishop at the time, Bishop Sheehan, and said, “This is terrible. You have to do something.” From 1969 to 1973, Hupp was making an issue of this but the bishop did nothing but move the priest to another parish.

So, we overcame the first defense that “We didn’t know and if we did know, we would have done something.”

Then, Hupp gave an ultimatum to the bishop, saying, “I am resigning as vicar general,” and the bishop tells him that he can’t do it. Hupp said, “I will either resign and you will accept my resignation or I will go to the Omaha World-Herald newspaper and we’ll see what happens then.” So the bishop let him resign. Shortly thereafter, Hupp was appointed to be the head of Boys Town. Today Hupp believes this was sort of a reward for keeping quiet.

He served as head of Boys Town until 1985 and, of course, went on film with the BBC acknowledging that he was like the wife who was the last to know. He is now determined to do what he can to correct the problem. He sees this as a failure to address the issue which caused it to get worse.

Are you able to determine how many boys from Boys Town got dragged into these national pedophile rings?

I know there were many. I did not realize how serious and widespread it was until about the last six months.

I had a visitor from the federal public defender’s office in Las Vegas. They called me and said: “I think we have a common interest.” They said: “Well, you know about a place called Boys Town.”

I responded: “You federal prosecutors have been part of the problem, helping to cover up what’s going on there.”

They said, “Would you be willing to meet with us?”

I agreed and they were there the next morning waiting at my office door.

They were representing a fellow named Paine who is on death row in Las Vegas. He had a bad habit of killing taxi drivers. This Paine had a number of brothers and they had all been raised in Boys Town. When Paine was convicted it turned out that, as they explained it to me, he was a multiple personality that was deliberately created.

In other words, someone had used psychiatric techniques and sexual abuse to alter this young man’s mind.

Yes, and this happened at Boys Town. The story he told was that all of these mind control experiments were being carried out.

Now, the first time you hear this, you think, “Oh, they are in la-la land.” However, the federal public defender went on to explain that Paine had revealed to them a host of very serious problems going on at Boys Town. Both he and his brothers had been involved, and Paine’s attorneys wanted me to share with them any information that I had come up with. They are appealing Paine’s death sentence and hope to use this information in the appeal.

The attorneys told me that this boy had another brother, Andre, who lived in Omaha. It turns out that many years before, on the very night the Franklin Credit Union was raided and closed by the federal authorities, he and a group of boys were taken out of Boys Town in the middle of the night and moved to an institution out of state.

I told these federal public defenders, after giving them a copy of my book: “I predict that after you read the book and before we get very far into this case that you will suddenly get intimidated and lose your interest. You’ll find that the FBI was involved in the cover-up of all of this.”

They said, “Oh no, no, no.”

So they lined up the brother, Andre, who is now in his early 20s, to meet with me. Andre told me all of the same things that my previous client, Paul Bonacci, and others had told me. But he had never had any contact with any of them. They had the same stories, the same information, the same people. However, Andre gave me some more information on how organized it was at Georgetown and how he was taken out of Boys Town on a regular basis to participate in sexual parties where they did pornographic films. They would say he was being taken on a visit to his mother, but, in fact, he was not visiting his mother.

It wasn’t 24 hours later I got a call from the kid and he told me that he was heading out of town. The reason why was because the FBI had shown up at the place where he was registered to go to computer school and seized the computers and told them the boy was involved in all kinds of things. He was kicked out of school. The FBI then went to his apartment and scared his landlord into evicting him. And they went to the place where he worked as a clerk and that place fired him.

The kid knew he was in trouble and he said, “If they come after me again, I’m going to kill myself.” But I’ve put this young man in touch via e-mail with Noreen Gosch, whose son Johnny was kidnapped and brought into these sex rings. They’ve been exchanging information.

What’s happened with the federal public defenders representing Andre Paine’s brother?

They stopped contacting me.

Another one of your clients who was involved in the Boys Town affair in the early days also ran for his life under similar circumstances.

Yes, that was Rusty Nelson, who had been a photographer at some of these sex parties. I found him in an Oregon prison after the authorities said that he never existed. I got him out of prison and brought him as a witness. He brought pictures that proved the Larry King connection in the case against King and in the same case where the judge threw out the archdiocese of Omaha as a defendant.

Your research has focused on Omaha, but this whole sex ring involving Larry King and Boys Town extends nationwide, all the way to Washington and involves the CIA and parts of the military.

I only focused on Omaha because it happened to be an important staging ground for so much of the intrigue that I documented. There was a confluence of institutions here in the Omaha area that are linked to all of this pedophile network. One of those institutions is Offutt Air Force Base, which, of course, is where the head of the Strategic Air Command (SAC) is located.

The SAC is the most secure place in the world. That’s where they took President Bush on Sept. 11.

As a Nebraska senator, I was in there. They have, beneath the ground, more of a secure barricaded facility that could take a nuclear hit.

What’s interesting—and this came out after the fall of the Soviet Union—is that there were more CIA people stationed and operating out of Omaha and Offutt than at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va.

Your research (and that of others) indicates that, for a variety of reasons, this national pedophile network is tied to the mind control and mind-altering experiments that have been conducted by the CIA under such names as MK-ULTRA. These have been acknowledged by the CIA and written about even in such mainstream publications as The New York Times. This mind control programming includes get ting small children and confusing them with sex and drugs.

As I pointed out in my book, many of the kids taken out of Boys Town and who were part of the sex ring being operated by Larry King were often taken out to Offutt Air Force Base. I believe that Offutt was the military component, so to speak, or contact point, for what we now know were mind control experiments in the MK-ULTRA mode.

Here’s a caller, Ken:

Are you familiar with the name John Jubert?

Yes, he was executed for the murder of two small boys.

I knew John Jubert and have been in correspondence with his mother. I was a senior at the same small military college in Vermont when he was a freshman. He was a good follower, but not a leader. He was always looking to please other people. He left school and went into the Air Force and ended up at Offutt. He killed two little boys. That wasn’t the John that I knew.

I had heard some stories about Offutt and know about the goings-on. As I learned more, it was clear that he was all wrapped up in this child sex ring. It seemed as if he were trying to impress somebody by committing this crime.

In your research, John DeCamp, have you been able to link this Jubert to what you’ve been investigating?

John Jubert had some other links that go directly into what we are talking about here. But I don’t think this is the time or the place to go into that right now. He was proved to have skinned alive two little boys from the Omaha area.

I know when you tell people about things like this, they think you are nuts. Are people in denial or does this system go so high that if you challenge those responsible you just disappear or what?

I will say that my client, Monsignor Hupp, had turned over to the bishop the name of a member of the clergy from the Omaha area who had killed a boy and they wouldn’t do anything about it. Again, I can’t go into that now.

I wrote my book at the suggestion of William Colby, the former director of the CIA. He said: “Write it for your own protection. Tell the story and nobody will have any reason to do you in, since you’ve already said it. They may try to make you sound like a kook, but at least they won’t have to kill you to shut you up.”

*Those interested in obtaining a copy of the BBC’s documentary along with a copy of Mr. DeCamp’s book, The Franklin Cover-Up, for just $20 can call 1-800-578-7854 or write AWT Inc., PO Box 85461, Lincoln, Nebr. 68501.  Let the order taker know that you read about Mr. DeCamp in American Free Press.

Source of Article: American Free Press

 The Franklin Cover-up—Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska:   Satanic sexual abuse, ritual murders, child pedophile rings, money-laundering—could these horrors be happening today, in middle America? John W. DeCamp, attorney and former state senator from Nebraska, affirms that it is, indeed occurring!  In DeCamp’s riveting book you’ll learn of the terrible pedophile priests at Boy’s Town who had “parties” with kids. You’ll discover how top Washington, D.C. politicians (including George Bush Sr.) and savings and loan executives were involved; and you’ll be angered about the media that covered it all up.  Also included: John DeCamp’s insightful analysis of the patriot movement and the police state tactics of the federal government. Alex Jones Interviews the Author.

The Franklin Child Sex Ring Implicating the Bush Whitehouse

The following archive paints a chilling portrait of what is really going on in the upper echelons of the ruling elite here in America. The story involves children from orphanages in Nebraska being flown around the United States by top Republican officials in order to engage in child sex orgies with America's ruling elite. It is a fact that during the 1980's, child sexual services were provided by top Republican officials to key, bureaucrats and diplomats but most importantly, there is a chilling proximity of all of these events and personalities, to the President of the United States at the time, George H.W. Bush. And there have been victims who claim that the President himself engaged in the activities. It is a tale of child sex, murder, espionage, blackmail, and huge payoffs. And all the players are involved. From the White House to the CIA to the media barrons to the Republican elite - right down to the orphanages where they procured their victims.

This story was the second biggest scandal of the 1980's which was completely obliterated by the Bush White House - A complete coordinated blackout by the ruling elite in cooperation with the American television networks. (The biggest scandal being the Bush involvement in the attempted assassination of President Reagan) Since the elite who own the television networks in America are the same elite who feast off the carcass of the American population - just like the Bushes do and who sit on the same boards of the same corporate cartels as the Bushes do - most Americans will never hear of this explosive story. But thanks to the Internet all these suppressed news facts are re-surfacing. Perhaps the most chilling aspect of this horrific tale is that such realities can be so completely obliterated by the powers that be so that, even though these are simply the very biggest most explosive stories of our time - you will never know that they happened. That is why exists. To bring you the hard cold truth about what is really happening to our world. To inform you about who these people really are who rule America.

Fortunately not all people are in on the crimes of the elite. Once and a while a person comes along who is human and who fights and resists this evil force which is destroying the human race. In this case, former republican Senator John Decamp was involved in the production a documentary called "Conspiracy of Silence" it was to air May 3, 1994 on the Discovery Channel. This documentary exposed a network of religious leaders and Washington politicians who flew children to Washington D.C. for sex orgies. As the story goes, at the last minute before airing, there was a massive effort from key Washington politicians who were implicated in the scandal to exert pressure on the channel to threatened the TV Cable industry with restrictive legislation if this documentary was aired.

Almost immediately, the rights to the documentary were purchased by unknown persons who had ordered all copies destroyed. A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired F.B.I. chief, Ted L. Gunderson. While the video quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is revealed by the participants involved. You can view the online video below.

The Franklin Cover-up Scandal

Boy prostitutes 15 years old (and younger) were taking midnight tours of the Whitehouse. There are 19 more Washington Times articles.














THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think