ChristmasIsALie.com

THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think

THE CHRISTMAS LIE

INTRO    THE STORY    THE REASON     THE CHRIST     THE MASS    THE SAINT    THE WISEMEN    THE TREE    THE CHURCH     THE GOSPEL    THE MAGIC   THE SPIRIT     THE JOY     THE SCROOGE     YES VIRGINIA    THE GRINCH   THE WAR

THE CHURCH



THE CHURCH ROMAN SOLAR-MASS INVENTED





THE CHRISTMAS CHURCH

THE CHURCH OF CHRIST-MASS   Ever wonder why CHURCHES have STEEPLES on them? [Old English for "Tower"]?  You might be surprised to discover it has to do with the Roman Christ of Christ-Mass and the same theology that motivated a Roman Vatican to select a Pope by the name of Sixtus III. [Literally 666] already fully aware of it's prophetic significance in Revelation.  Constantine intentionally named THE FIRST CHURCH he built, the THEA SOPHIA, after the False Christ of the Egyptian gnostics that "mixed" the worship of God and Satan together as "secretly the same thing".  Just as it's "Pope" was chosen to be both "Christ" and "Antichrist" at the same time, The CHURCH created to celebrate CHRIST-MASS was ACTUALLY created to fulfill the roles of the "bride of Christ" and "whore of Babylon".  This was due to the influence of Eastern Monism prevalent in Roman "mystery religion" of the era, embraced by Constantine, and recorded at Nag Hammadi.  Leaders in every stream of Christianity for 5 centuries, including Roman Catholic, recognized the hallmarks of this institution as having fulfilled an ominous prophecy 5 centuires before nag Hammadi documents were ever discovered, and went so far as to warn participation in this institution, placed everyone in "eternal danger". Thus creating what we call today, the Protestant Reformation. A movement begun by Roman Catholic clergy themselves, in fear of what they had discovered reading the New Testament documents! 

THE CHURCH OF CHRIST-MASS 

 

FEATURED VIDEO

ORIGIN OF THE SOLAR MASS CHURCH


THE CHURCH ROMAN SOLAR-MASS INVENTED

THE "CHURCH" CREATED TO WORSHIP THE SUN



 EDICT OF THESSALONICA - 380 A.D.

EMPERORS GRATIAN, VALENTINIAN AND THEODOSIUS AUGUSTI. EDICT TO THE PEOPLE OF CONSTANTINOPLE.

It is our desire that all the various nations which are subject to our Clemency and Moderation, should continue to profess that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine Apostle Peter, as it has been preserved by faithful tradition, and which is now professed by the Pontiff Damasus and by Peter, Bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic holiness. According to the apostolic teaching and the doctrine of the Gospel, let us believe in the one deity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity. We authorize the followers of this law to assume the title of Catholic Christians; but as for the others, since, in our judgment they are foolish madmen , we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the divine condemnation and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of Heaven we shall decide to inflict.

GIVEN IN THESSALONICA ON THE THIRD DAY FROM THE CALENDS OF MARCH, DURING THE FIFTH CONSULATE OF GRATIAN AUGUSTUS AND FIRST OF THEODOSIUS AUGUSTUS[3]

— Codex Theodosianus, xvi.1.2


 THE APOSTOLIC WARNING TO THE THESSALONIANS

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12  

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition Who opposeth and exalteth himself  above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. (See: "Ex Cathedra") Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lieThat they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness



It is fully admitted by Roman Catholic scholarship, that the "early Church" (and thereby meaning believers in Christ after the New Testament up until the era of Constantine DID NOT PRACTICE any HOLY DAY called "Christ-Mass".  What is usually not admitted is that there was a REASON New Testament believers did not begin their movement by "mixing it" with pagan celebrations of the Winter Solstice in honor of the birth of the Sun-god. 

 

If New Testament believers found such mixtures spiritually and morally unacceptable (which they did as you can see from the New Testament), the question must be asked if such mixtures today nullify one's status as a "believer in Christ" in the New Testament sense of the term.  The answer according to the texts in the scripture would be yes.

 

But this information rarely sees the light of day.  And far beyond the single day of the Solar Deity's birth, is the real question of whether the very institution itself, which has placed this "holy Day" at the very CENTER of it's ecclesiastical calendar, is even legitamite.  Ezekiel condemned the SUN-WORSHIPPERS of ISRAEL as not true ISRAELITES.  There is nothing in the 20 centuries of history that have passed since that evaluation, that have changed the truth of it.  The texts remain static and unmovable, though religious leaders may have vascillated and morphed, and attempted to hide their tracks throughout history. 

 

The institution that now honors this day as one of it's central ecclesiastical events, and openly declares itself as the completion of Religious Babylon, is not only NOT anything Jesus started, but something he actually called his followers"out of", thus employing the phrase the "ec-clesia" (called out ones). Thus it is understandable why the identity of the REAL CHRIST had to be CHANGED to support the ECCLESIOLOGY of this instutition.  The REAL CHRIST was the very anti-thesis of the CHURCH that CHRIST-MASS invented.  And as you will see, it was actually THE CHURCH, that the deity of the winter solstice INVENTED.

The beginning of the "Church" as the institution we know it today, began with Emperor Constantine who claimed to have had a "Vision" in the Sun of a "Cross" or "Chi Rho" and heard a voice saying "In This Sign Conquer".  This famous account has been both the source of legend and suspicion for millenia.  The Battle at Milvan bridge was allegedly won by Constantine, who displaying the symbol of the cross on his banner confused the large contingency of Christains in his opponent's army from Rome, and easily secured his victory with their lack of zeal for fighting against their own sacred symbol.

The above depiction of Constantine created as a result of the Protestant Reformation is a caracature illustrating Constantine in the famous story-line of "The Emperor Who Had No Clothes".

The origin of this "ecclesiological institution" we call today the "The Local Church" according to scholars, emerged from this historic event.  The Invacatio ritual (from which we get the word "Invocation") was a spiritual ritual performed by Roman generals the night before invading an opponent's city.  The Roman priest would make "offerings" in prayer to the "god" of the city asking it to foresake defending it's people, in return for greater glory and honor and a greater temple to be built in Rome.  According to Roman legend this was believed to be responsible for many of Rome's military victories against opposing forces indicating that once the Pontiff Maximus (or Roman high priest) had succesfully persuaded the city's god to forsake protecting it's people, military victory was pre-cognitively assured.  This ritual was performed the night before the battle at Milvan bridge, and we do know that upon securing his victory, the first thing Constantine did was to ride into Rome, and seek to build the "Christian god" a glorious temple. 

Of course, Roman templum-cultus was not a customary part of the New Testament religion, and as former Jesuit Scholar Malachi Martin explained, even the Roman Pope at that time, had trouble accepting Constaintine's effort to build for Christianity what it never built for itself... a Christian "Temple".  The commonly known 666 often referred to in the New Testament was only used 3 times in the Tanak (or Septuagent).  All 3 instances involved "the Temple" and it's most prominant occurance involved Solomon, the builder of the Temple, who recieved the same value in the amount of gold from the Queen of Sheba, an infamous Queen of Baal (sun-god) worship credited in part, to Solomon's apostacy.

Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the (abyss), whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. 

REV.9:11 - "Apollyon" is the same with "Apollo", the god of the Heathens, " - JOHN GILL'S EXPOSITION

APOLLYON (APOLLO) - As sun-god and god of light, Apollo was also known by the epithets Aegletes (/əˈɡliːtiːz/ ə-glee-teez; Αἰγλήτης, Aiglētēs, from αἴγλη, "light of the sun"),[13] Helius (/ˈhiːliəs/ hee-lee-əs; Ἥλιος, Helios, literally "sun"),[14] Phanaeus (/fəˈniːəs/ fə-nee-əs; Φαναῖος, Phanaios, literally "giving or bringing light"), and Lyceus (/laɪˈsiːəs/ ly-see-əs; Λύκειος, Lukeios, from Proto-Greek *λύκη, "light"). The meaning of the epithet "Lyceus" later became associated Apollo's mother Leto, who was the patron goddes of Lycia (Λυκία) and who was identified with the wolf (λύκος),[15] earning him the epithets Lycegenes (/laɪˈsɛdʒəniːz/ ly-sej-ə-neez; Λυκηγενής, Lukēgenēs, literally "born of a wolf" or "born of Lycia") and Lycoctonus (/laɪˈkɒktənəs/ ly-kok-tə-nəs; Λυκοκτόνος, Lukoktonos, from λύκος, "wolf", and κτείνειν, "to kill"). As god of the sun, the Romans referred to Apollo as Sol (/ˈsɒl/ sol; literally "sun" in Latin). [13] Apollonius of Rhodes, iv. 1730; Pseudo-Apollodorus, Biblioteca, i. 9. § 26, [14] Álvaro, Jr., Santos, Allan. Simbolismo divino. Allan Álvaro, Jr., Santos. - Apollo, Wikipedia.org, 6/1/12

QUOTE: In Rome December 25 was made popular by Pope Liberius in 354 and became the rule in the West in 435 when the first "Christ mass" was officiated by POPE SIXTUS III. This coincided with the date of a celebration by the Romans to THEIR PRIMARY GOD, THE SUN, and to Mithras, a popular PERSIAN SUN-GOD supposedly born on the same day. The Roman Catholic writer Mario Righetti candidly ADMITS that, "to facilitate the acceptance of the faith by the pagan masses, the Church of Rome found it convenient to institute the 25th of December as the feast of the birth of Christ to divert them from the pagan feast, celebrated on the same day in HONOR of the 'INVINCABLE SUN' Mithras, the conqueror of darkness" END QUOTE - (Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2, p. 67). - AUTHOR 1 Professor. Mario Righetti (docente di Liturgia a Genova, Accademico pontificio, consultore della Congregazione dei Riti e perito conciliare al Vaticano II) fu l’autore della più voluminosa storia della liturgia latina del XX secolo; presentazione in B. Mario Righetti (professor of liturgy in Genoa, Academic pope, consultor of the Congregation of Rites and expert reconcile the Vatican II) was the author of more voluminous history of the Latin liturgy of the twentieth century; presentation B. BAROFFIO, Mons. BAROFFIO, Msgr. Mario Righetti (1882-1975). Mario Righetti (1882-1975). Un'esimia figura del clero e della cultura italiana , in "Rivista Liturgica" LXII (1975), pp. Un'esimia figure of the clergy and of Italian culture, "Liturgical Magazine" LXV (1975), pp. 597-606.


HOW IT CAME TO BE: ROME'S REAL "FIRST" POPE
(A SAMARITAN SORCERER & PERSIAN WITCHCRAFT)

Act 8:9  But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one: 
Act 8:10  To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, This man is the great power of God. 
Act 8:11  And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had bewitched them with sorceries. 
Act 8:12  But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. 
Act 8:13  Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done. 
Act 8:14  Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John: 
Act 8:15  Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost: 
Act 8:16  (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 
Act 8:17  Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. 
Act 8:18  And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money, 
Act 8:19  Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost. 
Act 8:20  But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. 
Act 8:21  Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. 
Act 8:22  Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. 
Act 8:23  For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. 
Act 8:24  Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me. 
Act 8:25  And they, when they had testified and preached the word of the Lord, returned to Jerusalem, and preached the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans

THE BIBLE EXPOSES ROME'S CLAIMS ABOUT "PETER" TO BE COMPLETELY FICTITIOUS "TRADITION AND MYTH"

PETER WAS NOT SENT TO GENTILES

"The gospel of the CIRCUMCISION was unto Peter; (For He that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)" (Gal. 2:7-8).

II Timothy 1:11: "Whereunto I (PAUL) am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles."


PAUL WAS THE APOSTLE TO THE GENTILES (And the only APOSTLE sent to ROME)

"I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable"  (Rom. 15:16). 


PAUL WAS "THE FOUNDER" OF THE "ROMAN ECCLESIA"

Rom 1:1  Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, 
Rom 1:7  To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. 


PAUL DID NOT "BUILD ON ANOTHER MANS FOUNDATION" IN HIS "MINISTRY"

Rom 15:16  That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost. 
Rom 15:17  I have therefore whereof I may glory through Jesus Christ in those things which pertain to God. 
Rom 15:18  For I will not dare to speak of any of those things which Christ hath not wrought by me, to make the Gentiles obedient, by word and deed, 
Rom 15:19  Through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God; so that from Jerusalem, and round about unto Illyricum, I have fully preached the gospel of Christ. 
Rom 15:20  Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation: 

PAUL LISTS 28 "CHRISTIAN LEADERS" AT ROME 
(PETER IS NEVER EVEN MENTIONED AT A TIME HE IS SAID TO HAVE BEEN THERE!)

Rom 16:1  I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea: 
Rom 16:2  That ye receive her in the Lord, as becometh saints, and that ye assist her in whatsoever business she hath need of you: for she hath been a succourer of many, and of myself also. 
Rom 16:3  Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus: 
Rom 16:4  Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles. 
Rom 16:5  Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ. 
Rom 16:6  Greet Mary, who bestowed much labour on us. 
Rom 16:7  Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me. 
Rom 16:8  Greet Amplias my beloved in the Lord. 
Rom 16:9  Salute Urbane, our helper in Christ, and Stachys my beloved. 
Rom 16:10  Salute Apelles approved in Christ. Salute them which are of Aristobulus' household. 
Rom 16:11  Salute Herodion my kinsman. Greet them that be of the household of Narcissus, which are in the Lord. 
Rom 16:12  Salute Tryphena and Tryphosa, who labour in the Lord. Salute the beloved Persis, which laboured much in the Lord. 
Rom 16:13  Salute Rufus chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine. 
Rom 16:14  Salute Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermas, Patrobas, Hermes, and the brethren which are with them. 
Rom 16:15  Salute Philologus, and Julia, Nereus, and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints which are with them. 
Rom 16:16  Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you. 

YEARS LATER, THERE IS STILL NO MENTION OF PETER (NOT EVEN A SINGLE PASSING REFERENCE)

Act 28:15  And from thence, when the brethren heard of us, they came to meet us as far as Appii forum, and The three taverns: whom when Paul saw, he thanked God, and took courage. 
Act 28:16  And when we came to Rome, the centurion delivered the prisoners to the captain of the guard: but Paul was suffered to dwell by himself with a soldier that kept him. 
Act 28:17  And it came to pass, that after three days Paul called the chief of the Jews together: and when they were come together, he said unto them, Men and brethren, though I have committed nothing against the people, or customs of our fathers, yet was I delivered prisoner from Jerusalem into the hands of the Romans. 
Act 28:18  Who, when they had examined me, would have let me go, because there was no cause of death in me. 
Act 28:19  But when the Jews spake against it, I was constrained to appeal unto Caesar; not that I had ought to accuse my nation of. 

Act 28:30  And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house, and received all that came in unto him, 
Act 28:31  Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him. 

AS LATE AS 65 A.D. AND THE END OF PAUL'S LIFE (NOT A SINGLE MENTION OF PETER IN ROME)

2Ti 4:10  For Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world, and is departed unto Thessalonica; Crescens to Galatia, Titus unto Dalmatia. 
2Ti 4:11  Only Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable to me for the ministry. 
2Ti 4:12  And Tychicus have I sent to Ephesus. 
2Ti 4:13  The cloke that I left at Troas with Carpus, when thou comest, bring with thee, and the books, but especially the parchments. 
2Ti 4:14  Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil: the Lord reward him according to his works: 
2Ti 4:15  Of whom be thou ware also; for he hath greatly withstood our words. 
2Ti 4:16  At my first answer no man stood with me, but all men forsook me: I pray God that it may not be laid to their charge. 
2Ti 4:17  Notwithstanding the Lord stood with me, and strengthened me; that by me the preaching might be fully known, and that all the Gentiles might hear: and I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion. 
2Ti 4:18  And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen. 
2Ti 4:19  Salute Prisca and Aquila, and the household of Onesiphorus. 
2Ti 4:20  Erastus abode at Corinth: but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick. 
2Ti 4:21  Do thy diligence to come before winter. Eubulus greeteth thee, and Pudens, and Linus, and Claudia, and all the brethren. 
2Ti 4:22  The Lord Jesus Christ be with thy spirit. Grace be with you. Amen. The second epistle unto Timotheus, ordained the first bishop of the church of the Ephesians, was written from Rome, when Paul was brought before Nero the second time. 


PETER PROPHESIED BY CHRIST TO LIVE TO BE AN "OLD MAN"

Joh 21:17  He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep. 
Joh 21:18  Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. 


WHERE WAS PETER?

Act 12:5  Peter therefore was kept in prison: but prayer was made without ceasing of the church unto God for him. (Jerusalem)

Act 2:14  But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of Judaea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken to my words: 

Gal 2:11  But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. (Syria [North of Israel])

1Pe 5:13  The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son. (Babylonia, Center of the Rabbinical Academy)


FOR MORE ON THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF HOW SIMON MAGUS WAS IN FACT HISTORICALLY DOCUMENTED
BEING IN ROME AND HAVING A 'GREAT FOLLOWING" READ THE ARTICLE: "SIMON PETER" or "SIMON MAGUS": FIRST POPE OF ROME by Dr. E.L.MARTIN

The PERSIAN WITCHCRAFT (which you will see in the section entitled "THE MAGIC") contained in "Christmas" is literally A LIVING FOSSIL that is the direct result of the historical fact SIMON MAGUS, not SIMON PETER, was the real "Simon" that the "CHURCH OF ROME" finds it's origins and founding.  This historical fact,  is not simply a "convenient ploy" by Protestant theology to "discredit the Roman Papacy, it is admitted by the Vatican's own histories, that Simon Magus did come to Rome, and there secure a "mass following" of Romans, who identified themselves as "Christians".  Naturally, in their explanations, the "real Apostle Peter" (who was never there according to the Bible) had a face to face confrontation and "defeated him" in a show down of "spiritual power".  But while most assume that neither actually ever happened, there is post-era evidence that both the practices and theology of Simon Magus was in fact "institutionalized" in Rome, while the Jewish fisherman (both his religion and his family) were actually criminalized.  Something brought these practices to Rome, and while there may be other explanations for how they got there, the Vatican's own histories might be the "cover-story" once again, for what really did in fact take place. Simon Magus was never "defeated in Rome", and he may have in fact, been "canonized" as it's "first Pope".  Both the evidence from history, and the record from the New Testament, demonstrate the validity of this highly probable historical thesis. (More will be disscussed about this below) Peter (according to the real Apostles, never went to Rome: Gal. 2:7-8, Rom 16:1 -16, Act 28:15-31, 2Ti 4:10-22, Gal 2:11, 1Pe 5:13)

[TOP]

FOX NEWS (THE CHRIST-MASS JIHAD CHANNEL) MAKES A SHOCKING CONFESSION

IF YOU THINK "JESUS" STARTED "THE CHURCH" THEN YOU HAVEN'T READ YOUR BIBLE

"CHURCHES" EXIST BEFORE THE BIRTH OF "CHRIST"
and were not something "He Started"

Act 19:34  But when they knew that he was a Jew, all with one voice about the space of two hours cried out, Great is DIANA OF THE EPHESIANS. 
Act 19:35  And when the townclerk had appeased the people, he said, Ye men of Ephesus, what man is there that knoweth not how that the city of the Ephesians is a worshipper of THE GREAT GODDESS Diana, and of the image which fell down FROM JUPITER
Act 19:36  Seeing then that these things cannot be spoken against, ye ought to be quiet, and to do nothing rashly. 
Act 19:37  For ye have brought hither these men, which are neither robbers of CHURCHES, nor yet blasphemers of YOUR GODDESSs. - KJV


NOTICE HOW THE TERM "THE CHURCH" WAS UNDERSTOOD BY ORIGINAL TRANSLATORS

G2417, ἱερόσυλος, hierosulos, hee-er-os'-oo-los, From G2411 and G4813; a temple despoiler: - robber of churches.
G2411, ἱερόν, hieron, hee-er-on', Neuter of G2413; a sacred place, that is, the entire precincts (whereas G3485 denotes the central sanctuary itself) of the Temple (at Jerusalem or elsewhere): - temple.
G4813, συλάω, sulaō, soo-lah'-o, From a derivative of σύλλω sullō̄ (to strip; probably akin to G138; compare G4661); to despoil: - rob.


THE "MOTHER-GODDESS" CHURCH
PRE-EXISTED CHRIST
(AND WAS GIVEN NOTHING BY HIM)

What is important to note, is not simply the Greek word, translated CHURCH in this text.  It is how THE TRANSLATORS DEFINED THE WORD "CHURCH".  For here, it is UNDERSTOOD, what was FROM THE BEGINNING IN ENGLISH, what was actually MEANT, when you hear these same kinds of theologies speak of the word "CHURCH" today. (As in CHURCH and STATE)

Here it is noted that (1) that there IS NO SEPARATION of CHURCH AND STATE in the ancient city of Ephesus, (2) and that the term CHURCH refers to something that CHRIST DID NOT START.(Nor had anything to do with)  In fact, THE CHURCH in this text is actually something that is quite HOSTILE not only to CHRIST, but even HIS RELIGION, and even those who followed him, and taught about him.  THIS IS WHAT THEY MEAN WHEN THEY SPEAK OF "CHURCH AND STATE", AND "CHRIST" GIVING THE "KEYS OF HEAVEN" TO "THE CHURCH".

So why do you think, ENGLISH TRANSLATORS used the word "CHURCH" to refer to PAGAN TEMPLES that worshiped the Greek derivation "DIANA" from the Babylonian "MOTHER-GODDESS", ISHTAR (MOON-GODDESS, HARLOT OF ININNI), and the word they EQUATED with this abomination, was the word "CHURCH".  

And it actually was a word, that did not EVEN EXIST at the time of the writing of the New Testament !!!  But the THING, the word "CHURCH" actually referred too DID !!!! AND ...IT WASN'T BEGUN BY CHRIST !!!

WHY DO YOU THINK THEY USED THIS WORD ?
READ BELOW TO FIND OUR WHY !!
( IT COMES FROM "LATIN")

HERE'S ANOTHER FAMOUS TEXT WITH THE SAME WORD
(BUT THIS TIME "TRANSLATED" ENTIRELY DIFFERENT)

2Th 2:3  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 
2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the  ἱερόν  of God, shewing himself that he is God. 

2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the  CHURCH  of God, shewing himself that he is God. 

HERE IS HOW IT IS "TRANSLATED" HERE
(THE SAME WORD)
2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple ["Church"] of God, shewing himself that he is God. 

2Th 2:5  Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 
2Th 2:6  And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 
2Th 2:7  For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 
2Th 2:8  And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 
2Th 2:9  Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 
2Th 2:10  And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 
2Th 2:11  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 
2Th 2:12  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

Most people are not aware that the term ἱερόν IS TRANSLATED "CHURCH"
(And "Ecclesia" has nothing to do with the word "Church" in the Greek language at this point in history)

CHRIST STARTED AN "ECCLESIA" NOT AN "HIERON"

THE MASONS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND

The universal sentiment of the Masons of the present day is to confer upon Solomon, King of Israel, the honor of being their"first Grand Master".  But the "Legend of the Craft" had long before, though there was a tradition of the temple extant, bestowed, at least by implication, that title upon Nimrod, the King of Babylonia and Assyria. - History of Freemasonry, Chapter 12, p. 63

THE ROMAN VATICAN

As for the tower that thou seest built, it is myself, namely the Church, which has appeared to thee both now, and heretofore - THE SHEPHERD OF HERMES (Written by the brother of the Pope of Rome, and read as Scripture in Rome


FOX NEWS

MARCH 27, 2005 8:00 PM

QUOTE: "Jesus and his followers were JEWISH. They were bringing a REFORM movement within JUDAISM". END QUOTE

QUOTE: ""Jesus was born a Jew, Lived an observant Jew and Died an observant Jew and ALL his disciples were JEWISH". END QUOTE

 

In 2005 on the Fox "News" customary broadcast of Vatican religous content, kicking off it's program on the Vatican Easter Mass, it began it's program with two "scholars" talking about what is now known about the historical New Testament "Christ".  The first was a Rabbinical professor who smiled and explained to the Fox News audience that Jesus was actually Jewish and did not start a new religion at all.  The second was an expert "Scholar" and "Professor" on New Testament Studies, who went even further and explained that Jesus was actually a Torah observant Jew from the beginning to the end of his life, repeating the earlier statement that Jesus did not start a new religion, but was Jewish.


TALES FROM THE CRYPT

The typically clueless Fox host smiled happily and then transitioned to the next scene at Rome to the Opulent Vatican palace, it's procession of clergy dressed up in full Easter regalia and then to the Catacomb tombs in Rome where the narrative quickly changed to talking about all the Roman Christians who along with Saint Peter, hung out in the tombs of dead people, to venerate and pray to the dead and decayed rotting corpses. (with complete obliviousness and disconnect to it's own earlier programmed content offered as commentary in it's own "Vatican special" program) 

And of course, Fox News while attempting to bridge the bizzare opulance and obvious Non-Jewish Imperial Roman nature of the Vatican's royal empire Easter Mass, never bothered to inform it's audience that modern historians consider the traditional explanations previously offered by Vatican historical propagandists, concerning the Roman catacombs, to not even be historically valid conclusions any longer.  

Judaism, the religion of the New Testament and it's writers, considered even touching anything dead to be Unclean and certainly mixing it with something "spiritually" would have been considered nothing short of an "abomination". Constantine, upon building Saint Peter's Basilica, had the Necropolis (the cemetary) upon which it was built (over the supposed tomb of "Saint Peter"), DRAINED, and all the water which had previously filled the grave sites of rotting corpses, collected into the "Baptismal Pools" for the Basilica.  Thus literally "Baptizing" it's pilgrims in death.  The idea that any Jew, of any flavor whatsoever, particularly a New Testament Jew who was already risking life and limb to protest the innovations of Talmudic Academy Judaism, would be "ok" with this, is truly laughable to the extreme.

The spin doctoring of history to make this plausible to Christians, is accomplished through historical intermediaries which have been called "Apostolic fathers" and "early Church fathers", neither of which they were. (Neither Apostolic OR early) And upon closer examination are full of huge holes of historical credibly, and severe deviation from the Biblical record. Demonstrating both their general lack of familiarity with it's conceptual content, or even their own historical connection to it's community of adherents in reality.

But for a religious doctrine that embraces deceit as par for the course, in "promoting" and "consolidating" it's rule over the world (by any means necessary) such epistemological gymnastics should be expected (unfortunately, that is precisely the problem among naive Protestants, who do not expect it).  Protestants are suckered into "Church father" veneration, through a bunch of ecclesiastical mumbo jumbo pushed by Traducianists, whose only concern on earth is their political platform, and controlling the "voting block" to eliminate our current Protestant form of government, for a restoration of the Vatican's, Roman Reich.  Enforcement of Rome's "Solar-Mass" doctrine in violation of the US Constitution, is simply another part of that over-all openly and publicly stated goal.  But every Protestant in America, should be made fully aware of the extremes of historical deception, Rome is engaging in, with Biblical history to pull off that deception, ..because those deceptions have spiritual impacts to them.  They do not come, without consequences, even down to the issue of Christ and salvation itself.

WHAT THEY "FATHERED"

 

 


Mat 16:18  And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my ________(Fill in the blank);
 

If you walked into a group of grown men arguing over who was the real owner of the original Ferrari of Jesus Christ, most would immediantly assume they were just joking and being silly.  If you then realized they were not only serious, but deadly serious, the next thought might be they were completely insane (LIKE ON THE SCARY SIDE).  Yet, this text in English is actually no less strange.  


You will always hear by "Churchmen" Theologians, "Jesus" started the CHURCH, That settles it !  Now in case that is not convincing enough, they stick the word CHURCH in the text of the New Testament 79 times throughout the it's 27 books, to make sure you don't miss it.  They really like the use of this word.  It fills the New Testament like Orange Juice does an Orange.  

Main Entry: 1church 
Pronunciation: \ˈchərch\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English chirche, from Old English cirice, ultimately from Late Greek kyriakon, from Greek, neuter of kyriakos of the lord, from kyrios lord, master; akin to Sanskrit śūra hero, warrior
Date: before 12th century
1 : a building for public and especially Christian worship
2 : the clergy or officialdom of a religious body





You cannot even read but a few sentences before you start running into what appears to be long dissertations about THE CHURCH, God's plan for it, God's wisdom in it, how God redeems it, how it has all these wonderful things planned for it, etc., etc.  Paul a former converted "Rabbi" and remaining Pharisee, is just full of discussion about this entity called THE CHURCH!  Yes, as history records, Pharisees just "LOVED" the CHURCH!  They had CHURCHES all over Israel!  In fact, they even BUILT THEM IN THE DESERT when fleeing EGYPT they loved them SO MUCH !!!

There are all kinds of varieties of it, the LOCAL CHURCH, the UNIVERSAL CHURCH, the INVISIBLE CHURCH, the ROMAN CHURCH, the ORTHODOX CHURCH, the STATE Church, the FREE Church , Church, Church, Church!  Some Protestant Mission organizations make their slogan "A Church for every people!".  Just about every version imaginable in the English Bible (Of course originally translated from the LATIN VULGATE, from where it get's this glorious term, made the center of the life of every "Christian" on earth, and endowed with all the rights and privileges of ruling the entire universe, including the United States of Ameirca, even if we have to put the US Constitution in a paper shredder to do it!)  Why certainly the "Church" is more important than the U.S. Constitution! Of course!
 
There is only small problem of course.  Just a minor detail actually. The word "Church" doesn't even exist YET !  AND it is not the meaning of the word "Ecclesia" in the Greek text.  And neither the concept nor it's "building" nor even it's vocabulary word to describe it, will exist for centuries to come!!! YES CENTURIES!!  It is an ANACHRONISM transposed on the Greek word to accomplish a deception!  Yes, not an accidental little boo boo here, but a monstrous, henious, inexcusable, bloody deception. Jews did not have either "A Church" nor "Churches", and neither this institution, nor it's buildings existed in the New Testament era.

Main Entry: anach·ro·nism 
Pronunciation: \ə-ˈna-krə-ˌni-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: probably from Middle Greek anachronismos, from anachronizesthai to be an anachronism, from Late Greek anachronizein to be late, from Greek ana- + chronos time
Date: 1617

1 : an error in chronology; especially : a chronological misplacing of persons, events, objects, or customs in regard to each other
2 : a person or a thing that is chronologically out of placeespecially : one from a former age that is incongruous in the present
3 : the state or condition of being chronologically out of place


Out of place historically? Yes.  Completely out of place.  And the "magic" used to create this transference from one thing to another (actually it's opposite in reality) is really quite amazing.  And probably no other thing in the entire Bible screams as loud as this blunder, deception, bait and switch, whatever you wish to call it. And since all of western Europe, and consequently most of civilization itself, has been either directly subjugated and ruled by, or at the very least infiltrated and influenced by the "Western Church" this lie has spread all over planet earth, virtually unchallenged except by the most observant and conscientious reformers!  Some reformers even refused to use the word "Church" for "ecclesia" when translating the New Testament, recognizing it had no basis in fact.

The "institution" which sits headquartered in Rome, in London, in Copenhagen, in Oslo, in Washington DC, in Nashville, throughout the great cities of the earth, and which takes in more money collectively, and owns more land, than any government on earth, is a complete and total fraud.  It is a fraud so bad that even when Protestant ministers (in the course of their education) eventually discover the fraud, the way out of the fraud looks so long and impossible, they simply remain in it, hoping "God in heaven" will forgive them for their lies and compromises, rather than tell the truth and suffer the consequences.

What is the "The Truth" that Protestant ministers today refuse to share with their "congregations"? It is that the word "CHURCH" did not even EXIST at the time the New Testament was written. If you check your "Etymology" of the word, it does not even come from the Greek word "Ecclesia" it is USED to TRANSLATE?  It does have Greek roots, but actually comes from the Latin conjuction of two entirely different GREEK WORDS!
 
Of course, it would be LATIN.

So in other words, it's like using the word "Space Shuttle" in reference to the Pilgrims landing their "ship" at Plymouth. (The distance in time is literally the same)

"Ek" (Out of) + "Clesia" (To Call) "Ecclesia" means "Called-Out" and comes from the Hebrew word קרא Qârâ' , kara (pron. kaw-raw') - A primitive root word through the idea of accosting a person met; to call out to  - See Strong's Concordance 
 
The word "CHURCH" however, comes from an entirely different set of Greek Words. "Kurios" and "Doma"neither of which have anything to do with "ECCLESIA". The Etymology as given by Merriam-Webster's Exhaustive Third International Dictionary, 3 volume set is as follows:
 
CHURCH: Etymology – Middle English “CHIRCHE” from Old English “CIRICE”, from Medieval Greek “KURIKON” from Late Greek “KURIAKON” (DOMA), meaning THE LORD’S HOUSE, from Greek KURIAKOS, meaning “Of The Lord”, from “KURIOS”, meaning LORD.
 
Merriam-Webster Online gives it this Etymology: CHURCH Etymology: Middle English chirche, from Old English cirice, ultimately from Late Greek kyriakon, from Greek, neuter of kyriakos of the lord, from kyrios lord, master.
 
The Online Etymology Dictionary gives it this ETYMOLOGY: O.E. cirice "church," from W.Gmc. *kirika, from Gk. kyriake (oikia) "Lord's (house)," from kyrios "ruler, lord." Gk. kyriakon (adj.) "of the Lord"
 
As you can SEE, there is no mention of ECCLESIA anywhere in it's entire word HISTORY!
 
But wait, there's more.   An earlier "Etymology" from the same publisher, Web. New Int. Dic. of the English Language 1942 ed. states:
 
CHURCH, from Middle English chirche, from Anglo Saxon, circe, from Greek kyriakon the Lord's house, from kyriakos concerning a master or lord, from kyrios master, lord, from kyros power, authority; akin to Sanskrit sura mighty, bold, Old Irish caur, cur, hero,  confir Kirk.
 
QUOTE: In Smith's Dictionary of the Bible (one volume edition), which you can find in almost any Christian bookstore today, under the article "Church," Professor Smith states that the English word "church" actually comes from an early word meaning "circle" which is akin to the word "circus." He stated a major study made by Professor Lipsius of Germany, the great historian and theologian during the Reformation, showing that our word "church" does indeed come from "circle." We also find that Professor A. F. Fausett in his "Home Bible Study Dictionary" under the word "Church," mentions favorably this same research by Lipsius. That doesn't end the matter. Scholars who compiled the exhaustive 10 volumes of the "Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature" Under the article "Church" also subscribe to this pagan derivation of the word "Church." It says: "The word Church: The origin of the word is uncertain. In the Germanic and Slavonic languages it is found as follows: Anglo-Saxon, cyrica, circ, cyric; English, church; Scottish, kirk; German, kirche; Low-German, karke; Frisan, tzierke; Danish, kyrke; Swedish, Kyrka; Bohemian, cyrkew; Polish, cerkiew; Russian, zerkow. There was probably some word which, in the language from which the Teutonic and Slavonic are descended, designated the old heathen places of religious assembly, and this word, having taken different forms in different dialects, was adopted by the Christian missionaries. It was probably connected with the Latin circus, circulus, and with the Greek kuklos. Lipsius, who was the first to reject the received tradition, was probably right in his suggestion" (Volume II, p.322). <> Brewer states: "The etymology of this word is generally assumed to be from the Greek, kuriou oikos (house of God); but this is most improbable, as the word existed in all the Celtic dialects long before the introduction of Greek. No doubt the word means 'a circle.' The places of worship among the German and Celtic nations were always circular (example Stonehenge). Compare Anglo-Saxon 'circe,' a small church, with 'circol,' a circle."END QUOTE - E.L.Martin Ph.D.
 
He continues…
 
QUOTE: An example of this is the circular Stonehenge in England. In fact, the Scottish "Kirk" or the German "Kirche," are clearly from the early word "Circe" (with the letter "c" having a "k" sound in the original vocalization). All of this historical information gives us an abundance of evidence to show where the word "Church" comes from. It is derived from "Circe." But what did the original word "Circe" actually refer to in ancient times? The word "circe" is well known by classical historians. In his classical study, "The Myth of Kirke," Robert Brown gives extensive meanings derived from its various usages in the ancient Greek world and concludes that its simple meaning is "Circle" or "Circular" (p.22). But there is more to it than that. It was also a proper noun. It not only referred to a building or monument that was "circular," but one of its main meanings was its reference to one of the Goddesses of the ancient world. Robert Brown's book was devoted to the exploits of this early Goddess called "Kirke" or "Circe." She was the great heathen Goddess who was the daughter of the Sun God. She was famous for taming wild animals in her circus. She also met Ulysses returning from the Trojan War and had an adulterous relationship with him that produced, as one of the children, Latinus the supposed founder of the Latin race. And how is Circe pictured in the classical accounts? She is shown holding a golden cup in her hand mixed with wine and drugs through which she controlled the kings of the world (among whom was supposed to be Ulysses). END QUOTE - E.L.Martin Ph.D., The Anatomy of a Church, September 27, 1998
 
 
Revelation 17:2-5… Come hither; I will show thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication…having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication. And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH 
- the Great Whore, called Mystery Babylon, who sits on many waters and the seven hills of ROME
 
 
 ORIGIN OF THE WORD "CHURCH" - CIRCE
 
"In the entrance way they stayed
 To listen here, insider her quiet house
 They heard the Goddess Circe
  Low she sang
  In her beguiling voice, while on her loom
  She wore ambrosial fabric sheer and bright
  By the craft [sorcery] known to the Goddesses of heaven".
- Homer, Book 10 of the "Odyssey",8th Cent.BCE
 
 
FACT: The word TRANSLATED 79 TIMES in the New Testament as "CHURCH" has NOTHING TO DO WITH the word it is used to REPLACE !?!
 

It has to do with the Mother-goddess who gave birth to the Latin (i.e., Roman) empire.
 SEE "CIRCE" - Greek Mythology by messagenet.com
 
 
DID YOU KNOW THIS?
 
 
 
MORE CONFUSION FROM BABEL

This CON-FUSION of language from ROME prevented the translators of the English Bible, from even being able to TRANSLATE the Bible into ENGLISH:
 
Act 7:37,38  This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. This is he, that was in THE CHURCH in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:
 
ἐκκλησία ekklēsia ek-klay-see'-ah From a compound of G1537 and a derivative of G2564; a calling out,

That was a clear reference to the term EXODUS. [Not a "Steeple-Church"] Roman theologians attempted to over-lay their STEEPLE-TEMPLE on top of the Jewish EXODUS in this text. ROMAN Apologist point to the TABERNACLE, and claim that is why the "exchange" was appropriate?

But the TABERNACLE is ALREADY MENTIONED IN THE VERY TEXT! 

Act 7:44 Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness,..

AND... There IS a Greek word for TABERNACLE, it is

σκηνή , skēnē (pron.skay-nay') Apparently akin to G4632 and G4639; a tent or cloth hut (literally or figuratively): - habitation, tabernacle.

IT IS NOT "ECCLESIA".  Why did ROME change this word?

  

קרא  Qârâ' , Kara (pron. kaw-raw') - A primitive root (rather identical with H7122 through the idea of accosting a person met); to call out to  - Strong's Exhaustice Concordance 

KARA - refers to a known SECT within Judaism.  They are called KARA-ITES [From the same word]!  “KARA-ITE” was REPLACED by the term “CHRIST-IAN”, which left them with a linguistic HOLE to FILL, when it came to the term ECCLESIA, which originally referred to the KARA-IM. Originally, against the synagogue system and Rabinical Judaism, including it's Talmud.  Rabbinicals claim it did not "start" until the middle-ages.  Roman Catholicism makes the same claim concerning Biblical Protestantism.  Modern Karaism is actually another religion which originated 5 centuries later, originally called "Ananites", adopting this name.  They have been used as the "cover story" under which the truth has been buried.  More about this will be discussed in the section entitled THE CHURCH.
 
GUESS where the term "QARA" (to call) is first USED in the BIBLE? 
 
Gen 1:4,5  And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
 
Guess Where Else?
 
Gen 3:20  And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
 
Christ was called the “Second Adam” and the ECCLESIA/KARA-IM is said to BE HIS BRIDE!!!  And it should be noted that according to the Torah he preached from, he would only take a JEWISH BRIDE.  [If she were a Gentile, she would have to “convert” first]  That would entail a strange custom called Mikvah where the gentile must be immersed in water [as a washing from “uncleaness” ,i.e., “unkosher”, and be “born as a Jew”] symbolically [since that’s the only way you can be one, i.e., by "birth"] , the origin of the practice of "Baptism".  The REAL CHRIST went so far as to claim even this custom was not “good enough” for him, he wanted that PLUS the “Ruach HaQodesh” [That’s the "Spirit" of the Jewish nabbim] before considering them “born-again” as a Jew!!!  He was extremely “picky” about his concept of what constituted his Jewish Bride.


Of course, the blonde Latin-Jesus of Christ-mass has no problem marrying gentile pagans because he is one.

 GEN 11: let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name,[a "Shem"] (A CHRIST!)
 
Not ONLY did ROME make itself A CHRIST to replace the Jewish Joshua, and a "NAME" to REPLACE HASHEM, they even made themselves a STEEPLE-TEMPLE, we now call "CHURCH" to REPLACE "THE CALLED-OUT ONES"

In the original Babylonian scheme, the MOTHER marries HER SON.  In Rome's revised account, THE FATHER actually marries HIS DAUGHTER.  Although the ROMAN WITCH hides her identity under the replacement words found in the actual New Testament, the nature and character of what this ROMAN WITCH actually does, remains quite accurate to her "spirit", even into the modern era.  The "Cup" which she offers "believers" to turn them into "pigs" remains as real today, as it was originally portrayed in the ancient Greco-Roman mysteries, from which she emerged.  Her "Cup" is the CHRIST MASS, which she uses to this day to turn men into "pigs". A "Pig" of course, is not only the sacred animal of the sungods, but as a result, a symbol of GENTILE religion.

Rome's SOLAR-MASS to APOLLYON as a "CHRIST" mass is designed TO TURN MEN INTO PIGS for CIRCE.(The Mother-goddess (witch) of ROME'S EMPIRE)  And all you have to do is watch TV to realize it's "magic" is in full force during this time.  People literally kill themselves trampling the weak or elderly to get a $20 discount at a store on "Black Friday".  They drink themselves until they vomit.  They spend money until they go bankrupt.  And they indulge sentimentalism until they commit suicide.  It works. And the hard facts demonstrate it.

Not only is Rome's Christ actually APOLLYON (The Sun), it's "Church" is CIRCE, the "Daughter of the Sun"!  (This discussion will be expanded more fully under the title "THE CHURCH" of Christmas which you can view by clicking the link here or in the navigation menu above.)  The point of mentioning here in this introduction to the "magic" of Christmas, is to note that a tremendous "illusion" is being created at Rome's Solar-mass to Apollyon now called a "Christ" mass. And that "illusion" is not being created to "save the pagans" as Rome and other Solar-mass Apollo-gists claim.  It is precisely the opposite, it is to continue to be a (Roman) pagan, and claim the exact opposite.




[TOP]

THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT THE "CHRISTMAS" CHURCH

DISAMBIGUATION

DEFINITION OF TERMS

The following terms are being debated constantly and you will find completely antithetical claims made about them by different sources.  This is usually being created by various theological traditions which wish to be "identified" with the "good-guys" and distanced from the "bad-guys" in the New Testament.  So a lot of gymnastics are conducted to reach these goals.  For the purpose of this web-site they will be defined as follows and used accordingly, and these definitions are being given to avoid any confusions which may arise as a result of the poetic license invoked for the promotion of various theological sets.

PHARISEES - A Jewish "Puritan" movement called the "P'rushim" which constituted a common spiritual group and a theocratic political party in 1st Century Israel, which included a variety of members from Jewish sub-sects, but whose tendencies were toward what would later become orthodox-conservative streams of Judaism and stood in contrast to the Jewish Hellenists (Sadducess), and the Jewish Romanists (Herodians) but found some sympathy among the Jewish Nationalists (Zealots)..

RABBIS - (1) Leaders of the Synagogue movement in 1st century Israel, affiliated with the Jewish Academy in Babylon or it's leadership, the center of Talmudic "scholarship".(2) A general term of usage among 1st century Jews indicating spiritual leadership with a following, similiar to the modern employment of the word "Preacher" among evangelicals, usually indicating a theological degree from a college or seminary but not necessarily requiring such. (Thus the occassional confusion created by the inter-change of definitions 1 and 2)

KARAITES - An early Jewish reactionary movement against the Synagogue system, it's Rabbinical class of  "degreed" and "ordained" clergy, and it's academic based Talmudic additions and revisions to Biblical Judaism.(Which are said to have not existed until Anon Ben David of the 8th Century, but are recorded in the Bible (both Old and New Testaments) , in a different earlier form, with whom Christ associated himself as a young man and later referred to his own discipleship movement by it's name)  Modern Karaites and Modern Karaite organizations appropriate the name in the same way that "NAZARENES" now refer to a "Christian Church Denomination" which feel itself representitive of, but not necessarily directly connected to historically.  The re-occurance of the term "karaite" throughout history in different manners testify to the existence of this movement in history.  The modern re-incarnations of this term usually indicate some general shared tendencies among it's variations, but are not being directly referenced by the term in this study anymore than the term "NAZARENE" would be used to refer to the Christian Church Denomination whose headquarters might be in Nashville, Tennessee, unless specified as such.  But because the Christian Church Denomination called THE NAZERENES, did not exist in 1st century Israel, does not mean there was no one in Israel being called a "Nazarene".  And that the NAZARENES in Nashville, Tennessee do not feel (rightly or wrongly) that they are at least in some way, a"continuation" and "representation" of that earlier entity.

KARAITE - For the purpose of this study, refers to an early Jewish-"Protostatace" movement led by the Nabbi as opposed to the Rabbi, marked by rejection of Jewish Babylonian Talmudism, the monetary practices of the Talmudic Academy, it's Degree system of academics and payments, it's clergy of sacerdotal professionalists, and it's Torah unauthorized synagogue-temple-cultus.  Karaites that have adopted the same practices as Rabbinicals, are obviously Rabbinicals with the name of Karaite.  In very ancient communities, the great great grandfather may have actually been a Karaite, but the defintion of what a "Karaite" is, is determined not by the use of the name, but by the identification with, adherance to, and superscription within the ecclesiology of the original historical Protostatace founders (which preceded Anon-ben David) by several centuries.  In other words a Texan is someone who actually lives there, not a broadway actor who wears a cowboy hat, cowboy boots, and likes country-western music.  This is not an attempt to define modern karaism, as much as it is simply an attempt to help the reader rediscover an ancient karaism that has been long forgotten and foresaken ...and intentionally hidden behind a Christ-Mass lie.  

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.  It is literally a defiance of physics to think otherwise. And so it was with the Talmud, it's Academy, the Synagogue, and it's Rabbi.  That equal but opposite reaction had both an existence and a name.  They called themselves the "Karaim"... a/k/a the Karaites. You are about to read a documented history of their existence at a time in history the Christ-mass lie claims they did not exist.


[TOP]

JESUS DID NOT START YOUR CHURCH

While thousands of Churches sit around boasting they are the one "Christ started", like the ugly sisters in the Cinderella story, the glass slipper doesn't fit any of them.  It is very clear from what we know about history and what we see in the New Testament, Jesus was a particular type of Jew which grew out of a diaspora community in Northern Israel, Babylonia and Egypt. Egypt being where he spent over a decade of his life growing up, moving to Northern Israel on his return. The actual religion which is found in the New Testament, and which it's messianic rabbi we know today as "Jesus Christ", was the leader of, had become the religious persuasion of the deposed royal family.  Perhaps (if the New Testament is taken at face value), even sponsored and promoted by them, noting the same connections found in John the Baptist. 

The fact is that Jesus didn't start anybody's Church. If one accepts the same records the "Church" itself points too, it will be seen, he started a "movement", perhaps not even actually starting it, but organizing it, inspiring it, teaching it, fulfilling it, and thus consolidating it with a prophetic message powerful enough in it's impact to threaten the solidarity and order of the Roman empire.  A message the Roman empire responded to, centuries later, by virtually exterminating it, and in it's place, giving the world a replacement Roman Institution which shared little to nothing of it's origin, cutlure, theology and or traditions.  These facts are admitted by Rome, and documented in our own New Testament.  We now erroneously refer to that Roman institution, or one of it's various splinter groups, laughably as something started by Christ and use a word ("Church") to describe it, that did not even exist in his day, to speak, the term itself being a word, that historically, not only never came out of his mouth but didn't even EXIST for centuries to come. 

And no matter how hard these "institutions" try to squeeze their foot into that glass slipper found in the New Testament, the foot is always too fat, just like with Cinderella's evil step sisters that desperately wanted to claim her place for themselves, regardless of the contortions of reality,  lack of conscience, and deception that it required.

Thus, no matter what Church your Church is, no matter how much you may admire it, and no matter how old it may be, or how new it may be, one thing is certain, Jesus (meaning Yeshua of the New Testament) did not "start it".  In fact, the word "Church", though later transposed onto the term "Ecclesia", did not exist at the time the New Testament documents were being written and the concept itself would have been as alien to the Jews in the New Testament, as swiss Cheese to Australian Aborigines.  The only and closest comparasion to the Roman invention of the Latin term "Church" would have been the Jewish synagogue. The same institution identified with the adjectives of "Satanic" in first 2 chapters of Revelation.  And this conclusion is not really new, or even debatable in the New Testament, not if you wish to remain honest with yourself, or with others in society.  The failure, among institutionalized zealots, to affirm this kind of basic intellectual honestly, is at the root of much of the lack of credibility "Christianity" and the "Church" suffer.  How can anyone take any of "Christianity's" claims seriously, when basic obvious historical facts are not even at least honestly acknowledged?   As though, at least there is at very minimum, a basic attempt to respect obvious factual historical realities. (Even those found documented in the text of the New Testament itself, spelled out in writing)

As you will see in the following material, Jesus (Yeshua) of the New Testament was not even a "Christian". There have been several reasons already examined throughout previous sections of this web site, but they will be reveiwed here, in summary form, in this section to demonstrate once again, that Jesus did not, in fact could not have, started what we as modern Americans call "OUR CHURCH", no matter which one it is.  


JESUS WAS JEWISH AND DID NOT START ANYONES CHURCH

 

SALVATION IS OF “JUDAISM”

Joh 4:22  Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.  – JESUS


THE “SHEMA” IS THE "GREATEST COMMANDMENT"

Mar 12:29  And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

Mar 12:30  And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.

Mar 12:31  And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. – JESUS


THE "TRINITY TEXT" WAS FRAUDULENTLY INSERTED

(BECAUSE ROME RECOGNIZED IT'S ABSCENCE IN THE NEW TESTAMENT)

A: 1Jo 5:7  For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1Jo 5:8  And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

 

A.T.Robertson’s Word Studies – Translator’s Note

1Jo 5:7 -

For there are three who bear witness (hoti treis eisin hoi marturountes). At this point the Latin Vulgate gives the words in the Textus Receptus, found in no Greek MS. save two late cursives (162 in the Vatican Library of the fifteenth century, 34 of the sixteenth century in Trinity College, Dublin). Jerome did not have it. Cyprian applies the language of the Trinity and Priscillian has it. Erasmus did not have it in his first edition, but rashly offered to insert it if a single Greek MS. had it and 34 was produced with the insertion, as if made to order. The spurious addition is: en tōi ouranōi ho patēr, ho logos kai to hagion pneuma kai houtoi hoi treis hen eisin kai treis eisin hoi marturountes en tēi gēi (in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth). The last clause belongs to 1Jo_5:8. …Some Latin scribe caught up Cyprian’s exegesis and wrote it on the margin of his text, and so it got into the Vulgate and finally into the Textus Receptus by the stupidity of Erasmus.

 

HE COMMANDED THE KEEPING OF THE JEWISH PASSOVER

(THIS COULD ONLY BE OBSERVED IN A HOME) NOT A TEMPLE, SYNAGOUGE OR CHURCH?

Exo 12:22  And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the bason, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the bason; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning.

Exo 12:46  In one house shall it be eaten;

Luk 22:15  And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you 

Luk 22:19  And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. – JESUS


 

HE CALLED THE PASSOVER HIS “NEW TESTAMENT”, HIS BLOOD AND HIS BODY

THIS PASSOVER - Luke 22:13,15, Mtt.26:19
THIS DO - Luke 22:19,1 Co.11:24,25 
THIS IS my body - Luke 22:19, Mtt.26:26, 1 Co.11:24,25
THIS IS my blood - Luke 22:20, Mtt.26:28, 1 Co.11:24,25

HE OBSERVED THE SABBATH NOT SUNDAY


Mar 1:21  And they went into Capernaum; and straightway on the sabbath day he entered into the synagogue, and taught.

 

HE CALLED HIMSELF THE "LORD OF THE SABBATH" NOT "LORD OF SUNDAY"
 

Mat 12:8  For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.  – JESUS


THE SABBATH WAS SAID TO BE BECAUSE OF "CREATION" NOT THE "LAW OF MOSES"

Heb 4:4  For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.


 
THE SABBATH WAS SAID TO "REMAIN FOR THE PEOPLE OF GOD"

Heb 4:9  There remaineth therefore a SABBATH (Translated "rest" in KJV) to the people of God.


HIS DISCIPLES STILL OBSERVED KASHRUT DIETARY GUIDLINES FOR MEAT PREPARATIONS
 

Act 15:20  But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.

 

HE NEVER TAUGHT PEOPLE TO "IGNORE THE LAW" AND WARNED AGAINST DISMISSIVE TEACHING CONCERNING IT
 

Mat 5:19  Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

 

HE TAUGHT CHILDREN WERE INNOCENT PRIOR TO THE AGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY
 

Mat 19:14  But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

This is a crucial point that may be lost to many lay persons.  "Christianity" as defined by Roman Catholic "Church Fathers" and "Church Councils" taught that children were damned to hell upon birth. (This is the origin of the doctrine of "Human Depravity")  After birth, (Because they are automatically damned to hell) they needed to be "sprinkled with holy water by the Roman Priest" (which magically through the power of Roman Sacerdotalism transforms them into "Roman Catholics").  This is the reason for "infant baptism" which thus permits them to then be allowed into heaven as "Christian infants".  It was a nice way to say to hell with even your kids if you are not a Roman Catholic. (a way to sub-humanize even the innocence of infanthood from children of non-catholic parents)

Protestants never could figure out what to do with this doctrine.  Many simply incorporated the "innocent until accountable" (age of accountability) doctrine from Judiasm, while at the same time, maintaining the "Christian doctrine" of "Depravity", which is logically a complete contradiction because "Depravity" states explicity that there is no "innocence".  So there is logically no reason for "excusing" infants and toddlers from damnation".  The doctrine of "Depravity" only remains logical if held in the context of it's original perversion, infant damnation.(Which was the purpose of it)

This doctrine (i.e., infant damnation, a uniquely "Christian" doctrine) is completely absent from the New Testament, and is overtly contradicted by Christ himself. (Because HE WAS JEWISH)  And the "age of accountability" from Judaism is what he overtly taught.

HE NEVER AFFIRMED ANY NUMERICAL VALUE TO GOD OTHER THAN ONE

Mat 19:16  And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

Mat 19:17  And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God:


HE ASSOCIATED SALVATION WITH KEEPING THE JEWISH MITZVAHS AND THE SHEMA


Mat 19:17  And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

 

PAUL WAS SAID TO HAVE BEEN MISUNDERSTOOD IN HIS OWN DAY BY HIS OWN STUDENTS

2Pe 3:16  As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.


PAUL DID NOT TEACH THE TORAH WAS "WRONG" OR "EVIL"

1Ti 1:5  Now the end of the commandment (Mitzvah) is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:

1Ti 1:6  From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;

1Ti 1:7  Desiring to be teachers of the law (Torah); understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

 

PAUL DID TEACH THE TORAH WAS TO BE USED IN TEACHING

1Ti 1:8  But we know that the law (Torah) is good, if a man use it lawfully;

 

OBJECTIONS BASED UPON FAILURE TO DISTINGUISH THE COVENANTS

There are an inventory of verses that are cited to counter this observation but if one looks closely at the verses in the original Greek they are rarely translated as they appear in the Greek text.   And never explained by preachers and priests the same way they were argued by and to Jews.  Most are addressing two issues: (1) The Mosaic system of national government and temple sacrifice and priesthood were going to come to an end (pass away is the term most used but "destroyed" is actually how Christ described it in Matthew 24)  This is often referred to as the "Mosaic Law" or the "Levitical Priesthood". (Which did in fact "pass away")  You couldn't keep those laws even if you wanted to, as the Synagogue Rabbinicals themselves soon realized after 70 CE.  The second was a polemic used by Paul to scare people out of attempting to keep this doomed system of "righteousness".  His argument was that Moses pronounced a "curse" on everyone who did not "continue" in the "whole law" (meaning the Mosaic nationalistic legal system of government and Temple sacrifice). 

          Deu 1:18 And I commanded you at that time all the things which ye should do.

Deu 29:19 And it come to pass, when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart, to add drunkenness to thirst:

Deu 29:20 The LORD will not spare him, but then the anger of the LORD and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the LORD shall blot out his name from under heaven.

His argument was that righteousness had to come the same way it came to Abraham in the beginning (by faith in hearing and obeying what God speaks) which is in reality how Christ taught it had really always come.  Before there ever was a "nation of Israel" in existence and this discussion was being given by him to Rabbinical leaders before he had ever been crucified. Because soon the Levitical system would be no more.  This Paul contrasted with "righteouness by Law" to say that since you are not going to be even able to keep the "whole law", you will be under the "curse of Moses" if you keep trying to continue in any part of it (i.e., the Mosaic system).  This "Mosaic covenant" was going to come to an end.  But the "Torah" as a whole is quite another matter.  There is more than 1 covenant in the "Torah".  The "reform of Judaism" God was bringing, was coming whether people were going to accept it or not, and those who "reformed" willingly in obedience to God as a result of the prophetic witness (The Tehudah) of the Moshiach would be "righteous".

Eph 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

covenants...(plural) And the covenant of Abraham is not abrogated by the end of the covenant of Moses.  This distinction is never made by people who wish for one reason or another to have the New Testament sound more like it was written by Hadrain, rather than students of a Jewish Rabbi.  And that unfortunately, is often a goal that is pursued equally by "Christians" and "Jews" and "secularists".  While it may be gratifying emotionally, it is not historically accurate, nor accurate to the text of the New Testament.  It is noted by historians that as late as 49 CE even as far away as in Rome itself, the New Testament movement was still exclusively Jewish.  (See FF Bruce, Non-Christian origins outside the New Testament)

 

If Paul had been preaching what he is misrepresented to have said today, no Jew in Rome or anywhere else, would have ever even seriously listened to him, much less been persuaded enough to split synagogue congregations and cause riots, and the reaction then would be no different than the reaction now.  But it wasn't.  Because the words being put in his mouth from traditional "christian" textual distortions now, are not what he was saying as a Jew then. (as evidenced by the marked difference in both Jewish and Non-Jewish perceptions) The movement was an "exclusively Jewish" movement as late as 49 AD even in Rome.  Admittedly this not being the only cause.  But certianly, at least a contributing factor, which is generally observable.

HE REFERRED TO THE PHARISEES AS THE STANDARD OF RIGHTEOUS WHICH HAD TO BE MET AND EXCEEDED AMONG HIS DISCIPLES

Mat 5:20  For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

 

HE SAID CALLING HIM "LORD" WITHOUT KEEPING MITZVAH WAS INIQUITY

Mat 7:21  Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Mat 7:22  Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, Mat 7:23  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. [literally, "lawlessness", Torahlessness]

 

HE CALLED ABRAHAM HIS FATHER

(ABRAHAM WAS "THE FATHER" OF MONOTHEISTIC JUDAISM)

Mat 1:1  The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

Luk 1:72  … to remember his holy covenant;

Luk 1:73  The oath which he sware to our father Abraham,

Luk 16:24  And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me,

Luk 19:9  And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham.

Joh 8:39  They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

Rom 4:16  Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all THE SEED; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

Gal 3:7  Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.

 

HE DISCUSSED CONVERSIONS OF GENTILES TO JUDAISM THROUGH MIKVAH WITH RABBIS
 

Joh 3:1  There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

Joh 3:2  The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that  Joh 3:5  Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.


HE TAUGHT HIS DISCIPLES TO ADDRESS GOD IN THE CUSTOM OF JUDAISM AS "HA SHEM"


Mat 6:9  After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be Thy Name

 

HE TAUGHT PRAYER WAS TO BE DONE IN THE PRIVACY OF ONE'S HOME

(IN THE EARLY KARAITE TRADITION)

A: Mat 6:5  And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues [sunagōgē, i.e., assemblies] and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

Mat 6:6  But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet (Hebrew: A "Kuppah"), and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

 

PAUL TAUGHT PEOPLE WHO BELIEVED WERE "TRUE JEWS"

(NOT "TRUE CHRISTIANS" THOUGH ADMITTEDLY THEY WOULD BE REJECTED BY THE JEWISH MAINSTREAM, AS KARAITES ARE)


Rom 2:29  But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

ph 2:11  Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;

Eph 2:12  That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

Eph 2:13  But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh ("kin") by the blood of Christ.

 

THE APOSTLES TAUGHT THE NEW COVENANT WAS MADE WITH JEWISH ISRAEL AS PROMISED
 

Heb 8:10  For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws (Torah) into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

Heb 8:12  For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

Heb 8:13  In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.(The Levitical Priesthood of Moses & it's Temple which did in fact "vanish")

HIS RELGIOUS PRACTICES WERE JEWISH

HE TAUGHT ABOUT AND KEPT THE SABBATH IN REFORMED TRADITION

 (1) Sabbath Was Made For Man-

Mark 2:27 And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:

 (2) Sabbath Was A Day Of Learning The Scriptures-

Luke 4:31 And came down to Capernaum, a city of Galilee, and taught them on the sabbath days.

(3)Disciples Observed Torah Concerning Sabbath-

Luk 23:56 And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment .

HE TAUGHT HIS DISCIPLES TO OBSERVE THE SABBATH COMMANDMENT.

Mark 2:28 Therefore THE SON OF MAN IS LORD OF THE SABBATH.

Matthew 24:20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, NEITHER ON THE SABBATH DAY:

Luk 23:56  And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment.

HE ACCEPTED THE SALUTATION OF "RABBI" BUT DID NOT ENCOURAGE IT'S USAGE 

(FORBADE THE TITLE AMONG HIS DISCIPLES AND SUBSEQUENT FOLLOWERS AS EARLY KARAITES DID)

Joh 1:38 Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, RABBI, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou?

Joh 1:49 Nathanael answered and saith unto him, RABBI, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.

Joh 3:2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, RABBI, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

Joh 6:25 And when they had found him on the other side of the sea, they said unto him, RABBI, when camest thou hither?

Mat 23:8 But be not ye called RABBI: for ONE IS YOUR RABBI, EVEN CHRIST; and all ye are brethren.

HE GAVE INSTRUCTIONS FOR JEWISH CONVERSIONS WHICH FOLLOWED EARLY KARAITE TEACHING

Joh 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

Joh 3:2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him,  RABBI ...

Joh 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of WATER [MIKVAH]  AND  of THE SPIRIT [The Ruach], he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

Joh 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. [MIKVAH ALONE DOES NOT CONVERT]

Joh 3:9 Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be?

Joh 3:10 Jesus answered and said unto him, Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?

COMMANDED THE DOMESTIC PASSOVER BE KEPT AS HIS BLOOD COVENANT AS EARLY KARAITES DID:

Luk 22:15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this PASSOVER with you before I suffer:

Luk 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, THIS IS MY BODY which is given for you: this  THIS DO IN REMEMBERENCE OF ME . [SEDER]

Luk 22:20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying,  THIS CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT  IN MY BLOOD, which is shed for you.

Although today, Rabbinical Jews keep a domestic passover, this practice was not instituted until after the destruction of the Temple and Israel in 70 CE.  Meaning that the PASSOVER is originally a NEW TESTAMENT practice that even predates RABBINICAL JUDAISM!  It is both absurd and ironic that Rabbincal Jews would resent "Christians" keeping the Passover Seder.  It is not the Jewish Rabbi who should be offended by "Christians" keeping the Passover, but the "Christains" who should be offended by the Jewish Rabbi who claims it as his own exclusive piece of real estate property, when their practice was adopted AFTER the New Testament, not BEFORE.  The only Jews keeping a domestic passover in 1st Century Israel were the Karaites who allegedly do not exist yet according to the same Rabbinical sources that now complain about "Christians" keeping "their" passover.  Passover was literally taken from the Christians and given to the Jews by the Roman empire and it's Theodosius Codex.

It is commonly attempted by some to claim that this is/was not 'really' the PASSOVER.  Here are some things to consider when you hear this claim:

FURTHER PROOFS THIS WAS THE PASSOVER SEDER -

Rabbis did not "institute passover seder" as Roman Catholic and Rabbinic Apologists attempt to claim because...

(1) PASSOVER SEDER was INSTITUTED BY MOSHE 1440 BCE

Exo 12:14 And this day [PASSOVER SEDER] shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance  FOREVER .

(2) RABBINICALS discontinued THE BIBLICAL PRACTICE in Israel, to elevate THE SYNAGOGUE (or whenever possible, pilgrimages to the Jewish Temple)

Eze 33:32 And, lo, thou art unto them as a very lovely song of one that hath a pleasant voice, and can play well on an instrument: for they hear thy words, but they do them not.

Eze 2:6 And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though defiers and despisers be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions; be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, for they are a rebellious house.

(3) KARAITES CONTINUED THE BIBLICAL PRACTICE IN ISRAEL

Mat 26:18 And he said, Go into the city TO SUCH A MAN, and SAY UNTO HIM, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep THE PASSOVER AT THY HOUSE with my disciples.

Mar 14:13 And he sendeth forth two of his disciples, and saith unto them, Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water: FOLLOW HIM. 
Mar 14:14 And wheresoever he shall go in, say ye to the goodman of the house, The Master saith, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall EAT THE PASSOVER with my disciples? 
Mar 14:15 And HE WILL SHOW YOU a large upper room FURNISHED AND PREPARED: there make ready for us.

(4) JEWS WHO "BELIEVED" WERE IDENTIFIED BY "ROME" [AS HERETICS] CONTINUED TO KEEP THE PASSOVER - OVER WHICH THEY WERE CONDEMNED

QUOTE: The sucessors of Jesus the Nazarene and Paul of the party of the Nazarenes were the "Heretical" Nazarenes DENOUNCED BY EPIPHANIUS - THE EARLY CHRISTIAN WORLD, Philip Esler, p. 159

(5) PASSOVER ITSELF WAS KNOWN TO BE SO WELL OBSERVED, ROME WAS FORCED TO MAKE IT ILLEGAL AMONG XTNS.

325 AD COUNCIL OF NICEA- 
ROME: It is unbecoming beyond measure that on this holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews. Henceforth let us have nothing in common with this ODIOUS PEOPLE...

Further discussion about the two dates of Passover observance recorded in the New Testament often used by Apologists of the Eucharist are discussed below.  As you will see, their own argument in defense of the Eucharist, will actually substantiate that it was a Jewish Passover and Christ was a practicing Karaite (at a time, it is falsely claimed, they did not exist)

DISCIPLES COMMANDED KASHRUT MEAT PREPARATION TO BE KEPT

Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and FROM THINGS STRANGLED, AND FROM BLOOD.

Act 15:29 That ye ABSTAIN FROM MEATS offered to idols, and FROM BLOOD, and from THINGS STRANGLED, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well. (Kashrut Kosher)

Act 21:25 As touching the Gentiles WHICH BELIEVE, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and FROM BLOOD, and FROM STRANGLED, and from fornication.

            [PLEASE NOTE- Given the SAME IMPORTANCE AS FORNICATION]

THEY CALLED THEIR "MOVEMENT" A REFORMATION OF JUDAISM

[NOT A NEW RELIGION]

Heb 9:10 Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until  THE TIME OF REFORMATION .

The REFORMED JUDAISM of the NEW TESTAMENT predates REFORMED JUDAISM.  So who is really the REFORMED JEWS?  The Rabbinicals who much later REFORMED? Or the New Testament who REFORMED before the Temple was even destroyed based on the Prophetic Witness (The Tehudah) that it was coming, and God wanted the practice of Judaism to REFORM (under the direction of the Prophetic witness to Israel) to adapt to it's coming inevitable change?

Many of the very REFORMS found in the New Testament, REFORMED JEWS have over the years come to accept as well, unkown to most "Christians".  REFORMED JEWS collectively in general, by adopting a progressive understanding of the scriptures, have arrived at many of the same logical conclusions, Jews in the New Testament did through a prophetic witness, excepting the primacy of the synagogue.

One of the greatest criticisms of the New Testament is it's dimissal of "Circumcision".  But if you look at the texts closely it is not ALL CIRCUMCISION that is being discussed, it is ADULT MALE circumcision for converts, that is being debated.  Ironically today, Reformed Judaism has reached the same conclusion as the New Testament concerning Adult Male circumcision.  And the fact is that while "Christians" indulge themselves in Unkosher food, they almost always have their children "circumcised".  This of course is quite humorous.  Because the "christians" claim it should not be done, and the Rabbis claim "Christians" dismiss it.  Yet if you ask a room full of "Christian" males how many are "circumcised" nearly ever hand goes up in the room!?!

In 1st Century civilization, Adult Male circumcision could be dangerous without the benefits of modern medicine, and often led to medical complications.  This fact is even noted in the Torah where it was actually used to set up a group of gentiles to be defeated in a battle.  However, two things have to be noted.  (1) There is a debate about circumcision for Adult males (what religion has this debate?) Christianity or Judaism? It is Judaism because "Christianity" does not allegedly care.  And it is most certiainly a controversial issue in Judaism just as you find it to be in the New Testament. (2) Infant circumcision is never discussed.  Why not? Because it wasn't controversial. Jews in the New Testament continued to do it.

"CONVERSION" WAS MAKING "MEMBERS" OF THE JEWISH "COMMONWEALTH"

Eph 2:12 That at that time ye were WITHOUT CHRIST, being ALIENS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF ISRAEL, and STRANGERS FROM THE COVENANTS of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

CALLED THEMSELVES MEMBERS OF "THE TWELVE TRIBES"

(Rabbinical Jews Rejected 12 Tribe Existence Asserting the Tribe of Judah Only)

Jam 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.

Rev 7:4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: ...of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

2Co 1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.

  THE 12 TRIBES

(THE BASIS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC THEOCRACY IN ISRAEL)

This is a VERY IMPORTANT POINT.  Rabbinical Judaism came primarily out of the Tribe of Judah.  So naturally it is claimed by Rabbis that only Judah exists, or has existed even, since the beginning of their own movement in Israel.  In what sense are we to believe that all the other tribes were "absorbed" into Judah when the New Testament clearly identifies distinguishable "Tribes" in 1st century Israel.

Luk 2:36 And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity;

Rom 11:1 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Php 3:5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;

It is popular for Rabbis to summarily dismiss these references with disdain and a smile that no such tribes existed, as though the writers of the New Testament documents were nothing more than bumbling Gentiles attempting to perpetrate a fraud.  However, that dismissal is not so easy to make.  Just because Rabbis did not "recognize" the existence of the tribal associations in Israel, doesn't mean there were not some people in Israel still clinging to them. 

The creation of the Apocryphal work, the TESTAMENT OF THE 12 PATRIARCHS , though appropriated by "Christian" Interpolators (i.e., the Vatican) later, was originally a Jewish inter-testamental work written in Aramaic and Hebrew.  It's review of each patriarch and the moral lessons derived from each, as though written themselves as their last and parting admonitions to the sons of Israel, demonstrates the consciousness of the 12 Patriarchs in the imagination of the Jewish people in 1st Century Israel, was still alive and well, and even being promoted in it's popular literature.       

And furthermore we know that all the way into the middle ages there were Jews in Spain that claimed to have been from the Tribe of Benjamin, so it would hardly be logical to attempt to argue they "no longer existed" when in fact we know from history there were still people who identified themselves as Jews and still identified themselves with a particular patriarchal tribe. 

But the situation gets much worse than this.  To further contradict their own claims, they then go one step farther and actually "appeal" to the genetics of the "Tribe of Levi" to study Jewish DNA.  Well certainly if the "Tribes" are no more, then obviously no such study would even be possible.  Yet it is.  So obviously the claim is invalid.  You cannot have your DNA and claim it does not exist ...at the same time. And why would you arbitrarily acknowledge the existence of the tribe of Levi by studying Jews with the last name "Cohen" or "Levi", and intentionally ignore and suppress Jews with the last names of "Simon", "Benjamin", "Asher", "Joseph", etc., all of which do in fact exist (as is fully known).

Secondly, among Biblically observant Jews (as you would find among a Karaite Tradition) because certain spiritual forms of government are based upon the existence of 12 tribes (the non-rabbinical one) , it would be logical that among these people, the demand for recognition of the continued existence of the 12 tribes (if only symbolic, spiritual or by ancestral memories or traditions) would be perfectly logical to find, exactly as we do in the New Testament.

The reference to the 12 tribes in the New Testament once again illustrate it was (A) A Jewish tradition not a "Church" tradition that was being discussed and (B) It was a tradition in a Jewish karaite philosphy that remained committed to seeing the Biblical pattern for Israel be fulfilled, and dismissed by anyone's "Extemporaneous Tradition making".

The Rabbinical Tradition had already declared the end of the "legitamite Prophets" althogether to be conveninetly replaced by it's graduates from the Rabbinical academy.  What we find in the New Testament is a reference to not only Prophets, (not accepted by the synagogue) but even the 12 tribles (whose very existence were and still are, completely dismissed by Rabbinnicals).

Just because the synagogue Rabbis no longer acknowledged any of this in their "theology" didn't mean it therefore did not exist.  As recently as 1998 a film documentary was underway to examine the claim by Bukharan Jews that they were descendants from various segments of the northren 10 tribes. The Rabbinical claim that these tribes no longer existed in the time of the New Testament is a fact clearly contradicted by the record of history, their own efforts at DNA research and personal claims by Jews throughout the world even today. (The explanations offered for these contradictions do not suffice.  More about this will be discussed below on the section dealing with the origin of the Synagogue movement in Israel)

The fact is, based on the same method of plain reading of the Torah, that made the practice of Passover a logical necessity for a Torah compliant Jew in 1st Century Israel, despite all the authoritarianism, compromise and assimilation of Babylonianism among the authors and promoters of the Talmud, the existence of the 12 Tribes themselves are Biblical NECESSITIES, for the observance of a "Constitutional Government" which Biblically required elections from each tribe to constitute the SANHEDRIN.  Replacement methods would obviously have to be utilized until a governmental "resortation" of the structure of the 12 Tribes, or even the existence of the 12 Tribes themselves, had been recreated.(Which as is well known, "Elijah" as the forerunner of the Messiah, was expected to do)

 

YEHOSHUA "COMES TO THE TEMPLE" AT HANNUKAH

Joh 10:22,23 And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication [HANNUKAH], and it was winter. And Jesus walked into the temple in Solomon's porch.

HANNUKAH WAS THE TIME FOR MARRIAGES AND IS REFERENCED IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION 

Marriages were held during Hannukah because this festival was a CIVIL/STATE MEMORIAL DAY (Like the modern Holocaust Memorial Day), not a TORAH SACRED HOLY DAY.  And while work and business was casually suspended, no Sabbatical requirements were manditory, meaning Jews had the time off from work, but could plan events like getting married and holding wedding parties.

Rev 2:1  Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks;

Rev 2:5  Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, (It is Jewish custom that once the Menorah is lit, it is not to be moved from it's place)

Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants

ἀποκαλύπτω,  apokaluptō,  ap-ok-al-oop'-to, From G575 and G2572; to take off the cover, that is, disclose: - reveal. [Word used to describe when a bride removed her veil after getting married]

Rev 19:9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb.

NOTE: While it is true Hanukkah is not part of the relgious holy day schedule of modern karaite Jews, Hanukkah in Israel was a state memorial day.  It's observance was civil and karaite Jews would have simply observed this day as any State memorial day in any country.

 

HIS CLOSEST THEOLOGICAL AFFILIATION WAS WITH THE PHARISEES, NOT HELLENISTS, NOT ROMANS, NOT GENTILES


JESUS FIRST COMES TO JOHN TO BE BAPTIZED

[among the Pharisees & Sadducees some of whom "convert" TO him]

 

Mat 3:7,13 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John,

 

HE HOLDS THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE PHARISEE AS THE  STANDARD

 

Matthew 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

 

DISCIPLES OF JOHN AND JESUS ARE SEEN IN COMPARATIVE TERMS TO DISCIPLES OF PHARISEES

 

Mat 9:14 Then came to him the disciples of John, saying, Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft, but thy disciples fast not?

 

THE MAJORITY OF HIS TEACHING DONE TO PHARISEES

[NOT SADDUCEES, ZEALOTS, HERODIANS]

 

Luk 7:36 And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat.

 

Luk 11:37 And as he spake, a certain Pharisee besought him to dine with him: and he went in, and sat down to meat.

 

Luk 14:1 And it came to pass, as he went into the house of one of the chief Pharisees to eat bread on the Sabbath day, [In cultural context this was a great honor - The "majority" of teaching & miracles done outside the original disciples were done among the Pharisees {that is why they are mentioned so often}]

 

HE "SILENCED" THE SADDUCEES IN DEBATE AND PHARISEES FLOCKED TO HEAR HIM

 

Matthew 22:34 But when the Pharisees had heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence, they were gathered together.

Matthew 22:41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,

 

HE IDENTIFIED THE PHARISEES AS THE LEGITAMITE "SEAT OF MOSES"

[NOT THE SADDUCEES]

 

Matthew 23:2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:  

This was established as the legal government of Israel (in the Torah) equivalent to the U.S. Senate or House Of Representities (the legally constitutionally appointed [via Torah] legislative bodies of Israel) to which he required his own disciples to submit to.  The same advice was given by Paul in reference to the civil government of Rome.  The only exception being conscientious objection when obedience to God and to the state could not be fulfilled simultaneously.

Act 5:29 Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

 

HE IDENTIFIED THE PHARISEES AS "RIGHTEOUS" AND "WHOLE", NOT "SICK"

 

Luk 5:30 But their scribes and Pharisees murmured against his disciples, saying, Why do ye eat and drink with publicans and sinners?

Luk 5:31 And Jesus answering said unto them, They that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick.

Luk 5:32 I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

 

HE USED THE HERMENEUTICAL PRINCIPLES TAUGHT BY PHARISEES

[not Sadducees]

 

Joh 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?

Joh 10:35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; [NOTE: "Cannot be broken" means you cannot take one text at the expense of another- a karaite principle of reading scripture]

 

HE TAUGHT THE VIEW OF SCRIPTURE SHARED BY PHARISEES

[Not Sadducees]

 

Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. [Every letter had meaning]

 

PHARISEES INFORMED HIM OF CONSPIRACIES AGAINST HIM AND HE SENT MESSAGES THROUGH THEM TO THE LEADERSHIP

 

Luk 13:31 The same day there came certain of the Pharisees, saying unto him, Get thee out, and depart hence: for Herod will kill thee.

Luk 13:32 And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox,

 

PHARISEES RECOGNIZED YAHOSHUA WAS FROM GOD

[not Sadducees, Zealots, Herodians]

 

Joh 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

Joh 3:2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, WE KNOW that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be

with him.

 

THE PHARISEES DEFENDED HIS CLAIMS BEFORE THE SANHEDRIN

 

Joh 7:46 The officers answered, Never man spake like this man.

Joh 7:47 Then answered them, Are ye also deceived?

Joh 7:50 Nicodemus saith unto them, (he that came to Jesus by night, being one of them,)

Joh 7:51 Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?

Joh 7:52 They answered and said unto him, Art thou also of Galilee?

 

THE PHARISEES RECOGNIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF HIS MOVEMENT

 

Joh 12:18 For this cause the people also met him, for that they heard that he had done this miracle.

Joh 12:19 The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing? behold, the world is gone after him.

 

THE PHARISEES DEFENDED PAUL AGAINST THE SADDUCEES

 

Acts 23:9 And there arose a great cry: and the scribes that were of the Pharisees' part arose, and strove, saying, WE FIND NO EVIL IN THIS MAN: but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, LET US NOT FIGHT AGAINST GOD.

 

THE PHARISEES WERE AMONG THE EARLIEST BELIEVERS IN JERUSALEM

 

Act 15:4 And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.

Act 15:5 But there rose up certain OF THE SECT OF THE PHARISEES WHICH BELIEVED, saying,

That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.

Act 15:6 And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.

 

THE PHARISEES WERE THE GREATEST CONTRIBUTORS TO HIS CONVERSIONS

 

Act 26:5 Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I LIVED A PHARISEE.

 

Phi 3:5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, A PHARISEE;

 

THE GREAT GAMELIEL, A FOUNDING FATHER OF RABBINICAL PHARISAISM WARNS ISRAEL AGAINST PERSECUTING

 

Act 5:34 Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles forth a little space;

Act 5:35 And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, TAKE HEED TO YOURSELVES WHAT YOU INTEND TO DO AS TOUCHING THESE MEN.

 

THERE WAS IN FACT NO OTHER GROUP IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, AS CLOSELY AFFILIATED WITH THE REAL CHRIST! 


A "CONVERTED" PHARISEE RABBI WROTE THE MAJORITY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT.

"CONVERTED" TO WHAT?

Joh 12:42 Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue:

Act 6:9 Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen.

Act 18:7,8 And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man's house, named Justus, one that worshipped God, whose house joined hard to the synagogue. And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and many of the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized. (They went through "Mikvah" outside of the synagogue)

THE WITNESS OF JOHN THE BAPTIST

Mat 3:1  In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, 
Mat 3:2  And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. 
Mat 3:5  Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan, 
Mat 3:6  And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.

(1) Primary under-pinning of Jewish Identity, Conversion and Nationalistic Association, not Genetic Descendancy.
(2) Primary definer of Conversion = Jewish synagogue and Talmudic Rabbinicalism.
(3) Primary source of Synagouge's Talmudic Rabbinicalism = Babylon.
(4) Primary source of Talmudic clergy in Babylon = The Bimah Houses [High Places] denounced by Elijah as apostate. [Instructed OPENLY in the Tosefta (Meg. 4:23(Sh. Ar., OH 150:2))

John the Baptist thus claimed that the Rabbinical Synagogue system was NOT VALID!!  And it's membership was not being given "Judaism".  It's "converts" were no more Jews, than Gentiles.  John the Baptist was applying the "conversion Mikvah" to JEWS.  This is an embarrasing fact, that is never admitted by either Christians or Jews.  And the narraitve of John The Baptist's movement makes no sense to anyone without this vital historical information placing this Mikvah movement in the context of this Jewish conflict.  Furthermore, once again, you will find John The Baptist's message to be one of Jewish Karaism. Return to the scriptures.  The Scriptures (and thereby the Prophets) are the basis of what God is doing in Israel, not the sacerdotalism of arbitrary "religious authorities and academics" of men.  This message is further evidenced by the answer given by Christ to the Rabbis when they "questioned his authority":

Mat 21:23  And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority? 
Mat 21:24  And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things. 
Mat 21:25  The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him? 
Mat 21:26  But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet. 
Mat 21:27  And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.

John The Baptist openly hummiliated the synagogue leadership in his public sermons, refusing to recognize them as legitimate spiritual leadership of Israel.

Mat 3:7  But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 
Mat 3:8  Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:

Generation Of Vipers - This is a very specifically defined charge in the Bible, and as you will find out below, it is a direct charge of Babelism.  The word "Generation" in the Greek text is the origin of our English word "Genus" and refers to a TYPE, CATAGOREY or SPECIES, not a period of time.  John The Baptist was calling the religious leadership of Israel (of the TYPE) of Genesis 3 - THE SERPENT.  The Serpent is an open reference to Babelism from Genesis 3,6, and 11. 

What "fruits of Repentence" did he refer too?

Mat 3:9  And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of THESE stones to raise up children unto Abraham.

Do not claim you are the Rabbinical "fathers" and you make children of Abraham because of you have the stones of the synagogue, they are no different than (these) stones ...right here. (any stones)  Being connected to the stones of the synagogue make you no more a Jew (or a son of Abraham) than do these stones on a desert floor! God is the one who makes people Jews (children of Abraham), not you and your synagogue stones.

CHRIST'S OWN PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THE RABBINICAL ACADEMY

Mat 23:5-12  `And all their works they do to be seen by men, and they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the fringes of their garments, they love also the chief couches in THE SUPPER, and the chief seats IN THE SYNAGOGUES, and the salutations in the market-places, and to be called by men, Rabbi, Rabbi. And ye--ye may not be called Rabbi, (Karaite Spiritual Leaders Do Not Call Themselves "Rabbis") for one is your guide--the Christ, and all ye are brethren; and ye may not call any your father on the earth, for one is your Father, who is in the heavens, nor may ye be called directors (guide, Master), for one is your director (guide, Master)--the Christ. And the greater of you shall be your servant, and whoever shall exalt himself shall be humbled, and whoever shall humble himself shall be exalted. (Young's Literal Translation)

Mat 23:10  A.T.ROBERTSON
Masters (kathēgētai). This word occurs here only in the N.T. It is found in the papyri for teacher (Latin, doctor). It is the modern Greek word for professor. “While didaskalos represents Rab, kathēgētes stands for the more honourable Rabban,  ̇bōn” (McNeile). Dalman (Words of Jesus, p. 340) suggests that the same Aramaic word may be translated by either didaskalos or kathēgētes.

Karaites rejected the Rabbinical Academy, so naturally Christ, the Karaite, did the same. 

Not only did Christ not "enroll" in the Academy,

Joh 7:15  And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?

None of his disciples were from the Academy either:

Act 4:13  Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus.

And the only one from the Rabbinical Academy, Rabbi Sha'ul, a/k/a Paul renounced his title as Rabbi:

Php 3:7  But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.

Php 3:8  Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,

 And this was an explicit reference to his form of KNOWLEDGE, and his TITLE.

 

THE INSULT OF CHRIST AS A KARAITE

Joh 8:41  Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication (We are not MAMZERIM); we have one Father, even God.

Note: This text is traditionally taken as a reference to Christ's non-earthly father controversy.  However, there is something in the text that clearly changes it's intended reference.  That is the end of the phrase "...we have one Father, even God."  If the Rabbis had been referencing his physical illegitamacy only, this last part of the phrase would not have been a reference to RELIGION.  And as you can plainly see, it is.  It may have been a duel reference perhaps, but RELIGION is clearly specified after the use of the phrase "We are not MAMZERIM!"

THE RABBINICAL LABEL OF "BASTARD" FOR KARAITES

Rabbinical Judaism does not RECOGNIZE the Judaism of the Karaites.  Rabbinical Jews refer to Karaite Jews as "BASTARDS"

Rabbinic scholars have traditionally held that, because the Karaites do not observe the rabbinic law on divorce, there is a strong presumption that they are mamzerim (adulterine bastards), so that marriage with them is forbidden even if they return to Rabbinic Judaism. Some recent scholars have held that Karaites should be regarded as Gentiles in all respects, though this is not universally accepted. They hasten to add that this opinion is not intended to insult the Karaites, but only to give individual Karaites the option of integrating into mainstream Judaism by way of conversion.- WIKIPEDIA,4-23-09

Zec 9:6 And a bastard shall dwell in Ashdod, and I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.

(The State Of Israel has appointed ASHDOD as the primary city of residency for Karaite Jews who wish to return to Israel where Karaites now number about 2000 families)

PLEASE NOTE SOMETHING ELSE...

This is why the term MAMZERIM is given to KARAITES by Rabbinicals:

Deu 23:2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

COMPARE:

Joh 12:42 Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue:

 

 

YESHUA FOLLOWED THE KARAITE CALENDAR FOR JUDAISM

This next point may be rather complicated to follow, but please try, because this is a very important proof that Christ was in fact following Karaite teaching as evidenced by his observance of the calendar.  There is the observation in the text that Christ observed the Passover, before the Passover?

Luk 22:11-15  And ye shall say unto the goodman of the house, The Master saith unto thee, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the passover with my disciples? And he shall shew you a large upper room furnished: there make ready. And they went, and found as he had said unto them: and they made ready the passover. And when the hour was come, (The hour of Passover) he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him. And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:

This is clear and unambigious.  The text called it THE PASSOVER.  He also referenced WHEN THE VERY HOUR WAS COME. (the custom of Passover beginning at Sundown )   Remember is it literally referencing the very hour of commencement of PASSOVER!  Who practices their "communion" at Sundown?  Where are "Eucharists" held 1 day a year at "sundown"?  The gymnastics employed to get something out of this text, which is clearly not in it, is inexcusable.

AND this is also said in John:

Joh 19:31  The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.

This is 2 days later.  These two different dates for PASSOVER have been the source of every claim on earth, except the most obvious and historically unavoidable one in existence.  Skeptics have pointed to it to claim the gospels are "contradictory" and Eucharist apologists have pointed to it to prove it was NOT the Passover, but the "Eucharist" (a term it is clearly not called in the text). 

Yet, the obvious explanation that actually accounts for all of it, is precisely the one they refuse to ever admit, and choose to never speak. Catholics and Orthodox argue this could not possibly have been THE PASSSOVER even though that is what it says in the text because there are two different dates being observed!  They point this out themselves.  No one brings it to their attention.  (Now remember this is supposed to be their "proof" justifying the "Eucharist")

They have worked very hard to show this calendar discrepancy between what Christ was doing and what was done by Jews on Passover to drive that historical wedge between the two making them separate, pointing to the two different dates of observance.  Of course, the Eucharist "apologists" who came up with this argument (which they insist is conclusive and irrefutable), are arguing with Synagogue Messianics who use the same calendar as the Synagogue Rabbinicals.  This evidence demonstrates with the very same certainty, which they have conjured up to prove these two events  are separate events, that Jesus was following not the Rabbinical calendar, but a Karaite one.  THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DATES OF OBSERVANCE!!!!

The subject of the Hebrew calendar is a very complicated one historically, and there is a tremendous amount of disagreement among scholars on the subject, so it would be easy to make unverifiable claims based on hypothetical constructions of history, or find someone to cite to buttress whatever argument you wish to "win".  But, if we stick to the clearly observable facts found in the documentation of the New Testament itself (which is intentionally not done), we can deduce some faccts with relative certianty.

(1) He had his disciples go to the house of a "certain man" who had already begun initial preparations for the domestic passover. [At a time in history when Rabbinicals confess they did not keep a Biblical domestic passover]. And this was done on Nissan 13th.

(2) He called it the Passover and even referenced the VERY HOUR of it's commencement. Nissan 13th.

Luk 22:13  And they went, and found as he had said unto them: and they made ready the passover
Luk 22:14  And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him. .

(3) The Rabbinical day of "preparation" when the Passover lamb was slaughtered. Nissan 14th.

(3) He was taken down from the cross by Rabbinicals prior to Nissan 15th (which they identified as their "Passover")

(4) We observe a 2 day difference between the "Passover" of Christ's dsiciples and the "Passover" of the Synagogue Rabbis.

So it is an irrefutable observable fact there are two different dates being observed.  Now this leads to one conclusion and it is not the one that Eucharist apologists claim.  Because the text makes it clear, everyone from the disciples of Christ, to "a certain man" in whose home they held their passover, to Christ himself, called this unmistakably THE PASSOVER, not a "Eucharist".

The undeniable fact is that because Karaites reference their religious practices to the scriptures, and reject Rabbinical Talmudism authority, they consequently are forced to use a different calendar system  than Rabbinical Jews.  The calendar system in the scriptures, is not the same as the calendar system used by Rabbinicals.  This has been a major unmistakable feature of Karaism throughout history and any Karaite even today sees it as a major point of difference in their Halakah.

The variation in todays dates between the Karaite observance of the Biblical calendar, and the Rabbinical calendar based on the Talmud, vary be a couple of days either way.  This further emphesizes the charge John The Baptist was bringing against the leadership of the synagouge.  It was  apostate. Not true Judaism.  Christ came to John The Baptist and participated in his Mikvah. It was a KARAITE MIKVAH to return to Biblical Judaism. (Which he did) as evidenced by his use of the Biblical calendar concerning PASSOVER and his observance of it as a DOMESTIC ORDINANCE established "forever" by Moshe in the Torah.

The two day difference in Christ's DOMESTIC PASSOVER, and the Rabbinical Synagogue observance, is a dated and documented proof of this undeniable historical truth.  For example, in 2009 Rabbinical Passover was observed on Sunset of April 8th.  The Karaite calendar Passover was observed on Sunset April 10th.  That's literally a two day difference just as it is observed in the text of the New Testament 2 millenia earlier. 


While most claim the calculated calender was not instituted until 70 CE, it is also admitted that there are early hints of Calendar changes in the Talmud (which agrees with the observation in the New Testament that two different calendars were in fact in use) and the fact is that there is no absolute certainty when certain Talmudic modifications were introduced and later simply codified. 

But this fact is beyond debate.  It is undeniably observed that the PASSOVER of Christ and his disciples, as well as other unidentified Jews in 1st century Israel, were already observing PASSOVER on a DIFFERENT DATE than Rabbinical Judaism, and it is an undeniable fact that there were Jews in 1st century Israel observing a KARAITE CALENDAR ...AND...A KARAITE PASSOVER.  The claim therefore that Karaism "did not start until Anan Ben David" is patently false and disproven by the very text (from history) of the New Testament itself!

The existence for the two dates of PASSOVER is explained by the use of the two different calendars, the Rabbinical one and the Karaite one, and it is fully consistent with the observation that Christ's orientation was that of Karaite Halakah from Egypt.  In fact, that difference is EXACTLY AND PRECISELY WHAT YOU WOULD IN FACT SEE IF CHRIST HAD BEEN A KARAITE JEW OBSERVING PASSOVER WITH HIS DISCIPLES!!!

And to modern Karaites, who fully understand the implications of the two calendar system, this serves as no greater proof, there faith was here.  It is virtually a confession of Karaite faith.  Roman apologists who contort these historical facts to cover the alien origins their "Eucharist", and the REPLACEMENT of precisely what Christ had commanded, a KARAITE PASSOVER, and Rabbinicals who have persecuted Karaites for millenia, is fully known by both, and never acknowledged.  How can this exercise of intellectual dishonesty be excused? (especially when it is directly connected to a group of people you have knowingly and admittedly been involved with, "exterminating"?)

 

LANAGUAGE PATTERNS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT ESTEEM JEWISH ETHNICITY, CULTURE AND RELGIOUS PRACTICE OVER GENTILES


The word GENTILES is mentined 99 times in 91 Verses in the whole New Testament:

 

HOW MANY ARE POSITIVE? 16%

---------------------

 

Mat 12:21 - Gentiles will trust in him

Act 10:45 - Holy Spirit given to a Gentile

Act 11:1 - Gentiles recieve word of God

Act 13:48  - Some Gentiles believed

Act 28:28 - Gentiles may now be saved

Rom 2:14 - Gentiles keep law of conscience

Rom 3:9  - Gentiles really just like everybody else

Rom 9:30  - Gentiles attain righteousness by faith

Rom 15:10  - Gentiles rejoice with Jews

Rom 15:11 - Gentiles worship Jewish God

1Co 12:13 - All have 1 spirit in Christ

Gal 3:14 - Blessing of Abraham to Gentiles

Eph 3:1 - Paul sacrificed for Gentiles

Eph 3:6 - Gentiles fellow partakers

Col 1:27 - God made known among Gentiles

1Th 2:16 - Some Jews do not want Gentiles

 

HOW MANY ARE NEUTRAL? 35%

---------------------

Mat 4:15 - A prophecy

Joh 7:35 - Jews wonder if

Act 9:15 - Paul chosen to go

Act 13:42 - Gentiles wanted to hear

Act 13:47 - Paul a light to Gentiles

Act 14:27 - Tells Jewish Church

Act 15:3  - Jews happy Gentiles converting

Act 15:7 - Paul sent to Gentiles

Act 15:12  - Paul asked to report

Act 15:14 - Converting them prophesied

Act 15:17 - Converting them prophesied

Act 15:19 - Leave them be

Act 15:23 - Clarifies circumcision

Act 18:6  - Silas gives up on Jews, goes to Gents

Act 21:19 - Paul reports to Jews on progressive

Act 21:25 - Gentile conversion requirements

Act 22:21  - PAul sent to Gentiles

Act 26:23  - Christ will show light to Gentiles

Rom 1:13 - Rome like other Gentiles

Rom 3:29 - YHVH is over gentiles too

Rom 9:24  - Some Gentiles called

Rom 11:11 - Gentiles are used to provoke jealousy

Rom 11:13 - Paul speaks to Gentiles

Rom 15:9  - Gentile conversion prophesied

Rom 16:4  - Paul's personal sacrifice

1Co 10:32 - Don't offend people

Gal 2:2 - Paul called to Gentiles

Gal 2:8  - Paul called to Gentiles

Gal 2:12 - Peter was unsure about Gentiles

Gal 2:14 - Paul corrected Peter

Eph 3:8  - Paul is least, preaches to Gentiles

1Ti 2:7  - Paul teaches Gentiles

1Ti 3:16 - Believed on among Gentiles

2Ti 1:11  - Paul teaches Gentiles

2Ti 4:17 - Gentiles might hear through Paul

 

HOW MANY ARE NEGATIVE? 48%

---------------------

Mat 6:32 - Just seek materialism

Mat 10:5 - Don't even go to them

Mat 10:18 - God will give words against

Mat 12:18 - Christ will show them judgement

Mat 20:19 - Gentiles Mocked,Scourged & Crucified Christ

Mat 20:25 - Gentiles are brut authoritarians

Mar 10:33 - Christ handed over to Gentiles

Mar 10:42 - Gentiles Brut Authoritarians

Luk 2:32  - Gentiles are darkened w/o Israel's glory

Luk 18:32 - Gentiles will mock, spite, and spit on Christ

Luk 21:24 - Gentiles destroy God's city

Luk 22:25 - Gentiles are Brut Authoritarians

Act 4:27 - Gentiles crucified Christ

Act 7:45 - Joshua fought Gentiles

Act 11:18 - Surprised God would give to them

Act 13:46  - Judge yourselves unworthy

Act 14:2 - Gentiles side with unbelieving Jews

Act 14:5 - Rulers incited to stone Paul

Act 21:21 - Paul accused of undermining message

Act 26:17  - Paul is delivered from the Gentiles

Act 26:20  - Gentiles should repent

Rom 2:24 - Gentiles blaspheme name of God

Rom 11:12 - Don't get too proud Gentile

Rom 11:25 - Don't be concieted Gentile, you are temporary

Rom 15:12 - Christ's rule over Gentiles prophesied

Rom 15:16 - Gentiles are like an "offering"

Rom 15:18  - Gentiles are being made to be obedient

Rom 15:27 - Gentiles should send money

1Co 5:1   - Gentiles referenced for perversion

1Co 10:20 - Gentiles sacrifice to devils

1Co 12:2 - Gentiles worship dumb idols

Gal 2:15  - Gentiles by nature are sinners

Eph 2:11  - Gentiles are spiritually dead and walk in flesh

Eph 4:17 - Gentiles walk in vanity of their mind

1Th 4:5 - Gentiles walk in Lust

1Pe 2:12 - Gentiles speak against as evildoers

1Pe 4:3 - Gentiles walk in lust

3Jo 1:7 - Take nothing from the Gentiles

Rev 11:2 - Secrets of Temple Not Given To Them

 

EIGHTY THREE PERCENT OF THE TIME 83% 

"GENTILES" 

ARE REFERRED TO IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

AS AN EITHER NEUTRAL OR NEGATIVE TERM! 83%!


HIS REFERENCE TO "ECCLESIA" 

WAS BASED ON A KNOWN REFERENCE IN JUDAISM 

TO A SCHOOL OF BIBLICAL JUDAISM KNOWN AS KARAISM, 

AS WERE ALL THE KEY COMPONENTS OF HIS RELIGIOUS PRACTICE IN THIS TRADITION

 

THE "TRUTH"ABOUT THE REAL "CHRIST"

 

(10) Peter went to Babylonia [center of Talmudic studies] But also home of the 2nd largest karaite community in the world. (He never went to Rome as claimed)

1Pe 5:13 The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son.

Notice the word "Church" is Italicized.  That is because the "translators" stuck it in there even though it is not actually in the TEXT.  Peter greets them from the city of Babylon.  That is where the Jewish (Talmud) Academy was located and the 1st or 2nd largest karaite community in the world existed.  In the 1950s the bones of Shimon Kefa (a/k/a "Saint" Peter) were discovered in a tomb in Jerusalem. (Despite the Vatican having claimed they were in Saint Peter's bascillica for millenia)  The bones in Rome were excavated and tested which revealed them to be a hodge-podge of barn-yard bones and a few mixed human bones which included pigs and chickens, some even belonging to women.  Possibly the grand work of the necromancy cult of Ambrose identifying martyrs in Roman cemetaries by nothing more than the ecstatic seizures of one of his disciples upon approaching the grave? AMBROSE THE NECROMANCER

(11) "Tehudic" [meaning Testament] Karaite Judaism was labeled "Judiazing" by the Roman councils and made a state crime. It was successfully exterminated by Rome as a public belief but continued  in the Jewish community up to the present day in individual homes and people, eventually giving impetus to modern "messianic Judaism" movement [but this movement is essentially Church/Synagogue, thus not tehudic karaite].

 

(12) In the middle ages, it was responsible in part for the Tsaphan [secret] practice of Judiasm in Spain. [Who felt it no crime to acknowledge Christ, but secretly still kept the practice of Judaism]  Something a normal rabbinical Jew would never do and Spain was another community whose known numbers of Karaites were high.

SPANISH KARAITES WERE EXTERMINATED BY THE CHEIF RABBI IN COOPERATION WITH THE KING

During the 10th and 11th Centuries, Karaite Jews in Spain had become "a force to be reckoned with." In Castile, high-ranking Rabbinical Jews such as Joseph Ferrizuel persuaded the king to allow the persecution and expulsion of Karaite Jews. With royal assistance, Rabbi Todros Halevi and Joseph ibn Alfakhar successfully drove out a large portion of the surviving Karaite population. - Wikipedia

(13) (2) Rabbinical Judaism did not honor the Passover Seder as commanded in the Torah until after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem [this is according to their own claims],

Judaism: A Quarterly Journal of Jewish Life andThought | Date: 6/22/2005 | Author: Sandmel, David Fox

QUOTE: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF A SEDER RITUAL IN THE TIME OF JESUS. THE ENTIRE SEDER RITUAL WAS DEVELOPED AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE IN 70 CE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A WAY OF CELEBRATING PASSOVER WITHOUT THE TEMPLE. END QUOTE

Yet the New Testament clearly indicates there were Jews in Israel (who despite the Rabbinical neglect of this practice) were STILL keeping the Biblical passover Seder [who were these Jews as they were NOT Synagogue Rabbinicals?]

Mat 26:17,18  Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?  And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep the passover at thy house with my disciples.

What "such a man" would be familiar with keeping Passover in his home? That would have already made preparations to keep Passover in his home at a time when Rabbinical-Synagogue Judaism had forsaken this practice? [A Karaite]

 

 

(13) Christ PROPHESIED that God would send Israel:

Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men,(Hakhams!)  and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

NOTE: The only segment of Judaism that still accepted the continuation of the prophetic was the Karaite who remained committed to the text of the scriptures.  The second class of people Christ cites is HAKHAMS (Translated "Wise Men")!  Christ was literally identifying 1 minority sect of Judaism in this statement (A) that STILL accepted the prophetic and (B) was indicated by "Hakhams" and "Navi".  This eliminates Rabbinical Judaism, and points without confusion to Karaite Judaism.

The term "Rabbi" or even "Priest" (Cohenim) is absent from this list, however the "Nabbi/Navi" is listed (Which Rabbis rejected) 

(14) One Of The First Things The Young Yeshua Upon Returning From Egypt With His Family Does, Is Debate The Rabbis At The Temple.

Luk 2:46,47  And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.

Notice that it says he was "asking them questions", and then it says they were astonished at HIS understanding and answers.  So he was providing the answers to his own questions, but offering the questions to the Rabbis to illustrate a hole in their logic, to stump them.  He was testing his skill with the Torah from a Karaite perspective, against the professional training of the Rabbinical doctorates, by pointing out questions they could not logically answer.

Who was Christ's Rabbi in Egypt? There was none.  Karaites do not have Rabbis. There were 3 Hakhams who preceeded Joseph's dream to take his family there. And then he comes back to Israel asking the Rabbis in Jerusalem some simple questions a 12 year old could ask, but tough questions they cannot answer. Questions he was exposed to while growing up as a Karaite Jew in Egypt.

NOTE: Rabbinical scholars claim Karaism did not start until the early middle ages.  They also seriously but rediculously claim Moses started their synagogues and they go back to Mount Sinai [preceeding even the prophets] ?!?!  A claim that is directly contradicted not only by the Biblical text itself, but even the TALMUDIC texts, and the hard science of archeology which has historically traced the development of the synagoue in Israel to the Babylonian captivity and prior to that, these buildings are identified as "high places" by archeologists! (Cited later in the page below)

Roman Catholics also make the claim Protestantism had no precedent in history until Martin Luther.  Obviously somebody wrote the New Testament, and obviously they literally logistically could not have been yet Roman Catholic, Post Reformation Protestant  nor Talmudic Rabbinical Judaism.  Yet it is the collusion between these three biases that reject not only the historical existence of Karaites altogether, but completely ignore the Greek word cognates in the New Testament text itself that clearly point to an early primitive karaite community in New Testament times, of which New Testament Jews were a part!

Rome has been left with unchallenged monopolies on these histories.  Even today, it is not the nation of Israel, nor even the Synagogue academy, nor a scholarly Muzeum, that hold the original text of Maimonides (the most important Rabbinical Scholar in post second temple Diaspora history.  It is the Vatican. The Vatican.  Israel has to "borrow a copy" to even study the documents to find out what he even wrote!  The original texts have never been released.  So in essence, all Rabbinical Judaism is taking Rome's word for what Maimonides really even wrote (the father of modern Rabbinical Judaism!)  The historical collusion (or perhaps victimization) between Rome and Rabbinical Judaism will be explored a little further in a section below.

The people in the New Testament idenitifed THEMSELVES in the very TEXT by the term ECCLESIA/KARA - TO CALL OUT.  In the Hebrew "tongue" they called themselves "Karaim" (and it is cited in the very text of the New Testament 115 times!). So why would you take a name they called themselves 115 times, and replace it with a name that is used 3 times only, and in all 3 times, the context is that of being an insult invoked by "hostile outsiders"?  Coined in one of the most anti-semitic regions of the world (Antioch Syria?) And then claim that the Hebrew identity the 115 references clearly refer to, does not exist?  How could any honest person seriously buy this explanation? 


THE BIBLE IS NOT A "CATHOLIC DOCUMENT"

(IN FACT, IT'S NOT EVEN A "CHRISTIAN"  ONE)


What does not "exist" are Rome's "church fathers". And what is not really Jewish, is the "synagogue". (At least according to the New Testament, and the New Testament (unlike Maimonides) has been too widely distributed and too documented for Rome's fraudulent cover stories to withstand serious modern scrutiny.

To claim Karaites "did not exist" is simply an act of historical "denial", akin to claiming the Rabbinical "synagogues" were started by Moses or the Jesus started the Vatican.  Or there was no Inquisition, or the Holocaust never happened. And it is no accident that the same people claiming Moses started the synagogue and Jesus started the Vatican also claim Karaites did not exist until the middle ages. These biased self-serving relgious non-historical claims should be rejected by serious historians, honest Jews and objective Protestants.  They are counter-productive and demonstrably false.


It is a DENIAL, that is simply "convenient" to Rabbinicals because they do not wish to acknowledge the historical existence of Karaites as a possibly competing and potentially legitamite school of Judaism.  Catholics  (be they small "c" or large "C") subscribing to Roman theologies do not wish Christ to be connected to a "Biblical" Jewish tradition which seriously undermines Roman theological posture, and it is even a denial that the majority of Karaites themselves (today) prefer, because they do not want their tradition or movement associated with "Christ" or "Christians" (who they see more as German Nazis than Jews).  It would be the social equivalent of associating the NAACP with the KKK in the mind of many Jews today.  But this is largely the result of Roman and European "Christmas Church" anti-semitism.  Karaites want legal recognition from the state of Israel, and since the State of Israel has been granted to the monopoly of Orthodox Rabbinical Judaism, it is with Rabbinical Judaism they must legally find acceptance.  The same is true with the budding "Messianic Jewish Movement" attempting to establish itself with the Rabbinates by creating "Messianic synagogues" as a legitamite "Jewish" institution.  But do these "desires" and "agendas" justify "cooking the history books"? No they do not.  There is another historical heritage of Judaism that is being academically "exterminated" for convenience, and everyone is guilty of taking part and some of these agendas are even openly admitted.  One leader of the Messianic Synagogue movement recently stated that if Messianic Jews adopted the Karaite model of Judaism, it would be the end of the Messianic movement.  Maybe.  But what good is "Messianic Judaism" that is built on a lie?  Another relgious movement based on a lie? There are already plenty of those to choose from.

The fact is that Rome, above all, has had a very long and very old self interest in identifying Rabbical Judaism as the "True Jews", in the face of it's complete contradiction of what is written in the Bible (Rev.2:9,3:9).  This fact, builds the case, that Rome has treated this history, just like they have so many others, (by writing it literally as whatever fiction they wish it to be) and then call it "History".  It is extremely dishonest and inexcusable behavior from both a moral and spiritual, much less academic and ethical, perspective.  But what else could be expected by the same institution that seriously propigated a blonde European Jesus born on Apollo day and followed the advice of John Chrysostom and Ignatius Loyola concerning using deciet for the benefit of it's Church?

Rome has been propping up Rabbinical Judaism (and it's synagogue system) as the "True Jews" since the time of Christ, which it then has likewise attempted to exterminate.  The "Hallmarks" of early karaite Judaism are fully known and documented.

“If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.”

 Douglas Adams


These "Hallmarks" are also found throughout the New Testament and taught by Christ before they supposedly ever existed, including the use of the very name "KARAIM" itself.  The real CHRIST was the leader of a SECT of JUDAISM, which called itself ECCLESIA/KARA-IM, but was labeled by "outsiders" by a number of names (1) Nazerenes [Matt.2:23; Acts 24:5] (2) Christi-anos [Acts 11:26]  (3) Heretics [Acts 24:14]  and (4) Protostates [Acts 24:14], even "Mamzerim".  

These however, were derogatory terms used by "outsiders" who would not "accept" the legitamacy of their non-rabbinical "Judaism".  The empires were complicit in assisting, and in some cases, actually SPONSORING these attacks at separating and alienating them from Judaism, and were certianly involved in the overt attempts at exterminating it.  "Divide and conquer" has always been the basic method of choice used by the empires to "Balkanize" it's undesirable subjects.  Roman and Masonic Babelists, are still using this very same ancient tactic among virtually all religious groups, (Islamic, Jewish and Christian) to this very day.  It's behavior is as predictable as rise and fall of the sun it's worships.

Jews of Israel during the New Testament era had no problem with the idea someone would "claim" to be the messiah as it was a relatively common occurance, and the expectation of which was certinaly a major component of the religion of Judaism.  [Acts 5:34-40]  The problem with the New Testament karaim was that they "spoke against the Temple" and it's "synagogues" [Acts 6:13, 21:28, Rev. 2:9, 3:9].  This was historically only done by Karaites.  The Essenes created their own temple-cult community in the desert. (Which is also referenced in the New Testament by Christ himself and later by Paul and clearly disassociated with Mt.24:26, 1 Tim. 4:3)

All this is simply a matter of factual documentation no one can honestly deny.  It is right there in your own Bible, in front of your very own eyes, in plain black ink on the white paper page with dates of composition that clearly precede what you are told existed.  The Rabbis rather than admit these people were Karaite, prefer rather to claim they were "anti-semitic" gentiles. (and of course! what else could be expected?)  Ironically, that is the same label they give Karaites!?!

It is much less the fault of a prejudicial synagogue Rabbi who claims these people in the New Testament were anti-semitic Gentiles, or a Roman Catholic Academic who has accepted standards of Truth from Ignatius Loyola and John Chrysostom, than it is Biblically orientated Protestant "Christians" and supposedly objective secular historians who "accept" these bogus claims" with some appearant satisfaction? (Who should both know, and care much better) Both about history from a secular perspective and certainly about a smothered heritage having to do with one of western history's most important people, Christ himself.

CHRIST WAS A KARAITE JEW

THE "REAL HISTORY" OF THE KARAITE MOVEMENT HAS BEEN CENSORED THE SAME WAY THE IDENTITY OF THE "REAL CHRIST" WAS INTENTIONALLY CHANGED

(1) The FACT is Anan Ben David IDENTIFIED with a pre-existing sect. He did not INVENT IT.

WHY WAS THIS TERM CHOSEN BY ANAN BEN DAVID? (ANANITES?)

Understanding the historical origin of the Ananite movement and it's setting in the predominate Mulsim lands of the middle-east, explain where and why this term was chosen. (And also bear witness to it's use in antiquity).  In original Islamic tradition, the prophet Mohammed did not practice the kind of categorical antisemitism found among post-WW2, Nazi influenced, Islam, that one sees today in the Middle-east.  Which is more the result of the Nazification of Islam after the influence of Hitler's Third Reich (originating in the ambitions of the Vatican) and it's political manipulations among the Arabs, who were recruited to assist their goals of imperializing the middle-east under Rome's Mussolini and Hitler.  

Historians are fully aware of these modern connections and they can be found in print, in video, and all over the internet discussed in depth by everyone from historical researchers to the common blogger, so there is no need to review them here.  Prior to this time in history however, Islam was actually less hostile to Judaism, than even Rome's Christianity, including later some of it's Protestants, Martin Luther (the excommunicated Catholic), serving as a prime example of "Protestant" antisemitism. (Although Luther was really still Roman Catholic in his own mind, and displayed it's native attributes in that regard). 

Originally, as one will find written in the Quran itself, Mohammed recognized (by logical necessity), the place of pious Jews, and even Monotheistic Christians, as not the subject of his complaints in the message of recitation.  These Jews were commanded respect, and instructions were given to leave them alone.  Who were these Jews?

Later when Anan Ben David needed to identify his movement among Muslims, he made use of a term already familiar to Muslims, and a flattering term already found in Islamic history. That term was the term "Karaite" (singluar) and "Karaim" (Plural).  And thus Anan Ben David, secured favor for his following among Mulsims, without which they would have been persecuted, and if encouraged by the Rabbis influencing the Caliphates, exterminated.  Today, religious historians are fully willing to bury this fact, in order to promote their theological agendas, and pressure is placed on these secular sources of information to comply with this vested revisionism.  But that is precisely what it is. Purely fabrication, historical revisionism for vested political interests, and nothing more. Not accurate information, not historical, not real, and not the truth.

Where did the term originate? And why did it secure favor among the Mulsims (who still refer to this term to this very day in FAVORABLE ways as THE ROOT OF THEIR OWN ORIGINS AS MUSLIMS!)

Muhammed's brother was hired by Rome to do an Arabic translation of THE NEW TESTAMENT.  In the course of translating the word "ecclesia" into Arabic, (which is actually "ودعا إلى ) the Arab's did not have a common word for "Church" yet, because no "Church" yet existed in Arabia. It was a Roman institution.  Comparing Arabic to Greek, the Arabs used the term "Qaraim" to translate the concept "Ecclesia" while extending the word كنيسة "Kaneesa" to Rome's translation of the word "Church", and thus why the term was KNOWN among the Muslims, event though it had been smothered by the "Christians" from Rome. A "kaneesa" is a borrowed term, from Arabic paganism, and was the word was used to refer to the "idol temples" of pre-monotheistic Arabs.  The Greek term "Ecclesia" of course, has no relationship to the word "kaneesa". But rather, is the base cognate for the etymology of the modern Arabic term القرائين



קרא

qârâ' (kaw-raw')

A primitive root: (1) to call out to (that is, properly address by name, but used in a wide variety of applications): -(2)  to call out (for, forth, self, upon), cry (unto), invite, (3)  to recite, pronounce, read, say.

QARAISM: THE ABRAHAMIC FAITH

(1) HEBREW: Kârâ' , (pron. kaw-raw') - A primitive root (rather identical with H7122 through the idea of accosting a person met); to call out to

(2) GREEK: ἐκκλησία ekklēsia ek-klay-see'-ah From a compound of G1537 and a derivative of G2564; (Called out ones) to call out, 

 (3) ARABIC: Qara'a QURAN from primitive root "Qara'a" (Qara'an) to read or recite 

Even today, there are MUSLIMS who claim to be THE ORIGINAL QARAIM!!!  They have their own traditions in contrast to Sunni and Shiite Muslims, and appeal to this term for their own legitamacy !!!!!  The Arabs UNDERSTOOD the word.  When Anan Ben David claimed HIS MOVEMENT to be THE QARAIM, as opposed to THE JEWS, it deflected the condemnations given mainstream Rabbinical Judaism in the Quran by Muhammed, and secured peace and refuge for his Jewish movement.

Rabbis, who wish to SLANDER the Karaite Jews in Israel, point to the USE OF THE WORD AMONG MUSLIMS, to "discredit them" and make them "Look like Muslims" to people who have no knowledge about history, or the truth about this buried movement in the middle-east.  of course, Muslims who appropriate the term today, are not the original Muslims either despite their use of the word "qaraim", because they are quite fanatical about their "Mosques", and the original "Qaraim" were quite vocal in their opposition to religious temples (just as one observes in the comments made by Christ and his disciples). 

Enter modern "Karaites" today.  Today, "Karaites" will claim they did not start until Anan Ben David. They will claim they are the theological descendents of the Sadducees, so Yeshua (i.e., Jesus) could not have been one.  But if you do not start until Anan Ben David, it would be quite impossible to be the "theological descendents" of Sadducees.  You would have started as Sadducees, and the modern Karaite movement would be better called, the Sadducean movement, and Anan Ben David really wouldn't have done anything.  The Rabbinical movement DID already exist.  The PHARISEES were RABBINICAL predominatly, BUT, and here is a really huge exception to be noted, they were NOT ALL RABBINICAL.  How do we know this?  Because that fact is documented in the New Testament.

Paul renounced being a RABBI, but he never renounced being a PHARISEE!?!  Now why is that if what they are now claiming is true?  So literally a half millenia before Anan Ben David's FIRST KARAITE ever shows up, you have A PHARISEE renouncing his RABBINICAL STATUS, but continuing to be identified as A PHARAISEE.

Meaning it was not the SADDUCEE who renounced their Rabbinical Status, their Rabbinical Academy, their Rabbinical oral traditions, it was THE PHARISEE.  In fact, it was a widely known and accepted fact, for literally centuries, among all classic Scholars even such as those as Alfred Eidershiem, the Jewish-Christian historian, that the Sadducees were THE HELLENISTS among Judaism.  This fact is repeatedly demonstrated in the New Testament records as well.  And thus why the Sadducees never once were found to be big fans of either John the Baptist or even Christ, or his apostles, or even among "The Judaizers".  They were wholly absent at every turn.  Why? Because they embraced Neo-platonism.  Matter was evil, spirit was good, thus no ressurection was even wanted among them!  How on earth would you identify with a movement that claimed someone was a messiah because they "resurrected"!?!?!

Today, the subject of "ressurection" is getting a "make-over" because it appears to be a somewhat fantastic concept that is counter-intuitive to modern scientific thinking.  But there is a strong argument for something very strange and very unexpected from modern Quantum physics, which has been argued by a physicist, not a theologian, as demonstrating a "scientific" understanding of the inevitability of a "resurrection". (A re-occurance of life itself, in the time-space continuum)

In ancient Israel, those who held to a "resurrection" were not the "Liberal Hellenists" who embraced Neo-platonism, and mixed it with Judaism, it would have been "the Torah purists", who rejected the Greek philsophical concept of it's dichotomy between the good and evil of matter and spirit, and insisted on their own Jewish conceptual identity of unity between matter and spirit, thus requiring the necessity of "ressurection", despite it's disdain among the Greeks.

As a polemic against Christ's identity, and the identity of his Jewish followers who first used the Hebrew term "Qara" to define themselves half a millenia before Anan ben David, the claim is now being built that modern karaites were the descendants of the "Sadducees".  Therefore viola, problem solved.  This argument is being cited by Roman sources too who see in it the advantage of retaining their Roman "Jesus" dettached from historical sources.  But this creates some serious problems for modern Karaites themselves, if they embrace this Vatican inspired argument. One of two options exist for modern Karaites today if in fact, THEY ARE,  as they claim to be, the descendents of the Sadducees.

THE PROBLEM WITH THE THEORY OF SADDUCEAN ORIGINS OF KARAITES

(1) Sadducees doctrine and practice was well documented from external sources.

Even if you do reconstruction to account for bias and misrepresentation, there are certain objective historical facts about the Sadducees, that are beyond subjective debates.  These facts reveal their actual posture in history, both politically and theologically concerning their identity.

QUOTE: "they became still more subservient to their heathen masters, and were the leaders in the Hellenizing movementThey took no part in the Maccabean struggle, which was mainly supported by their opponents the ḥăṣı̄dhı̄m, as they were called (the Hasideans of 1 Macc 2:42, etc.). When the ḥăṣı̄dhı̄m, having lost sympathy with the Maccabeans, sought to reconcile themselves to the priestly party, Alcimus, the legitimate high priest, by his treachery and cruelty soon renewed the breach. The Hasmoneans then were confirmed in the high-priesthood, but were only lukewarmly supported by the ḥăṣı̄dhı̄m". END QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(2) Sadducees as "Allies" of Antiochus Ephiphanes (where the equivalent of "Antichrists" in Israel, and unpatriotic traitors to the nation of Israel)  They were "the enemies within" of Israel.

QUOTE: Josephus describes the Sadducees along with the contemporary sects, the Pharisees and the Essenes (Josephus, Ant., XIII, v, 9; X, vi 2; XVIII, i, 4, 5; BJ, II, viii, 14). His earliest notice of them is after his account of the treaties of Jonathan with the Romans and the Lacedemonians. He indicates his belief that the parties were ancient; but if so, they must have formerly had other names. It has been suggested that the earlier form of the conflict between the Sadducees and Pharisees was opposition between the priests and the prophets. END QUOTE - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(3) Because Sadducees were essentially JEWISH HELLENISTS, they adopted all of the pagan philosophy and practice of THE GREEKS, yet exercised SEARING HYPOCRISY, in claiming they rejected valid doctrines of real Judaism, as "Not Torah".

QUOTE: the Sadducees denied the resurrection of the body, and did not believe in angels or spirits (Mat_22:23; Act_23:8). More can be learned from Josephus, but his evidence is to be received with caution, as he was a Pharisee and, moreover, had the idea that the Sadducees were to be paralleled with the Epicureans. END QUOTE - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(4) Not only were the Sadducees searing hypocrites, nationalistic traitors, and Greek Assimilationists (sympathizers and allies with Antiochus Ephiphanes), they MURDERED FELLOW ISRAELITES.

QUOTE: The division between the Hasmoneans and the ḥăṣı̄dhı̄m, or, as they were now called, Pharisees, culminated in the insult offered by Eleazar to John Hyrcanus, the Hasmonean high priest (Josephus, Ant., XIII, x, 5). Alexander Janneus, the son of Hyrcanus, became a violent partisan of the Sadducees, and crucified large numbers of the Pharisees. END QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(5) Far from being a "movement" of the people and of the Torah, the Sadducees WERE AN OLIGARCHY PARTY.

QUOTE: the quasi-independence enjoyed by the Jews be taken from them, and with this the influence of the Sadducees would depart. An oligarchy is proverbially sensitive to anything that threatens its stability; a priesthood is unmeasured in its vindictiveness; and the Sadducees were a priestly oligarchyEND QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(6) The Sadducees not only allied themselves with ISRAEL'S GREEK OPPRESSORS during the MACCABEAN period, they then allied themselves with ISRAEL'S ROMAN OPPRESSORS during the ROMAN PERIOD.

QUOTE: With the outbreak of the Jewish war, the Sadducees with their allies the Herodians were driven into the background by the Zealots, John of Gischala and Simon ben Gioras. Annas and Joshua, also called high priest by Josephus, were both put to death by the Zealots and their Idumean allies (Josephus, BJ, IV, v, 2).  END QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(7) The Sadducees were not only political  traitors to Israel, they were spiritual traitors the God of Israel as well.

QUOTE:  The Sadducees rejected all these traditions. From Acts (Act_23:8) we learn that they believed in neither “angel or spirit.” As appearances of angels are mentioned in the Law, it is difficult to harmonize their reverence for the Law with this denial. They may have regarded these angelophanies as theophanies. Josephus distinctly asserts (Ant., XVIII, i, 4) that the Sadducees believe that the soul dies with the body. They deny, he says, divine providence (BJ, II, viii, 14). Their theology might be called “religion within the limits of mere sensation.” END QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(8) Sadducees were so worldly, their philosophy was easily MISTAKEN  AS "GREEK EPICURIANISM"

QUOTE: It need hardly be said that there was no real connection between Sadduceanism and the doctrines of Epicurus. There was a superficial resemblance which was purely accidental. Their favor for Hellenism would give a color to this identification. END QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

(9) Sadducees were COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNISTS who simply USED religion for POLITICAL POWER and MONEY

QUOTE:  The Sadducean high priests made Hophni and Phinehas too much their models. Annas and his sons had booths in the courts of the temple for the sale of sacrificial requisites, tables for money-changers, as ordinary coins had to be changed into the shekels of the sanctuary. From all these the priests of the high-priestly caste derived profit at the expense of desecrating the temple (Edersheim, Life and Times of Jesus, I, 371 ff). They did not, as did the Pharisees, pay spiritual religion the homage of hypocrisy; they were frankly irreligious. While officials of religion, they were devoid of its spirit. This, however, represents their last stage. END QUOTE  - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

While you might be able to argue away some of the opinion based material, you cannot change this hsitorical facts they did in fact establish THE MONEY CHANGERS AT THE TEMPLE, (Commericalists) the did in fact SYMPATHIZE WITH ANTIOCHUS EPHIPHANES and they did in fact ALLY THEMSELVES with Rome's political patsy group in Israel, THE HERODIANS.

So.. if modern Karaites wish to be so appalled at the idea Christ and his disciples were found among their earliest pioneers, and prefer to find themselves historically with the Sadducees, then despite all the the evidence to the contrary, it is probably an accurate spiritual identification for them. (and they are not really Karaites anymore, they are Sadducean traitors, and commercial opportunists as they wish to be known)  But this is not who Qaraim were in ancient history past (as all of Arabia already fully know, and as is documented in the New Testament itself), despite the desperate polemics from both Rome and Cairo today, to hide this past.

(2) The FACT is that "karaite" meant by conceptual defintion, "Biblical Judiasm", ...it's history and it's body of teaching, are found in THE BIBLE. IT'S OWN BODY OF LITERATURE & HISTORY.

(3) Protestant Historians in Europe have researched the origins of Karaites back to 1st century Israel and beyond before the existence of the Synagogue movement.

FACT: Karaites exist in Israel when Christ comes, whom he:

(1) Identifies with in teaching

Mar 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.

(2) Practices Karaite READING

Joh 10:35 If ...the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;

(3) They Provide Refuge and Support To His Family

Mat 2:1  Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,

Mat 2:13 And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt

(4) Calls his disciples by their name

Mat 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my EC-CLESIA (HEBREW "KARA'IM") ; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

(5) Celebrates THEIR PASSOVER in the HOME OF ONE.

Mat 26:18 And he said, Go into the city TO SUCH A MAN, and SAY UNTO HIM, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep THE PASSOVER AT THY HOUSE with my disciples.

Mar 14:13 And he sendeth forth two of his disciples, and saith unto them, Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water: FOLLOW HIM.
Mar 14:14 And wheresoever he shall go in, say ye to the goodman of the house, The Master saith, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall EAT THE PASSOVER with my disciples?
Mar 14:15 And HE WILL SHOW YOU a large upper room FURNISHED AND PREPARED: there make ready for us.

(6) According THEIR CALENDAR In Distinction To The RABBINICAL CALENDAR

(7) Is called BY THEIR INSULT NAME, A MAMZERIM

(8) Has no RABBI growing up, Yet Returns To Jerusalem To Drill The Rabbinical Doctors

(9) Wears No Phylacteries

(10) Calls the Rabbis "Hypocrites" and later, the synagougue "of Satan".

 

WHY JESUS WAS NOT A RABBINICAL PHARISEE

The arguments in this debate are always predictable because they always remains consistent with the act of theological posturing, rather than simply what occurred.  Which is why there is so much mud covering up the truth about all this.  While modern people may have many misconceptions about who Christ in history was, the Pharisees had none whatsoever.  They knew he was not a Pharisee. The insult name given to him, was clear enough, as were the denunciations he gave them concerning their concept of "Oral Law" that was stolen from the prophets. (Originally, meaning "what God spoke", or "the word of God" [from his mouth])  It was "God's mouth", not the mouth of Bamah house rabbis, that this "Oral Torah" was to emerge and be observed.  And "Oral Torah" (from the prophets) simply repeated what "Written Torah" had already commanded, and the authorities were corrupting for money or politics.


.(1) Prushim leaders were trained in the rabbinical academy, and were "Academics" [He was not]

Joh 7:15 And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?

(2) Most held rabbinical degrees, [he forbade]

Mat 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Mat 23:9 And call no man your Abba upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Mat 23:10 Neither be ye called Rabbon: for one is your Rabbon, even Christ.
Mat 23:11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
Mat 23:12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
Mat 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!

Act 4:13 And beholding the openness of Peter and John, and having perceived that they are men unlettered and plebeian, they were wondering--they were taking knowledge also of them that with Jesus they had been--

(3) Most were leaders in the synagogue movement.[Jesus was not] They were excommunicated.

Luk 4:28 And all they in the synagogue, when they heard these things, were filled with wrath,
Luk 4:29 And rose up, and thrust him out

Joh 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
Joh 3:2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him,

The "Pharasees" were the most sympathestic group in Israel to his movement, and many of them became "kara'im" as a result of hearing his message, but the Prushim as a body politik never left the synagogue system it was helping to build in Israel.

 

LATER BEING IDENTIFIED WITH CHRIST (THE MAMZERIM) MEANT BEING "PUT OUT" OF THE SYNAGOGUE (THE KARAIM NEVER STARTED BUILDING THEIR OWN, NOR WERE EVER INSTRUCTED TO DO SO) BECAUSE THAT WAS THE WHOLE POINT OF THE "EC-CLESIA" (CALLING OUT)

 

COMMON OBJECTIONS - 

1. Christ was not a Karaite because Karaites started in the 5th/6th century. 

Fact: This claim is demonstrably false, via documentation from the New Testament, and via the documentable history of the etymology of the term in the middle-east among the Arabs.

2. Karaites were the Sadducees, Christ associated with Pharisees, so he was not a "Karaite"

Fact: Sadducees were Hellenists.  They rejected "resurrection" because of the duality of "matter and spirit". Karaites (by definition even today) claim to be "opposed" to "assimilation" doctrines, so the claim is patently false.  Both in terms of their origins with Sadducees, and who the Sadducees were. If they were the Sadducees, then they are not modern "Karaites", they are Sadduceans.(And thus Hellenists, which of course they claim they are not)  So there is a serious contradiction of fact concerning this claim.

3. Christ accepted "Oral Tradition" therefore he was Rabbinical/(Not Karaite)

Fact: The instances of Christ's rejection of Rabbinical Tradition in contrast to his appearant "acceptance" of "Oral Tradition" are not even numerically close. The examples given, always involve his appeals to them in argumentation.  The Disciples quoted pagan Greek poets, popular contemporary literary sources, and pagan Seers (Prophets/Fortune-tellers) to make their points.  That does not "equate" to their categorical "acceptance" of these sources as "authoritative" or "true", but simply illustrates commonly practiced persuasive argumentation. It's stupid to even make such claims and it is highly suspicious that intelligent educated people would even attempt to pass them off with a serious face. President's Bush and Obama quoted the Quran. Neither were Muslim. Rabbis have quoted Hitler in Midrash sermons.  That hardly made them Nazis or endorsers of Nazi philosophy. This line of argumentation is quite disingenuous.




4. Christ was called a "Rabbi"

Christ did not correct the use of the term Rabbi for himself (because it means a "Master") which of course, the Messiah had to be by definition.  But he did prohibit the term among his own dsiciples, just as Karaites do today, once again demonstrating his theological origins.

5. The SEAT OF MOSES, was established by "Oral Tradition" and he told them to submit to it.

The SEAT OF MOSES, while expounded by Oral Tradition, was not established by Oral Tradition, it was established by the Torah.  it is the "Seat of Moses", as the term implies.  But it was also, reguardless of it's "origin" a legal post in the nation of Israel.  To attempt to "over-throw" this institution, was to be involved in acts of treason.  The structure of the nation of Israel would soon be irrelevent anyway, no matter it's form, as it was all going to be destroyed anyway, the "Seat of Moses" included.  When the Disciples taught that the "law of Moses"  was going to "pass away" (be destroyed), this is precisely what they were referring to.  So it's existence would be a short lived and rather irrelevent phenomena.  It held no place in this THEOLOGY, only his POLICY.  And these two distinctions are very great.  He also "prophesied" God's wrath was coming to obliterate it with such fury, that not one stone would be left upon another.

Fact; Virtually the same "policy" was instructed among Jewish believers in Rome, in reference to ROME'S "SEAT" of power and throughout the entire Roman Empire.

1Pe 2:13  Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; 

1Ti 2:2  For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. 

Rom 13:1,2  Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. 

The fact that these instructions to submit to legal authorities in Israel (the seat of Moses) are also reflected in instructions one should submit to legal authorities in Rome, and it's "seat of power" as well did not grant a THEOLOGICAL "endorsement" to the either legal instutition.  It was POLICY, not THEOLOGY. On the matter of THEOLOGY, the matter was quite the reverse.

Act 5:29  Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men

Rev 2:9  I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan

2Th 2:3  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God

6. "Oral Torah", "Oral tradition" and "Traditions of men"  (understanding the difference)

Some "oral traditions" were not "oral traditions" but were derived from a recognition of application of texts from Torah and the Prophets.  The fact, that they also coincidentally happen to be also considered "Oral Tradition" is misleading.  Their origin was written Torah. 

Example: In the New Testament, Paul commanded the disciples to "keep the traditions of the Apostles", but those "traditions" were the "tradition" of keeping THE SCRIPTURES, such as "Passover" in the home.  It was "the Tradition" of the Apostles, but it was also "commanded".  Separating this one thing, into two separate things, and then blowing it up to include every pagan practice in the Roman empire as "a secret tradition' is just lunacy, but that is precisely what the "Christmas Church" argues.  In Rabbinicalism, the same technique was used to incorporate alien and antithetical institutions from Babylon into Judaism.  This technique is a religious gimmick based on myth-making, disinformation and anti-historical superstition.

The origin of "Oral Torah" was a term (and concept) from the Prophets, not the Rabbis.  "Oral Torah" was the "Torah" that came from the "mouth of God".  It had to be consistent with the "Written Torah" to be valid.  That is how you "tested" a word from God.  "Oral Torah" had to "match" (follow the historical precedent of, agree with written Torah, just as in modern legal jurisprudence concerning judges decisions) .  This was how the "word of a prophet" was examined, through Scriptural "precedent". That is why you do not have real "prophets of God" prophesying you are supposed to go and worship a big stone in the shape of a reproduction organ to promote "fertility"!

1Co 14:29  Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge. 

1Co 14:32  And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. 

Num 12:6  And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the LORD will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream

Deu 13:1-4  If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, (Oral Torah) and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.  (They refer to the SAME THING)

Rabbis confiscated the original use of the term "Oral Torah" when they moved to put an end to the prophetic within Israel in favor of the Academic, and "re-directed it away from it's original meaning and practice" to mean "new rules for the empire, made up in secret, by leaders of the Academy" we shall now call "secret ancient traditions".  Yes, Christ did teach "Oral Torah" as any real Karaite would have done who still accepted the role of the prophet, but he did not mean by that term or practice "secret Oral Traditions", something entirely different, he condemned.  The source of divine authority is completely opposite in the practice of these two forms. One is commanded by the Torah itself, the other is forbidden by the Torah itself.

Mat 4:4  But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.  (This was their concept of "Oral Torah", not "secret Rabbinical Traditions mythologically passed down from mount Sinai")

Most of the people using these arguments would in all reality use any argument, no matter how invalid, simply because they do not like the conclusion the "truth" leads them too.  And that is how virtually all "Christmas theology" on earth is conducted along with all it's "supporting actors" on the stage, for the empires they serve.

PAUL WAS JEWISH TOO AND DIDN'T START YOUR CHURCH EITHER

PAUL IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS A "JEW", NOT A "CHRISTIAN"

(1) Phi 3:5 CIRCUMCISED {brit milah} the eighth day, of the STOCK OF ISRAEL {family linage}, of the TRIBE OF BENJAMIN {real estate heirs to Jerusalem}, an HEBREW OF THE HEBREWS; as touching the law, A PHARISEE; {A strictly ORTHODOX version of Judaism}

Rom 11:1 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I ALSO AM AN ISRAELITE, OF THE SEED OF ABRAHAM {a blood covenant Jew}, OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN.

PLEASE NOTE: The distinction;"of the SEED of ABRAHAM". This was known as a BLOOD COVENANT JEW [brit ha da&#770;m]{Not a convert}. BLOOD COVENANT JEWS were the "most esteemed", because they were considered direct descendants of Abraham. In the same way today, there are those who claim descendancy from Mohammed. They have "illustrious careers" as religious leaders just waiting for them. .. As was the case with PAUL'S JUDAISM:

(2) Act 22:3 I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city AT THE FEET OF GAMALIEL, and TAUGHT ACCORDING TO THE PERFECT MANNER of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day.

GAMALIEL - Is still to this day, a extremely highly respected Rabbi, in Rabbinical Judaism, surpassed by only a few others such as Hillel. There are SCHOOLS, even TODAY, two thousand years later, which still bear his NAME.

"ACCCORDING TO THE PERFECT [complete] WAY" - ORTHODOX JUDAISM, not REFORMED, not CONSERVATIVE, not KARAITE, not RECONSTRUCTIONIST, not MESSIANIC. Still to this day, in order to be "recognized" as "Jewish" in Israel if you are a convert, it is ORTHODOX alone, which is accepted. This is the FULL DOSE of it, according to every little detail in the Torah. The same, who still to this day "esteem" Gamaliel as one of it's greatest Rabbis.

(3) Gal 1:14 And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

As a [brit ha da&#770;m] blood descendant of Abraham, he would have had the opportunity for an illustrious career as a Rabbi among the diasporia. Which appearantly, he did. "...profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals "

PAUL'S ARGUMENTS WERE JEWISH AND CHARACTERISTIC OF KARAITE BIBLICALISM 

Shaul, the former Rabbi, uses direct quotes of the Tanakh 45 times in over 1160 words of direct citation in his MIDRASH concerning the "New Covenant". Allusions are innummerable. The formulaic phrase used by Karaites: "it is written" specifying a direct reference to the Tanak:

FOR IT IS WRITTEN

Acts 1:20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, ...

Acts 7:42 ...as it is written in the book of the prophets, O ye house of Israel, ..

Acts 13:29 And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, ...

Acts 13:33 ...as it is also written in the second psalm, ...

Acts 15:15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,

Acts 23:5 ...that he was the high priest: for it is written, ...

Acts 24:14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:<<<

Romans 1:17 ...as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

Romans 2:24 ...as it is written.

Romans 3:4...as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

Romans 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

Romans 4:17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations...

Romans 4:23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;

Romans 8:36 As it is written, For thy sake...

Romans 9:13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, ...

Romans 9:33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion...

Romans 10:15 ...as it is written, How beautiful...

Romans 11:8 (According as it is written, ...

Romans 11:26 ...as it is written, There shall come out of Sion...

Romans 12:19 ... for it is written,...

Romans 14:11 For it is written, ...

Romans 15:3 ...as it is written, The reproaches of them ...

Romans 15:4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.

Romans 15:9 ...as it is written, For this cause I will confess ...

Romans 15:21 But as it is written, To whom he was not spoken of...

1Corinthians 1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise...

1Corinthians 1:31 That, according as it is written, ...

1Corinthians 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, ...

1Corinthians 3:19 ...For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

1Corinthians 9:9 For it is written in the law of Moses, ....

1Corinthians 9:10 ...this is written: that he that ploweth...

1Corinthians 10:7 ...as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, ...

1Corinthians 10:11 ...and they are written for our admonition, ...

1Corinthians 14:21 In the law it is written, With men of other tongues...

1Corinthians 15:45 And so it is written, ...

1Corinthians 15:54 ...that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

2Corinthians 4:13 ...according as it is written, I believed, and therefore have I spoken; we also believe, and therefore speak;

2Corinthians 8:15 As it is written, ...

2Corinthians 9:9 (As it is written, ...

Galatians 3:10 ...for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

Galatians 3:13 ...for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

Galatians 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, ...

Galatians 4:27 For it is written, ....

Hebrews 10:7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.

FROM THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN

The "tribe of Benjamin" had a continuing identity well into the middle ages among the sepherdim and the molonoes of Spain. NOTE:

            Romans 15:24 Whensoever I take my journey into Spain, I will come to
            you: for I trust to see you in my journey, and to be brought on my
            way thitherward by you, if first I be somewhat filled with your
            company.

            Romans 15:28 When therefore I have performed this, and have sealed
            to them this fruit, I will come by you into Spain.

MADE GENTILE CONVERTS TO JUDAISM, NOT "CHRISTIANS"

Rom 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit,

Eph 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

Act 19:34 But when they knew that he was a Jew, all with one voice about the space of two hours cried out, Great is Diana of the Ephesians.

Act 21:39 But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.

Act 22:3 I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel,

 

TRUE JUDAISM REQUIRES "FAITH" IN GOD OF ABRAHAM

Rom 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the EUANGELLION of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; TO THE JEW FIRST, and also to the Greek. {Really now, would a Roman Catholic write that?}

Rom 1:17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: AS IT IS WRITTEN, The JUST shall live by FAITH.

The former Rabbi and student of Gamaliel, In his Midrash concerning a "just" relationship with God is based upon what is "written" about Abraham. That would be referred to as TORAH. From the "Book Of Moses", the Pentetuech.  It did not "pass away", it is being cited as the "Spiritual Law".

Gen 15:6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.

His point was that while the Torah as "National Law" was given for the government rule of a nation [Israel], it was "never" the means by which people were made either "JEWISH" or "JUST" with God:

Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by THE FAITH OF Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by THE FAITH OF JESUS CHRIST, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Notice the term is "FAITH >OF< JESUS CHRIST".  The FAITH OF JESUS CHRIST was Jewish.

The former Rabbi Shaul and student of Gamaliel, continues in his Midrash:

Gal 3:6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.

Gal 3:7 Know ye therefore that THEY WHICH ARE OF FAITH, the same are the children of Abraham. [This is what JEWISH really IS]

Not "conversion" through a "synagogue" at the hands of a Rabbi with a Babylonian Talmud !!

Gal 3:8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the EUANGELION unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.

Gal 3:9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.

            NOTE: The former Rabbi Shaul and student of Gamaliel, says that the
            EUANGELLION {"gospel"} was PREACHED TO ABRAHAM! And that is was
            always God's intent to spread the Abrahamic covenant {the very
            definition of what is a Yehudi} to the WHOLE WORLD:

            "...saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed"

            The former Rabbi Shaul and student of Gamaliel, continues to show
            that the "definition" of JEWISH, beginning with ABRAHAM, predated
            the DEFINITION of JEWISH, through the MOSAIC LAW by hundreds of years:

Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

            The former Rabbi Shaul and student of Gamaliel, explains you cannot
            claim people are made JEWISH by keeping the LAW OF MOSES, because the TORAH
            DIDN'T EVEN EXIST FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS, AND THERE WERE "JEWS"
            ALREADY, AS DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM! (So what really made them "Jews"?)

The answer is that they "came out" of Babelism by "faith" in what God spoke and by "faith" embraced, accepted, and trusted in the living-speaking monotheistic God of Abraham.  Whereupon God changed Abraham's name, and the name in the Torah by which he was called, changed from Eloheim to YHVH.

Faith in and "covenant with" YHVH (the God of Abraham) made one a "Jew", and a "Son of Abraham".  And this was hundreds of years before the Torah was ever written by Moses, who himself had it written down.

PAUL'S CAREER WAS BI-PROFESSIONAL IN KEEPING WITH RABBINICAL PRACTICE

Act 18:3 And because he was of the same craft, he abode with them, and wrought: for by their occupation they were tentmakers.

PAUL was a TENT MAKER, by trade. It was required of a Rabbi to also have a trade.

            EASTON'S BIBLE DICTIONARY====================
            According to Jewish custom, however, he learned a trade before
            entering on the more direct preparation for the sacred
            profession. The trade he acquired was the making of tents from
            goats' hair cloth, a trade which was one of the commonest in
            Tarsus.
            ==============================================

PETER WAS JEWISH AND DIDN'T START YOUR CHURCH EITHER

CHRIST DID NOT GIVE ANY "KEYS" TO "ANY CHRISTIAN CHURCH"

BECAUSE HE WAS NOT A "CHRISTIAN", 

AND THERE WAS NO "CHRISTIAN CHURCH" TO GIVE THEM TO.

AND PETER TO WHOM HE ALLEGEDLY GAVE THEM TO,

WAS JEWISH AND NEVER WENT TO ROME

 

 

FOX NEWS

MARCH 27, 2005 8:00 PM

QUOTE: "Jesus and his followers were JEWISH. They were bringing a REFORM movement within JUDAISM". END QUOTE

QUOTE: ""Jesus was born a Jew, Lived an observant Jew and Died an observant Jew and ALL his disciples were JEWISH". END QUOTE

 

The expulsion of the Jewish community from Rome caused a set back to the progress of Christianity in that city, for in A.D. 49 it appears to have been only a distinctive movement with Judaism that Christianity was known there. p. 21, F.F.Bruce, Jesus & Christian Origins Outside The New Testament,(c)1974, WM.B.Eerdmans Pub. Co.

 

(1) It wasn't the CHURCH (a word not even composed yet)

(2) It wasn't CHRISTIANITY (a word not uttered for another 100-200 years?)

What DID exist in Matthew 16:18?

A Karaite Jew by the name of Shimon Kefa Ben-Yonah. Who practiced Judaism and was "called" to "minister to the CIRCUMCISION" who never left his Jewish ministry to Jews, from his time in Jerusalem, to his time in Samaria, (Acts 8:14,25) to his relocation to Babylonia (modern day Iraq - 1 Peter 5:13). He was with, among, and ministered to, Jews.

Never setting a single foot in Rome.

So whatever was given to PETER (Shimon Keipha Ben-Yonah) if it was given literally to him and him alone,(Mtt.18:16) It stayed with him in the middle-east (1 Peter 5:13) and never made it's way to Rome. Not even to be "buried".

Down in the Vatican cellar, Catholics are "venerating" the bones of chickens, pigs, and a mouse -- in the belief that they are the relics of St. Peter. How this fraudulent situation came to be is a tangled tale going back to problems encountered by Pope Pius XII when he tried to find a place to stack his predecessor. - OF BONES AND BONERS: SAINT PETER AT THE VATICAN, Spring 1997, By Frank R. Zindler,

 

 

PETER WAS JEWISH AND NEVER WENT TO ROME

 

The "Church" caracature called "Saint Peter" usually has his own blonde hair too.  He speaks Latin. Made his way to Rome. And founded the Roman Vatican and blessed the Roman Pontiff Maximus with the keys to heaven, even though the same Pontiff Maximus would later be busy slaughtering his family and exterminating his linage down to his distant cousins in Jerusalem.

 

THE TRUTH ABOUT PETER AND ROME

It is probable that the tradition of a 25-year episcopate of Peter in Rome is not earlier than the beginning or the middle of the 3rd century. The claims that the church of Rome was founded by Peter or that he served as its first bishop are in dispute and rest on evidence that is not earlier than the middle or late 2nd century. - Encyclopedia Brittanica, 2002, Cd-Rom Edition, © 1994-2002 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

The excavation of this site, which lies far beneath the high altar of the present Church of St. Peter, was begun in 1939...After a half century of investigation… None of the excavations, however, in all of the areas indicated at various times as the resting place of the apostolic relics, have produced any evidence whatsoever that the bodies of Peter and Paul were either buried there originally or brought there at a later time after earlier burials elsewhere.  If a grave of the Apostle did exist in the area of the base of the Aedicula, nothing identifiable of that grave remains today. - Encyclopedia Brittanica, 2002, Cd-Rom Edition, © 1994-2002 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

 

 

 

THE FICTITIOUS FIRST INFALLIBILE POPE
POPE PETER

Catholics do believe that the Pope, be he saint or sinner, is preserved by God from leading the Church into doctrinal error.  This is referred to as his infallibility.  More exactly, the Catholic Church claims to speak in matters of faith and morals through her bishops, and in a special way through the Pope, with an authority that demands respect.p. 43, Father Hendricks Ph.D.,Cathedral Of The Immaculate Conception, Religions In America

 

THE INFALLIBLE POPE PETER

Over 40 Citations In Scripture That The Infallible Pope Peter 

Would Have Led A Mindless Follower Into Damnation If They Thought Him "Infallible"

Mat 14:28 And Peter answered him and said, Lord, if it be thou, bid me come unto thee on the water.
Mat 14:29 And he said, Come. And when Peter was come down out of the ship, he walked on the water, to go to Jesus.
Mat 14:30 But when he saw the wind boisterous, he was afraid; and beginning to sink, he cried, saying, Lord, save me.
Mat 14:31 And immediately Jesus stretched forth his hand, and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt?

Mat 15:15 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Declare unto us this parable.
Mat 15:16 And Jesus said, Are ye also yet without understanding?

==============> THE "KEYS" <===================
Mat 16:18,19 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
==============> AFTER THE KEYS <===============
===============================================
BEGINNING OF PETER'S CAREER AS INFALLIBLE POPE
===============================================
===============================================


(1) CALLED SATANIC
Matthew 16:23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

(2) CALLED SATANIC
Mark 8:33 But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.

(3) REBUKED BY HEAVEN
Mat 17:1 And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,
Mat 17:2 And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
Mat 17:3 And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
Mat 17:4 Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
Mat 17:5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

(4) REBUKED BY HEAVEN
Mar 9:5 And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
Mar 9:6 For he wist not what to say; for they were sore afraid.
Mar 9:7 And there was a cloud that overshadowed them: and a voice came out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

(5) REBUKED BY HEAVEN
Luk 9:28 And it came to pass about an eight days after these sayings, he took Peter and John and James, and went up into a mountain to pray.
Luk 9:29 And as he prayed, the fashion of his countenance was altered, and his raiment was white and glistering.
Luk 9:30 And, behold, there talked with him two men, which were Moses and Elias:
Luk 9:31 Who appeared in glory, and spake of his decease which he should accomplish at Jerusalem.
Luk 9:32 But Peter and they that were with him were heavy with sleep: and when they were awake, they saw his glory, and the two men that stood with him.
Luk 9:33 And it came to pass, as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias: not knowing what he said.
Luk 9:34 While he thus spake, there came a cloud, and overshadowed them: and they feared as they entered into the cloud.
Luk 9:35 And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

(6) THREATENED BY CHRIST TO "HAVE NO PART"
Joh 13:6 Then cometh he to Simon Peter: and Peter saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet?
Joh 13:7 Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.
Joh 13:8 Peter saith unto him, Thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me.

(7) "PREVENTED" BY CHRIST
Mat 17:24 And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute?
Mat 17:25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers?

(8) REBUKED FOR UNFORGIVENESS
Mat 18:21 Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?
Mat 18:22 Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.

(9) ERRS BECAUSE OF PRIDE

Mat 26:33 Peter answered and said unto him, Though all men shall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended.
Mat 26:34 Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, That this night, before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.

(10) ARGUES WITH CHRIST
Mar 14:29 But Peter said unto him, Although all shall be offended, yet will not I.
Mar 14:30 And Jesus saith unto him, Verily I say unto thee, That this day, even in this night, before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice.
Mar 14:31 But he spake the more vehemently, If I should die with thee, I will not deny thee in any wise. Likewise also said they all.


(11) DENIES CHRIST
Luk 22:34 And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day, before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me.

(12) DENIES CHRIST
Joh 13:36 Simon Peter said unto him, Lord, whither goest thou? Jesus answered him, Whither I go, thou canst not follow me now; but thou shalt follow me afterwards.
Joh 13:37 Peter said unto him, Lord, why cannot I follow thee now? I will lay down my life for thy sake.
Joh 13:38 Jesus answered him, Wilt thou lay down thy life for my sake? Verily, verily, I say unto thee, The cock shall not crow, till thou hast denied me thrice.

(13) COULDN'T PRAY FOR 1 HOUR
Mat 26:37 And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy.
Mat 26:38 Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me.
Mat 26:39 And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.
Mat 26:40 And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What,
could ye not watch with me one hour?

(14) COULDN'T PRAY FOR EVEN 1 HOUR
Mar 14:33 And he taketh with him Peter and James and John, and began to be sore amazed, and to be very heavy;
Mar 14:34 And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch.
Mar 14:35 And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him.
Mar 14:37 And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and
saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou? couldest not thou watch one hour?

(15) REBUKED FOR CRIMINAL VIOLENCE
Joh 18:10 Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus.
Joh 18:11 Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath:

(16) DENIES CHRIST
Mat 26:69 Now Peter sat without in the palace: and a damsel came unto him, saying, Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee.
Mat 26:70 But he denied before them all, saying, I know not what thou sayest.


(17) DENIES CHRIST
Luk 22:56 But a certain maid beheld him as he sat by the fire, and earnestly looked upon him, and said, This man was also with him.
Luk 22:57 And he denied him, saying, Woman, I know him not.

(18) DENIES CHRIST
Joh 18:17 Then saith the damsel that kept the door unto Peter, Art not thou also one of this man's disciples? He saith, I am not.


(19) DENIES CHRIST
Mar 14:66 And as Peter was beneath in the palace, there cometh one of the maids of the high priest:
Mar 14:67 And when she saw Peter warming himself, she looked upon him, and said, And thou also wast with Jesus of Nazareth.
Mar 14:68 But he denied, saying, I know not, neither understand I what thou sayest.

(20) DENIES CHRIST
Luk 22:58 And after a little while another saw him, and said, Thou art also of them. And Peter said, Man, I am not.

(21) DENIES CHRIST
Joh 18:25 And Simon Peter stood and warmed himself. They said therefore unto him, Art not thou also one of his disciples? He denied it, and said, I am not.


(22) DENIES CHRIST
Mat 26:71 And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and said unto them that were there, This fellow was also with Jesus of Nazareth.
Mat 26:72 And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man.

(22) DISOBEYS CHRIST OVER OATH TAKING
Mat 26:71 And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and said unto them that were there, This fellow was also with Jesus of Nazareth.
Mat 26:72 And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man.


(24) DENIES CHRIST
Mar 14:69 And a maid saw him again, and began to say to them that stood by, This is one of them.
Mar 14:70 And he denied it again.


(25) DENIES CHRIST
Mat 26:73 And after a while came unto him they that stood by, and said to Peter, Surely thou also art one of them; for thy speech bewrayeth thee.


(26) CURSES AND SWEARS IN DENIAL OF CHRIST
Mat 26:74 Then began he to curse and to swear, saying,


(27) DENIES CHRIST
Mat 26:74 Then began he to curse and to swear, saying,I know not the man. And immediately the cock crew.
Mat 26:75 And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. And he went out, and wept bitterly.


(28) DENIES CHRIST
And a little after, they that stood by said again to Peter, Surely thou art one of them: for thou art a Galilaean, and thy speech agreeth thereto.
Mar 14:71 But he began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not this man of whom ye speak.
Mar 14:72 And the second time the cock crew. And Peter called to mind the word that Jesus said unto him, Before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice. And when he thought thereon, he wept.


(29) DENIES CHRIST
Luk 22:59 And about the space of one hour after another confidently affirmed, saying, Of a truth this fellow also was with him: for he is a Galilaean.
Luk 22:60 And Peter said, Man, I know not what thou sayest. And immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew.
Luk 22:61 And the Lord turned, and looked upon Peter. And Peter remembered the word of the Lord, how he had said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.
Luk 22:62 And Peter went out, and wept bitterly.


(30) DENIES CHRIST
Joh 18:26 One of the servants of the high priest, being his kinsman whose ear Peter cut off, saith, Did not I see thee in the garden with him?
Joh 18:27 Peter then denied again: and immediately the cock crew.


(31) BELEIVED NOT
Mar 16:7 But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you.
Mar 16:10 And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.
Mar 16:11 And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.


(32) BELEIVED NOT
Luk 24:10 It was Mary Magdalene and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles.
Luk 24:11 And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not.
Luk 24:12 Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass.


(33) WAS "WITHSTOOD TO THE FACE"
Gal 2:9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
Gal 2:10 Only they would that we should remember the poor; the same which I also was forward to do.
Gal 2:11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.


(34) "WITHDRAWS IN FEAR"
Gal 2:12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision.


(35) LEADS OTHERS "AWAY" (ASTRAY)
Gal 2:13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation.


(36) CAUSES "DISSIMULATION"
Gal 2:13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation.


(37) WALKED NOT UPRIGHTLY
Gal 2:14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?


(38) DID NOT TEACH THE TRUTH OF THE GOSPEL
Gal 2:14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel,


(39) MADE CHRIST "THE MINISTER OF SIN"
Gal 2:17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.


(40) FRUSTRATED THE GRACE OF GOD
Gal 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.


(40b) MADE CHRIST'S DEATH "VAIN"
Gal 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

 

THERE ARE 40 RECORDED ACCOUNTS OF HOW PETER AS AN "INFALLIBLE POPE" WOULD HAVE DAMNED THE BODY OF CHRIST". 

Paul first met with Peter at Jerusalem three years after his conversion. In the record of this meeting the name of Cephas (Peter) precedes that of James, although Galatians notes that in another meeting 14 years later the name of James precedes that of Cephas (Galatians 2:9). Paul also emphasized an incident involving himself and Peter at Antioch. Apparently, Paul had achieved some success in the difficult matter of welding the Jewish and Gentile Christians of Antioch into one congregation. The Jewish Christians saw the sharing of food with Gentiles as quite alien to their tradition. In the absence of Paul, Peter, perhaps in his capacity as missionary, visited Antioch and ate with the united group. Later, "certain persons came from James" and opposed the united congregation's custom of eating together. In apparent deference to James, Peter "drew back and began to hold aloof," and the Jewish Christians did likewise. The unity of the group had been destroyed. When Paul returned, he upbraided Peter for what he may have considered Peter's vacillation or perhaps even purposeful disruption (Galatians 2:11–14). This incident may have occasioned the Jerusalem Council (AD 49 or 50), in which it was settled that hereafter Paul should be "entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised" (Galatians 2:7) and Peter "for the mission to the circumcised" (Galatians 2:8).
ENYCLOPEDIA BRITTANICA, 2002 CD-ROM ED.

We have seen how well the doctrine of the first (and greatest) "infallible Pope" in Scripture would have "damned" the body of Christ.  The history of western civilization is repleat with examples where the historic position of the Papacy was in error and only reversed when it had no other choice but to do so, the damnation of Galilleo being obviously the most famous example.

THE INFALLIBLE POPE IN HISTORY

(1)  Pope outlaws blood relatives of Christ

(2) Pope outlaws religion of Christ, his family and his historical followers

(2)  Pope affirms flat Earth

(3)  Pope affirms Earth center of Solar system

(4)  Pope condemns Gallileo to hell

(5)  Pope damns paying for theological education

(6)  Pope approves paying for theological education

(7)  Pope approves of "selling salvation" through indulgences

(8)  Pope forbides the reading of "Scripture"

(9)  Pope damns the practice of "Banking"

(10) Pope damns the practice of "Medicine"

(11) Pope damns the practice of "Science"

(11) Pope orders "ethnic cleansing" & genocides

(12) Pope orders "death sentences" for "witches & heretics" (which becomes political licenses to kill anyone)

(13) Pope affirms the practice of slavery

(14) Pope sides with the SOUTH in US Civil war

(13) Pope sides with NAZIs in WWII

(14) Pope refuses to confront pedophile preists

(15) Pope refuses to return Nazio gold confiscated from Holocaust victims

That's simply a short list of examples.  There are enough examples to fill many such pages.

THE BIZZARE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VATICAN AND ASHKENAZI RABBINICAL JUDAISM

 

FOUR WOMEN FROM ROME

Modern Rabbinical Judaism Is The Subsidized Creation  Of Vatican, Rome

 

40% OF THE WORLD'S TOTAL ASHKENAZI JEWISH POPULATION ARE GENETICALLY TRACED TO BE DESCENDANTS FROM 4 FEMALES WHO MIGRATED WITH HUSBANDS TO ITALY AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL (BY ROME) IN 70 CE

 

Ashkenazi Jews accounted for (at their highest) 92% of the world's Jews in 1931 and today make up approximately 80% of Jews worldwide

 

 

NEW YORK TIMES

New Light on Origins of Ashkenazi in Europe
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: January 14, 2006 (EXCERPTS)

A new look at the DNA of the Ashkenazi Jewish population has thrown light on its still mysterious origins.

Until now, it had been widely assumed by geneticists that the Ashkenazi communities of Northern and Central Europe were founded by men who came from the Middle East, perhaps as traders, and by the women from each local population whom they took as wives and converted to Judaism.

But the new study, published online this week in The American Journal of Human Genetics, suggests that the men and their wives migrated to Europe together.

In the case of the Ashkenazi population, the researchers found that many branches coalesced to single trees, and so were able to identify the four female ancestors.

Looking at other populations, the Technion team found that some people in Egypt, Arabia and the Levant also carried the set of mutations that defines one of the four women.

The Technion team suggests a different origin for the Ashkenazi community: if the women too are Middle Eastern in origin, they would presumably have accompanied their husbands. At least the Ashkenazi Jewish community might have been formed by families migrating together.

Dr. Hammer said the new study "moves us forward in trying to understand Jewish population history." His own recent research, he said, suggests that the Ashkenazi population expanded through a series of bottlenecks - events that squeeze a population down to small numbers - perhaps as it migrated from the Middle East after the destruction of the Second Temple in A.D. 70 to Italy, reaching the Rhine Valley in the 10th century.

But Dr. Goldstein said the new report did not alter his previous conclusion. The mitochondrial DNA's of a small, isolated population tend to change rapidly as some lineages fall extinct and others become more common, a process known as genetic drift. In his view, the Technion team has confirmed that genetic drift has played a major role in shaping Ashkenazi mitochondrial DNA. But the linkage with Middle Eastern populations is not statistically significant, he said.

Because of genetic drift, Ashkenazi mitochondrial DNA's have developed their own pattern, which makes it very hard to tell their source. This differs from the patrilineal case, Dr. Goldstein said, where there is no question of a Middle Eastern origin.

TWO UNPLEASANT OBSERVATIONS

1. MATRALINEAL DESCENT TRACKING IS WORTHLESS

QUOTE: Because of genetic drift, Ashkenazi mitochondrial DNA's have developed their own pattern, which makes it VERY HARD TO TELL their source. This differs from THE PATRILINEAL LINE, Dr. Goldstein said, where there is NO QUESTION of a Middle Eastern origin. END QUOTE

The Patrilineal line? Not the Matralineal line? RABBINICAL JUDAISM is traced through the Mother, the Matralineal line!  (Which is virtually worthless in terms of genetics)

You can have a Jewish Father and a Karaite Mother, and the Rabbi will tell you you're "NOT JEWISH"!!!  But you can be an atheist Norwegian whose grandmother was a convert to Rabbinical Judaism, and Rabbinical Judaism will call you "Jewish".  Which according to hard science is literally worthless genetically.

And the only kind of  genetic tracing that has any merit, is the kind that is practice in keeping with the Scriptures, and kept by Karaite Jews to this day.  Patrilineal descent.

2. WHAT KIND OF "JEWS" WOULD MIGRATE TO ROME WHILE ROME IS DESTROYING ISRAEL?

In the historical accounts of the sack of Jerusalem is recorded the betrayal of the nation of Israel by a group of Rabbis in league with Rome.  Later, the lives of these Rabbis were spared and given safe refuge.  40% of the world's Ashkenazi Jews are genetically traced to 4 women in Italy who arrived during this period in history.  The Cheif Rabbi in Rome, responsible for much of the later codification of modern Rabbinical Judaism, was from this immigration.

 

WHY DOES RABBINICAL JUDAISM TRACK MATRALINEAL JEWISH DESCENT IF IT IS VIRTUALLY WORTHLESS GENETICALLY , NOT THE BIBLICAL PRACTICE, AND EVEN CONTRADICTED BY BIBLICAL COMMAND?

 

THE ISREALI INSIDER
QUOTE: We really need to wake up and reexamine if the Vatican is our friend. Last week, world newspapers ran stories and photos of 160 Jews "blessing the Pope." The Pave the Way Foundation, which organized the meeting in Rome, said, "We have traveled here with the blessings of millions of our faith in order to thank you." Well, with all due respect to that group, I doubt millions of Jews were sending blessings to Vatican City.

Halacha (Jewish Law) was nowhere to be found at that event. In the presence of the CHEIF RABBI OF ITALY, the Pope was praised, Catholic saints were spoken of and the Jews presented the Pope with a cross. The media referred to 160 "world Jewish leaders", which immediately begged the question - what Jewish leaders? They were not political leaders of Israel, nor were they top American politicians that happen to be Jewish. Who they were, were mostly BUSINESSMEN FROM NEW YORK, none whom wore a kippah, but who all shook hands with the Pope, calling him "YOUR HOLINESS". For a Jew, what is holy about the Pope?

http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/5276.htm

And the ironic thing about this publicity stunt is that it takes place at the same time, the Vatican is literally fighting in court, to keep from returning Nazi Gold confiscated from Holocaust victims during Wolrd War II?  What Jews would hold a "Blessing for the Pope" while he is busy fighting a law suite against Nazi Holocaust victims refusng to return gold confiscated from their families?

 

Vatican Fights to Keep Nazi Gold Lawsuit Out of US Courts

San Francisco

February 3, 2009

While the Vatican faces new charges of Holocaust denial over the Popeʼs pardon of Holocaust denier Bishop Williamson, it has also been fighting a little-known 10 year battle to protect the Vatican Bank from accountability for laundering Nazi loot after the Second World War.

The lawsuit, Alperin v. Vatican Bank, (9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Case: 08-16060) alleges the Vatican bank and Franciscan Order laundered tens of millions of dollars including concentration camp gold from former Yugoslavia immediately following the Second World War.

The case against the Vatican Bank (but not the Franciscan Order) was dismissed on grounds the Vatican Bank is an organ of a sovereign entity, the Vatican, which is immune from lawsuits.

The just filed appeal however argues that the Vatican Bank is not sovereign and engages in commercial activity in the United States and therefore should be held accountable in a United States Federal Court.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs, Holocaust survivors and their heirs including Serbs, Jews, and Roma, originally filed the lawsuit in 1999.  They are seeking an accounting and a return of the loot estimated to have been worth over $50 million dollars in 1946. http://www.vaticanbankclaims.com/

 

QUOTE: The Vatican consider themselves supreme rulers of the world, superior to all common people, kings, prime ministers and presidents. All that is missing is a title of power, and the Pope almost had that. Only a few years ago the Catholic leader sought the ultimate authority, he was going to announce himself as the Holy Roman Emperor, reigning from the Urals to the Atlantic.  <> Just last month the Vatican “graciously” opened its “secret archives” which contains a large amount confiscated Jewish property. The repository will “loan” to Israel papers of Maimonides, which they have held captive since the 12th century. For hundreds of years Jews have wanted these documents, among other items, but the Vatican has DENIED ACCESS to them. If the Vatican was intrinsically good, if they really wanted to make a gesture towards peace, they would hand over all of THE JEWISH MATERIAL to the Jewish people. These games of “letting us borrow” OUR OWN MATERIALS, preposterous and juvenile.END QUOTE  - Sephardiccouncil.org/vatican

 

WHAT EXPLAINS THIS BIZZARE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE VATICAN AND ASHKENAZI RABBINICALISM?

Jerusalem Post
JEWISH POPES
Friday, April 15, 2005

QUOTE: Rabbi Shimon ben Elchanan HaGadol (the Great) of  TENTH CENTURY Mainz, Germany. Rabbi Shimon?s son, Elchanan was captured and kidnapped as a child by Christians and baptized and raised as a Christian. Rabbi Shimon, distraught and heartbroken, never gave up hope of finding his son and restoring him to Judaism. Rabbi Shimon is THE AUTHOR of a piyut (prayer poem) that has found a PERMEMANT PLACE in the recitation of the ASHKENAZIK LITURGY for the shacharit/morning prayer service of Rosh Hashana. In this prayer there is an acrostic that begs God, ??my son, Elchanan, live into the eternal world.? This is apparently a reference to the boy?s kidnapping and forced conversion to Christianity. Legend has it that Rabbi Shimon somehow gained an audience with the pope to plead for the relaxation of Catholic decrees against the Jews and in that meeting both the pope and Rabbi Shimon realized that they were father and son. The chess game between the two was a later embellishment of the original legend. That Rabbi Shimon?s son was kidnapped and baptized is a fact. What happened to him afterwards is open to legend and conjecture.

NEW YORK TIMES-
QUOTE: Dr. Hammer said the new study "moves us forward in trying to understand Jewish population history." His own recent research, he said, suggests that the Ashkenazi population expanded through a series of bottlenecks - events that squeeze a population down to small numbers -  perhaps  as it migrated from the Middle East after the destruction of the Second Temple in A.D. 70 to ITALY, reaching the Rhine Valley in THE 10TH CENTURY

List of the VATICAN'S "JEWISH" POPES
Jew * Das Papsttum, Breitkopf & Haertel 1904. Pope Leo X was a Medici (i.e. Khazar Black Nobility) and Clement VII was his cousin.
Jew ** Khazar Black Nobility whose father was a banker brought to Rome in Rothschild employ.
Jew ***Paul VI, Montini, was Jew according to the Blue Book of prominent families in Italy.
Jew **** Mother was a Jew, maiden name "Katz" Polonised as "Kaczorowska".
Jew ***** whose family had been accepted into the annals of Roman nobility more than a century before his birth. (The Broken Cross - The Hidden Hand in the Vatican by Piers Compton, p. 51).

Despite the fact there was no such office or word as "pope" until about the fourth century and that Peter was neither Roman Catholic nor pope, commencing with Peter, THE FIRST TEN POPES WERE "JEWS" of some description - (Philip I by William Thomas Walsh, Shead & Ward London, 1938).

Some "Jewish" popes previous to Malachy's prophecy include, Zephyrin (199-217), Siricus (384-399), Hormidas (514-523), and Analdet II (1130-1138). (Gert Haendler: Kirchengeschichte, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt Berlin, 1980).

THE VATICAN STARTED THE CLAIM THAT "JEWS" WERE A "RACE" (Not a Nationality Or Religion) AND THIS "RACE" WAS DERIVED FROM THE "MOTHER"

THUS THE ROMAN PONTIFF COULD BE BOTH "ROMAN" FROM THE FATHER

AND "JEWISH" FROM THE MOTHER

FULFILLING BOTH "MESSIANIC PROPHECY" GIVEN CONCERNING THE "JEW"

AND THE IMPERIAL TITLE OF PONTIFF MAXIMUS GIVEN ONLY TO A ROMAN.

 

MODERN RABBINICAL JUDAISM WAS CREATED AS A SELF-SERVING HISTORICAL TOOL OF THE 

VATICAN

 

While at the same time in history it was busy exterminating the family of Christ and the Karaim

[The Biblical Jew]


Today, what little remains of the Biblical (Karaite) Jew, is a tiny minority of the "Jewish popultion"

The Reformed Karaim (who wrote the New Testament) have been virtually exterminated through genocide.

 

Luk 18:7,8  And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them? I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?

 

Centuries later, Hitler (a Roman Catholic) believed his own Church's lies that Jews were a "Race" and attempted to have the "Jewish Race" EXTERMINATED.

KARAITES (Who are not acknowledged by the Vatican or Rabbinicals as "True Jews") Were Spared The Curse of Hitler's Holocaust

 


MORE UNPLEASANT OBSERVATIONS

(1) The Vast Majority of what we call "Jewish" today is a fabricated State-sponsored Judaism of the Vatican.

(2) It's founders assisted in betraying the State of Israel to it's national destruction with Rome.

(3) And was rewarded with political refuge in Rome 70 A.D., and even at this date, may or may not have been of actual "Jewish biological descent".

(4) Rabbinical Judaism today is a religion begun after the time of Christ, not before him, primarily as a replacement artifact for real Jews that were exterminated.

(5) It's writings are the property of Rome (it's actual sponsor) and in exclusive possession of the Vatican (who started it), still to this day.

(6) Messianic Jews starting "Christian synagogues" complete with Talmud quoting "Christian Rabbis" today, are no closer to the real (or Jewish) Christ than a Catholic Church, and are turning to a religion that was begun after him by decades if not centuries, for the sole purpose of "replacement" of "real actual historical Jews".

(7) No one is incentivized to admit who Christ really was, from the Protestant to the Catholic to the Orthodox to the Messianic to the Rabbinical or even to the modern Karaites themselves, who want his documented Biblical identity smothered perhaps most of all.

(8) The modern state of Israel (while destined to be) is simply a prop for a future move by the Vatican, and a rebuilding of a "Temple" it needs to be fully fulfilled as "the Antichrist", sponsored by Nicolaitan Roman & Masonic Babelists, not Jews, not Christians.  Israel will eventually be claimed by the Vatican itself, (probably complete with a Hitler style holocaust) after the Muslims in the area (which are a problem for Rome) have been eliminated.

 ROME DID TO AMERICAN PROTESTANTISM, THE VERY SAME THING IT HAD ALREADY DONE A LONG TIME AGO, TO BOTH ISLAM AND JUDAISM CENTURIES BEFORE

And that is why the CHRIST-MASS LIE is so much bigger than you think.

 

THE STRANGE CASE OF RAMBAM'S ROMAN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE

WHAT ELSE HAS THE VATICAN HIDDEN?

One of the most remarkable things about the teaching of Modern Rabbinical Judaism, based on one of it's most important "Fathers", is that at the end of it's most cardinal doctrinal statement (called the 13 principles of "Judaism") given by Rambam himself, is the odd, bizzare and completely inexplicable claim that Judaism will be no more, once the Jewish Messiah comes.  Of course, this statement is so counter-productive to the advancement of Judaism, not much less seriously flawed when one examines the claims of the Messianic era from the Prophets in the Tanak, there appears no logical explanation for it.  The Messiah of the scriptures, was to spread Judaism to the world, not bring it to an end.  In fact, the Jewish Messiah in the scriptures actually brings an end to the "Age of Gentiles", meaning it is Gentile religion that comes to an end, not Judaism! But there it is, in Rambam's own 13 princeples of Judaism.  How? Judaism is exclusively defined as the belief that Messiah "will come" (future tense).  So if he ever does come, Judaism is no more. (At least according to copies of the documents in the exclusive possession of the Vatican )

JUDAISM ACCORDING TO RAMBAM

1. G-d exists
2. G-d is one and unique
3. G-d is incorporeal
4. G-d is eternal
5. Prayer is to be directed to G-d alone and to no other
6. The words of the prophets are true 

7. Moses' prophecies are true, and Moses was the greatest of the prophets 

8. The Written Torah (first 5 books of the Bible) and Oral Torah (teachings now contained in the Talmud and other writings) were given to Moses
9. There will be no other Torah
10. G-d knows the thoughts and deeds of men
11. G-d will reward the good and punish the wicked
12. The Messiah will come
13. The dead will be resurrected

 

 

JUDAISM ACCORDING TO TORAH

#7b - A Statement contrary to the Torah, Abraham is the "father" not Moses.

Exo 3:6 Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.

Deu 9:27 Remember thy servants, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; look not unto the stubbornness of this people, nor to their wickedness, nor to their sin:

#8, - A Statement contary to the Torah

Deu 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

#9. - A Statement Contrary To The Tanak

Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

12. - A Statement Elimating Judaism, contrary to the Tanak

Isa 42:1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

If the Jewish Messiah were to ever actually come, then Rambam's "Judaism" would be self-annulled. [and exist no more forever]

ROME created a "wall of Partition" between Jews and "Christians" enforced by legal code in the Theodosius Codex.

Eph 2:14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

It is no accident this Judaism is traced back to ITALY, it's formative council is traced to after 70 CE, and it's very own original compositions of it's own RAMBAM are in the exclusive possession of Vatican, Rome, and known only from a "copy" MADE BY A "SCRIBE" TWO CENTURES LATER after they were allegedly composed? And unlike with the scriptures, both the Septuagint and the New Testament, there are no external sources of the documents, to contradict and expose Rome's own interpolations, without the scrutiny of science from textual criticism. We do know this is how every document it held in it's possession has been treated, from secular histories of Josephus to the very sacred texts of the New Testament itself, nothing was spared.  Who is going to know what Rambam really wrote, after the document forgers get finished with it, in Rome?  (Rome's interpolations could literally be anything) And taking Rome's "word for it" is almost a written money-back guarantee you are ultimately trusting in a certified pathological liar.  Judaism which depends on Rome, and ultimately comes from Rome, is not Judaism, it is Romanism, under another label with some different names.  The fact that Rome simultaneously creates it, and then attempts to destroy it, (to silence it) after it has finished using it, is as normal to Rome, as it is with the Italian Mafia.

Is it really surprising then, that the Judaism which emerges from it's Rome's own Archives, sounds more like it was penned by Roman Catholicism, than it does Biblical Judaism, or anything found practiced by actual Jews in the time of the New Testament? (Not when it has Josephus confessing "Jesus was the son of God" and the New Testament's letter from John citing the doctrine of the Trinity, 1 Jo. 5:7,  in a completely fabricated text)

The elements within Judaism that conspired with Rome for power, are no different than America's own modern day phony puppet "Evangelicals", put into power by the same mechanisms of money and academia, that corrupted both Arabic Islam, and Judaism before that.  The mechanics used were virtually the same, as was the outcome, in all three cases.

 There actually was a "universal" or "Catholic faith", but it is not the one that Rome has propped up with it's Pope as the head of, to be worshiped by all humanity.  It is the very one Rome has been aggressively attempting to destroy since even before the birth of Christ himself.  More about that will be shown below.


THE ORIGIN OF AN ANCIENT CONSPIRACY

 

 

 

 

How many "RELIGIONS" do you see in the picture below?

 

 

CORRECT ANSWER:

ONLY ONE

 

The False One.

 

THE BIBLICAL HISTORY OF BABELISM

 

 

Started At Babel By Nimrod, the anti-shemite [i.e., antichrist].

Gen 11:2-4 and it cometh to pass, in their journeying from the east, that they find a valley in the land of Shinar, and dwell there; and they say each one to his neighbour, `Give help, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly:' and the brick is to them for stone, and the bitumen hath been to them for mortar. And they say, `Give help, let us build for ourselves a city and tower, and its head in the heavens, and make for ourselves a name, [Young's Literal Translation]

 

 

2Ki 17:29  Howbeit every nation made gods of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places ...every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt.


 

RAISING UP THE LOCAL "CHURCH" AND A "CHURCH" FOR EVERY PEOPLE

(SOUND FAMILIAR?)

 

 

 

 


Rev 17:5  And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

 

 

 

MYSTERY BABYLON

 

 









DEFINITION:

 


μυστήριον, mustērion, moos-tay'-ree-on, From a derivative of μύω muō (to shut the mouth); a secret or “mystery” (through the idea of silence imposed by initiation into religious rites): - mystery. – Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance

 

Βαβυλών, Babulōn, bab-oo-lone', Of Hebrew origin [H894]; Babylon, the capital of Chaldaea (literally or figuratively as a type of tyranny): - Babylon.

 

H894, בּבל, bâbel, baw-bel', From H1101; confusion; Babel (that is, Babylon), including Babylonia and the Babylonian empire: - Babel, Babylon.

 

H1101, בּלל, bâlal, baw-lal', A primitive root; to overflow (specifically with oil); by implication to mix; also (denominative from H1098) to fodder: - anoint, confound, X fade, mingle, mix (self), give provender, temper.

 

H1098, בּליל, belîyl, bel-eel', From H1101; mixed, that is, (specifically) feed (for cattle): - corn, fodder, provender.

 

ETYMOLOGY OF PHRASE:

 

Babylon

6th Century BCE

 




"Let them make their land shine by building Temples for themselves.”

“As for us, by as many a name as we have called, he [Baal] shall be our god"

"Let the wise teach THE MYSTERY to the wise"

"THE BABYLONIAN GENESIS", Alexander Heidel,
University of Chicago Press

 

 

SYNOPSIS:

 

·        MARDUK [Bel, Baal], associated with THE SUN [i.e., THE SUN GOD]

 

·        Founder Of The Tower-Temple [marked by an affixed "tower to heaven"] [Designed, Invented and built 1st]

 

·        Overcame the “Creator” through the use of “Magic” using the “Temple” as a form of "secret" sorcery to enslave hummanity and bring under his control

 

    ·        Founded The empire City Of Babylon

 

·        Was the Son of Nudimmud [Nimrod]

 

·        His symbol: The Sun Disc with  a Spoke/ Cross in the center

 

·        Attributed with power over the “destinies” of men, to "exalt" or "kill" [martyr]

 

·        In gratitude for “saving the old gods” threatened with extinction during the flood, he is “given” the “kingdoms of the earth”.

 

In the New Testament paradigm, you have just read a description of Satan.

 

 Rev 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.


 

IN THE TORAH

 

THE BIBLICAL HISTORY OF RELIGIOUS BABELISM

(MYSTERY BABYLON)

 

 

THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE

 

 

 



KNOWLEDGE, know (n½) v. knew (n›, ny›), known (n½n), know·ing, knows. --tr. [Middle English knowen, from Old English cn³wan. See gn½- below.] --know"a·ble adj. --know"er n.

————————————————————

 gn½-. Important derivatives are: know, can1, cunning, uncouth, notice, recognize, noble, diagnosis, narrate.

gn½-. To know. Contracted from *gno…- as in "Gnostic". 1. Variant form *gn-, contracted from *gn…-. KNOW, from Old English cn³wan, to know, from Germanic *kn(w)-. 2. Zero-grade form *gö…-. a. CAN1, CON2, CUNNING, from Old English cunnan, to know, know how to, be able to, from Germanic * 5. Suffixed form *gn½-dhli-. NOBLE, from Latin n½bilis, knowable, known, famous, noble. 6. Reduplicated and suffixed form *gi-gn½-sko-. GNOME2, GNOMON, GNOSIS; AGNOSIA, DIAGNOSIS, PATHOGNOMONIC, PHYSIOGNOMY, PROGNOSIS, from Greek gign½skein, to know, think, judge, with gnosis (< *gn½-ti-), knowledge, inquiry, and gn½m½n, judge, interpreter. 7. Suffixed zero-grade form *gö…-ro-. NARRATE, from Latin narr³re (< *gnarr³re), to tell, relate, from gn³rus, knowing, expert. 8. Traditionally but improbably referred here are: a. NOTE; ANNOTATE, CONNOTE, PROTHONOTARY, from Latin nota, a mark, note, sign, cipher, shorthand character; b. NORM, NORMA, NORMAL; ABNORMAL, ENORMOUS, from Latin norma, carpenter's square, rule, pattern, precept, possibly from an Etruscan borrowing of Greek gn½m½n, carpenter's square, rule. [Pokorny 2. ªen- 376.]

 

 

 

THE Carpenter's SQUARE is the symbol of FREEMASONRY [builders of the Gothic Cathedrals of the Middle Ages], who trace their origins through Roman Catholicism to Nimrod, the founder of the Temple.

TREE OF "KNOWLEGE"

 

 (1) ...from Latin nota, A MARK

 (2) ...from Latin norma, CARPENTER'S SQUARE

 






THE FAMILY TREE OF "BABELISM"


 

 

THEY ARE THE SEED OF THE SERPENT

 

Gen 3:1  Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

 

Moses presents the act of SELF-DEIFICATION as leading to the loss of union between God and Hummanity [and the loss of "hearing God"] The first "Calling Out" is presented in this account.

 

Gen 3:8,9  And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.  And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?

 

Religious Babelism causes people to "hide" from the "voice of God" which speaks within them, out of "fear"; because they REPLACE God's voice with "carnal Knowledge of Good and Evil" [Ge.3]

 

Gen 3:10  And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.

 

This internal "suppression" leads to both mental and physical consequences.  It has been "estimated" that up to 90% of illnessess [many leading to DEATH] are ultimately "psycho-somatic" in origin [See Rom.6:23].

 

Gen 3:15  And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

 

 

This is the first allusion to the coming "Messiah" which will "bruise the head" of the "Serpent" [the TREE OF KNOWLEDGE tradition] and it's "TEMPLE" [same word used for the "side" of the "head"]  Here it is "prophesied" that there would be a "natural" EMNITY between the "seed [descendants] of the Tree of Knowledge" and the "REDEEMER".

 

Mat 23:31  Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

Mat 23:32  Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

Mat 23:33  Ye serpents*, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?


*A reference to THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE [and it's Religious Babelism] ... present at the time in the form of illegal & unconstitutional "synagogues" within the State of Israel, opposed by early karaites among the P'rushim [Literally "Pure Ones", i.e., Puritans], translated "Pharisees".

The "Foundational Principle" of Religious Babelism is the "substitution" of God's voice [and what he speaks to you] with "Carnal Knowledge" [also referred to in Euphemism as Spiritual Adultery]

 

 


THE MURDERER WHO "TILLS THE GROUND"

 

 The "Builders" of the Temple-Towers, referred to by Christ, as "unfaithful stewards" who "dig earth" [Mat.25:18]  with God's money, are presented in the next story as "Tillers of the ground" who offer the "fruit of their labor" to God as an "offering" that God has "no respect for".

 

Gen 4:2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

 

One of the most "dangerous" aspects of RELIGIOUS BABELISM is that it often "presecutes" those who "reject" it's "offering from the ground" through violence and oppression.  This is alluded to here in the second story from Moses.

 

Gen 4:3-5  And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.  And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect.

 

Gen 4:8  And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.

 

Religious Babelism has claimed more life in history, than any other institution in existence other than the human government itself, to which it is "wedded".

 

The "Murderer" who is the "tiller of the ground" instead of a "keeper of the sheep", is then given "THE MARK" by God, with the warning that no one is to "kill" the "killer".  This is THE FIRST TIME in the scripture the phrase is used.  It is the MARK OF CAIN.  Someone who is a "tiller of the ground" and "kills" his "righteous brother" over RELIGION.

 

 

The "Murderer" who is the "tiller of the ground" instead of a "keeper of the sheep"  goes out "from the presence of the Lord" [apostacy] and becomes the "founder of the CITY" [Enoch] in the land of Nod.  Some scholars have identified this as the Babylonian city of "Uruk", also pronounced "Unuk". It is historically the oldest complete cult center in the world dedicated to the worship of Ishtar. [the "whore" of Babylon]

 

 

How did this religion, founded by the "Tiller of the ground" instead of "the keeper of the sheep", who "murdered" his rigtheous brother? Who offered the "fruit of his labor from the ground" as an "offering to God", that God had "no respect for"? Who bore THE MARK as an apostate, fleeing from God's presence?

 

 

By buildng towers to heaven, selling religion for money, and observing the solar cycles as sacred, including Ishtar time [which occured in the spring when the constellation THE HARE appearred on the horizon celebrated with eggs, bunnies, passion plays and "weeping for Tammuz"] and the longest night of the year, marking the return of the Sun the next day, known as the WINTER SOLSTICE.

 

 

 

 

 

SOURCE OF IDOLITRY

 

IDOLIZING THE “MIGHTY MEN OF RENOWN, MEN OF OLD”

 

Gen 6:4,5  The fallen ones were in the earth in those days, and even afterwards when sons of God come in unto daughters of men, and they have borne to them--they are the heroes, who, from of old, are the men of name. And Jehovah seeth that abundant is the wickedness of man in the earth, and every imagination of the thoughts of his heart only evil all the day;

 

The earliest practices of “Idolatry”  came from “praying” to the Dead King, as a form of “sorcery”.  Originally the earliest TEMPLES were actually TOMBS.  In order to address the problem of DECOMPOSITION of the bodies, and it’s associated STENCH, the bodies were at first simply “mummified” to preserve the corpse for veneration.  Later, the practice of making A STATUE was found to solve the problem of the ROTTING CORPSE and still provide the devotees what is described by modern psychologists as “hallucinatory experiences”, serving as a “point of contact”.  Creation and veneration of the STATUES of all the various HEROS OF OLD came to be known as the practice of IDOLATRY in the Bible, from the term IDOL. [I-Doll]


Babelists intentionally promote real idolatry in modern society. Both idolization of "celebrity", and literal "statue-making" of "mighty men of renown, men of old".  The "idols" under the "Christmas ever-green tree" is not there by mistake, but by design.

 

  

BUILDERS OF TOWERS TO HEAVEN


RELIGIOUS BABELISM

 

Gen 11:3,4 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower,  whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

 

Gen 11:7,8,9 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel;

 

Main Entry: stee·ple

Function: noun

Etymology: Middle English stepel, from Old English stēpel tower; akin to Old English stēap steep

Date: before 12th century

: a tall structure usually having a small spire at the top and surmounting a church tower; broadly : a whole church tower

 

Main Entry: 1tow·er

Function: noun

Etymology: Middle English tour, tor, from Old English torr & Anglo-French tur, tour, both from Latin turris, from Greek tyrris, tyrsis

Date: before 12th century

1 : a building or structure typically higher than its diameter and high relative to its surroundings that may stand apart (as a campanile) or be attached (as a church belfry) to a larger structure and that may be fully walled in or of skeleton framework

 

The SHEPHERD OF HERMAS, written by the brother of the Bishop of Rome, claims to be a prophetic “revelation” in which he is shown that the ECCLESIA is supposed to FINISH THE TOWER OF BABEL, and the TOWER OF BABEL is actually the CHURCH.  Thus began the practice of placing “steeples” on CHURCHES.  Often, as an indication of the concept of the SECOND TOWER, many Gothic style cathedrals will have not one, but TWO TOWERS.  This is also a reference to a concept in MASONRY known as the TWO PILLARS which were allegedly found after the FLOOD by NIMROD, and “restored” the SECRET KNOWLEDGE.

 

Many modern office complexes, influenced by Masonic architecture, display the TWO TOWER theme, including the late TWIN TOWERS in New York City destroyed on 9-11.  Is there a “revelation” to us as Americans in the events of 9-11?

 

Revelation 9:11  and they have over them a king--the messenger of the abyss--a name is to him in Hebrew, Abaddon, and in the Greek he hath a name, Apollyon.

 

 

 

 

 

ABRAHAM "CALLED OUT" FROM RELIGIOUS "BABELISM"

(MYSTERY BABYLON)

 

God never “made covenant” with BABEL.   He “cursed it”.  Tracing “Mystery Babelism” throughout the Bible shows a consistent relationship between God and Babelism, it is one of hostility and judgement.

 

(THE ABRAHAMIC COVENANT - "ECCLESIA" - CALLED OUT)

AND WHY THE REAL "ABRAHAMIC COVENANT" BRINGS "SALVATION"

 

Gen 12:1,2,3 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. 

 

Gen 15:6,7 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness. And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.

 

The “claim” that BABELISM is consistent with the ABRAHAMIC COVENANT is a complete “DENIAL” of the very PURPOSE of the CALLING OUT to begin with.

 

God has "cursed" Babelism by causing it to manifest the very opposite of the thing it promises.

 

Gen 11:4  And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

COMPARE:

Gen 11:8  So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

 

In the New Testament, it is written that it claims to be "The Bride" and will "See No Sorrow".  But instead of the being the "Bride of Christ" and "Saved from hell-fire", that is precisely what it manifests:

 

Rev 18:7  How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.

COMPARE:

Rev 18:8  Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

 

 This is not the "Abrahamic Covenant", it is the perversion and apostacy of Religious Babelism, an occult form of Devil Worship, that the Bible says will damn it's leaders and their followers to the Lake Of Fire.

 

While offering to "Save you", they are actually damning you. (The danger of the "Confusion" caused by "Babelism")

 

 

 

IT'S MESSENGERS FIGHT AGAINST GOD'S VOICE

 

Gen 13:12,13 Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain [Ge.11:2], and pitched his tent toward Sodom. But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly.

 

 

the cities of the plain =

Gen 11:2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. (Babel)

 

 

Rom 1:28  And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind,

 

The primary part of the brain responsible for “responding to God” and knowing him [which occurs through “instinct” or “intuition”] is the HYPOTHALAMUS, the center of all the basic human life-drives [collectively creating "instinct"].  “THALAMUS” is literally the Greek word for “BRIDE’S CHAMBER” [i.e., as in "Bride" of Christ, for example] and is found at the base of the brain [the area exposed when a person “bows their head” to pray]

 

This AREA is said to be “suppressed” and “damaged” in the New Testament by the “effects” of religious Babelism which uses Pavolian conditioning to suppress natural intuition to achieve group control.  It's effects are said to result in a physical “condition” translated into English as a “reprobate mind”.  The "reprobate mind" is marked by gender "confusion" and unnatural self-destructive appetites which can show up in reference to food, sleep or sex (any basic drive).  While no "scientific studies" have been or probably ever will be conducted on this link presented in the Scriptures, modern scientists have discovered the Hypothalamus appears to be atrophied in patients with homosexual orientation and in people with a history of drug abuse.  On the other hand, God-conscoiusness centers have been physically located in the frontal lobe discovered through the use of fMRI's.

 

If the Hypothalamus shares a neurological process with "intuition" in the brain, which it naturally would due to it's function at the brain stem, and that function is consistenly violated and suppressed, through religious "doctrines", forms and customs forced on people through relgious Babelism, it would not be hard to understand how often the more "religious" people get, in the institutionalized forms of religious Babelism, the more suppressed these sources of natural intuitive responses become.

 

The internal suppression of natural God-given intuitive responses responsible for protecting the welfare and survival of the individual could become subjugated to relgious institutionalism and literally disable a survival function within the individual in a counter-productive way.  The word "Babel" actually means "confusion", and if one understands this as a "spirit" (meaning actually state of consciousness), it would create behavioral and cognitive manifestations.  The Biblical concept of this suppression is certinaly consistent with the irony of higher than normal levels of homosexuality found among the Roman Priesthood, though as an institution, it has demanded condemnation of homosexuality and is even sworn to the asexual extreme of celebacy.  This odd contradiction obviously makes sense, given the very description, to the very same Roman institutions and practices, in the time of Paul.   - SEE TheVatican And Sex

 






Brain feature linked to sexual orientation. (hypothalamus and homosexuality)

From: Science News  | Date: August 31, 1991  | Author: Ezzell, Carol  | More results for: hypothalamus homosexuality

 

A comparison of 41 autopsied brains has revealed a distinct difference between homosexual and heterosexual men in the brain region that controls sexual behavior. The finding supports a theory that biological factors underlie sexual orientation, although it remains unclear whether the anatomical variation represents a cause or result of homosexuality, says neurobiologist Simon LeVay, who describes the study in the Aug. 30 SCIENCE. - Brain Feature Linked To Sexual Orientation - Highbeam.com

 

 

 The "judgement" of destruction by fire on the Sodomites of Babelism, is echoed in the book of Revelation, where CHRIST returns in the air to "destroy" "Mystery Babylon" [Rev.18,19].   As hard as this may be to understand for some, not all homosexuals in the scriptures are "Sodomites", and not all heterosexuals are "not Sodomites" (although this is what this term has been corrupted to mean). Sodomites are "Babelists", not simply homosexuals. And "Sodomites" suppress the truth, not only about God but even themselves, often making a political hobby out of persecuting homosexuals, while secretly engaging in the practice (and according to scripture, this is the "judgement"/"justice" from God, they "recieve" in their "bodies" (meaning physiology).  They literally cannot stop it.  As in the case of Nicolaitanism, it's urge for sex with boys, is irrational, and physiologically based, (regardless of what the person may "believe" or say they believe publicly, is "right and wrong") and it is not unrelated to the development of "consciousness".  Until the constructs of consciousness itself has changed, and that change is permanent enough to induce physiological changes, change will be impossible, and given the fact, there is a threshold of no return evidenced by the warnings in these texts concerning Babelism, some will never be able to change.  The damage becomes permanent. 

 

 

 

 

SOME WHO BELONG TO GOD ARE IN IT

 

...and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain, and pitched his tent toward Sodom

 

 

 

GODLY MEN WRONGLY TRY TO FULFILL GOD'S PROMISES TO THEM THROUGH IT

 

Gen 16:1,2 Now Sarai Abram's wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar.And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.

 

Gen 21:9,10 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac.

 

Gal 4:22-26 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. [JERUSALEM ABOVE "HAS NO TEMPLE"]

 

 

BABELISTS SELL-OUT THEIR SPIRITUAL "BIRTH-RIGHT" FOR A BELLY FULL OF "SOD" (Used to "make Bricks")

 

Gen 25:30-34 And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom. And Jacob said, Sell me this day thy birthright. And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?And Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob. Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright. [RED - "AWDAM" - POTTAGE from SOD] <BRICKS>

 

 

 

 

THEY DO NOT HAVE THE "REVELATION" THAT THE EARTH IS "GOD'S HOUSE"

 

Gen 28:12,13 And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it. And, behold, the LORD stood above it, and said, I am the LORD God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed;

 

Gen 28:16,17 And Jacob awaked out of his sleep, and he said, Surely the LORD is in this place; and I knew it not. And he was afraid, and said, How dreadful is this place! this is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.

 

 

 

 

 THEY DESPISE THE ONES THAT THE "FATHER" LOVES

 

Gen 37:3,4 Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours.And when his brethren saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren, they hated him, and could not speak peaceably unto him.

 

 

 

THEY ENSLAVE GOD'S PEOPLE TO "CRUEL BONDAGE TO BRICK AND MORTOR"

 

 Exo 1:13,14,24 And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigour: And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in morter, and in brick, And God heard their groaning, and God remembered his covenant with Abraham,

 

 

 

THEY RESIST THE HOLY SPIRIT and "DEMAND MORE BRICK"

 

Exo 5:6,7 And Pharaoh commanded the same day the taskmasters of the people, and their officers, saying,Ye shall no more give the people straw to make brick  And the tale of the bricks, which they did make heretofore, ye shall lay upon them; ye shall not diminish

 

 

 

THEY MOCK THE "VOICE OF THE LORD"

 

Exo 5:2 And Pharaoh said, Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not the LORD, neither will I let Israel go.

 

 

 

THEY ABUSE GOD'S PEOPLE TO KEEP THEIR "BRICKS"

 

Exo 5:14 And the officers of the children of Israel, which Pharaoh's taskmasters had set over them, were beaten, and demanded, Wherefore have ye not fulfilled your task in making brick both yesterday and to day, as heretofore?

 

 

 

BUT GOD WILL REMEMBER HIS "COVENANT" WITH ABRAHAM TO "CALL OUT" OF BRICK & MORTOR

 

Exo 6:5 And I have also heard the groaning of the children of Israel, whom the Egyptians keep in bondage; and I have remembered my covenant.

 

 

 

GOD'S JUDGEMENT WILL COME ON THE PHARAOHS, and his "FREEMASONS" OF BRICK AND MORTOR

 

Exo 11:4-6 And Moses said, Thus saith the LORD, About midnight will I go out into the midst of Egypt: And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts. And there shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt,

 

 

 

THE "PASSOVER" - DO NOT LEAVE YOUR HOME

 

Exo 12:22 And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the bason, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the bason; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning. For the LORD will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the LORD will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you.

 

 

 

"PASSOVER" IS AN ETERNAL MEMORIAL OF GOD'S JUDGEMENT AGAINST SLAVERY TO THE "BRICK & MORTOR" OF BABELISM

 

Exo 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.

 

 

 

HOUSEHOLDS OF "ECCLESIA" TO REMEMBER THE "CALLING OUT"

 

Exo 12:26 And it shall come to pass, when your children shall say unto you, What mean ye by this service? That ye shall say, It is the sacrifice of the LORD'S passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt, when he smote the Egyptians, and delivered our houses. [WHILE THE EGYPTIANS IN THEIR TEMPLES OF BRICK & MORTOR MOURN THEIR DEAD]

 

 

 

THIS IS THE "MARK OF GOD" ON THE HAND AND THE FOREHEAD [THAT MARK HIS "CHOSEN"]

 

Exo 13:9,16 And it shall be for a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial between thine eyes, that the LORD'S law may be in thy mouth: for with a strong hand hath the LORD brought thee out of Egypt. And it shall be for a token upon thine hand, and for frontlets between thine eyes: for by strength of hand the LORD brought us forth out of Egypt.

 

 

 

GOD'S JUDGEMENT ON AND DELIEVERANCE FROM SLAVERY TO THE BRICK & MORTOR OF "BABELISM" IS THE "SONG OF MOSES"

 

Exo 15:1 Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto the LORD, and spake, saying, I will sing unto the LORD, for he hath triumphed gloriously: the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.

 

Exo 15:2 The LORD is my strength and song, and he is become my salvation: he is my God, and I will prepare him an habitation; my father's God, and I will exalt him.

 

 COMPARE

 Rev 15:2  And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God. 

Rev 15:3  And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints. 

 


HE WILL "HEAL" HIS PEOPLE OF THE "JUDGEMENT OF SICKNESS & DEATH" ON BABELISM [MYSTERY BABYLON]

 

Exo 15:26 and He saith, `If thou dost really hearken to the voice of Jehovah thy God, and dost that which is right in His eyes, and hast hearkened to His commands, and kept all His statutes: none of the sickness which I laid on the Egyptians do I lay on thee, for I, Jehovah, am healing thee.

 

 

 

EVERYMAN WORSHIPS GOD IN THE "DOOR OF HIS TENT"

 

 Exo 33:10 And all the people saw the cloudy pillar stand at the tabernacle door: and all the people rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door.

 

 

 

JOSHUA RECIEVES THE REVELATION WHERE WALKS [THE "EARTH"] IS HOLY

 

Jos 5:14 And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my lord unto his servant?

 

Jos 5:15 And the captain of the LORD'S host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.

 

 

 

THE BLAST OF THE SHOFAR OF THE COVENANT WILL DESTROY THE WALLS OF BRICK & MORTOR

 

Jos 6:5 And it shall come to pass, that when they make a long blast with the ram's horn, and when ye hear the sound of the trumpet, all the people shall shout with a great shout; and the wall of the city shall fall down flat, and the people shall ascend up every man straight before him.

 

 

 

THE SCARLET THREAD OF REDEMPTION FOR THE WHORE

 

Jos 2:18 Behold, when we come into the land, thou shalt bind this line of scarlet thread in the window which thou didst let us down by: and thou shalt bring thy father, and thy mother, and thy brethren, and all thy father's household, home unto thee.

 

 

 

DO NOT GO OUT OF YOUR HOUSE OR THE "COVENANT" IS "BROKEN"

 

Jos 2:19 And it shall be, that whosoever shall go out of the doors of thy house into the street, his blood shall be upon his head, and we will be guiltless: and whosoever shall be with thee in the house, his blood shall be on our head, if any hand be upon him.

 

 

 

 

JOSHUA "SAVES" THE HARLOT WHO STAYS IN HER HOME

 

Jos 6:25 And Joshua saved Rahab the harlot alive, and her father's household, and all that she had; and she dwelleth in Israel even unto this day; because she hid the messengers, which Joshua sent to spy out Jericho.

 

 

 

THE "CURSE OF JOSHUA" IS PRONOUNCED ON THE "CITY OF WALLS"

 

Jos 6:26 And Joshua adjured them at that time, saying, Cursed be the man before the LORD, that riseth up and buildeth this city Jericho: he shall lay the foundation thereof in his firstborn, and in his youngest son shall he set up the gates of it.

 

 

 

EVEN THE "THINGS" OF "MYSTERY BABYLON" ARE CURSED [DO NOT COVET THEM]

 

Jos 6:26 And Joshua adjured them at that time, saying, Cursed be the man before the LORD, that riseth up and buildeth this city Jericho: he shall lay the foundation thereof in his firstborn, and in his youngest son shall he set up the gates of it.

 

 

 

IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

 

 

 

 

 

BABELISTS ARE UNFAITHFUL STEWARDS WHO "DIG EARTH" WITH GOD'S MONEY

 

Mat 25:18 But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money. Mat 25:19 After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them. Mat 25:24 Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed: Mat 25:25 And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine.Mat 25:26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant,

 

 

 

BABELISTS WILL BE CAST INTO OUTER DARKNESS

 

Mat 25:30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

 

 

 

BABELISTS ARE THE "GOATS" OF THE "HIGH PLACES" THAT WILL BE CAST INTO FIRE

 

Mat 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

 

Mat 25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

 

Mat 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

 

 

 

BABELISTS WILL COME IN CHRIST'S NAME AND "DECIEVE MANY"

 

Mat 24:5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

 

 

 

BABELISTS ARE "FALSE RELGIOUS LEADERS" DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING:

 

23:5 -   Wear religous garb to draw attention to themselves                              

 

23:6 -   Sit themselves in seats of honor in religious buildings (they build with unethically obtained money)    

 

23:7 -   Love to be called by Academic titles             

 

23:13 - Have an anti-spiritual bias or predjudice         

 

23:15 - Propigate the religous system of Babelism                    

 

23:23 - Focus on tithing, solicitations

 

23:29 - Give lip service to dead prophets          

 

CHRIST PREACHES AGAINST EVERY "VERSION" OF IT

 

Matthew 23 - The Synagogue Temple Cult - It's leaders, converts, practices and theology is condemned.                          

 

Matthew 24 - The Jerusalem Temple Cult - It's destruction, the end of it's time prophesied and the presence of the Messiah without a Temple.                       

 

Matthew 24 -The "Pseudo Christian" Temple Cult - It's leaders, converts, practices and theology is both prophesied and condemned.                                      

 

Matthew 25 - Teaching Contrasting Temple Cultists with the "faithful steward",the "virgins",and the"sheep".

 

REFUTED BY BOTH "EXAMPLE" AND THEOLOGY THROUGHOUT HUNDREDS OF VERSES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

 

Matthew 10:5-14                     Sent  Apostles to homes   

 

Matthew 24:23-28                   After Destruction of Temple  "Do not believe, do not go"      

 

Matthew 26:17, 26-28             New Covenant Established In Home    

 

Exodus 12:14,21-22                 Cmp. Passover- told not to leave home           

 

Acts 1:4,13                              Told To Wait In Jerusalem (in home)

 

Acts 2:1-2                                Shikinah Glory Fills the House     

 

Acts 2: 6                                  Gift of "Tongues" a "Sign" of God's Judgement in Israel                                                  against "Babelism" [Is.28:11]   

 

Acts 4:10-12                            The "Stone" the "Builders" Rejected

 

Acts 5:20-21                            People At Temple Outside Words of   "this Life".    

 

Acts 6:9,13-14,                        Stephen Tried for speaking "... words against Temple".  

 

Acts 7:1-2, 45-51                    Builders of Temple Called "Stiffnecked" and "Resisting                                                  Holy Spirit"                        

 

Acts 12:12                               Prayer meetings held in home.

 

Acts 16:15                               Thyratira (Household) met in home     

 

Acts 16:25-34                          Phillippi (Household) met in home      

 

Acts 16: 40                              Ministered to the Bretheren (Home)   

 

Acts 18:7-11                            Corinth (Household) in home

 

Acts 20:7,8                              Assembled In Upper Room Of House   

 

 

Acts 21:8-12                            Caesarea (Assembled in Home)     

 

Acts 21:27,28                          Paul Arrested for "Speaking against...(temple)"        

 

Acts 28:30                               Paul Assembled in "Rented House"

 

Romans 1:7,                             "To all the saints.... (Continued)"      

 

16:3-5,                                     Priscilla & Aquilla (Church in thier house)                               

 

10                                            (Household) of Aristobulus       

 

11,                                           (Household) of Narcissus       

 

14,15,23,                                 All the saints "with them" (Households)

 

1 Cor. 1:11,16                         Chloe's Household                

 

1 Cor.14:26,                            Baptized Household of Stephanas   

 

16:15,16, 19                            (Household Of Stephanas) Submit to Ministry     

 

Gal 4:24-31                              Physical Jeruslaem (& Temple =Hagar)

 

Eph. 2:19                                 Called Members of the "Household Of God"                              

 

Eph. 2:20,21                            People Called "The Temple"

 

Phil 4:21                                   (Household) in home

 

Col 4:15                                   "The Church that is in His House"     

 

2 Thess. 2:1-12                        Man Of Sin Revealed         

 

2 Thess. 2:15                            Told To "Keep The Traditions". (As protection against the                                                         "great delusion" See 2 Thess 2: 1-12)  [Whether by                                                                   "Epistle" or in person]   

 

1 Tim 3:15                                The House Of God       

 

2 Tim. 3:6                                 False Teachers Had to Go To "Households"         

 

2 Tim 4:19                                Greet "Household" of Onesiphorus

 

Philemon 1-3                            "To the Church In Your House"   

 

Hebrew 10:25                          Forsake Not The Assembling (In Homes) Vs. Returning to                                                        Temples and Synagogues.

 

James 2:1-4                              "Sit here on my footstool" (Furnature in Home)                 

 

1 Peter2:4-8,                            Spiritual House, Stone "Builders"  rejected.                  

 

3:20-22,                                   Noah & His Family Saved  (Like Baptism by Household)                                                          [Mikvah in homes rather than synagogues]   

 

4:9,10                                      Hospitality Necessary For Use Of Gifts

 

2 Jo. 11,10                               "Do Not Recieve Into House"       

 

Rev. 18:                                   Historical Origin Of Temples  (Babylon) Called (A                                                                    Mystery) "Whore"(See Genesis 11)       

 

Rev. 21:2,3,                             In Bride Of Christ, There is No Temple   

 

9-10,22                                                                                  

 

GOSPEL PRESENTED TO JEWS:                                            

 

Acts 7:45-51                            Concluding Point: "God does not dwell in Temples made  by hands"                                                             

 

GOSPEL PRESENTED TO GENTILES:                                       

                               

Acts 17:22-24                          Opening Point: "God does not dwell in Temples made with HANDS"          

                               

 

 HAVE YOU HEARD THE "GOSPEL" LATELY?

Why is it these "Full Gospel" Churches never tell you THE FULL GOSPEL?

Why is it these "Evangelical" leaders, never PREACH the EVANGEL?



  LUTHER'S "TRULY EVANGELICAL" SERVICE                      

 

Luther described the following as the "Truly Evangelical" meeting:                                                                       

 

"They should sign their names and meet alone in a house somewhere to pray, to read, to baptize, to recieve the sacrament, and to do other Christian works.". (This quote goes on at  length describing such a meeting: Can be found in:) Liturgy & Hymns, Vol.53,Luther's Works, p.53                                       

 

"A man need not go to Jerusalem, to Rome, to St.James.  He has God at home in the Lord Christ.  Therefore let everyone who would be saved and have a gracious God and obtain from him what he desires turn his heart and eyes toward heaven and look upon Christ, who is sitting at the right hand of God.  let everyone who would serve God and be sure to find him come to this spiritual and true temple - Christ.  Before him let him fall down.  There let him pray and believe on him. END QUOTE: Exposition of John 2:21,Discourse of 1537 - Martin Luther                                        

 

 

HISTORIANS ARE UNANIMOUS          

 

Malichi Martin,

former Jesuit Priest-,

 

"The idea of a Christian basilica is too much for him. All his life, has only known the little churches and chapels, the "dominica" houses of the Lord - really littleback rooms.  For Miltiades a basilica has always been a pagan building... For Miltiades, a Christian basilica is a square circle and he will never change his mind..." p.33                                                     

                                  

 

F.E. Peters

Secular Historian, states, in his sizable work, "The Harvest Of Hellenism", that:                   

 

"The DIDACHE, an ecclesiastical handbook from the second century , describes what is already  a fairly sophisticated  Eucharistic liturgy.  There was no question of church buildings at this point; the rites were celebrated in private homes. " p. 492         

 

 Westminster Dictionary of Christian Liturgy & Worship 

 

"Primitive Christian worship, centering in the eucharist,was essentially domestic and so was celebrated in the private house." p. 71                                                                  

 

"After the victory of Constantine, with Christianity replacing the pagan cults as the state religion, worship ceased to be a family gathering and became a public occassion." p.  71                                        

 

THE HISTORICAL FACT

 

The emergance of a Christain Temple cult marked both a significant and monumental DEPARTURE from the older tradition of Karaite Jewish "family worship" which had been in existence since the close of the New Testament era among Christians.   That DEPARTURE is now known as "Christianity".  An entire religion which is not even so much as NAMED nor whose central tenets of beliefs are [such as the TRINITY] even described in the NEW TESTAMENT !?!

 

 

FACTS ABOUT RELIGIOUS BABELISM

 

Both Christ and the Apostle John placed the guilt of "all those slain upon the earth" at the feet of the RELIGIOUS BABELISM, in Mathew 24, (Christ addressed the Synagogue = Jewish) and in Revelation 17 John refers to Mystery Babylon = Gentile.  Despite the fact that one was Roman and the other was Jewish both are said to be responsible for the blame of "all those slain upon the earth".  While obviously the point in these passages is to be understood spiritually, their truth is evidenced by history in the following bloody facts:

                                                          

1.  Martyrs recorded in the New Testament were killed, not over claims of Christ being the Messiah, but of their statements concerning the ungodliness of the RELIGIOUS BABELISM, both Jewish and Gentile.   Acts 16:13,14

 

2.  According to historical tradition many of the Apostles died as a result of offending the powers of the RELIGIOUS BABELISM in other cultures.  Acts 19:25,27,28     

 

 

3.  In the entire history of mankind, God permitted (PERMITTED, not commissioned) the building of only one (1) religious building. (And THAT BUILDING was later condemned) Acts 7:49

 

4.  The leaders of the RELIGIOUS BABELISM were directly responsible for the murder of the Messiah. Acts 2:40, Mtt.23:31-35         

 

5.  It has been at the center of the majority of all of the world's wars and has given approval and empowerment to and received the same from some of the world's most heinous tyrants.    

 

6.  Communist countries, though given to state-atheism, permit attendance at a STATE TEMPLE.  But worship of God in your own home is outlawed. “Houses” are routinely “bulldozed” in communist countries if unofficial private religious activity is discovered.                               

 

7.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM first established the institution of slavery, [see history of Mesopotamia] propagated it throughout the world, [Egypt/Rome/Americas] and defended it without exception (until a few generations ago) in it's quest for cheap labor for building programs, this includes the building of Solomon's Temple.    

 

8.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM first established human sacrifice and the sacrifice of children and continued this tradition well into the Christian era in Medieval Europe as evidenced by the finding of bodies in the walls of some of Europe's oldest cathedrals (buried alive!)

 

9. The Temple itself was an outgrowth of sorcery and the worship of the dead (This has been documented historically BY SECULAR HISTORIANS and is supported by the testimony of Scripture).                    

 

10.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is the single most dangerous (and most powerful) religious cult in the world and in the history of mankind.                  

 

11.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is responsible for inciting, training, arming and funding the majority of the world's terrorism today.                             

 

12.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is supported by a network of numerous occult "secret societies" who require their members to take oaths of death for telling the "esoteric meanings" of the architecture of these buildings, this includes Christians and their churches (Read up on the Masons and their origin, chartered purposes and requirements).                                

 

13.  The number 666 is used only three times in the entire Bible.  In all three cases it is associated with the Temple cult.                                              

 

15.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM in America now owns 1/5th of the Total land mass of the United States costing American Tax

 

16.  Over 130 billion dollars is drained from the pockets of Americans PER YEAR, to support the RELIGIOUS BABELISM in America alone.  (Many of whom are themselves in great financial need)    

 

17.  Ever major social evil (as in child labor abuse, slavery, racism, sexism, and international violence) has been defended by the leaders of RELIGIOUS BABELISM in the history of society, thus turning many intellectuals historically against religion as even a concept.          

 

18.  Christian RELIGIOUS BABELISM was responsible for the mass genocide of every living blood relative of Christ upon the earth to aid in establishing it's authority over all Christendom from Vatican Rome.                            

 

19.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM according to Scripture is responsible for "the blood of all the saints, apostles and prophets", and it is called the "throne of Satan".

 

20.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM engages in socially approved institutional "brainwashing" on a daily basis, and yet is never called into question for it's practices by any of the societies in which it exists, though it's mental abuse through years of indoctrination and even physical abuse of children, scar them for life.   And have throughout history engaged in viciously unjustified abuse and "ethnic cleansing" of  many harmless and benign religious minorities.              

 

21.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is what "reveals the man of sin"(2 Thess 2).                          

 

22.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM has consistently, throughout history, been the single greatest enemy of science and social progress, confused by Atheists and Antagonists as "religion" in general with no discrimination for type.                           

 

23.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is the source of the "great delusion". (2 Thess. 2 )                   

 

24.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is the wealthiest institution in the world and owns it own governments.  Islamic, Roman Catholic, State Orthodox, Buddhist, Hindu.   

                 

25.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM enjoys full international diplomatic rights, has it's own embassies and is represented in the United Nations.  [See Vatican representation in UN]      

 

26.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM is currently defending child molesters and in some sections of America have been bankrupted by the number of paternity suites and child molestation judgments.                               

 

27.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM defrauded consumers over 15 billion dollars last year in just 5 states.

 

28.  RELIGIOUS BABELISM requires payments of money which can run as high as $80,000 dollars to enter their Christian “ministries”.                          

 

29.  The establishment of the RELIGIOUS BABELISM in Scripture brought the 3rd worst world wide judgment in the history of mankind.(See Genesis 11)    

 

30.  The cruelty of world empires bears a direct relation to the ambitions of their RELIGIOUS BABELISM.             

 

 

31.  America currently is one of the most violent societies on planet earth, it also (ironically) has more church buildings than any other nation.  

 

32.  The 1960's marked a period of gross decline in morality and ethics in America, as well as, the beginning of what today is known as the "Mega-church" trend.                          

 

33.  Christ was carried to "the pinnacle of the Temple" when tempted by Satan in Matthew 4.

 

34.  The Jews were in slavery in Egypt for hundreds of years (making "bricks" for Egyptain temples?)  

 

35.  During the night of Passover, one of the requirements for divine protection was "not to go out of your homes".  While the Egyptians were in their Temples praying for their dying children, the Jews were commanded to stay home.

 

36.  The "gospel" as recorded being preached in Scripture, (1) To the Jews concluded with "God does not dwell in Temples made with hands" [See Acts 7]and (2) To the Gentiles began with "God does not dwell in Temples made with hands".  [See Acts 17]

 

37.  Christ is the Lamb [Thus New Testament believers did not sacrifice sheep], Christ is the Mediator, [Thus New Testament believers did not have a high priest], Christ is the Temple [Thus New Testament believers did not build churches].

 

Have you accepted Christ in place of the physical Temple in Jerusalem, and as your "gate to God" instead of the "tower to heaven"? You'll be glad you did.  PS. You are not the "Bride Of Christ" until you do.  [See Rev. 21:9,22]     

 

 


 

 

TESTIMONY FROM HISTORY

 


THE IMPOSTER MARRIED TO HER DELUSIONS

CHURCH FATHERS OR APOLIA SONS?

Whenever the CHRIST-MASS CHURCH wishes to excuse it's obvious departures from texts in the New Testament, it appeals to groups of historical intermediaries which they call "Church Fathers".  These alleged "Church Fathers" introduce every departure from the teachings and practice of Christ and his disciples recorded in the New Testament, but these departures are all supposedly "justified" because these "Church Fathers" were allegedly "disciples" of the ORIGINAL APOSTLES and INTRODUCED these departures as an on-going line of "development" which "represented" the intentions and wishes of not only the real Christ, but his "Apostles" as well.


This sordid explanation is surpirsingly sufficient for what otherwise is relatively intelligent and sincere people who really should be way past such fallacies in logic, but such is not the case.  The historical fact is relatively easily discerned that these alleged "Church Fathers" were simply liars, or the words that were placed in their mouths were placed there by liars.  This is not actually a prejudicial statement, but a reference to what the Original Apostles (meaning the real ones written about in the New Testament) actually chose to call these men, who did in fact exist in their day, but were hardly their "students" or "disciples", as is claimed by the Sun-worshippers of Rome's deity Apollo who have appropriated the title of "Christ" for their deity.  The standard list of most frequently invoked "Fathers"  begin with what is termed "Apostolic Fathers" and span across 4 centuries to "Early Church Fathers".  Oddly enough, there is nothing either "Apostolic" about these "Apostolic Fathers" and nothing "Early" about these "Early Church Fathers" but the titles make for good PR by those who cite them to justify their rejection of the real Christ and the writings of the real Apostles found in the New Testament.

Historically speaking, the logic employed in this exercise of credulity, is actually reversed from normal logical historical investigation, where you go to the earliest sources to get the actual story of what happened, not the latter complete with it's rumor, hear-say, misinformation, and later prejudicial distortions of opinions.   No one "studies" the American Pilgrims by reading legends of misinformation 200 years later, and insisting these pre-empt whatever the pilgrims actually wrote themselves? (And then calling it "Pilgrim History")  Historians would laugh such an approach into utter shame and humiliation if this were offered up as "History" in a secular history department.  Yet that is precisely what the CHRIST-MASS CHURCH does to justify it's worship of Rome's Apollo-Christ Icon.  Of course, it has no choice. An honest approach to the question would quickly result in a rejection of it's core institution which would render it's leadership not only null and void, but pitifully and dangerously decieved.

 

 CHURCH FATHERS?

The Devil Worshipper Augustine?

The Necromancer Ambrose?

The Blasphemer Chrysostom?


Mat 23:31-33  Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? 

THE SEDUCTION OF THE PRO-LI?E MOVEMENT

PAGAN ROME ON ABORTION:



Musonius, In reference to Augustinian legislation of 28 BC and 9 AD: -The lawgivers, who had the same task of searching out and finding what was good for the city and what bad, and what helped or harmed it, did not they also consider that it was most beneficial to their cities to fill the houses of the citizens, and most harmful to deplete them? They considered that childlessness, or small families, of citizens was unprofitable, while to have children, and in fact many children, was profitable. Therefore, they forbade the women to abort and attached a penalty to those who disobeyed; secondly they forbade them to use contraceptives on themselves and to prevent pregnancy; finally they established honors for both men and women who had many children and made childlessness punishable. -Fragment 15a

PAGAN ROME WAS A "CONSUMER" OF HUMAN LIFE

AND FORCED IT'S WOMEN TO BEAR CHILDREN FOR IT'S EMPIRE 

UPON PENALTY OF LAW

(like cows)

Spiritual Rome has used the "Pro-life" movement to seduce many Protestants into it's theology by offering citations from it's "Early Church Fathers" to prove abortion is "murder".  What these misled Protestants never seem to understand is that these citations are necessary because the plain and historical text of the Bible flatly denies the claim.  So obviously so, the Halakah Jewish law, even during the time of Christ defined the beginning of life as when the head emerges from the womb.  A definition never contradicted by the New Testament. In fact, Christ made it clear that you had to be "born-again", not "conceived again" and openly and flatly equated the "Spirit" to BIRTH, not "conception".  James 2:26 Explicitely states the body without the spirit is "dead".  Even the definition of the word "Spirit" and "Soul" itself (if this were not obvious enough) means THE BREATH OF LIFE....that takes place AT BIRTH.

Pagan Rome had outlawed abortions even before Christianity had ever arrived on the scene, and it had nothing to do with the fact it was murder, and everything to do with Rome being the "consumer" of Human life.  As a "consumer" of human life, the more "human life", the better, just like a farmer who always needs more chickens and pigs, Rome, the "consumer  of human life" always needs more.  Population lowers labor costs for the empire and increases it's numerical strength for waging wars.  Rome's calculation on the question of "abortion" was solely on the side of the Roman State, over the God-given rights of any and all Parents.  End of story.  Nothing has changed in Rome, except they have a few more deluded Protestants worshipping their idols, and praying to their dead apostates for good luck in Las Vegas.

Evangelicals have been so sucked into this movement that they have put this issue even above an honest read of the text of the scriptures.  Abortion is irrelevent to a godly Protestant, who will in all probably never need one, excepting some odd medical condition.  It is irrelevent to the scriptures, where both the unwed mother and her unborn child were stoned to death, together

Deu 22:21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

..and it is certianly irrelevent to a gospel that praises a father Abraham for sacrificing his son. 

Jas 2:21,22 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?

In the scriptures, parental rights were total and absolute.  To the extent of actually even having the right to exercise capital punishment or even to more shocking extreme of relgious sacrifice ...of their children!!! After they were fully born even!  The life of the child belonged to the PARENT, not the STATE.  This sounds odd to modern societies, but the same modern societies that reached the agreement with Rome to allow the empire to own the life of the children, stood by while Rome wrecked havoc on families and children for centuries. The same medieval grunts who stood by and watched women die from pregnancy complications and murdered any doctor who attempted to rescue her through an abortion procedure, were the same who were butchering and slaughtering adults they deemed "heretics" and confiscating children from Jewish parents to "save them".   Go on any debate board and simply observe the violent, murderous, hate-filled rhetoric of these "pro-lifers" and you will quickly realize there is nothing "pro-life" about them.  They without fail will call for the murder of anyone and everyone who "disagrees" with them, just as their historical predecessors did in the inquisitions.  HITLER was ANTI-ABORTION too, and it hardly made him "pro-life". 

 

Bedoiune society was primitive and often remote.  Parents had the right and responsiblity of the life of the child, or no one did.  And if you wish to incite the Bible on the subject, the very least you could do is give the courtesy of being honest with your congregations about it.  The sacrifice of the child was not the "sin", as is dishonestly claimed by these ministers, it was sacrificing it to a pagan deity, that was the problem.

Jdg 11:30,31,35,36 And Jephthah vowed a vow unto the LORD, and said, If thou shalt without fail deliver the children of Ammon into mine hands, Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the LORD'S, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering. And it came to pass, when he saw her, that he rent his clothes, and said, Alas, my daughter! thou hast brought me very low, and thou art one of them that trouble me: for I have opened my mouth unto the LORD, and I cannot go back. And she said unto him, My father, if thou hast opened thy mouth unto the LORD, do to me according to that which hath proceeded out of thy mouth; forasmuch as the LORD hath taken vengeance for thee of thine enemies, even of the children of Ammon.

But to psuedo-catholic pro-lifers none of this matters.  They are much more concerned with their anti-abortion rally than anything the Bible has to say about it, and the only time the Bible is actually consulted on the matter is to figure out how to twist and turn these verses like a finger puppet doing Olympic gymnastics to get them to say what is simply and obviously not there in any text.  The "Pro-life" movement has become nothing more than a theological code word for "Catholic evangelism" to seduce otherwise Biblically oriented evangelicals into the apostate absurdities of Rome's spiritual fascism.  And the Vatican knows it is intentionally using this deciet as a "tool" to seduce evangelicals all over the world, and they protect their "golden egg" to the extent of even threatening damnation for their own members who fail to vote for it satisfactorily.   The same RELIGIOUS-REICH Imammgelicals that sit around and make a hobby out of chasing relgious minorities with the bully pulpit, do not even so much as squeak, over the idea of "salvation by political affilition" or the correct wrist action in a voters booth.

The fact that the Pro-life movement has become a gaint suction hose for Rome is now even being admitted by conservative "Pro-life" Pastors, who find themselves in the middle of a mess they created with their own doing by adopting this phony Roman theology, they wish to force onto the pages of a Bible for no other reason than their own political success.

QUOTE: the pro-life movement has been one of the key factors, if not the key factor, in desensitizing Christians to the danger and sin of accepting the Roman Catholic Church as Christian. In More Than These, Pastor Ovadal begins with the Second Vatican Council of 1962-1965 and documents how the Roman Catholic Church has systematically used the pro-life movement, with the help of Christians, to advance its ecumenical strategy. In the writing of this book, Pastor Ovadal drew from his own extensive experiences working in virtually every area of the pro-life movement, beginning in the late 1970s and including the rescue movement. His years spent as a Christian radio and television program producer and host on a nationwide network provide an added perspective shared by few people. More Than These is also based on research from a wide range of sources, some of which are unavailable to all but a relatively small group of pro-life activists.  This book details how Roman Catholic influence and even doctrine has permeated the pro-life movement, including street-level activist ministries, Christian radio, the pregnancy center networks, and the hearts of major Christian ministries. It documents the damage that such influence has had on the cause of Christ, including actual stories of Protestants converted to the Roman Catholic Church due to Christians being involved in pro-life ministry with Catholics. END QUOTE  SOUTHERN FUNDEMENTALIST ADMITS HIS PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT IS A RECRUITING TOOL FOR ROMAN CATHOLICISM

There is nothing more hypocritical than to watch these psuedo-catholic Imammgelicals rant and rave about "cults" like Jehovah's Witnessess and Seventh Day Adventism (i.e., "cult" a derogatory word for any relgious minority no matter how noble ethically or true to the scriptures theologically), while they sit back and cite Roman devil worshippers and necromancers like Ambrose and Irenaeus, and defend a Roman Pope (who calls himself God) and recieves "worship", and never blink an eye.  It is mind-boggling on every level and caused by nothing more than the shear blind Idolatry of their political ambitions to own and run the country as politicians, rather than remain humble servants of God who faithfully teach the scriptures and minister to souls.

The academic level of integrity is either wholly absent altogether, or dishonestly ignored in that Traducianism (the very core doctrine of the "pro-life" movement) has been openly condemned as a heresy (even in Catholic church history), and it's new modified heresy "Neo-Traduciansim" is nothing more than a cheap trick to avoid the technical wording of condemnations against Traducianism.  The Bible teaches the soul is created at birth, at the "breath of life", that is what is clearly taught and was clearly understood for millenia, until the "pro-life" movement decided it needed to "fix it" to bolster it's politics.

And Rome's own unbiblical preoccupation with the wombs of women come straight from it's own perversions of "Mother-Child" worship, another amazing trend among these psuedo-catholic Imammgelicals (the worship [i.e., code word "veneration"] of "Mother-Mary")  The Bible never tells anyone to "venerate" anything except God.  And it is not accident, that the same people who wish to use compulsion to force the world to worship the Image of The Beast, are obsessive-compulsive Neo-Traducianists...just...like...their...predecessor ...Hitler.

But just because consequences are not what one wishes, does not mean the content of historical and Biblical fact should be smothered, suppressed, distorted and dismissed to keep a firm grip on our "delusions" that we prefer to make more important than God himself.

THE BEAM IN THE EYE OF CHRIST-MASS CRUSADERS

 

Jer 3:9 And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks*.

* "Stocks" -  ‛êts (pron. "ates")  From H6095; a tree (from its firmness);

 

 

 

 

committed adultery with stones and stocks 

 

 

 

Mat 7:3  And why beholdest thou the straw that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the [construction] beam that is in thine own eye? - The Real Christ

 

Good Question.

 

THE CONSTRUCTION BEAM

REMEMBER THAT, YOU WILL READ MUCH MORE ABOUT IT TOWARD THE END OF THIS PAGE.

 

 

THE CHURCH FOUNDED TO CELEBRATE CHRIST-MASS

 

 

THE THEA [goddess] SOPHIA [wisdom], later renamed the Hagai [holy/saint] Sophia [wisdom] was built with the stones from the TEMPLE OF DIANA which were dis-assembled and MOVED all the way from EPHESUS To Constantinople by Constantine HIMSELF to build this first to be Christian TEMPLE ever built.  It is the origin of our modern English word CHURCH from the Latin(1)

 

 

 

THEA SOPHIA

 

 

 

 

HER NAKEDNESS EXPOSED

 

 

 

Nah 3:5  Behold, I am against thee, saith the LORD of hosts; and I will discover thy skirts upon thy face, and I will shew the nations thy nakedness, and the kingdoms thy shame.

 

 

 

 

THEA SOPHIA'S NAKEDNESS EXPOSED

 

 

In 1945, a collection of writings [now known as the Nag Hammadi library] from the Saint Pachomius monastary [founder of catholic monasticism] were found.  They had been "hidden" in the cliffs of a nearby mountain whose caves had served as a cemetery.

 

 

Mat 24:26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you,

Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth:

 

BEHOLD HE IS IN THE DESERT

 

 

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NAG HAMMADI MONASTIC COMMUNITIES

TO THE FOUNDERS OF THE ROMAN CHURCH:

 

"These monks (1)  were individualists dedicated by their feats of asceticism (2)  to defeating the demonic forces they believed inhabited  the desert. (3) They were reguarded in Egypt and Syria, as men in touch with angelic powers(4), and hence their word and judgement were those of God himself(5)" P. 54, The Christian World  

 

QUOTE: "Theodosius [the "Christian" Ceasar] ... sought the advice (6) of John, a servant of God who lived in the desert of Egypt. [Exact monastary containing Nag Hammadi Library] Popular opinion had it, and he heard, that this man possessed the gift of prophecy. "END QUOTE:  - SAINT AUGUSTINE (Augustine, The City Of God, 5,26)

 

COMPARE

 

1Ti 4:1-3  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;  (1) Forbidding to marry, and (2) commanding to abstain from meats,

 

Mat 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you,  (3)  Behold, he is in the desert; (6) go not forth:

 

Col 2:18-23  Let no man beguile you of your reward in a (4)voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind (5), (Touch not; taste not; handle not; Which all are to perish with the using;) after (2) the commandments and doctrines of men?  Which things have indeed (2) a shew of wisdom [SOPHIA]  in will worship, and humility, and (2) neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.

 

 

ADVICE BEING GIVEN BY THESE "IMPERIAL PROPHETS"

 

THE TEMPLE

 

Thus the senseless man... does not ask "where is the TEMPLE into which I should go to worship... On account of his senselessness he is worst than a PAGAN" v. 34, p282 THE NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY

 

THE SENSELESS MAN

 

Joh 4:20-24 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. - THE REAL CHRIST

 

 

 

ORIGIN OF THE CHRISTMAS LIE PRACTICES

THE SENTENCES OF SEXTUS

 

Why would a POPE take the name SIX ??? [Knowing it’s connotation in the scriptures?] There have been 5 Popes which have taken the name SEXTUS (Latin for "SIXth").  Of course, the most significant would be Pope Sixtus III [ Literally 666].  The NAME SEXTUS/SIXTUS, appears in the NAG HAMMADI as the TITLE:

 

(165e,168) When there is someone, while you speak the truth, even if you lie, there is no sin.  There is no kinsman of the truth except wisdom. [Sophia]

 

COMPARE

 

Eph 4:25  Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour:

 

Pro 21:6  The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death.

 

 

THE "GREAT SAVIOR" IS REVEALED

 

In the texts of the Nag Hammadi Library discovery, it was found written:

 

 

The great Seth wrote this book with letters in one hundred and thirty years.  He placed it in a mountain ...in order that at the end of the times and the eras... it may come forth and reveal this incorruptable, holy race of the great savior, and those who dwell with them in love, and the great, invisible, eternal Spirit, and his only begotten son... - p.20, Nag Hammadi Library, James M. Robertson Editor, Harper & Row Publishers

 

 

Though these "prophets" had been very "influential" in the original "design" of both the theology and policies of the Roman institution now called "the Church", they had been "betrayed" centuries later in history [in the same manner as the knights templars who would come after them]. 

 

These early baalim "prophets" had hid their sacred writings to prevent them from being extinguished from the face of the earth, [as had happened to so many others before them]... along with the prophecy mentioned above.

 

 

"The savior" they are describing is the same "savior" that is painted on the walls of the THEA SOPHIA in Constantinople and in the MARIA MAGGIORE in Rome, where CHRIST-MASS was declared law.


But as you will soon see... this is not the Biblical version of the "only begotten son", but something entirely different.  [On the walls of the cliff tombs where the Nag Hammadi library was discovered are crosses painted on the walls and prayers to "Zeus Sarapis" mixed in with PSLAMS from the Bible. [see p.20, ibid]

 

 

Who is "Zeus Sarapis"? Take a wild guess.

 

Zeus (also spelled Seus)  the father "God" of the pantheon ..."Sar" [son of] ..."Apis" the Sun. We know Seus SarApis as the Greco-Roman Je-Sus born on the SOLAR SOLSTICE, Dec. 25th, his "traditional" birthdate throughout the ancient world.

 

Here is what "gave birth" to him, ...the THEA SOPHIA. [which means "Goddess Wisdom"]

 

THE CHURCH OF CHRISTMAS

 

 

 

"THEA SOPHIA" SPEAKING IN THE NAG HAMMADI TEXTS

 

 

For I am the first and the last.

I am the honored one and the scorned one.

 

 

I am the Whore and the holy one. p. 271

 

 

I am she whose wedding is great and

I have not taken a husband. p. 272

 

 

I, I am godless,

and I am the one whose God is great. p. 274

 

 

I am the one below

and they come up to me.

 

 

, I am sinless,

and yet the root of sin derives from me. p. 274

 

 

For I am the wisdom of the Greeks [Sophia]

and the knowledge of the Babarians [Friia]

I am the one whose image is great in Egypt [Isis]...

            p. 273

 

 

[NOTE: All observing “The Birth” of the “Sun-god” at the Winter Solstice!]

 

 

 

"I am lust in appearance,

and interior self-control exists within me."           

     
"But her son is the begotten one who is lord -

afterward the authorities called him "the beast"

in order to lead their molded bodies astray. 

 

 

The interpretation of "the beast" is "the instructor". 

For he was found to be wiser than all of them". (p.171)           

 

"She [Thea Sophia] entered the TREE OF KNOWLEDGE and remained there."  

 

 

BEHOLD THE CHRIST-MASS CHRIST

 

THE CHRIST OF THE THEA SOPHIA

(THE ROMAN STATE CHURCH)

AND IT'S SOLSTICE BIRTH-DATE,

A/K/A CHRIST-MASS

IS CALLED "THE BEAST"

BY IT'S OWN FOUNDERS,

IT'S OWN DESIGNERS, AND IT'S OWN ARCHITECTS!!!

 

THEY LITERALLY TELL YOU IT'S THE BEAST !!!! 

 

AND THE NEXT POPE SELECTED AFTER AUGUSTINE

(WITH AUGUSTINE'S "SUPPORT")

WAS NAMED 666

 

(JUST IN CASE YOU DIDN'T BELIEVE THEM !?!?!)

 

AND THEN OFFICIATES ROME'S FIRST OFFICIAL CHRIST-MASS ON THE SOLAR SOLSTICE

AT ROME'S "SHRINE OF THE WOLF" SURROUNDED BY THE FIRST NATIVITY-SCENE IDOLS EVER MADE

 

 

THEA SOPHIA IS THE "WHORE" AND THE "HOLY ONE"

 

THE BEAST IS THE "SON" OF "THEA SOPHIA"

 

THE BEAST IS THE "INSTRUCTOR"

 

THEA SOPHIA REMAINS IN THE "TREE OF KNOWLEDGE"

 

 

 

"SHE ENTERED THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE AND REMAINED THERE"

 

tem·ple (tµm“p…l) n. 1.a. A building dedicated to religious ceremonies or worship. b. Temple. Either of two successive buildings in ancient Jerusalem serving as the primary center for Jewish worship. c. Judaism. A synagogue, especially of a Reform or Conservative congregation.  2. Something regarded as having within it a divine presence. 3. A building used for meetings by any of several fraternal orders, especially the Knights Templars. 4. A building reserved for a highly valued function: the library, a temple of learning. 5. Temple. Either of two groups of buildings in London, the Inner Temple and the Middle Temple, that house two of the four Inns of Court and that occupy the site of the medieval Knights Templars establishment. [Middle English, from Old English tempel, from Latin templum.  [Middle English, from Old French, from Vulgar Latin *tempula, from Latin tempora, pl. of tempus, temple of the head.]

 

Mat 27:33,35  And when they were come unto a place called Golgotha, that is to say, a place of a skull, ...they crucified him,

 

 

CHRIST-MASS IN BABYLON

 

The Persians adopted their annual renewal festival from the Babylonians [ISHTAR] and incorporated it into the rituals of their own Zoroastrian religion. The last day of the Persian month Azar is the longest night of the year, when the forces of Ahriman are assumed to be at the peak of their strength. While the next day, the first day of the month "Day" known as "khoram rooz" or "khore rooz" (the day of sun) belongs to Ahura Mazda, the Lord of Wisdom* [SOPHIA]. Since the days are getting longer and the nights shorter, this day marks the victory of Sun over the darkness. The occasion was celebrated in the festival of "Daygan" dedicated to Ahura Mazda, on the first day of the month "Day"  - YALDA SHAB-E CHELEH SHAB-E YALDA

 

 

UNDERSTANDING ORIENTAL "SYNCRETISM" - "MYSTERY" RELIGION

 

According to Eusebius, Constantine, the unbaptized new convert and still pacticing pagan, claimed he was "not only a partaker, but in some measure, a PRIEST and HIEROPHANT OF THE CHRISTIAN "MYSTERIES". P. 297, Gibbons,

Oriental Mystery religion involved the incorporation and mixing of opposite concepts.  Male/Female, Light/Darkness, Good/Evil, etc. "mixed together to create "one".  Thus the Whore being also the Church and the Pope later actually taking the name 666.  It was intentional and considered a form of secret knowledge.  The modern STEEPLE found affixed to most modern Churches was a conscious adaptation of the Tower of Babel [Baal worship] motif to the building/institution begun by Constantine; we now colloquially refer to as The Church.

 

 

THE CHURCH founded to celebrate "christmas"

 

Gen 11:3,4  And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.  And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name,

 

 

 

 

THE "TOWER TO HEAVEN" THEY CALLED "CHURCH"

As is evident by simply taking a look around any city, all traditional "Churches" have "towers" on top of them. Why? Did the REAL CHRIST ever "build" one of these? And stick a "tower" on top of it? Of course not. They are absent entirely from the New Testament [at least at first glance]. They are actually present once you begin to dig a little deeper, but just not the "way" we think of them.  They are the "mark" of something called "Mystery Babel" or "Mystery Babylon". [where they originated].  The funny thing is that, thanks to Rome, a very important NAME SWITCH-A-ROO, was accomplished.

Most people think that "Jesus" started THE CHURCH.  The text is always quoted to them:

 

Mat 16:18  And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church;

 

 That settles it !  "Jesus" started the CHURCH.  If that's not convincing enough, the word CHURCH is used 79 times throughout the New Testament to make sure you don't miss it.

 

There is only small problem. The word "CHURCH" did not even EXIST at the time the New Testament was written. If you check your "Etymology" of the word, it does not even come from the Greek word "Ecclesia" it is USED to TRANSLATE?  It does have Greek roots, but actually comes from the Latin conjuction of two entirely different GREEK WORDS!

 

"Ecclesia" means "Called-Out" and comes from the Hebrew word קרא qârâ' , kara (pron. kaw-raw') - A primitive root (rather identical with H7122 through the idea of accosting a person met); to call out to  - Strong's Exhaustice Concordance 

 

The word "CHURCH" however, comes from an entirely different set of Greek Words. "Kurios" and "Doma", neither of which have anything to do with "ECCLESIA". The Etymology as given by Merriam-Webster's Exhaustive Third International Dictionary, 3 volume set is as follows:

 

CHURCH: Etymology – Middle English “CHIRCHE” from Old English “CIRICE”, from Medieval Greek “KURIKON” from Late Greek “KURIAKON” (DOMA), meaning THE LORD’S HOUSE, from Greek KURIAKOS, meaning “Of The Lord”, from “KURIOS”, meaning LORD.

 

Merriam-Webster Online gives it this Etymology: CHURCH Etymology: Middle English chirche, from Old English cirice, ultimately from Late Greek kyriakon, from Greek, neuter of kyriakos of the lord, from kyrios lord, master.

 

The Online Etymology Dictionary gives it this ETYMOLOGY: O.E. cirice "church," from W.Gmc. *kirika, from Gk. kyriake (oikia) "Lord's (house)," from kyrios "ruler, lord." Gk. kyriakon (adj.) "of the Lord"

 

As you can SEE, there is no mention of ECCLESIA anywhere in it's entire word HISTORY!

 

But wait, there's more.   An earlier "Etymology" from the same publisher, Web. New Int. Dic. of the English Language 1942 ed. states:

 

CHURCH, from Middle English chirche, from Anglo Saxon, circe, from Greek kyriakon the Lord's house, from kyriakos concerning a master or lord, from kyrios master, lord, from kyros power, authority; akin to Sanskrit sura mighty, bold, Old Irish caur, cur, hero,  confir Kirk.

 

QUOTE: In Smith's Dictionary of the Bible (one volume edition), which you can find in almost any Christian bookstore today, under the article "Church," Professor Smith states that the English word "church" actually comes from an early word meaning "circle" which is akin to the word "circus." He stated a major study made by Professor Lipsius of Germany, the great historian and theologian during the Reformation, showing that our word "church" does indeed come from "circle." We also find that Professor A. F. Fausett in his "Home Bible Study Dictionary" under the word "Church," mentions favorably this same research by Lipsius. That doesn't end the matter. Scholars who compiled the exhaustive 10 volumes of the "Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature" Under the article "Church" also subscribe to this pagan derivation of the word "Church." It says: "The word Church: The origin of the word is uncertain. In the Germanic and Slavonic languages it is found as follows: Anglo-Saxon, cyrica, circ, cyric; English, church; Scottish, kirk; German, kirche; Low-German, karke; Frisan, tzierke; Danish, kyrke; Swedish, Kyrka; Bohemian, cyrkew; Polish, cerkiew; Russian, zerkow. There was probably some word which, in the language from which the Teutonic and Slavonic are descended, designated the old heathen places of religious assembly, and this word, having taken different forms in different dialects, was adopted by the Christian missionaries. It was probably connected with the Latin circus, circulus, and with the Greek kuklos. Lipsius, who was the first to reject the received tradition, was probably right in his suggestion" (Volume II, p.322). <> Brewer states: "The etymology of this word is generally assumed to be from the Greek, kuriou oikos (house of God); but this is most improbable, as the word existed in all the Celtic dialects long before the introduction of Greek. No doubt the word means 'a circle.' The places of worship among the German and Celtic nations were always circular (example Stonehenge). Compare Anglo-Saxon 'circe,' a small church, with 'circol,' a circle."END QUOTE - E.L.Martin Ph.D.

 

He continues…

 

QUOTE: An example of this is the circular Stonehenge in England. In fact, the Scottish "Kirk" or the German "Kirche," are clearly from the early word "Circe" (with the letter "c" having a "k" sound in the original vocalization). All of this historical information gives us an abundance of evidence to show where the word "Church" comes from. It is derived from "Circe." But what did the original word "Circe" actually refer to in ancient times? The word "circe" is well known by classical historians. In his classical study, "The Myth of Kirke," Robert Brown gives extensive meanings derived from its various usages in the ancient Greek world and concludes that its simple meaning is "Circle" or "Circular" (p.22). But there is more to it than that. It was also a proper noun. It not only referred to a building or monument that was "circular," but one of its main meanings was its reference to one of the Goddesses of the ancient world. Robert Brown's book was devoted to the exploits of this early Goddess called "Kirke" or "Circe." She was the great heathen Goddess who was the daughter of the Sun God. She was famous for taming wild animals in her circus. She also met Ulysses returning from the Trojan War and had an adulterous relationship with him that produced, as one of the children, Latinus the supposed founder of the Latin race. And how is Circe pictured in the classical accounts? She is shown holding a golden cup in her hand mixed with wine and drugs through which she controlled the kings of the world (among whom was supposed to be Ulysses). END QUOTE - E.L.Martin Ph.D., The Anatomy of a Church, September 27, 1998

 

 

Revelation 17:2-5… Come hither; I will show thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication…having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication. And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH - the Great Whore, called Mystery Babylon, who sits on many waters and the seven hills of ROME

 

 

 ORIGIN OF THE WORD "CHURCH" - CIRCE

 

      

   

 

"In the entrance way they stayed

 To listen here, insider her quiet house

 They heard the Goddess Circe

  Low she sang

  In her beguiling voice, while on her loom

  She wore ambrosial fabric sheer and bright

  By the craft [sorcery] known to the Goddesses of heaven".

- Homer, Book 10 of the "Odyssey",8th Cent.BCE

 

 

FACT: The word TRANSLATED 79 TIMES in the New Testament as "CHURCH" has NOTHING TO DO WITH the word it is used to REPLACE !?!

 

It has to do with the Mother-goddess who gave birth to the Latin empire.

 

SEE "CIRCE" - Greek Mythology by messagenet.com

 

 

DID YOU KNOW THIS?

 

 

 

MORE CONFUSION FROM BABEL

 

This CON-FUSION of language from ROME prevented the translators of the English Bible, from even being able to TRANSLATE the Bible into ENGLISH:

 

Act 7:37,38  This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:

 

ἐκκλησία ekklēsia ek-klay-see'-ah From a compound of G1537 and a derivative of G2564; a calling out,

That was a clear reference to the term EXODUS. [Not a "Steeple-Church"] Roman theologians attempted to over-lay their STEEPLE-TEMPLE on top of the Jewish EXODUS in this text. ROMAN Apologist point to the TABERNACLE, and claim that is why the "exchange" was appropriate?

But the TABERNACLE is ALREADY MENTIONED IN THE VERY TEXT! 

Act 7:44 Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness,..

AND... There IS a Greek word for TABERNACLE, it is

σκηνή , skēnē (pron.skay-nay') Apparently akin to G4632 and G4639; a tent or cloth hut (literally or figuratively): - habitation, tabernacle.

IT IS NOT "ECCLESIA".  Why did ROME change this word?

 

KARA - refers to a known SECT within Judaism.  They are called KARA-ITES [From the same word]!  KARA-ITE” was REPLACED by the term “CHRIST-IAN”, which left them with a linguistic HOLE to FILL, when it came to the term ECCLESIA, which originally referred to the KARA-IM. Originally, against the synagogue system and Rabinical Judaism, including it's Talmud.  Rabbinicals claim it did not "start" until the middle-ages.  Roman Catholicism makes the same claim concerning Biblical Protestantism.

 

קרא  Qârâ' , Kara (pron. kaw-raw') - A primitive root (rather identical with H7122 through the idea of accosting a person met); to call out to  - Strong's Exhaustice Concordance 

 

And GUESS where it’s first USE is FOUND? 

 

Gen 1:4,5  And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

 

Guess Where Else?

 

Gen 3:20  And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

 

Christ was called the “Second Adam” and the ECCLESIA/KARA-IM is said to BE HIS BRIDE!!!  And it should be noted that according to the Torah he preached from, he would only take a JEWISH BRIDE.  [If she were a Gentile, she would have to “convert” first]  That would entail a strange custom called Mikvah where the gentile must be immersed in water [as a washing from “uncleaness” ,i.e., “unkosher”, and be “born as a Jew”] symbolically [since that’s the only way you can be one, i.e., by "birth"].  The REAL CHRIST went so far as to claim even this custom was not “good enough” for him, he wanted that PLUS the “Ruach HaQodesh” [That’s the Spirit of a Jewish Prophet] before considering them “born-again” as a Jew!!!  He was extremely “picky” about his concept of what constituted his Jewish Bride.

Of course, the blonde Latin-Jesus of Christ-mass has no problem marrying gentile pagans because he is one.

 

let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name,[a "Shem"]

 

Not ONLY did ROME make itself A CHRIST to replace the Jewish Joshua, and a "NAME" to REPLACE HASHEM, they even made themselves a STEEPLE-TEMPLE, we now call "CHURCH" to REPLACE "THE CALLED-OUT ONES". 

 

WILL THE REAL BRIDE OF CHRIST PLEASE STAND UP

THE CHURCH of Christ-Mass

 

Mat 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you, ...

behold, he is in the (Sanctuary); believe it not.

 

 

Mat 24:26 "Therefore, if they say to you*, 'Look! He is in the wilderness!' you* shall not go out, [or they say], 'Look! [He is] in the private rooms!' you* shall not believe [them]. - ANALYTICAL-LITERAL TRANSLATION, [e-sword] 

 

sanctuary

c.1340, "building set apart for holy worship," from Anglo-Fr. sentuarie, from O.Fr. sainctuarie, from L.L. sanctuarium "a sacred place, shrine" (especially the Hebrew Holy of Holies; see sanctum), also "a private room," - Online Etymology Dictionary

 

STRONG'S Definition ταμεῖον, tameion (pron. tam-i'-on) Neuter contraction of a presumed derivative of ταμίας tamias (a dispenser or distributor; akin to τέμνω temnō, to cut); a dispensary or magazine, that is, a chamber on the ground floor or interior of an Oriental house (generally used for storage or privacy, a spot for retirement): - secret chamber, closet, storehouse.

 

sanctum

1577, from L. sanctum "a holy place," as in L.L. sanctum sanctorum "holy of holies" (from Gk. to hagion ton hagion, from Heb. qodesh haqqodashim), from neut. of sanctus "holy" (see saint). In Eng., sanctum sanctorum attested from c.1400; sense of "a person's private retreat"  - Online Etymology Dictionary

 

 

 

 

BEHOLD!!!  HE IS IN THE SANCTUARY

 

 

PANEGYRIC ON THE BUILDING OF THE CHURCHES, ADDRESSED TO PAULINUS, BISHOP OF TYRE: "...And thou, O excellent ornament of this new and holy temple of God endowed by him with the wisdom of the age... has granted the distinguished privilege of rebuilding and renewing it to Christ ...his holy and divine spouse: whether one might call thee a  new Beseleel, the architect of a divine tabernacle, or a Solomon, the king of a new and better Jersualem, or a new Zerubbabel, superadding a glory to the temple of God, much greater than the former.....so have we seen, in the city of the Lord of hosts, in the city of our God. And in what city but in this newly built and framed by God? "I was glad when they said unto me, we will go into the  house of the Lord: and again,Lord I have loved the beauty of thine house, and the place where thy honor dwelleth." They also confess Christ the Son of God... in the midst of the city which holds sway over the whole earth. Witness the splendid ornaments and donations of this very temple, which themselves are noble and truly grand, worthy of admiration and astonishment, and expressive symbols of our  Saviours's kingdom. Next to him, however, the second place immediantly devolves on one alone of his equals, the presiding prelate and leader of this host, who has been honored by the first and great High Priest himself with the second in rank in this sanctuary, and has been appointed by him... obtaining this people of yours as his portion by the judgement and allottment of the Father; a new Aaron or another Melchisedech assimilated to the Son of God.  (Pgs. 406-418) - EUSEBIUS ECCLESASTICAL HISTORY

 

Heb 7:1,3 For this Melchisedek, king of Salem,

priest of God Most High,..without father,

without mother, without genealogy,

having neither beginning of days nor end of life,

and being made like to the Son of God,

doth remain a priest continually [forever].

 

 

"another Melchisedech assimilated to the Son of God"?

 

 Heb 9:24 For Christ is not entered into holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

 

 

Main Entry: as·sim·i·late

Pronunciation: &-'si-m&-"lAt

Function: verb

Inflected Form(s): -lat·ed; -lat·ing

Etymology: Middle English, from Medieval Latin assimilatus, past participle of assimilare, from Latin assimulare to make similar, from ad- + simulare to make similar, simulate

transitive verb

1 a : to take in and utilize as nourishment : absorb into the system b : to take into the mind and thoroughly comprehend

2 a : to make similar b : to alter by assimilation c : to absorb into the culture or mores of a population or group

 

 

Mat 24:4,5,23,24 And Jesus answering said to them, `Take heed that no one may lead you astray, for many shall come in my name, saying, I am the Christ, and they shall lead many astray, <> `Then if any one may say to you, Lo, here is the Christ! or here! ye may not believe;  for there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, Lo, I did tell you beforehand. `If therefore they may say to you, Lo, in the wilderness he is, ye may not go forth; lo, in the inner chambers, ye may not believe;  for as the lightning doth come forth from the east, and doth appear unto the west, so shall be also the presence of the Son of Man;  - Young's Literal

 

 

 

I AM THE CHRIST

 

"The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, he is Jesus Christ himself, hidden under the veil of flesh."  - Catholic National July 1895.

 

 

 

ANOTHER "BRIDE" TOO?

 

 

EUSEBIUS

 

"...And thou, O excellent ornament of this new and holy temple of God endowed by him with the wisdom of the age... has granted the distinguished privilege of rebuilding and renewing it to Christ ...his holy and divine spouse: whether one might call thee a  new Beseleel, the architect of a divine tabernacle, or a Solomon, the king of a new and better Jersualem,

 

 

 

THE CHURCH BUILDING ? ? ?

 

................................................................. a new and better Jersualem,?

 

................................................................. the new and holy temple of God ?

 

................................................................. his holy and divine spouse?

 

 

 

His Divine Spouse?

A Pile Of STONES?

 

 

?

 

 

     BASIC MATH:

 

     ANOTHER CHRIST

 

+   ANOTHER TEMPLE

 

+   ANOTHER BRIDE

_________________________

 

=  ANOTHER RELIGION ( One started in 324 CE )

 

Whose CENTRAL HOLY DAY of the ECCLESIASTICAL YEAR IS

 

DECEMBER 25th

 

The Birth Of The Sun-God

Celebrated With TREES

Worshipped in Temples Made Of Stones

[God never commanded]

 

Jer 3:9 ...committed adultery with stones and stocks 

 

 

MYSTERY BABYLON IS "NO MYSTERY"

 

 

Mat 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you, ...

behold, he is in the sanctuary; believe it not.

 


 REV 17:4-5 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand... and upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON [BABEL] THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS

[NOTE: BABYLON is  also known as BABEL]

 

 Gen 11:3-4  And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar.  And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower*, … and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered

*[STEEPLE is the Old English/Saxon word for TOWER]

 

 

[Speaking of the Tower Of Babel] "She answered, Dost thou not see over against thee a great tower, which is built upon the water, with bright square stones? "As for the tower which thou seest built, it is myself, namely the church, which have appeared to thee both now and heretofore." SHEPHERD OF HERMAS - Read As Scripture In Rome




"...the Legend ascribes the origin of Masonry to the era of the building of the tower.  Nimrod is made the first Grand Master and makes the first charge- that is, frames the first Constitution that the Masons ever had" - Dr. Albert Gallatin Mackey, pg.59, The History of Freemasonry

 

MYSTERY BABYLON

[According to the Babylonians]

 

"In accordance with the engenious plans of Marduk did      
Nudimmud (Nimrod) create it"                                
                                                           

"Come let us make something whose name shall be            
called  Sanctuary

 

It shall be a dwelling for our rest at  
night
; come let us repose therein. 

 

There let us erect     
throne dais, a seat with a back support."                   
                                           

                
"So shall Babylon be,
whose construction you have          
desired;

 

Let it's brickwork be fashioned, and call it a    
Sanctuary.

          

  "Let them make their land shine by building Temples for
            themselves.

 

As for us, by as many a name as we have
            called. he shall be our god
"

         

   "Let the wise teach THE MYSTERY to the wise"

 

"THE BABYLONIAN GENESIS", Alexander Heidel,
University of Chicago Press
(a complete translation of     
cuneiform tablets)  See Pages 48, 49, 51, 52, 53

 

 

Moral of the Story:

You can call Satan whatever you like... even Yahweh if it makes you "feel better".

... as long as you worship "HIS WAY"

 

 

BEHOLD HE IS IN THE SANCTUARY

 

 

Act 7:48,49,51  Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost

 

 

 

IGNORANT WORSHIP

Act 17:23-25 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 

 

GOD DOES NOT DWELL IN SANCTUARIES

"It was opened in me 'that God did not dwell in temples made with hands'". This at first seemed a strange word, because both priest and people used to call their temples or churches, dreadful places, holy ground, and the temples of God. But the Lord showed me clearly, that he did not dwell in those temples which men had commanded and set up, but in people's hearts; for both Stephen and the Apostle Paul bore testimony, that he did not dwell in temples made with hands, not even in that which He had once commanded to be built, since he put an end to it; but that his people were his temple, and he dwelt  in them". - GEORGE FOX,  p., 127,Deeper Experiences Of Famous Christians, (c) 1911, James Lawson

 

HE WILL SAY I NEVER KNEW YOU

 "God will say: (on Judgement day) "Who commanded you to build churches? I have placed living temples before you. These you should have built up for me, supported for me, helped for me. Instead you dealt with other things, tomfooleries I have not commanded. Therefore depart from me, I never  knew you" - MARTIN LUTHER, Page 161, What Luther Says

 

FACT:  "After the victory of Constantine, with Christianity replacing the  pagan cults as the state religion, worship ceased to be a family gathering and became a public occasion" -  P.26, WESTMINSTER DICTIONARY OF CHRISTIAN WORSHIP

 

Acts 8:3 As for Saul, he made havock of the Ecclesia entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.

 

Romans 16:5 Likewise greet the Ecclesia that is their house. Salute my well-beloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.

 

1Corinthians 16:19 The Ecclesia of Asia salute you. Aquila and Priscilla salute you much in the Lord, with the Ecclesia that is in their house.

 

Colossians 4:15 Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea, and Nymphas, and the Ecclesia which is in his house.

 

Philemon 1:2 And to our beloved Apphia, and Archippus our fellowsoldier, and to the Ecclesia in thy house:

 

 

2Th 2:15  Therefore, brethren, [to avoid the "man of sin"] stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle. [who exalts himself in a TEMPLE from a BEMA and speaks AS GOD!]

 

 

BEHOLD HE IS IN THE SANCTUARY

 

  

NOTE: The FIRST INSTANCE of only two occurrences of the number 666 in the Old Testament is here:

 

1Ki 10:14 Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six (666) talents of gold,

 

It is the amount of GOLD that SOLOMON collected from the QUEEN OF SHEBA after BUILDING THE TEMPLE.

 

 

 

 

EUSEBIUS

On the

INVENTION of CHRISTIAN TEMPLES by CONSTANTINE,

[later called "Churches"]:

 

"For when he had thus completed the temple, he also adorned it with lofty thrones, in honor of those who preside, and also with seats decently arranged in order throughout the whole, and at last placed the holy altar in the middle." Which buildings were erected by this our most  peaceful Solomon, the founder of the temple, ... So that the prophecy repeated above, seems to consist no longer in words, but in facts and deeds: "For the glory of this latter house is truly far beyond the former". (pgs  406-418)        

 

Mat 24:26-28 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the Sanctuary ; believe it not.  For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the PRESENCE of the Son of man be. For whosesoever the carcass is, there will the EAGLES be gathered together. [The Eagle Was The Standard Of The Roman Empire Taken from the Building of the TEMPLE in Babylon]

 

The eagle, as a symbol, is of great antiquity. In Egypt, Greece and Persia, this bird was sacred and considered a symbol of the sun. Among many pagan civilizations, it was an emblem of Jupiter, and with the Druids, it was a symbol of their supreme god. ...The story of our Eagle has been told by the eminent Assyriologist, M. Thureau Dangin, in the volume of Zeitschrift fur Assyriologie, 1904. …. The cylinders are now in the Louvrein Paris and have been deciphered by M. Thurertu Dangin, who displays to our wondering eyes the emblem of power that was already centuries old when Babylon gave its name to Babylonia. The cylinder in question is a foundation record deposited by one Gudea, Ruler of the City of Lagash, to mark the building of the temple, about the year 3000 BC, as nearly as the date could be fixed.  -  The Double-Headed Eagle, August 2001, by Phil Elam 32° Member, Masonic Brotherhood of the Blue Forget-Me-Not

 

 

 

BEHOLD HE IS IN THE SANCTUARY

 

 

 

"We welcome you to God's house today. We hope you will find  friendliness, reverence, and Christ's presence in our santuary. If you must whisper, whisper a prayer".  - Direct Quote From A Presbytarian Church Bulletin

 

"The Rose window, when lighted at night, is simply magnificient in it's beauty. Last week a mother drove by with her preschooler. Upon seeing the window, her child said;"Oh, LOOK! Mother, The Church is  not even finished yet, and Jesus has already moved in!" - Direct Quote From A Southern Baptist Church Bulletin

 

 

 

 

DO NOT GO, ...DO NOT BELIEVE. - THE REAL CHRIST

 

 

THE "SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN"

 

CONSTANTINE

INSTITUTES THE

SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN

AS THE

"BRIDE OF CHRIST"

 

 

 

Rev 2:9  I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

 

Rev 3:9  Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

 

 

 

 

TORAH PROHIBITION ON UNAUTHORIZED TEMPLE CULT

 


Deu 12:1 These are the statutes and judgments, which ye shall observe to do in the land, which the LORD God of thy fathers giveth thee to possess it, all the days that ye live upon the earth.

 

Deu 12:2 Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree:

 

Deu 12:13 Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy burnt offerings in every place that thou seest:

 

Deu 12:14 But in the place which the LORD shall choose in one of thy tribes, there thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings, and there thou shalt do all that I command thee.

 

Deu 12:30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.

 

Deu 12:31 Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods;

 

Deu 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

 

 

 

THE “HOUSES OF THE HIGH PLACES”

 

 

HIGH PLACE - Hebrew: Bâmâh, Bimâh  – Pron. baw-maw' - From an unused root (meaning to be high); an elevation: - Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance

 1Ki 13:32  For the saying which he cried by the word of the LORD against the altar in Bethel, and against all the houses of the high places which are in the cities of Samaria, shall surely come to pass.

 2Ki 17:29  Howbeit every nation made gods of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt.

 

2Ki 17:32  So they feared the LORD, and made unto themselves of the lowest of them priests of the high places, which sacrificed for them in the houses of the high places.


2Ki 23:19  And all the houses also of the high places that were in the cities of Samaria, which the kings of Israel had made to provoke the LORD to anger, Josiah took away, and did to them according to all the acts that he had done in Bethel.

 

 

BIMAH HOUSES OF TODAY

 

BIMAH

Variant(s): also bi·ma /'bE-m&/

Function: noun

Etymology: Yiddish & Late Hebrew; Yiddish bime, from Late Hebrew bImAh, from Late Greek bEma raised platform -- more at BEMA

: a raised platform in a synagogue...

 

BEMA

One entry found for bema.

Main Entry: be·ma

Pronunciation: 'bE-m&

Function: noun

Etymology: Late Latin & Late Greek; Late Latin, from Late Greek bEma, from Greek, step, tribunal, from bainein to go -- more at COME

1 : the usually raised part of a church containing the altar

2 : (see) BIMAH

 

BEMA: Area around the altar of a church for the clergy and choir; often enclosed by a lattice or railing - WordWeb

 

bema, bemae:

Latin. A structure of brick or mortar rising by steps or stages to an elevated platform  - Glossary - Mithraism In Archeology And History

 

 

BEMA HOUSES [Translated: Houses of the High Places]  in the Old Testament were "Local unauthorized houses of worship". They were served by "ordained ministers" who were NON- LEVITICAL in nature and their requirement was that they had to be built on the "highest point" in a town or village. Josiah, called "the most righteous king of Israel ever before or after" sought to have all the "high places" completely destroyed. The remains of this campaign have been uncovered by archeologists today.

 

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF A "HIGH PLACE" FROM ARCHEOLOGICAL REMAINS:


 

"From the location of the Sanctuary inside the royal Israelite citadel and form it's contents, there can be no question that this is a Yahwistic-Israeliste sanctuary..." [Please note that this was patently a Jewish place of worship] "It was built in the tenth century (Stratum XI) and continued in use with slight alterations throughout strata X-VII. After it's destruction at the end of stratum VII, it was never reconstructed. The casemite wall of stratum VI which was appearantly built by Josiah, cuts through it's center. This is a striking confirmation of the Biblical account of the great religious reform carried out by that king. "P. 86, Encyclopedia Of Excavation

 

This reform was rejected by the people of Israel and they were carried into captivity in Babylon ALONG WITH THE PRIESTS OF THE HIGH PLACES:



 





Encyclopedia Judaica Jerusalem:

 

QUOTE "It is to the period of the Babylonian exile that one must look for the origin of the synagogue." END QUOTE, p.580,

 

 

 

QUOTE: "The site on which the Synagogue is to be built, according to the Tosefta (Meg. 4:23) and codified by the posekim (Sh. Ar., OH 150:2), should be the highest spot in the city and the synagogue should also be the highest building. Jews have been unable to comply with this law in many times and places. As a result, Jews in the MiddleAges attempted to fulfill this law by erecting on the roof of the synagogue a pole or rod [steeple] which would rise higher than the surrounding buildings. As long as the extension was a "built one" rather than just a simple attachment this method of compliance was acceptable (Sh. Ar., OH 150:2, see Ba'er Heitev, ad loc., and Mishnah Berurah,para. 8). Rav said (Shab. 11a) that "any city whose roofs are higher than the synagogue will be ultimately destroyed, for it is written 'to exalt the house of our God'[Ezra 9:9]" END QUOTE, p. 585

 


 

 

 

The "HIGH PLACE"

[Bema House]

Emerged from Babylon as

THE SYNAGOGUE

[Of Satan]

into Israel.

 

 

 

 

Note the following quote:

 

"In the times to come the synagogues of Babylonia will be transferred to Israel"  (Meg. 29a) and "A man's prayer is only heard in the synagogue" (Ber. 6a).

 

 

 

ORIGIN OF THE “BEMA HOUSE”

Gen 11:4  And they [BABYLON] said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower [LATIN, "STEEPLE"], whose HEAD is in the heaven; and let us make us a name for ourselves, - YLT

 

 (SYNAGOGUES no longer have steeples on them because under Constantine, the LAW was passed that no synagogue was to be "higher" than a Church.  Thus the steeples or towers on the synagogues had to be removed. The custom was never "re-introduced" afterwards.)

 

 

FACT: The "BEMA HOUSES" were condemned more times in the Old Testament than even idolitry itself.