MEET THE "THREE STOOGES"
STOOGE: a : one who plays a subordinate or compliant role to a principal b : puppet 3. 2. : straight man. 3. : stool pigeon - Merriam Webster Dictionary
THE THREE WISE MEN WERE ...
(1) THREE MITHRA WORSHIPERS
(2) THREE [CATHOLIC] MAGICIAN/SORCERERS
(3) THREE KINGS
(4) THREE MASONS
(5) ALL OF THE ABOVE
For the sake of logical development, before looking at who the "wise men" actually were, it is just as important to understand who they were "Changed into" in order to "become". The record of how their identities were "Changed" is just as revealing as the raw facts of who they were, which the reader will be show below in detail, with 70 proofs, detailing their buried historical and Biblical identity. But, before we begin citing the facts of who they were, and what they did, we must begin by noting what they weren't, and how their identity was intentionally "Changed" according to each epoch of history in Rome and western Europe. Understanding these "Changes", reveal as much as do the facts of who they were. For each "Change" that is introduced, an original "Fact" of who they were (was hidden).
THE THREE WISE MEN MYTHOLOGY
From Jewish History to Roman Mythology
THE REAL STORY
While there are debates over the various ways to interpet and date the chronology of Christ's birth between Luke and Matthew, they both agree on the fact, Herod the Great was still alive when Christ was born. Herod died in 4 B.C., so Christ by necessity of both accounts, would have had to have been born prior to 4 B.C.
WHEN CHRIST WAS REALLY BORN
Some of the confusion for scholars in the past, has come from the fact that Quirinius was governor twice. (Not once as some previously assumed). His first reign began in 12 B.C. as a co-regent, and in the year 9 B.C. did in fact, give orders for a "census". Another aspect of historical logistics is that unlike today, a census in the 1st century BC/AD took literally YEARS to complete. This census occurred from 9 B.C. when it was ordered, to 6 B.C. in order to "complete", placing the birth of Christ after 9 B.C. and before 6 B.C. (8 BC - 7 BC)
These facts create the time frame during which the gospel accounts record his birth as having occurred; Augustus as Caesar, Quirinius as governor, and Herod as King. (8 BC - 7 BC)
Luk 2:1-5 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed. (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.) And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:) To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child. Joseph and Mary were originally from Bethlehem according to the Scriptures, and by deduction would have been the place where they had first become acquainted with one another. The Scriptures indicate one of the requirements for the census was to return to their towns of origin to be registered by the Roman empire. Thus the home of their families, and additional extended relations, would have been present in Bethlehem.
Their relocation to the town of Nazareth, probably due to the fact an ambitious building program, under-way in Galilee, offering employment for Israeli trade craftsmen which Joseph was recorded as having been. A new city, Sepphoris, was being constructed by Herod Antipas to be the new "capital" of Galilee, only 4 miles away from Nazareth.
Joseph was not a "carpenter" but a τέκτων. While this term is translated "Carpenter", the actual meaning of the term is "craftsman" or "artisian", without reference to the "material" that one is a "craftsman" with. It has been assumed to be "carpentry", but archeology has shown there was very little wood in the area to work, and most work of this sort of "craftsman" was actually working with "stone", "brick", "mosaic"or "plaster". There were no "carpentry shops" in Nazareth as is portrayed, and Joseph was much more likely to have been closer to a "skilled construction laborer", than a "carpenter", with a "shop".
While antagonists have attempted to charge there was no Bethlehem, and no one lived in Nazareth, recent archeology has given less and less, credence to their claims. Residential structures dating to the time of Christ were excavated in Nazareth, showing the town did exist, and was inhabited, and had a daily routine of life, and a bulla seal dating from the 7th century CE, from the first Temple period, lists Bethlehem as an already established town with commerce, trade and taxes being recorded in Jerusalem.
No doubt, as time continues to pass, and more and more of the incomplete archeological records are filled in with newly discovered artifacts, the future prospects of such minimalist theories will continue to grow less and less credible, with each passing discovery. This fact due to the simple reason, when these things were first written, they were written to be believed, that is, to be "credible". Obviously citing cities which do not exist, or cities in which there are no inhabitants, would hardly make these accounts "believable" to local inhabitants of Israel, to whom it's first accounts were published, and which numbered not in the dozens or even hundreds, but the thousands.
When Joseph and Mary returned to their home-town, the idea they would have stayed in an "Inn", rather than with extended family as anyone would have normally done, is a violation of middle-eastern custom, history, and based on the misconception created by the translators in their treatement of the term " κατάλυμα", which they translated as "Inn".
1Ti 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality,
Heb 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
Luk 1:39,40,56 And Mary arose in those days, and went into the hill country with haste, into a city of Juda; And entered into the house of Zacharias, and saluted Elisabeth. And Mary abode with her about three months, and returned to her own house.
In the nativity accounts, the term is translated as the word "Inn", but later in Luke 22:11, it is translated as "guest room"/"guest chamber" and verse 12 is translated as "Upper Room". So the term is not being translated consistently, and can mean any of the above, as demonstrated in it's various translations.
Evidence later in the text, suggests it was NOT an "Inn", but a HOUSE. [Mtt.2:11] And was would normally be expected according to custom, the "house" of an extended family member or parents, with whom they stayed during the census period and Mary's birthing.
Mat 2:11 And when they were come into THE HOUSE, they saw the young child with Mary his mother,
What emerges, is an almost unrecognizable story [from the Bible] that has been in the face of [and ignored] by "Christians" for almost 2 millenia. Why? Because the REAL STORY (Along with the REAL CHRIST) was of no concern. It wasn't "him" they were "celebrating" anyway. If you are really "worshipping" someone, the very least you would do, is actually know the man's real name. Much less who his real family was, how he was really born, what his real religion was, and what he really taught. None of which, they have apparently, even really been interested in from the beginning?
There is no donkey, there is no lean-too in a field, no animals mentioned being there, there is no "inn", no "Stable", no "angels", certianly not Nikes, he didn't glow in the dark, there is no "singing", and last but certianly not least, the Magi did not show up until he was a TODDLER. Perhaps as much as 2 years later!
Mat 2:11 And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.
Mat 2:16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men.
THE "MAKE OVER"
NICOLAITANS consolidated their dominance over "Christianity" due to the various social pressures within the empire; the revolt of Bar Kokhba, the empire wide antisemitism, the synthesis by off-shoots of the New Testament communities with Roman "Mystery Religions" , their "secret societies", their "rites" and "rituals" of "magic", "necromancy" and "sorcery", the need to "adapt" not only "Christ" to the "Universal principle" of "Sun-worship", but all the various parts of the "Euangellion" became "symbols" to over-lay onto familiar reference points in these other systems of "Monism" theology.
Naturally, the "birth of Christ" equated as a cognate to the "birth" of all the other pagan "sun" deities, which obviously all occured when the "sun" was naturalistically "born" every year on the Winter solstice. All the various elements of that "narrative" originally given, such little importance, that it's date of occurance intentionally not even mentioned by the original founders and authors of it's faith. Transformed afterwards, into major aspects of importance, way beyond the original perspective of it's authors, in order to accommodate these transferences of identity.
During the earliest formative age of the Nicolaitan creation called the "Roman Universalist Temple", which is the actual meaning of the terms "Roman Catholic Church", the Nicolaitans sought to bring "equations" between the mythological Solar-deities throughout the empire, born on the solstice, and the flesh and blood Jewish Messiah. In order to accomplish this "cognate equivalency", the doctrine that "Christ" was really "just a universal symbol", or a "spirit", rather than actual flesh and blood. This change was noted as early as the writing of the New Testament, where it's Cheif advocate, Cerinthus, in Ephesus, was openly and publicly denounced in the strongest terms possible.
1Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
1Jn 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
The entire POINT of all these condemnations, was the ISSUE AND NATURE OF CHRIST'S BIRTH! Was it simply a "Symbol" or a "Spirit", or was there really, literally, physically a JEW who had really BEEN BORN? Was he simply a SYMBOL OF THE BIRTH OF THE SUN, or was he a REAL JEW who had REALLY BEEN BORN? The Nicolaitans preferred to "interpret Christ" after the typical manner of the Romans, whereas the Apostles who were themselves JEWS, demanded he BE RECOGNIZED as a REAL PERSON of FLESH AND BLOOD, who had not come to "Synthesize" all religion in the Roman empire, but call people "OUT" of It, i.e., ("Ecclesia").
Naturally when Roman
NICOLAITANS went to "interpret" the "elements" of the narrative of his "Birth" to "syncretize" it with the deities of the Roman empire, it treated the other "elements" of history, in the same manner as it did "Christ", one of which is this reference to the "Magi' who came to see him. While all the elements of this corruption evolved simultaneously, due to the nature of the foundation which it was all built upon, the various "elements" of distortion, were "emphasized" based upon the period in which that one particular element of corruption, was found most useful for propaganda purposes. Thus while all were present from the beginning of NICOLAITANISM they were not all given the same emphasis at each period in history. The first and most critical element being the NICOLAITAN connection with denying "Christ's" flesh and blood, and the "equation" of "Christ" with the "birth of the sun", the chief deity of the Roman empire. Thus, the "wise men" at this point are transformed in Babylonian/Persian Mithra worshipers . The narrative is given "supporting" arguments naturally from points of intersection found in the Scriptures, but by necessity, corrupt these points of intersection, into these they were not, in order to "make the leap", from concepts and histories in Judaism, to their mythological equivalents in Romanism.
Mat 2:1 Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,
There is no mention of the number of "wise men" (magi) that come. Only a plural term is used.
Mat 2:11 And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.
By the time, they actually get "to the HOUSE" where "Christ" is, he is no longer a "New Born" (ἀρτιγέννητος), but a "Toddler" (παιδίον).
Neuter diminutive of G3816; a childling (of either sex), ..a half grown boy or girl; figuratively an immature
From G737 and G1084; just born, that is, (figuratively) a young convert: - new born.
The "pictures" and "plays" of the "Three Wise Men" coming to a "manger" is completely fictitious. And while plans to under-take their journey may have begun with observation of an astronomical phenomena, and a trip to Jerusalem, by the time they got to THE HOUSE, where Christ was, Christ WAS A TODDLER. So the merging of this "imagery" with the "birth of the Sun", naturally, has nothing to do with THE CHRIST OF THE FLESH, because at that time "Christ's FLESH" had ALREADY GROWN INTO BEING A TODDLER.
Now this may seem like a small matter to some, and certainly by itself could be attributed to nothing more than sloth and error on the part of credulous Christians, but you have to remember, the entire point of this "synthesis mythology" IS A DENIAL OF THE FLESH OF CHRIST, so naturally the "Flesh" of Christ (it's actual state) is of NO RELEVENCE in this story.
In other words, every time you see THREE WISE MEN, showing up at a MANGER, you need to be reminded that you are looking DEAD AIM at a "theological fossil" which DENIES THE FLESH OF CHRIST, down to every detail, even to that of this concocted story about "Three Wise Men" showing up at his "Manger" in Bethlehem. It never happened. Not even according to the people who wrote about it. Not even according to the New Testament Scriptures. What you are looking at is an unbiblical "Myth". A propaganda "fraud".
But much more sinister, than simply the corruption of the Biblical story is at work. The "Doctrine of the Antichrist" is what you are observing in this deception. A Doctrine which DENIES the real FLESH of Christ, in order to concoct these Roman mythologies that conveniently transfers the identity of a Jewish Christ, onto a Roman deity called "Apollo" [Rev.9:11], which was (and still is) it's real deity, "the Sun".
Connecting the "Three Wise Men" (which were not numbered) to "sun worship", [like all the rest of the "Christmas lie"] requires not only changing the "time" of their arrival, but also their identity, from what they really were, into something they were not.
What they were NOT is Mithraic sun-worshipers. How do we know this? Below, the reader will be pointed to 70 facts from Scripture and History that contradict the claim of who you have been told the "magi" in Matthew 2:1 were. Not only were the "Magi" not "sun-worshipers", it can be shown, they were not even "gentiles" at all. And this fact blows a major hole in this "connection". In fact, it blows a major hole in almost all the foundational corruptions introduced by NICOLAITANISM onto this text. And thus why, that is the ONLY thing, you will never hear anyone claim they were.
But here, were are studying the "corruptions" first. This being mentioned only by way of the fact, the corruption must first be actually recognized as a "corruption" to begin with. Mithras worshipers clearly point the observers (or victims if you prefer) to the origin of the Persian Holy-Day to begin with, Mithraism in order to accomplish their "transference".
PHASE 1 - THE THREE MITHRA WORSHIPERS
Rev 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. [The Sun]
“For the Sun of Righteousness, who drives His chariot over all, pervades equally all humanity, like His Father, who makes His sun to rise on all men” - CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, (Exhortation to the Heathen 11).
Why must the "magi" come and "bring Gifts" to "Christ' who was born in a "Stable/Cave"? Because that is the story of the person they were really worshiping Rome and how he was "born". Mithra was born in a "cave" and visited by "Wise men and Shepherds" bearing him "gifts". Not Christ. But since it is not "Christ" that is actually being worshiped, the exact details of the actual story of "Christ's" birth, are important only in so far as to how they "over-lap" with Mithra, and thus the strange distortions of fact, for fancy.
The idea that there were "three Magi" is said to have been deduced from the number of gifts mentioned that were brought by them to Christ. While on the surface, this explanation sounds reasonable, there are some additional facts from history that make the selection of the number 3 much more likely the product of Nicolaitan syncretism and Roman occultism, than anything to do with what is found in Matthew chapter 2.
The number "Three" was sacred to polytheistic/occultist/mystery religions in the ancient Roman empire. From it's earliest times, documented in Hindu devil worship, the repeating number of 3 emerges. As you can see in the illustration to the right, the Hindu "Mother-goddess" Sri Lalitha, is accompanied by 3 children, each representing a different "element", also symbolized in the "colors" white, red and black.
In Roman mythology, SATURN'S 3 SONS, (From which we derive the "Saturnalia"), were Zeus (the sky), Neptune (the sea) and Pluto (the earth). Also 3 elemental "spirits". The "coloration" of the "3 wise men" from Priscilla's tomb, indicate that the number "3" were also "equated" not to "3" races, but "3" elementals, or in other words, the 3 Children of Saturn, or the 3 attendants of the ancient "Mother-goddess", from polytheism, behind whose head shines of course, THE SUN.
...Second Vatican Council inevitably becomes the event that turned the priest around and broke the altar away from the wall. Until then, the celebrant had typically faced the apse or rear wall of the church, ostensibly appearing to be “away from the people.” This practice was described for symbolic and historical reasons using the Latin phrase, ad orientem, “to the east,” - Light from the East:The Orientation of Christian Worship in Light of Modern Scholarship by Matthew Alderman
Ezekiel 8:16 And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD's house, and, behold,...their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they WORSHIPPED THE SUN toward the east.
"It was to the rising sun that Christians alike in East and West turned in prayer, whether in congregational worship or in private devotion. IN TERTULLIAN'S DAY THERE WERE ALREADY SOME WHO THOUGHT THE SUN TO BE THE CHRISTIANS' GOD". - Norman H. Baynes, History Constantine The Great and the Christian Church,2nd edition, Oxford, 1972, P.95
For the sake of brevity, and to avoid needless repetition under this topic ,for a more complete discussion of the connection between Christmas and Rome's worship of the Sun see the section entitled: THE
Suffice it to note here, that the earliest portrayals of the "Three Wise Men/Magi" occurring anywhere on earth, are found in the Roman Catacombs, associated with Sorcery and Necromancy. They depict the "Three Wisemen" as 3 elemental spirits, not 3 "races", after the manner of Saturn's Three Sons, and the three attendants of the most ancient versions of the "Mother-goddess" as found in Hindu polytheism.
Simply to illustrate the effect on western culture these occult ideas have held, if you were to ask most people today;"How many 'RACES' are there?" Most would reply "Three" citing Caucasian, Asian and African, or more technically the more historical three categorizations of Caucasian, Mongolian, and Negroid. Which is in fact, completely false. There are 4-5 genetic grouping of "race" for those who still use the antiquated term. The UN has dropped the language as scientifically inaccurate terminology, and refer to "ethnicities" instead, of which, there are MORE THAN 5000.
The fact that RACISM is a large part of this "occult tradition", inserted into "Christianity" through Nicolaitan corruption, is totally in keeping with it's primary directive from the beginning cited by Constantine, who quoted Virgil's epilogue on the dedication of the first Roman Universalist Temple, built from scratch, using the stones of the Temple of Diana from Ephesus. For more on this discussion, SEE: "THE CHRIST": Wrong Race and Ethnicity
The "3 Races" obviously an adaptation of the THREE SONS OF SATURN, and the THREE ELEMENTS which they represented, each bearing a color corresponding to their attribute of "occult power". When Romans use "free Association" to "connect the dots" with symbolism from Biblical narratives, completely outside of their historical, cultural and linguistic contexts to find "Cognates" with all it's various occult doctrines, naturally the "Three Gifts" themselves, (not being the SOURCE of the inspiration, but certainly adding a POINT OF FIXATION, being interpreted along the same lines of the THREE ELEMENTS; Gold, Frankencense and Myrrh, equating to Earth, Water and Fire, or Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto.
The fact that the actual number of "Magi" are not directly cited, adds to the opportunity, to take these three "Gifts" representing the THREE ELEMENTS, and by way of EXTENSION, carry them to the THREE SONS OF SATURN, as the THREE WISE MEN. Another aspect of this link, is the fact that the "Three visitors" are depicted not as aged learned "scholars", but as "Youth", thus emphasizing SONS... as in THE THREE SONS OF SATURN.
In order to make the connection between Rome's principal deity "Sol Invictus" (a/k/a Apollo, Rev.9:11), and also known as "Mithra" in Persia, for whom the Winter-Solstice is commemorated as a "High Holy Day", identifying the "magi" as PERSIAN was a simple necessity. Thus bringing together the various disparate religious traditions into a single "syncretized" system of "Sun-veneration" as the "Annointed [ONE]". (Emphasis on "One"), a concept of occult secret-Babelism religious tradition so profound and indespensible, it was promoted by early American Mason's as America' "official slogan" and placed on America's seals and currency:"E Pluribus Unum" (Along with a picture of the "Unfinished Tower")
E pluribus unum (/ˈiː ˈplʊərɨbəs ˈuːnəm/; Latin [ˈeː ˈpluːrɪbʊs ˈuːnũː]) — Latin for "Out of many, one" (alternatively translated as "One from many") — is a phrase on the Seal of the United States, along with Annuit cśptis and Novus ordo seclorum, and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782. Never codified by law, E pluribus unum was considered a de facto motto of the United States until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H.J. Resolution 396), adopting "In God We Trust" as the official motto. The motto was suggested in 1776 by Pierre Eugene du Simitiere to the committee responsible for developing the seal. At the time of the American Revolution, the exact phrase appeared prominently on the title page of a popular periodical, The Gentleman's Magazine, which collected articles from many sources into one "magazine". The phrase is similar to a Latin translation of a variation of Heraclitus's 10th fragment, "The one is made up of all things, and all things issue from the one." A variant of the phrase was used in Moretum, a poem attributed to Virgil but with the actual author unknown. In the poem text, color est e pluribus unus describes the blending of colors into one. St Augustine used a variant of the phrase, ex pluribus unum, in his Confessions. - E
PLURIBUS UNUM, Wikipedia.org
The connection to Persian Mithraism, is clearly established by the early "Nicolaitan" sun-syncretists who REPLACED the Jewish Christ of the "Flesh" found in the New Testament, with a "Christ" which served as nothing more than a "spirit-symbol" (I.E., NOT OF "THE FLESH") with Roman/Persian sun-worship. This dramatic REPLACEMENT "syncretism" will noted even FURTHER and in more shocking and graphic detail in the next epoch of Rome's perversion, which merges not only the Persian SUN-DEITY as "Christ", but goes so far as to even include it's abominable it's Ashteroth-Tree Mother-goddess worship, and even it's use of "Sorcery" (Pharmakia).
PHASE 2 - THE PERSIAN/BABYLONIAN MAGICIAN SORCERERS
ABC, the latest to "line-up" as another "commercial sycophant" for the Vatican, announced to it's viewing audience (about 7 million viewers), that at last the "secret mystery" of the "Three Wise Men" had been "solved" (as though it actually ever was a "mystery" to begin with). Proof positive who the "Wise men really were!" is found, "according to ABC's 'Faith matters'" (plugs for Vatican theology on American FCC Publicly licensed TV), and this is "in their own WORDS!", the announcer tells the public gleefully.
An "ancient manuscript" written by the "Wise men" themselves, explain in their own words, their entire story!
And not surprisingly, this document dates to at the very least, a century after their lives, and is conveniently produced by the Vatican for "translation" from Syriac into English, and despite the historical discrepancies, let alone it's content, is held out to the public by ABC with a "straight face" as a "real account of the wise men", and "explaining the mystery of the wise men".
Never mind the fact that the fraudulent document is simply nothing more than another example of Rome "fabricating" a fictitious history for it's heretical and perverse "doctrines" (which did not really exist, and thus the need to fabricate these kinds of phony documents for it). This fraud however, really goes off the deep end in a literal sort of way, justifying the Vatican's use of hallucinogenic entheogen drugs to "achieve enlightenment", and probably create drug induced Papal Megla-mania. (As is discussed in the section entitled THE TREE ) And while this document does not do anything by way of adding any real valid information about the Magi in Matthew 2, it does serve as "prima facie" evidence, the Vatican has after all, really been involved in the long suspected art of Sorcery (i.e., Pharmakeia).
But completely aside from the most remarkable component of this literary document fraud, and it's reliance on the use of "Pharmakeia" (Sorcery) by the "Magi" to "see the star" and "find Christ" (which is actually nothing more than a "drug trip" on an hallucnogen consumed as "food"), the most remarkable connection, as early as the 3rd century, documented in this fraud, hidden away in the Vatican archives as it's "secret collection" of "hidden wisdom"... it's overt and direct connection between it's "High Holy Day" of Persian Sorcery sun-worship and the "Gan Edin's" SERPENT TREE OF KNOWLEDGE, the Ashteroth Tree, worshiped by Persian idolaters and condemned by the prophet Jeremiah. It actually CITES the connection in graphic detail for the reader. (No wonder it's never been translated into "English")
Here, we have documented, not an "account" written by the "Three Wise Men" (Magi), but a document fraud attributed to them, and passed around in the Vatican as a "secret knowledge". A perverse "secret knowledge", that illustrates not only where they got such deluded ideas from to begin with, but what those "ideas" REALLY WERE, found in their own document creations.
Chapter 28 (yes, an entire Chapter) is dedicated to describing the "effect" of their "magical food", which gives them "visions" and "revelations" about "Christ".
28. The People Eat the Magi’s Food
Click here to read full Text: The Revelation of the Magi Translation by Brent Landau
28:1 And some of the people, rejoicing in love, took of those provisions and ate. And they began rejoicing and leaping for joy, while glorifying and saying to each other everything that appeared to them. There was one of them saying, “At the moment I ate of these provisions, I saw a great light that has no likeness in the world.”
28:2 And there is one saying, “I saw God bearing himself in the world as he wished.” And there is one saying, “I saw a star of light that darkened the sun by its light.” And there is one saying, “I saw a human being whose appearance is more unsightly than a man, and he is saving and purifying the world by his blood and by his humble appearance.”
28:3 And there is one saying, “I saw something like a lamb hanging upon a tree of life,and by him and his blood redemption takes place for all the creatures of the world.” And there is one saying, “I saw a pillar of light diving down inside the bowels of the earth,and the dead rise to meet it, and they worship and glorify it with great joy.”
28:4 And those who ate from those provisions were speaking to each other many other things beyond these, and their mind brought forth much glory day by day. And there was great joy in the entire land of the East, and the nobles, and the poor, and women, and children from the entire land were gathered together in the love of our Lord before those nobles who were called Magi.
28:5 And they came and heard from them the new and glorious teaching, and the mysteries, and the revelations, and everything that was spoken with them from that first day that they went out from their land until they came back in joy. And again, day by day, revelations, and visions, and all kinds of powerful manifestations were increased for them.
28:6 And the faith increased with the love of the testimony of our Lord Jesus Christ, by the mighty works which he did through them, that offspring of light who appeared to them until he accomplished the will of the one who sent him in everything and was taken up with glory to that heavenly height, his first abode. And the faith of salvation increased in the land of the East in those who heard.
Rev 18:23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
φαρμακεία, pharmakeia, PRON. far-mak-i'-ah, G5331,From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”) [drugs/potions],
that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): - sorcery, witchcraft.
The Amanita muscaria is the red and white magic mushroom that grows almost exclusively beneath Pine trees. One of the active substances in the hallucinogenic mushroom is DMT, an entheogen naturally produced in the brain’s pineal gland. “The Pine tree is one of the well-known central relics of Christmas. Under this tree is where those who are deemed good find their reward in the form of a present. A big red and white rounded mushroom grows under the very tree we are to look under on Christmas morning to find our gift.”
–James Arthur, “Mushrooms and Mankind”
Green, red, and white as Christmas colors comes from the evergreen tree and the red and white mushrooms underneath. The word Christmas originally comes from the Egyptian KRST (oiled/anointed one) and Mes, the sacred cakes annually made/ingested by the Egyptians. This Eucharist was originally made from Amanita muscaria.
THE MAGIC "FOOD" OF ROME'S "CHRISTMAS MAGI"
“Although most people see Christmas as a Christian holiday, most of the symbols and icons we associate with Christmas celebrations are actually derived from the shamanistic traditions of the tribal peoples of preChristian Northern Europe. The sacred mushroom of these people was the red and white amanita muscaria mushroom … These peoples lived in dwellings made of birch and reindeer hide, called ‘yurts.’ Somewhat similar to a teepee, the yurt's central smoke hole is often also used as an entrance. After gathering the mushrooms from under the sacred trees where they appeared, the shamans would fill their sacks and return home. Climbing down the chimney entrances, they would share out the mushroom's gifts with those within … Santa also dresses like a mushroom gatherer. When it was time to go out and harvest the magical mushrooms, the ancient shamans would dress much like Santa, wearing red and white furtrimmed coats and long black boots.” - Dana Larsen, “The Psychedelic Secrets of Santa Claus” Cannabis Culture, Marijuana Magazine, Dec 18th, 2003
Pictures of winged Babylonian and Sumerian gods are shown feeding pinecones to humans. The Amanita muscaria is the red and white magic mushroom that grows almost exclusively beneath Pine trees. One of the active substances in the hallucinogenic mushroom is DMT, a chemical naturally produced in the brain’s pineal gland.
“There are a number of hieroglyphic depictions of plants (many of which are psychedelic) on walls and within texts throughout Egypt. This is to be expected, yet this goes undetected or dismissed by most who are studying Egypt and its religious writings … The pillars that are at every temple in Egypt are shaped like giant mushrooms. These are shaped like the Amanita some are shaped like Psilocybe. Others look like tree fungus and are decorated with pictures of an incredible variety of plants.” In Egypt countless pillars are shaped like huge mushrooms with tall stems, umbrella caps, and mushroom engravings all up, down, and around them. In the Egyptian Book of the Dead they are called “the food of the gods,” or “celestial food” and “the flesh of the gods.” - James Arthur, “Mushrooms and Mankind” (44 & 53)
Naturally, if you are instituting a "doctrine" of "Syncretism", these elements of Pagan "Pharmakeia", would be a necessary point of absorption, along with the more public expressions of Idolatry and drug induced religious megla-maniacal blasphemy, that go along with it. The real "Revelation" of "The Revelation of the Magi" is actually how the Vatican intoxicated itself on mind altering poisons. If it seems as though the designer's of Vatican theology, were tripping on acid when they came up with some of their incredulous ideas, "The Revelation of the Magi", reveal exactly how the Vatican took it's "trips". With the "magic food" of the MAGI, the "Christmas Mushroom". (One of it's "Secret Revelations")
But as mentioned before, not only is the use of "Pharmakeia" (Sorcery) documented in this literary device produced and previously held in secret at the Vatican, there is also a literary attempt to "explain" the "Christmas Tree" and it's "Star" (at a time in history, they were previously claiming none of these things even existed). Well, as you see in the section entitled "THE TREE", both the "Tree" and it's practices of "Creche" idolatry, have been around not for centries, but millenia, and they are in fact even referenced in the Bible itself, hundreds of years BC.
MORE "ANCIENT DOCUMENTS" FROM THE VATICAN
(Document Fraud & Historical "Re-write")
The Vatican has acres and acres of ancient material it has confiscated, stolen and hoarded, none of which are seen by anyone other than Vatican staff cleared to view it. This is obviously a very strange policy for something which claims to be "Christian" but as you have already seen, the Vatican is institutionalized Nicolaitanism, not Christianity. Because this information is kept "secret", and the validity of any document from the Vatican, rests on the opinion of the Vatican about it, (and these documents are never released to the general or secular public for independent verification), the document factory at the Vatican could (and has, and probably still does), put out some "ancient document" on just about anything, proving just about anything. And no one familiar with the history of document fraud at the Vatican (which has been going on for thousands of years unapologetically) would have any reason to believe behavior today is any different than in the past.
Whenever Rome wished to lie about something, or brainwash a European king, they drug out their "lost documents", their "hidden traditions", and "secret knowledge". The fact this is still going on with the Vatican should not be viewed as some exceptional behavior but the standard model of operations. If you have watched the video series on the Antichrist on the ChristmasIsAlie.com Youtube channel, you will already be familiar with how Latin Roman-Catholic theologians such as Augustine embraced "secret synthesis" of opposites as "one". Christ and Antichrist were considered to be "secretly the same thing", and deception was considered a "useful skill", not an immoral or unethical "sin". The entire Holy Roman Byzantium empire was based upon this deceit, on a document fraud entitled "The Donation Of Constantine", that was never admitted until just recently.
Today when you look at a map of Papal conquests of the world, you see how well the Counter-reformation has succeeded. Protestant Europe is gone. It is now part of the European Economic Community and while attempts at establishing the European Union with the official religion of Roman Catholicism have come up barely short, this item is but simply a matter of time. The Vatican is the functioning religious head of the European Union which European Catholics are more than eager to remind everyone of, including it's entire plan for European Unification. (Known under Hitler as the "3rd Reich" and also called "the New World Order" just as it is referred to today).
The Papacy has demolished Russian Orthodoxy with Jesuit designed Atheism, they have demolished the U.S. Church with counter-reformation "rapture virus theology", and they have demolished Protestant Europe under European Unification and Jesuit Atheism. Latin America has always been the property of the Vatican, thus why it is called "Latin" America. That leaves only one large swath of land left, and that is China. Although China is officially an Atheist country, and that Atheism is enforceable by law on the population, China is also seeing one of the largest fastest growing movements of Protestant Christianity left in the world. It represents the last remaining major obstacle to the consolidation of a global Vatican-State.
So naturally, promotion of things like the Chinese Madonna, and of course, this purported documented showing the Magi were Chinese narcotic users being led to Christ on an hallucinogenic acid trip, comes at a perfect time for Vatican politics and propaganda. But the historical fact of the matter is "Magians" were not "Chinese", anymore than "Texans" are "Eskimos". The term "Magian" is a term of nationality, that was intentionally degenerated into meaning something diminutive associated with "magic" and "astrology", because in that area of the world, these things were prevalent. But they were not anymore prevalent in Magia than they were in Greece or Rome, it's just that the Greco-Roman world naturally did not appreciate the "Magian" version of the practices. And like many exotic occult arts from far away lands, Magians had many local impostures and con-artists, selling their con-artistry under the exotic label of "Magian". The same way China often creates "knock-offs" of designer bags, clothes and watches, sold to unsuspecting customers as the real thing.
THE "CHRISTMAS TREE" OF THE "MAGI"
6. An Excerpt from Seth’s Books of Revelation
Click here to read full Text: The Revelation of the Magi Translation by Brent Landau
6:1 Again, from the books that were in the Cave of Treasures of Hidden Mysteries: every word that our father Adam, the beginning of our great lineage, spoke with his son Seth, whom he had after the death of Abel, whom his brother Cain killed and over whom his father Adam mourned.
6:2 And Adam instructed Seth his son about[lacuna], [and about the revelation] of the light of the star and about its glory, because he [saw] it in the Garden of Eden when it descended and came to rest over the Tree of Life; and it illuminated the entire (garden) before Adam transgressed against the commandment of the Father of heavenly majesty.
6:3 And when he transgressed against the commandment that (the Father) ordained for him, the sight of the star was taken away from him, and (it was also taken away from him) because of his expulsion from Paradise. And Adam our father mourned over (his) foolishness, that he was humbled from his greatness.
6:4 And he strongly warned his son Seth, and he taught him to walk in righteousness so that he might find mercy before the Father of majesty.
Once again, we find more documented evidence the connection of the "Christ-Mass" Tree, was well known long before "Christ-Mass" apollo-gists have admitted, it's "Star", it's connection to "Gan Edin", it's connection to the "Serpent" and it's connection to the TREE OF KNOWLEDGE. Are all found mentioned in the "Revelation of the Magi" with the typical "syncretistic" twists, confusing the identities and roles of God with Satan and vica versa.
The "Revelation of the Magi" was a tremendous "Revelation", but not the one the Vatican perhaps was actually hoping for, and certainly not the one they had ABC parroting to it's 7 million viewers in the America public.
And it would not be appropriate before concluding this section, to not point out a few observations concerning the incredulous distortions of Biblical fact, being conducted through the use of this fraudulent psuedo-pygraphic document.
WHY THE "REVELATION OF THE MAGI" HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH "THE MAGI"
There are numerous historical problems with attempting to claim this piece of literature to be anything other than a literary device and the product of someone's vivid and perhaps drug-warped imagination, the Vatican found "useful" to collect, and hold in private as a tool.
1. While they claim to be from the "Land of Shir" (argued to be "China" by Landau), the document is written "by them", and it is in Syriac. Not too many "Chinese" from "the other end of the world", in 1st century BC/AD, would have been "fluent in Syriac". In fact, not to many Romans or Jews would have been either. Syriac was the language of "Syria". And in 1st Century Israel, the area of Syria was virtually the only place it was spoken. While the real Magi, meaning "Magians" originally from Susa, in Elam, could have very easily spoken "Syriac", arguing "Chinese" who were "Orientalists" would have possessed fluency in this language is very "far stretched" (literally).
Syriac (ܠܫܢܐ ܣܘܪܝܝܐ leššānā Suryāyā) is a dialect of Middle Aramaic that was once spoken across much of the Fertile Crescent. Having first appeared as a script in the 1st century AD after being spoken as an unwritten language for five centuries, Classical Syriac became a major literary language throughout the Middle East from the 4th to the 8th centuries, the classical language of Edessa, preserved in a large body of Syriac literature. It became the vehicle of Syriac Christianity and culture, spreading throughout Asia as far as the Indian Malabar Coast and Eastern China, and was the medium of communication and cultural dissemination for Arabs and, to a lesser extent, Persians. Primarily a Christian medium of expression, Syriac had a fundamental cultural and literary influence on the development of Arabic, which replaced it towards the end of the 8th century. Syriac remains the liturgical language of Syriac Christianity.-
THE SYRIAC LANGUAGE, Wikipedia.org
But, why the Psuedo-pygraphers would have chosen "Syriac" in which to create the fiction, indicates one of two possibilities. There was a pre-established rumor that they spoke Syriac, with which they sought to integrate their fiction into, or the authors of the document fraud were Syrian, (and that was their native tongue). So naturally they penned the fiction in their native tongue, despite attempts to place it's projected authors somewhere in the undefined "exotic Orient". The use of Syriac undermines this claim as genuine.
2. Ironically, when it comes to the New Testament, they attribute to it's documents the latest dates they can possibly cite without being laughed out of a room, and for Rome's "anonymous" Pseudo-pygrapha, such as the "Didache" or "The Revelation of the Magi", they stretch the earliest date they can possibly cite as credible. And even given these distortions of historical fact, the date of authorship, though called "early" is still well beyond the credible "life-span" of any real "Magi" which would have been well grown, mature and old enough to take on Herod, and escape his intended plans, at the birth of Christ (7-8 BC).
3. The descriptions of "taking the Eucharist", and the "tree of life" with a "Star on top of it", are also religious rites and customs which are dated in history, and occur well beyond the credible life-span of Magi in Matthew 2, in (7-8 BC). Ignatius being the earliest written reference for the Latinized "Eucharist" ritual at between an early estimate of 98 AD to 117 AD, and ...obviously Christian adoption of the Persian Yalda Ashteroth Tree with an Astarte "Star on top" come even later. Numerous document frauds were created in "Syriac" many attributed to "early Church fathers", such as Ignatius.
4. As you will see below, the "description" of who the Magi were in this document, "The Revelation of the Magi" (in Syriac) will clearly contradict over 70 items of identification deducted from it's reference in Matthew 2 and it's historical context. It is simply not the Biblical Magi who wrote this, nor who it describes. But... one other most important item will be listed here, for the sake of the reader who has just viewed the information concerning "Christmas Mushrooms"...
5. The God (of the Scriptures) does not speak to practitioners of "Pharamakeia": Rev.18:23, because self-deification replaces his voice with self-talk. However, "seducing spirits" certainly do. 1 Tim. 4:1 (Which is the real "source" of the deception here). "God-consciousness" attained as the result of chemical brain scrambling, is not the same as consciousness of "God", despite the "knowledge" gained from the similarities.
6. "Christ/Christians" did not "embrace" "False prophets" (meaning the use of a demonic spirit to "prophesy" or conduct "divination"), even when what a "false prophet" was prophesying was (a) complimentary or (b) even when it was accurate. This consistent pattern continues from the Old Testament, where Balaam's "prophecy' is recorded, however he was later executed. All the way into the New Testament, where a girl "prophesying" Paul was a "great man" and had "come to show the way of Salvation", was actually rebuked, and the demonic spirit cast out of her [Act 16:16-20]. This treatment was identical to the very same treatment by Christ, [Mar 1:23-27, Mar 3:11, Mar 5:2-13, Luk 8:28-33] who also "cast out demonic spirits" out from people who openly proclaimed him "the son of God".(Something you think he would be appreciative of). In the ancient world, Jews knew to grant a "false system" legitamacy, meant that point of "approval" would then be used to introduce "syncretism", consequently, it was never acknowledged, even when the content itself was "agreeable".
The "Revelation of the Wise men" clearly depict these visitors as "Sorcerers" (Pharmakeia), and they "appearance" at the home of Mary and Christ, would have probably received the same kind of treatment, as all the other "sorcerers" and "false prophets" did throughout the Bible, an unconditional condemnation, regardless of the content they "prophesied".
Now that we have seen the fulfillment of Revelation 9:11, and the worship of Apollyon as "Christ", and now that we have seen the fulfillment of the "Sorcery" by which all men were deceived, now it is time to move to the last phase of Empire "propaganda" using the "wise men", which is although last, certainly not "least".... that being KINGS. Enter the era of the Byzantium Empire, and it's need to use the "Three Wise men" to propagandize against and manipulate the behavior of "kings". Viola! THREE KINGS!
PHASE 3 - SCREWING AROUND WITH THE KINGS OF THE EARTH
We three kings of Orient are, Total frauds of Rome's Har-har
king and Nation, forn-i-cation, Misleading you so far.
BASTARDIZATION OF THE MESSIAH
While the New Testament records that Christ was honored with the title of being Mamzerim (a bastard) by the Rabbis of the Babylonian Synagogue, which had bastardized all of Judaism, it was the special honor or Rome's "Kings", which fornicated with the "Mother of Harlots" (Ishtar, Harlot of Inanna), that produced the prophetic confession of the Apostles themselves, their work would be one day "bastardized" by a bunch of greedy self-serving, gentile Kings connected to Rome's political escapades.
And though written hundreds of years before the fact, the very words of Scripture, were fulfilled in the very "fossil" remains of THE THREE KINGS. When you see the "images" of the "Three Kings", what you are looking at, is literally the physical "fossil" remains in culture, of metaphorically speaking, the 3 bastards of Rome, not Biblical "Magi/Wisemen".
The THREE BASTARDS OF ROME are very very popular. In fact, these three bastardizations are so popular, in SPAIN, their fictitious existence is celebrated in the streets of Spain's main cities, like the 4th of July is "celebrated" in America, complete with parades and fireworks and "floats", where 3 fictitious cartoon characters called by 3 fictitious names, through gifts into the crowd similiar to the Mardi-Gras parades in New Orleans, Louisiana, and equally pagan in nature.
The "celebration" of the THREE BASTARDS, however do perfectly "symbolize" precisely what the Scripture foretold about these developments centuries before they were realized as realities in western civilization, down to some rather amazing details of accuracy, which are spelled out in detail other sections of this website. So they will not be reviewed here, except by way of mentioning how they once again, as found having occurred in history. This fiction of THE THREE KINGS, being our present example. Of course, there are no "kings" in Matthew 2. And, the term in the Greek would not even suggest it by a far stretch.
And so having been called out continuously to the point of mockery on this point, by "critics" in America, capable of exercising their Constitutional right of free speech on matters of religion, they have retreated with their previously lie, and come out with a new equally distorted adaptation.
OK, OK, THEY WEREN'T KINGS, BUT THEY WERE "KING-MAKERS"!!!
So now, the Merchants of Babylon, have instead opted to shift attention to the claim that they weren't "Kings" per sae, but... they WERE "King Makers"!!! And this is deduced from the Political meaning of the term "Magi", and they came from Persia, or the Parthian empire, or ________ (fill in the blank)... and they were there to MAKE CHRIST A KING!!! Those ole "King-Makers"!! The Magi!! And of course, this greatly upset Herod, because he was King, and the Magi did not "make him", but instead came to "make Christ".
The "Magi" were not "Kings", they weren't "king-makers", and people selling Bible "Frankincense" and "Myrrh" perfume water, after explaining their latest fraud, for $34.95 a bottle, are as fraudulent as their stories about it. They will swallow any "Camel" on earth, and choke on the gnat that is the simple truth about it. Why? Because they love the lie, instead of the truth.
Once again, we see in the "Magi" the historic principle of self-projection. What do the religious-right in America want to be? The "king-Makers", so naturally NOW when they cite the "Three Wise Men", they concede there isn't "Three", and "adapt and revise" THE KINGS, into another "ink-blot" association, "King-Makers".... because that is precisely what they see themselves as being in American politics.