ChristMasIsALie.com

Many people believe there is a "Vaccination Conspiracy" afoot.  There is unquestionably ample evidence to support the notion there may be a "vaccination conspiracy" underway. The only problem is, it is not being conducted by those offering a "Vaccination", it is being conducted by those who are intentionally spreading disinformation, with the willful intent, fully knowing it's effect, may be the "death" of those who relied upon their information. In other words, they are literally "killing people".  (Let's look at "the real facts")

The old addage "follow the money", may "explain" more than most realize.  In this case, especially.

It turns out, that "religion" is really "big business".  Statistics on it, are pretty astounding. According to the Washington Post article in the link below, over $32 "Billion" (that's "Billion" with a "B") is "given to Church" in America, every year.  $32 "Billion". (That's a lot of money)  And you would think that that much money, would be "funding" all kinds of things. (after all, that is more money than most "countries" possibly have for their entire GDP [about 115 out of 211]) See: www.worldpopulationreview.com/countries/countries-by-gdp

And according to the Washington Post, while they recieve donation cash of $32 Billion a year, they also recieve $82 "Billion" in government "subsidies" and "tax exemptions", as though $32 "Billion" isn't enough already. (That's $82 "Billion" (with a "B") on top of their $32 "Billion" (with a "B"))  That's an absolutely rediculous amont of "money". Right? (And according to these same "preachers" however,  they need much much more). Even if it means they have to kill your Grandmother to get it.  As you will see why, in a moment.

But, that's not even the half of it. It might be that the Washington Post was being extremely "conservative" in what they reported. Because accoring to "Tith.ly" (a financial "ministry" whose job it s to know "Church finance", they reported, the actual figure in 2018, was $124 "Billion" (with a "B"), which you could fit $32 "Billion" (with a "B") "inside of", almost 4 times over. Not counting the $82 "Billion" (with a "B") from the "religious welfare rolls" of  "government handouts" and "tax exemptions". ("Catholic charites" alone, before they even get to their "donations",  recieves a "blank check" [from US Treasury] for $2-$3 "Billion" a year (with a "B") because "politicians" want their votes")  And they don't really care, what the first amendment has to say about it, either.

But of course, if you are a little country Church in rural south Georgia ? Well... you better just love God, because that's pretty much all you are going to get. "Politicians" neither need, nor care about, you or your 50 people, who work in a south Georgia peanut field.  "Religion for sale" needs to be a good "political investment", for those who "purchase it".

 It's not a very pretty thought, if you really think about it. There was nothing "noble" involved with it.  The right to kill Grandma, in order to keep "the lifestyle I'm accustomed to", was the "proposition" being called "religious freedom".  

It was a kind of "religious freedom" no one ever in previous ages, of American history, would have ever dared, to call "religious". Or at least, the vast majority of "Christians" would have "laughed out loud", over, after hearing. (Back in the day, when they routinely knew real "Missionaries" who spent their lives, living in "mud huts" in the jungle, just to "spread the gospel")  A "preacher" missing a few dollars from his "collection plate" would have never been "conflated" with "religious freedom" (where the absence of "real religious freedom" meant a "torture chamber" or being "burned alive"). Somebody complaining over a few missing dollars from the "collection plate" would have been cause for properly placed "rebuke", not a "national crisis" over "religious liberty".

Such "claims" to materialistic entitlement, at the expense of someone's life (posing as "religious freedom"), would have literally been, completly  morally "offensive". (Even to other ministers themselves, who would have publicly denounced such a thing) But of course, not today.  Today, such outrageous claims by our "religious leaders" are  perfectly "predictable" and are "the norm".  (Because this is what "religion", collectively has become) in our "post counter-reformation" society.

And while we are discussing literal "Fraud", remember, that does not even touch on the question of "theological fraud" these same "faux money preachers" are spreading to justify their actions, spiritually. (Which is the worst part of "the fraud" there is)  Because that "fraud" involves more than just your "wallet". It involves your "soul". (See the "Bible Study: 100 Reasons You Should  Never "Tithe" to a Preacher in a Church" below)

Although the term "conspiracy theory" is a technical term that comes from law, in the colloquial sense, it is not a  "theory" that there is a "crusade" to stop people from complying or cooperating with CDC health recommendations, intended to "prevent death", during this "pandemic".  This is an empirically based factual observation. There is no "theory" to it. The people involved in doing it, openly proclaim their intentions.  Their goal is to intentionally reject all reported factual  "data", in favor of "non-compliance" to "Covid-19 Vaccination and pandemic mitigation" efforts.  That is not a "theory", that  is what their devotees will openly and publicly state (to you). 

While the "anti-vaxxer" propaganda crusade might fall short of the "legal definition" of "conspiracy theory", it certainly meets the criteria of a "conspiracy" in the "Dictionary definition", especially noting definitions 3,4, and 5.

So, ironically, those filling the internet with "Vaccination Conspiracy Theory" are actually in effect, the "Vaccination Conspirators".  They are using "fraud" and "disinformation" to convince thousands of people to refuse medical treatment, that could be saving their life. They are "killing people" with deceit. That is the very definition of "evil".

And as the research uncovered, mentioned above, these are people who are doing this for "economic" benefit.  They do not care, what they are telling people is a fraud, because they are "making money" off of the "fraud". Do you really want to give up your life, so a "scam artist" on the internet can sell some good old fashioned miracle "snake-oil"? Please think about the "wisdom" of that.

In "conspiracy" statutes, "against the law" usually refers to "criminal law", not "civil law", although in many cases "civil law liability" can migrate into "criminal law" when death and bodily injury are the result.  Death as a result of "misinformation" is definitely open to "civil liability" lawsuits, and could be "charged" on that basis.  If a "criminal charge" could be brought from that, it is highly unlikely, those in charge of the State's prosecution would pursuit it, if they felt it would "fail" under opposition from either state or federal Supreme Courts.

A look at recent cases across the country on this issue evidences an emerging trend towards a public policy the requires vaccinations. It is also an indication that a parent’s anti-vaccination stance may be a determinative factor in awarding sole legal custody or tie-breaking authority to the other parent.  In 2004, the Texas appellate court upheld the trial court’s decision to give the father sole decision-making over vaccines when the mother was anti-vaccination.  See Garcia-Udall v. Udall, 141 S.W.3d 323 (Tex.App. 2004).

Because this area of "law" is usually the function of "State" law, definitions vary widely throughout the United States, from State to State. Most laws have codified statutes aimed at making "assisted suicide" illegal. Some but not all "States" in the U.S. have language in these laws that also address the act of "encouraging it" through communication, texts, telephone conversations, etc.

Example: Connecticut Law -  1. intentionally causing a person to commit suicide by force, duress, or deception is classified as murder (CGS § 53a-54a) and  2. intentionally causing or aiding a person, other than by force, duress, or deception, to commit suicide is classified as 2nd degree manslaughter (CGS § 53a-56).

Negligent homicide is a criminal charge brought against a person who, through criminal negligence, allows another person to die.[1]

Criminal Negligence - In criminal law, criminal negligence is a surrogate mens rea required to constitute a conventional as opposed to strict liability offense. It is not, strictly speaking, a mens rea because it refers to an objective standard of behavior expected of the defendant and does not refer to their mental state.

There are however, many laws, which do not fit into the catagorey of "unenforced law".  They may be "laws" which "have not been enforced", but are not "unenforced law".  The distinction is important, because whie the likelihood of "unenforced law" ever becoming "enforced" is very low, active laws which "have not been enforced", simply constitute an area of new legal application and new legal theory. (Based on applicable active law)  That difference is important.

Currently, it is not treated as criminally "illegal", to talk someone into taking actions, that lead to their death, under the catagorey of "Covid" and "public health" (despite existing language in statutory laws pointing to the contrary).  Mainly due to the application of the "First Amendment" protecting "free speech", but this is mostly applied to "the Press". (Not individuals, or "professions") 

In other words, false diagnostic information from a "Physician" is not "protected speech" under "free speech". (It could be grounds for a "law suit", termination of license, and criminal negligence charges) But if that very same information were "published" in the "National Enquirer" to all America, it would be fine. Even though there, it could kill millions, instead of just one. (The "Doctor" who gave it however, might be in trouble with his "peers") But that is all that would happen. (Because it involves "freedom of speech" of "the Press")

But that does not mean, however, that at no time in the future, could these same laws, ever be "interpreted" to be "applicable". "Interpretation" of law is decided by the court (and whoever the ruling "Judge" presiding over the "Court" at that time happens to be) The "language", is already present, for such a criminal prosecution.

Refusal by the current court system to apply the language of these laws to the act of "talking someone" into their own "death", through vaccine "disinformation", doesn't prohibit families of the deceased from filing "wrongful death" claims, against those who gave the false information, and which resulted in the death of the deceased, because they relied on that information. (And "reliance" on that false information, led to their "death")

Nor does it prevent, "family courts" from removing custody of "children" thought to be "endangered" by the negligent acts of parents who unreasonably refuse life-saving medical treatment for their children.

If you are a purveyor of "Vaccination disinformation" on the internet, or in "religious circles", you should probably talk to your "attorney" and plan to be sued, by someone's relative, you killed with your disinformation campaign. It will happen to someone, eventually.  It's only a matter of time. And it could be you. (Remember to "factor that in") to the "cost of over-head" from your "snake-oil" sales, when calculating the "margin of your profit".

FALSE

And for each of all these things, "Pagans" had a "god", an "idol", and a "demon",  for which it was dedicated to. And despite that, concerning the "use" of "things", Paul wrote this...

Titus 1:15

Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.

So you see, the problem is NOT the "thing" that someone "invents" (it is the "theology in your head), that is the problem.  Henry Ford was a Nazi. Does that mean everyone who drives a "Ford 150" is a "Nazi" or endorses the "Nazi party"? You might drive a very "un-Nazi" car, and actually BE a "Neo-Nazi". (It is your "theology" that is the problem)

Paul wrote on papyri, it was A THING invented by the Egyptians. He made "Tents", it was A THING, according to archeologists, invented around 40,000 BC, by primitive humans (who were  "Pagan") and worshiped snakes.

Paul was circumcised, which had been invented by the Egyptians. But, he didn't therefore "confuse" his religion with "Isis worship". Paul appealed to Rome's legal system (surrounded by attributions to pagan gods), and to "Caesar" who called himself "God" (and received worship). [clearly blasphemous]  But he didn't "assimilate" Rome's pagan "holidays" or "feasts" or "religious rituals" or "polytheism".

It is not the "thing", it is the "theology" that is the problem.   Cotton Mather, the Puritan minister, used A THING called "inoculations", but he didn't "convert" to worshiping "Aman-Ra", anymore than you become a "Nazi", when you drive a "Ford Pick-up" truck, or use a "pagan tooth-brush" to brush your teeth.

All "plagues" and "healing" come from God in the Bible, therefore there is no need to see a "Doctor" or take prescribed "medicine".  This is all just a "trick" by the quote: "medical establishment" !  If you "have faith in God" you don't "need" a Doctor, or his "medicine"!

He could have said, "They that are sick, DONT need a PHYSICIAN", but that is not what he said. He said that they DO.  And he compared his relationship to "sinners" in precisely the same terms, as a "physicians" relationship to the "sick".

So obviously, if there were something wrong with it, he would have both "distanced" himself from it, denounced it, and certainly never would have compared himself, to it. (He never compared himself to "prostitutes" or "murderers")

When you are SICK, you NEED a PHYSICIAN. (At least according to CHRIST)  The fact that God uses "medicine" to heal the sick, does not mean he immediately falls off the throne, (or ceases to exist) and gets replaced by a "physician".  Anymore than he ceases to be the source of "life", simply because you ate "lunch", ...or washed your hands, took a bath, or brushed your teeth. (It really is amazing, on an extremely basic level, this would even have to be explained)

And this is all the more pointed, when you study history, and find out what "Physicians" actually did, during that time in history. Their "treatments" (back then) were not anywhere near, as effective, as they are today.  Yet Christ used the word "need". (Something he never ascribed to the "religious leaders" of his day)  His "disciples" were all lay people, none of whom had attended the Rabbinical academy, or had any "degrees", in Rabbinical studies. SEE Acts 4:13

The situation would be quite different with the apostle Paul, however. (Who had been "trained" by Gamaliel)

But Christ made it very clear in the New Testament, when you are "sick", you NEED a "Physician" a lot more, than you NEED a Rabbi. Let that fact, sink in.  It is "profound" in a number of ways. (Especially during this "pandemic", with all the deadly "medical advice", coming from some very "deluded" preachers)  You had better listen to your "Physician", and ignore your "Rabbi", if you wish to keep living.

This is an example of "anti-vaxxers" "grasping for straws" in the Bible.  The text in Leviticus 19, 21 & Deut. 14, have nothing to do with "vaccinations" and you can't even "stretch it", to get it to mean that. Why? Because the "target" of these texts were a practice that had to do with appeasing, honoring, worshiping, consulting, "the dead".

A "vaccination" (using a "pin prick") is clearly the farthest thing from a "Gash" as there could possibly be.

Those who claim "Pharmakia" means the unconditional use of any mineral, chemical, or organic material, for the treatment of any disease, or "condition", is "Sorcery", simply  do not understand what they are talking about.  And they have created (in their interpretation) an unjust unconditional condemnation of thousands of years of Biblical history, in the process.  The fact they have openly thereby called the Qodesh, from Joseph, to Jeremiah the prophet, to the Apostle Paul, "sorcerers", as a result of their "interpretation" of "Pharmakia", might not be immediately apparent to them.  But hopefully the information below will help bring it to their attention.

The Greek word "pharmakia" was used in the Greek language in the same way, the modern word "Drugs" (or medicine) is used today.  And they have an identical meaning. (And this is precisely the point of it's use in the New Testament)

The use of it in the texts in 9:21 and 21:8, was NOT a blanket condemnation of the use of all (drugs as) "medicine" it was the condemnation of the use of "drugs" as "spells", "poisoning", i.e., like our use of the term,"illegal narcotics", meaning it would be used to "poison" or "drug" (a victim). "Poisoning" was a very accomplished art in the ancient world. It was used as a form of assassination. It was used as a military tool. And it was used by "thugs" in ancient cities, to take over control of a city. In the very same way, "drugs" are still used today.

We still say in our English use of this term,

(1) First Use: "Why did he do such a terrible thing? Oh, everyone knows he was on DRUGS" (Pharmakia)

(2) Second Use: "Doctor is there anything that can treat my disease? Yes, there is a new DRUG" (Pharmakia)

The same exact double-usage existed in Greek, when this term was used in the New Testament. And "WORD STUDIES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, by M.R.VINCENT", cites PLATO'S explanation of the two uses of that term in his commentary on Greek law, noting the distinction of the two usages (Sorcery versus Medicine). QUOTE:

...OR... you didn't "interpret" that correctly. (Which do you think is  more "plausible"?)

"Biblical faith" was based on "the word of God".  It was an objective "faith".  The "process" of hearing God speak, and having "confidence" in that information, that it was a "precognitively derived" accurate reflection of reality. (To be fully "verified" or "exposed as false" by real events in the future).  It was never a "blank check" to "believe" in whatever deceit or stupidity the latest local religious leader decided to spew from his mouth, or endorse for money, power or fame. (In the name of, and under the protective skirt of "religion")

As "anti-vaxxers" grasp for straws to justify their irrational rejection of medical science designed to "save lives" in the midsts of a global pandemic that is killing millions of people, they will contort and distort any number of "facts" to make their "square peg" of "vaccines" fit into the "round hole" of "the mark of the beast". The fact they have to actually  "lie" a little to make that case, is not considered troublesome. (After all, it's just "propaganda" anyway) and they have already openly "rejected" the "idea" of "truth". So, engaging in these little "mind-games" is "no problem", to them. (They do not actually care what the "real truth" is anyway) They really don't.

One such "trick" used to do this, is to "claim" that while the New Testament in Greek is extremely "clear" that John said "on" (epi) the "forehead" and "forehand", IN THE HEBREW, the word "Hand" really means "Arm".  Therefore John was REALLY saying "ARM". (As in where you get your "vaccine")  This bogus claim is being repeated now on the internet as "justification" to "believe" any and all "vaccines" are therefore the "mark of the beast".

(1) Revelation was written in Greek, so whatever is actually in Hebrew, does not nullify what the Greek word means.

(2) The provider of this erroneous "disinformation" has failed to inform the public that there are numerous words for "hand" in Hebrew.  (Much more specifically meaning "Hand" than even the Greek reference)

2. The "government" can already "track you". You have a GPS on your phone, on your car, and sometimes even in your watch. Every purchase is recorded electronically for time, date and location. And your computer, TV, smart device, home thermostat, baby monitors, security cameras, motion devices, and even your washer and dryer, (in fact anything that connects to the internet) can be monitored and tracked, by the "government" with a FISA warrant, that you will not even know is there. (So behave yourself) It's all already there.

3. There would be no need for it. They already know where you are, and where you're going. They can read the time on your wrist watch, from a satellite overhead, if they are so inclined to do so.

Steve Hofman, an Apiject spokesman, told Reuters that the special label has not been requested by vaccine manufacturers so far.

The video shared on Facebook also contains an obviously edited clip of Bill Gates made to look like he’s saying “innovations like vaccines, we need a measuring system that tracks the vaccine.”

Reuters tracked down Gates’ original speech from a 2013 financial inclusion forum, where he referred to vaccines as a breakthrough innovation and later called for a system to track financial inclusion, not vaccine distribution.

Pfizer has gone public with a list of ingredients that are actually in its vaccine, and a microchip is not among them.

The active ingredient in the shot is a snippet of the virus’s genetic material called messenger RNA. As Insider’s Hilary Brueck explained, mRNA acts as “a genetic punching bag for the body to learn how to fight against the proteins that help COVID-19 invade our cells.”

A mix of sugar, salt, and fats cushion the metaphorical punching bag and make it possible to deliver the vaccine via intramuscular injection.

READ THE INGREDIENT LABEL "INSERT" REQUIRED BY LAW

Here’s the full list of ingredients in Pfizer’s shot:

A nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 (this is what makes the shot work)

Lipids, or fatty substances, including:

• (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate),
• 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N, N-ditetradecylacetamide,
• 1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine,
• and cholesterol

Potassium chloride

Monobasic potassium phosphate

Sodium chloride (salt)

Dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate

Sucrose (sugar)

Moderna, the other vaccine maker that was recently granted an emergency use authorization by the FDA, also released a fact sheet detailing the ingredients in its COVID-19 vaccine.

The Moderna vaccine contains:

Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)

Lipids, or fatty substances, including:

• SM(sphyngomyelin)-102
• Polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG],
• 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC],
• and cholesterol

Tromethamine

Tromethamine hydrochloride

Acetic acid

Sodium acetate

Sucrose (sugar)

While it may be technically "Legal" in our current "Justice system" to "Kill people", by lying to them, and seducing them into their own "self-destruction",  Christ spared no hesitation in calling that "murder". (Because that is precisely what it really is), and... for theological reference, attributing it's spiritual "inspiration" and origin to... "the Devil".

And that is precisely, what every real Christian, should [in like manner] call it too. (Because he did)

"Disinformation", "Slander", and "False Accusations" are not "protected speech" under "Freedom of speech". Neither does "Freedom of speech" include "lying" to people, despite the fact that the very same lie told, may kill them, in order to sell horse pills, Jesuit Eschatology, and/or snake oil (all on the same "Christian" TV show). (at the expense of the lives of those in it's "audiences")

Aside from being a "Devilish murderer", at the very minimum, as a "Missionary for Death", you could become "liable" for the damages you caused. And if the arbitrary winds of political disfavor per-chance blow your way, you could even be potentially prosecuted, as a full blown criminal, under the language of a number of already existing laws and statutes, against this kind of criminally negligent dangerous and deadly behavior.

But regardless of what men may or may not ever call it, Christ called it murder. And if you engage in it spreading intentional falsehood, that leads to the death of others, simply for your own personal gain, or benefit, or inflated ego, or politics, or religious "nuttery" (based on some false medieval Jesuit Eschatology, no less), then you are a "murderer" too. And God will hold you accountable for your words, that have killed innocent lives, whose only crime was to "trust you".

"Christians" are being "Targeted" by "Con-artists" For "Filthy Gain" that put their "LIVES AT RISK"

The "response" to the "Covid-19 Pandemic" by some of America's most popular "religious leaders", has been a vivid illustration of who they really are. (And what you should be "afraid of", MOST OF ALL)