ChristMasIsALie.com

THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think

L  I  B  R  A  R  Y

 

THE "CHRISTMAS-CHURCH'S" PRACTICE OF "FABRICATING" FRAUDULENT HISTORY

 

BIBLICAL REFERENCE

John 8:44  Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Rev 2:2,6  I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: <> But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
 

FOUND THEM LIARS

 
 
"It is usual for the sacred historian to conform himself to the generally accepted opinion of the masses in his time.'

– St Jerome (P.L., XXVI, 98; XXIV, 855).


'To confute the opposer ... one argues as one pleases, saying one thing while one means another ... Origen, Eusebius [et al] write at great length ... Sometimes it is true, they are compelled to say not what they think but what is useful.'

– St Jerome, c. 380

‘There is nothing so easy as by sheer volubility to deceive a common crowd or an uneducated congregation.’

– St. Jerome (Epistle. lii, 8; p. 93.)
 

THE PRACTICE OF INTENTIONALLY "FABRICATING" FALSE HISTORICAL CLAIMS

 

"CHRIST" WAS BORN ON DECEMBER 25TH

Today, even the "Christmas-Church" acknowledges no such thing happened anywhere near December 25th. But what many today do not remember, is that for "centuries" this was the claim. Not that it was simply a "day chosen", but that it was "the day" it really happened. It was not until challenges from theologians during the reformation, that this claim was "given up" for reality.


But the "Christmas-Church" has been "manufacturing" historical "fraud" for centuries, and continues to do so, into our present day. There is no "conscience" about "deception" and "deceit". It is happily "embraced" as "faith" and excused as "Pious Fraud", when caught.  There is no "distinction" in the moral, ethics or pathology of the "Christmas-Church" between "truth" and complete and utter "deceit", as long as itself is "benefited" by the "deceit". (A completely narcissistic psychology of self-reference)  The items following in this list, are but a very small sampling of what could be listed. It is sufficient enough to demonstrate the practice. It is a "church" based on "deceit".  It has made an entire "religion", out of intentional "lying".

 
 

EDICT OF THESSALONICA

The Vatican begins it's history-spanning career of outright historical deceit and fraud with the "Edict of Thessalonica" 380 AD, in which it falsely claimed it had been given the "seat of the Apostles" by the "Apostle Peter" (who actually according to the New Testament, never visited the city) Instead, the Apostle Paul secures residential housing there, and "Peter" is no where to be seen. (Ever), long after the period of time, the Vatican claims he had "set up shop" in Rome, and would eventually "give" to them, the "keys" to his "kingdom".

 
 

THE DONATION OF CONSTANTINE

Claimed to be granted from Constantine to Pope Sylvester I (314-35). Constantine confers on the pope and his successors, primacy over all other bishops in the world, senatorial privileges for it’s clergy, imperial palaces and regalia, and not only the city of Rome itself, but it’s empire, as well!

 

Actually ..fraudulently composed by the Pope Paul I (757-67) while his brother Stephen II (752-57) sat on the papal throne.

 
 

THE DECRETALS

Over 100 fake letters containing decrees attributed to pontiffs from Clement (88-97) to Gregory I (590-604). All forged.

 

Actually… fraudulently composed by 'Isodore Mercator', a ninth century master document forger and papal aide. Like the Donation, the Decretals conferred rights and privileges on the papacy [of course].

 
 

DECREE OF MARCUS AURELIUS

Letter from the emperor to the Senate.  Marcus forbids persecution of Christians because in a battle with the Quadi in 174, prayers from Christian soldiers brought a thunderstorm which saved  the Romans from thirst drove away the barbarian army. The emperor accorded the Twelfth Legion the suffix fulminata or fulminea, 'thundering' because of this.

 

Actually… traced to Tertullian (c.160 - c.230), north African theologian. [Credited with "inventing" the "Trinity"] The twelfth legion had had the suffix legio fulminata from the time of Augustus. The stoic Marcus Aurelius actually hated Christians. Completely fraudulent.

 
 

 LETTERS OF EMPEROR ANTONINUS PIUS TO THE GREEKS

Fourth century Bishop Eusebius (Ecclesiastic History, IV, 13). In these “letters”, Eusebius has this 2nd century pagan forbidding 'tumults against the Christians.' Most historians concede them to be frauds, probably composed by Eusebius himself.  Another "Christmas-Christian" "document forger".

 
 

THE CLEMENTINES

20 entire volumes of “religious romance” (Catholic Encyclopedia), offered by the Church claiming to be from the first century Roman Pontiff Clement I.

 

Actually… written in the fourth century, to serve as a “historical proof” to bolster Rome's claim to be the primary see.  It includes the now admittedly phony Clement to James' which originated the fantasy that St. Peter was the first Bishop of Rome, perpetuated all over the world and for centuries as history. This fraudulent document was held up as "proof" of that fraudulent claim.

 
 

SENECA AND PAUL [CORRESPONDENCE]

A set of letters offered as correspondence written in the first century between the famous Roman Seneca the Younger and the Apostle Paul alluding to the fires in Rome and persecution of Christians and Jews. 

 

Actually… a 4th century composition. Authorship unknown. The scheme came unraveled when it was realized that “according to tradition” [that deceptive little Roman phrase], Gallio had sent Paul’'s writings to Seneca which so impressed him, this correspondence ensued.  Only problem was that at the time this allegedly happened, Paul had only penned two letters… neither of which from Rome, …as he had not even ARRIVED YET.

 

Most of the language is patently absurd and self-serving, apparently intended to flatter both Paul, Caesar and Seneca. [making Seneca one of Paul’s admirers]

 
 

TESTIMONIUM FLAVIANUM

Offered by Eusebius as an allusion to Josephus, a contemporary Jewish historian who “testifies”  that Jews realized Jesus was the messiah. Recognized by nearly all historians now, as a fraudulent interpolation [and entirely missing in eastern versions of Josephus]

 
 

THE LENTULUS LETTER

Offered up as having been written from the governor of Judea before Pontius Pilate, "Publius Lentulus".  He writes to the Roman Senate, reporting Christ's "raising of the dead". Describes Jesus as " His hair is of the colour of the ripe hazel-nut [blonde], straight down to the ears, but below the ears wavy and curled, with a bluish and bright reflection, flowing over his shoulders. "  Historians now realize no one ever existed by the name of Lentulus, as a predecessor of Pontius Pilate. It was a fraud.

 

First printed in the "Life of Christ" by Ludolph the Carthusian (Cologne, 1474). Scholars now believe it was probably composed in 13th century.

 

Report of Pilate to Caesar – mentioned earlier

 

 (Tertullian Apol. xxi and Anti-Nicene Fathers, iii, 35)

 
 

LETTER OF JESUS TO KING OF EDESSA

Offered up as having been written by Jesus himself to a king. [Scholars now believe composed by Eusebius]  The "Christmaas-Christian" Eusebius routinely engaged in lying, on a pathological basis.

 
 

OUR LADY OF GUADELOUPE

Recently canonized in 2002, Saint Juan Diego, a 16th century Mexican Indian who had the Virgin Mary’s image miraculously appear on his cloak.  Historians note the event is not mentioned for 100 years after the alleged event.  No record of it’s occurrence whatever for 100 years.  The “miraculous image” that “miraculously appeared” on his “cloak”, apparently came from a very unmiraculous brush with common paint on it.

 

Professor of Mexican History at Cambridge University: 'When the Pope canonizes Juan Diego, he will have elevated to sainthood the hero of a religious work of fiction.'  Proff. David Brading, (The Times, 31 June 2002)


That's "good enough" for the "Christmas-church". (Make believe)

 
 

SAINT JAMES IN SPAIN

In the 8th century, it was decided James went to Spain. On the banks of the Ebro river had a vision of the Virgin Mary and was told to build a Roman Cathedral. He then returned to Jerusalem to be martyred, to keep the story consistent [Acts 12:2].  His remains were then carried back to Spain, as a result of being carried by a rudderless boat which miraculously drifted at sea and accidentally shipwrecked on the north of Spain and was buried in the palace tomb of a Spanish queen.  A Spanish monk guided by a light in the sky discovered the bones of Saint James and inspired by this new discovery of Santiago Matamoros (Saint James the Moor killer) the Spanish defeated the Moors.


Of course, none of it ever happened. But why "spoil it" with "the truth".

 
 

HEADS OF JOHN THE BAPTIST

During the middle ages, the “head of John the Baptist” was venerated in scores of different Churches, along with knuckles, cross splinters from the real cross and a number of silly paraphernalia which was often sold to Church tourists. All “vouched for” by Rome as “Authentic”. (Just like "Christmas")

 
 

THE HOLY PENIS FORESKIN

[Miraculously Preserved from Jesus’ Circumcision]

Exclusively possessed and authentically enshrined at the following locations:

 

·       Antwerp

·       Coulombs

·       Chartres

·       Charroux

·       Metz

·       Conques

·       Langres

·       Anvers

·       Fécamp

·       Puy-en-Velay

·       Auvergne

·       Hildesheim

·       Santiago de Compostela

·       Calcata

  

"Saint Bridget was said to have received the Holy Prepuce from an angel, and would experience "orgasm-like sensations" when she would place bits of it on her tongue.[6]"

 

"During the late 17th century, Catholic scholar and theologian Leo Allatius in De Praeputio Domini Nostri Jesu Christi Diatriba ("Discussion concerning the Prepuce of our Lord Jesus Christ") speculated that the Holy Foreskin may have ascended into Heaven at the same time as Jesus himself and might have become the rings of Saturn, then only recently observed by telescope. "


- SEE HOLY PREPUCE, Wikipedia , 2-16-2007

 

THE HOLY UMBILICAL CORD

[Miraculously preserved from the Virgin Mary’s birth to Jesus]

There were three (3)
 
 

THE ORIGINAL “CROWN OF THORNS”

There were also three (3)
 
 

OTHER FAMOUS “AUTHENTIC” PROOFS OF HISTORY INCLUDED:

HOLY TOENAIL CLIPPINGS


LEFTOVERS FROM THE FEEDING OF THE 5000


3 ARMS OF SAINT FRANCIS XAVIER


PHIALS OF MILK FROM THE BREATS OF THE VIRGIN MARY


BABY TEETH FROM JESUS


BITS OF BABIES MASSACRED BY HEROD


ENOUGH “NAILS” FROM THE CRUCIFIXION TO FILL A BOAT


 - SEE Caslon Analytics Profile, Forgery Fraud and Forensics

 

 

SAINT PETER’S BONES

Saint Peter’s tomb was excavated. Instead of the skeleton of a man, they found three leg bones each belonging to different people, one of which was female, along with various small bones from barn animals including chickens and pigs.

 

This list of course, is virtually endless if one has the time and effort to track it all down.  There have been hundreds and hundreds of phoney saints canonized by ROME.  Some of which never even existed at all.

 
 

THE CURRENT "HOAX" OF THE "SHROUD OF TURIN"

DNA from the "Shroud of Turin" has been demonstrated it to be from a "Druze". (So rather than admit the "relic" is a fraud, the Vatican is now claiming "Christ", was "really" a "Druze" [not a "Jew", as the New Testament claims])

They would rather believe a complete "fiction" about Christ, than admit their "relic" is "THE FICTION".
 
 
This is what you are putting your "eternal trust" in, by doing "Christ-mass". 
Do you really think that it is "justified" behavior, when "truth" is treated with such complete "disregard"?