THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think



The Apostle Peter had the great idea once, of telling Christ, where and where not he should go. Peter's warning to Christ, was that he and the other disciples, were going to ban together and stop him from going to Jerusalem, so that he would not be "crucified". [Mat_16:23; Mar_8:33; Luk_4:8]

After being told that he was not going to be allowed to go to Jerusalem, Christ turned to his dearly beloved friend Peter, and called him "Satan".

If you are a "Christian", the idea of "telling Christ" where he needs to be, is a seriously bad idea. You are not going to "PUT CHRIST" anywhere. But he might have somewhere to "PUT" you, for the effort. It is a "mistake" to "declare" where you are going to "Put" Christ, even if you think your "intentions" are as honorable as "Peter's".

There are those who want "Christ" to be where they tell him to be, and there are those who want to be where "Christ" has told them to be. The difference literally is day and night, or literally what is actually "Satanic" and what is really "Christian".  At "Christmas", "Satanic" Christians tell Christ where to be, real Christians are where Christ told them to be. One group wants to tell Christ what to do, the other are simply obeying what he told them to do. That is the difference between real "Christianity" and "Nicolaitanism". ( What people know today as "Christmas Christianity" )

Notice anything "odd" about this "request"?


Mat 7:21 - 23

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then I will profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 




There are two amazing prophecies by Christ in the New Testament. 

(1) Most people in the world who call him "Lord" will NOT know him. 

(2) They will not KNOW, that is the case.

Something will completely mislead the vast majority of the "Christian world". And he pins that problem on the fact that they will not "accept" the "truth" about WHO he is. His personal actual IDENTITY.  There will be something else that they will BELIEVE is him, but unfortunately for them, it WILL NOT BE.

But these things are more than just "theoreticals" involving religious "doctrines". His VERY IDENTITY will be "exchanged" for something else, THAT IS NOT HIM. (But these poor souls will never know the difference) But they are not morally "innocent" in this fault. He says he will say...

I never knew you: 

depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 

He faults them for "working iniquity", and thinking in this "iniquity" that they are doing, they are "serving" him. But they are actually "replacing" him, with something that is not even HIM, at all.  What causes this?

You have to look no farther than "Christmas".  When you examine the history of what happened in the institutionalization of "Nicolaitanism" as the "State Religion" of the Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Jewish identity of Christ, is clearly seen. The loss of that personal identity, and it's replacement with something, that clearly was not him, is precisely what "Christmas" Christians actually "worship" every December 25th.




Hebrews 13:8  

Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.


1.  The REAL Christ NEVER observed "Christmas", when he was on earth.

2.  The REAL Christ, never taught any of his REAL DISCIPLES to observe Christmas.

3. The REAL Christ, never taught any of his REAL APOSTLES to observe Christmas.

4. NONE of his REAL DISCIPLES ever observed Christmas.

5. NONE of his REAL DISCIPLES ever TAUGHT anyone to observe Christmas.

6. NONE of his REAL APOSTLES ever observed Christmas.

7. NONE  of his  REAL APOSTLES  ever TAUGHT anyone to observe Christmas.




2 Thessalonians 3:6 

Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.


(And it's "Christ" is not the "Christ" of the New Testament)

"John,  the disciple of the Lord, preaches this faith, and seeks, by the proclamation of the Gospel, to remove that error which by Cerinthus had been disseminated among men, and a long time previously by those termed Nicolaitans

- Irenaeus, Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 11)

But many years after their fixing the canons, this festival was invented, as some say, by the disciples of the heretic Cerinthus; and was accepted by the Greeks, because they were truly fond of festivals and most fervent in piety; and by them it was spread and diffused all over the world.

- Ananias of Shirak, The Exposite, 5th Series vol.4, 1896
- The Discourse of Ananias, called the Counter upon the Epiphany of our Lord and Savior.


Ezekiel 8:16

And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD's  house, and, behold,...their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they WORSHIPPED THE SUN toward the east.
QUOTE: To this point Constantine's religious affiliations combined two tendencies. They were associated with the sun, the symbol of the all powerful and all embracing god of contemporary religious thought, and within this conception had come to focus on Christ [Apollo as Christ] as the particular representative of that power who had revealed himself and offered his support to Constantine. END QUOTE

- p. 148, Atlas of the Roman World

Quoting VIRGIL's Prophecy From The Ecologues  at the dedication of the Thea Sophia Church in Constantinople:

Now the last age by Cumae's Sibyl sung Has come and gone, and the majestic roll Of circling centuries begins anew: Justice returns, returns old Saturn's reign, With a new breed of men sent down from heaven. Only do thou, at the boy's birth in whom The iron shall cease, the golden race arise, Befriend him, chaste Lucina; 'tis THINE OWN APOLLO REIGNS', Ecologue 4, 7  -  SAINT CONSTANTINE

“The date of Christ’s birth is not known. The Gospels indicate neither the day nor the month . . . According to the hypothesis suggested by H. Usener . . . and accepted by most scholars today, the birth of Christ was assigned the date of the winter solstice (December 25 in the Julian calendar, January 6 in the Egyptian), because on this day, as the sun began its return to northern skies, the pagan devotees of Mithra celebrated the dies natalis Solis Invicti (birthday of the invincible sun). On Dec. 25, 274, Aurelian had proclaimed the sun-god principal patron of the empire and dedicated a temple to him in the Campus Martius. Christmas originated at a time when the cult of the sun was particularly strong at Rome.

—(1967), Vol. III, p. 656 - The New Catholic Encyclopedia
QUOTE: "This column was erected on  pedestal of white marble twenty feet high and was composed of ten pieces of porphyry, each of which measured about ten feet in height and about thirty-three in circumference.  On the summit of the pillar, above one hundred and twenty feet from the ground, stood the colossal statue of Apollo.  It was of bronze and had been transported... from a town of Phidias.  The artist had represented the god of the day, or , as it was afterwards interpreted, the emperor Constantine himself, with a scepter in his right hand, the globe of the world in his left, and a crown of rays glittering on his head." END QUOTE:

- Edward Gibbons, Decline And Fall of the Roman Empire, p.257, Vol.1

The word used in the Greek in Matthew 7:21-23, which is translated "many" actually means "the majority of", which is a very bizarre statement by Christ.  No religious leader condemns the majority of his future devotees when he's trying to start a religious movement. Yet, that is precisely what Christ did? Christ said "the majority" of those who called him "Lord, Lord", would not even know him. The vast majority  of those would be calling him "Lord", would actually be following AN IMPOSTER.

This IMPOSTER, is THE "CHRIST" OF "CHRISTMAS".  This "Christ" is not who the "world" thinks he is. He has a "hidden" identity. One that will "surprise them" to "find out", when they do. They think this IMPOSTURE is CHRIST. But the New Testament informs us prophetically, it WILL NOT be him.

So WHO is he? (Really?) You are going to find out next.



Most Christians do not realize the New Testament mentions "another Jesus".  The "other Jesus" is not the the Jewish messianic figure who was executed by Rome, and resurrected, as explained in the New Testament, but even as early as the writing of Paul's second letter to the Corinthians, Paul mentions "this Jesus" was "more popular" among many Gentile converts.

2 Corinthians 11:3,4

But I fear lest by any means, as the serpent deceived Eve in his craftiness, so your thoughts should be corrupted from the purity which is due to Christ. For if, indeed, the one coming proclaims another Jesus, whom we have not proclaimed, or if you receive another spirit which you have not received, or another gospel which you never accepted, you might well endure these.

Paul associates the "Other Jesus" with THE SERPENT in Genesis 3.  The obvious lesson in the text without any historical background (as usually explained by all ) is that the believers in this community were being "seduced".  Some ministers will openly connect this to "gnosticism" in their sermons on this text. 

But what most will overlook (or ignore) in their expositions, is that this "other Jesus" was making the rounds in the New Testament communities, and is found in virtually every major epistle written by Paul to his disciples.  This "other Jesus" as early as the writing of the Pastoral Epistles, was already threatening to over run the New Testament communities, and utterly change the definition of the Jewish messiah being taught in the "Euangelion". 

But, what is striking in it's graphic detail is that, as you have seen earlier, the serpent in Genesis 3 was a reference to Pharaoh's serpent of enlightenment involving Egyptian sun-god worship. A surprising amount of material is given about this "Other Jesus" in the New Testament. 

As one compiles the list of descriptions about this "Other Jesus", one will quickly begin to realize, the "Other Jesus" is the one that most people today, think of as "Christ", as a result of the work of the Roman Empire.   Historically, the "other Jesus" was in fact geographically, related to Egypt and and has been documented in the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library and is directly linked to the building of Constantine's first Church in Constantinople., the "Thea Sophia".

These same "gnostics" who were peddling this "other Jesus", eventually became the personal counselors of Rome's Byzantium Emperors and the defining architects of it's "religion", which named itself "Roman Catholicism", but today claims to be the only true inheritor of Apostolic "Christianity".  A claim that is found among it's first proponents, being denounced, by still living Apostles in the New Testament.




1.  Is not of Jewish FLESH, and thus also is not Apostolic [1Jn 2:19, 1Jn 4:3, 2Jn 1:7]

2.  Is not anchored to the historical CHRIST but to "traditions" and "myths" [2Co 11:4, Col 2:8, 2Ti 4:3 ]

3.  Is advocated by Religious Authoritarians who speak "as God" Ex Cathedra [2Ti 4:3 ]

4.  Is advocated by a clergy which is celibate [1Ti 4:1-3]

5.  Who will claim Christ's "Paurousia" is found in their "Desert communities" [Mat 24:26 ]

6.  And in their "Sanctuaries" [Mat 24:26, Mat 24:28]

7.  Who will "come in Christ's name", and claim to "be him" [Luk 21:8]

8.  Who will deceive the MAJORITY of those who call him "Lord" [Mat 7:22]

9.  And the whole world  [Rev 12:9]

10. Who will come with miraculous "signs" [Mat 24:24 , Mar 13:22]

11. Specifically Icons/Idols which will "come to life" [Rev 13:15 ]

12. And "Fire which will come from heaven" [Rev 13:13]

13. And will be consolidated under the authority of a man with a name of THREE SIXES [Rev 13:18]

14. And imposed on the world through FORCE [Rev 13:15 ]

15. Is connected to EGYPT [Jud 1:4-5, 2Co 11:3

16. Is identified by a "doctrine" of THREE FROG SPIRITS [Rev 16:13]

17. Will focus on THE SUN [Rev 9:11]

18. Specifically in the form of a hybrid APOLLO-Christ [Rev 14:9, Mat 7:22-23]

19. Which is born on December 25th [Rev 2:6,15]

20. And it's Idol, which will have LONG HAIR like a woman [Rev 9:8]

20. Marked by the selling and MERCHANDISING religion for money [2Pe 2:3 , Rev 18:11]

21. Which will make "Merchants" wealthy [Rev 18:15]

22. Will reproduce the "Tower of Babel" in it's "ecclesiology [Rev 17:5]

23. And will adopted "Secret society Babelism" or "Mystery Babylon" as it's real religion [Rev 17:1,2,5]

24. Will result in the "delusion" of a "false Christ" [2Th 2:11 ]

25. Where people will think they are "saved" [2Th 2:11-12]

26. But are actually "damned" [Rev 18:7,8, 2Th 2:11-12]

27. Will be anti-Semitic in tone and practice [1Jn 2:19, Rom 11:18, 1Jn 2:22]

28. Will have clergy which "claims" to be a "secession of the Original Apostles" but are lying [Rev 2:2 ]

29. Will teach "doctrines" which have their origin in "Hinduism" or "Egyptian/Roman Polytheism" [1Ti 4:1, Rev 16:13,14 ]

30. Will eventually be headquartered in ROME [Rev 17:9 ]

31. Will be spread through an Empire made up of 10 Kingdoms [Rev 17:12 ]

32. Will spread it's doctrines to the "kings of Europe" [Rev 16:14]

33. Will be marked by the worship of a MOTHER-GODDESS [Rev 17:9, Rev 17:7-9, Rev 17:5]

34. Will be involved in a MASS/EUCHARIST to REPLACE the Lord's Seder [Rev 17:4,Rev 14:10]

35. Will lead it's followers into "Perdition" (Spiritual Ruin) worshiping the "Lake of Fire" [Rev 20:15,Rev 20:10, Mat 13:42, Mat 13:50, Mat 25:41]

36. Will arise from Gentiles [1Pe 4:3,Mat 10:18 ,Mar 10:42,Luk 21:24,Rom 11:25,1Co 10:20,Rom 2:28]

37. Who practice utilitarian Deceit as a method of advancing their religion [1Ti 4:1-3]

38. Who will become guilty of mass murder throughout history future [Rev 13:15]

39. And be involved in controlling all finance and commerce [Rev 13:17,18]

40. And seek to take over "nations", and will reject the REAL CHRIST [Rev 13:7]









Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between Him and His bearers with their black beards and tawny* complexions!


* "Tawny" - Of a light brown to brownish orange color


Copies are in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C.





"I asked him to describe this person to me, so that I might know him if I should meet him. He said: 'If you ever meet him you will know him. While he is nothing but a man, there is something about him that distinguishes him from every other man. He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. His hair is a little more golden than hers, though it is as much from sunburn as anything else. He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. His eyes are large and a soft blue, and rather dull and heavy....' This Jew is convinced that he is the Messiah of the world. ...this was the same person that was born of the virgin in Bethlehem some twenty-six years before..."


- The Archko Volume, translated by Drs. McIntosh and Twyman of the Antiquarian Lodge, Genoa, Italy, from manuscripts in Constantinople and the records of the Senatorial Docket taken from the Vatican of Rome (1896) 92-93



Do you notice anything different?  What accounts for these glaring differences?

These changes were not simply "incidental". They were intentional. "Apollo-gists" will claim they meant nothing, and it does not matter what he "looked like". If that is true, then why did they intentionally "change" it? If it really "doesn't matter", why "change" it? Because it DID matter. Just look at what those changes actually were!


Revelation 9:11 

And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. 
Revelation 9:11 is more than just a prophecy about "Apollo". It is a prophecy about the DEITY that will be worshiped by "followers of the Antichrist".  "Apollo-gists" advocating Counter-reformation theology insist none of this can be true or real because all the "Christians" have not been "raptured" yet. And there is no "Antichrist" until after the "rapture". But "rapture" theology was "invented" and "spread" by Jesuits for the sole purpose of hiding what had happened. It was "disinformation".

Most "Christians" 2 centuries ago, had no knowledge of a "rapture". They had to be "converted" to that idea by "counter-reformation" propagandists, who for all practical purposes, completely destroyed real historical "evangelical" Christianity in America.


Matt. 7:23

...And then I will profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Do not believe in the lies of Rome's "Apollo-gists". They will not "go to hell" for you.

If you have "accepted" Apollo, (a/k/a the "Christmas Christ") as your "personal savior", you need to REPENT, if you wish to "BE SAVED".

APOLLO never "died for your sins".




Deu 11:16  

Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived

and ye turn aside, 

and serve other gods, and worship them


It was clearly “in the heart” of the people in Matthew 7:21-23 that they “believed” they were “following Christ”. They really believed that. And they really expected him to greet them with “congratulations my faithful servant !!”.  Because the text even lists all the things they did “for him” “in his name”.


The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Christ, the prophets and the apostles, were all quite unimpressed with the condition of the “human heart”. Jeremiah called it “deceitfully wicked” and said “who can know it”.  Meaning, you can’t really even know what is in your own heart, unless God shows it to you. It is “deceitfully wicked”. Do you really want to hold up the depravity of a disobedient heart, to God, as the final excuse for what you did?

The “atonement” is ideologically rejected in the claim, it is only what is in your heart that counts. Because the “atonement” becomes irrelevant. The Atonement is an objective external historical event that has nothing to do with your “heart”. It is something that exists apart from you. It exists without you. And it has absolutely no dependency on you. Nor your “heart”.

I Never Knew You
Mat 7:21-23

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Christ is saying of himself in Matthew 7:21-23, I am an external objective reality. I am defined by God's definition of who and what I am, not yours. Nor what is “in your heart”. If you do not accept who I am, externally, and independently of yourself, your vain imaginations, and your wicked deceitful heart, then you will never know me. I am not yours to be redefined by whatever vanity you personally feel and think.


It’s what is in God’s heart, that counts. Not yours.


Satanic “Christmas ministers” will promise as you participate in Rome’s “solar-worship” rituals, and support them, in renaming Rome’s Apollo, as the world's “Christ”, that it will be “only what’s in your heart that counts”, on judgement day. So don't be too concerned about it.


Christ warns, when that day comes, his speech will be with complete certainty and just conviction, “Depart from me, I never knew you”.

It would be wise, to take him at his word.



Matthew 16:23 

But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

If it was "what is in your heart that counts", Christ would have NEVER turned to PETER, and called him "Satanic" for just wanting "to help". Honestly, in all probability, "Peter's heart" was better than yours, even in that moment. Yet, Christ said to him;"Get Behind Me Satan".

What was in "Peter's Heart"? According to Christ himself? It was "Satan". Why? Because Peter was basing all his thinking on what HE thought was "good and evil" (Ge.3), not the "word of God", nor the "will of God".

And that is the problem with "Christmas Christianity". It is "Satanic" for the very same reason. And what is in "your heart",  when you demand "Christmas" be done (for "Christ") despite the fact he never desired it, taught it or requested it, is the very same thing, that was in Peters, that day.