THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think


Are the people, behind these rituals really “Christian”? What “Christian” would do this kind of thing? Especially even choosing these symbols? Let’s suppose all the lies they tell you to “rationalize” Christmas were true. It’s just a “Christian” holiday. It was observed forever by “Christians” And “Jesus is the reason”?

If any of that were actually true, you certainly would not bathe it in Greek Nikes (i.e., “Demonic spirits” in the New Testament), if it were “Christian”. You certainly would not venerate “Nicolaitanism” and pedophilia, if it were “Christian”. And you certainly would NOT put the “Tree of knowledge” at the very “center” of it. A “real Christian” would just never do any of these things. (That is why they didn't) Yet, there they are, with the "claim", it is "Christian". Why? Because, what is “animating” this practice, is NOT “Christian”. And when those things are done, and those doing them, demand they be seen as “Christian” (despite what they are), it is a “claim” that contradicts simple logic. It’s not even really that “hidden”. The “flip of the Script” has been accomplished in plain sight. Look in an Encyclopedia.

The constant deception, that is used in order to justify all these practices to unsuspecting genuine Christians, is viciously deceiving them. They are literally being “victimized” by this deceit. The people responsible for that deception, are deceivers, or colloquially speaking, liars.  Unfortunately, those most injured by their lies, are least likely to even suspect, there actually is intentional deceit, actually involved.  For many, it will prove to be to painful to consider. And the deceivers, depend on that very emotional denial, to continue what they are doing.

If you think what you are seeing is simply an “accident”, then you don’t really understand, what is being done. You are not willing, to believe your own eyes. Nor are you willing to “trust” the “Scriptures”, nor even the very voice of God within you. So what else is there? If you reject all these things? If you are a “Christian” and reject all these things, can you honestly expect to “be saved” by Christ, worshiping and serving, all that is “opposite to Christ”? You need to be honest with yourself, concerning what you are participating in. It may affect your eternal destiny, if you do not. So where did this “Church” (that worships the “opposite of Christ”, as “Christ”?) come from?








The “Christmas Church” is simply defined as the “Church” which does “Christmas” (all of them). While on the outside, they look like different groups, they are essentially united in the basic tenants of “Nicolaitanism”, which they fraudulently call “Christianity”. It cannot be “Christianity” if it had nothing to do with either “Christ” or the “Christians” who followed him. It is something OTHER than “Christ” and “Christianity. And calling that OTHER THING what the New Testament calls it, is a “basic tenant of Christianity”. Not the other way around. And that is the problem. 



In a nutshell, "the Christmas Church" worships an entity which they prefer to call "LUCIFER".   It is part of an "esoteric" (or "occult") theology that is held in common "behind the veil" (meaning "privately").  "Behind the Veil" is an expression that comes from the structure of the "The Temple".  The "outer court" was for "the nations" (or the "masses". Whereas, only the "Priests" (symbolic of "initiates of the Mystery") were permitted "Behind the Veil".  This is the "basic construct" of  the division between the "Priest/Laity" hierarchy in "the Christmas Church". 

They "interpret" the SUN as "Christ", and "Christ" as in reality "LUCIFER".
"Lucifer", in "historical Christianity", was considered to be the pre-fallen angelic name for what came to be referred to as "SATAN".  This form of theology is known as "LUCIFERIANISM".  It is held in common BY MANY RELIGIOUS GROUPS, including both the "MASONS" (Thus the "Church of England", Anglican/Episcopalian Church) and emerging originally (and still present) from the "CHURCH OF ROME".
When "LUCIFERIANS" promote the social ritual of "CHRISTMAS", they are KNOWINGLY "promoting" the worship of "LUCIFER". (Which they DO KNOW) 

The problem of course, is that most of the "Christians" they are busy lying to, and thus "seducing", do not. (There is NO "INFORMED CONSENT" being "permitted") And many of these "Christians" (not all by any means), but a significant amount, would have nothing more to do with it, IF they KNEW. Because, most "Christians" (from the historically Biblical tradition), do not really want to BE consciously "worshiping" LUCIFER. (Even if you "mask it" with the name "JESUS")




"Luciferianism" first originated early on, in the Nicolaitan community. It was mentioned in John's dealing with this group, as early as the book of Revelation itself, where he identifies the "counter-christian" Christianity of the Nicolaitan movement, as teaching an "esoteric doctrine" involving the identity of  what John called "Satan".  But since John is referring to this group/movement in derogatory terms, it is highly possible the actual reference is, to what they would have been calling "LUCIFER" (since historically in terms of Jewish Biblical theology, these terms would have been "synonymous" in John's vocabulary)

Rev 2:24 

Rev 2:20  ...thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants...But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.
Since this teaching focused on the nature of "Satan" but was infiltrating "Christian" communities, in the form of some "deep teaching" (that most were not either "privy" to, or capable of "understanding"), it was essentially an "esoteric" doctrine.

But John damned it as a lie, which solicited the very "Judgement of God". And John called it's proponents "false prophets", comparing them to "Jezebel" in the Old Testament. "Jezebel" could have been the literal reference to one female in particular, but he mentions her "children" meaning her "followers", as well, so this condemnation was "collective" and "categorical".  "Jezebel" however, could have also been an intentionally derogatory reference to a male leader, or a "group" of leaders.  The point however, is that he referenced them, as "Jezebel".

"Jezebel" was well remembered among Biblical Jews.


Jezebel (/ˈdʒɛzəbəl, -bɛl/;[1][2][3] Hebrew: אִיזֶבֶל‎, Modern: ʾĪzével, Tiberian: ʾĪzeḇel) was the daughter of Ithobaal I of Tyre and the wife of Ahab, King of Israel, according to the Book of Kings of the Hebrew Bible (1 Kings 16:31).[4] According to the Biblical narrative, Jezebel, along with her husband, instituted the worship of Baal and Asherah on a national scale. In addition, she violently purged the prophets of Yahweh from Israel, damaging the reputation of the Omride dynasty.[5][6][7][8] For these offences, the Omride dynasty was annihilated, with Jezebel herself suffering the gruesome death of defenestration. -



Baal (/ˈbeɪəl, ˈbɑːəl/),[1][a] properly Baʽal,[b] was a title and honorific meaning "owner", "lord" in the Northwest Semitic languages spoken in the Levant during antiquity. From its use among people, it came to be applied to gods.[6] Scholars previously associated the theonym with solar cults and with a variety of unrelated patron deities but inscriptions have shown that the name Baʿal was particularly associated with the storm and fertility god Hadad and his local manifestations. - Freedman, David Noel, ed. (1992), The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, Vol. 1, New York: Doubleday,
A solar deity (also sun goddess or sun god) is a sky deity who represents the Sun, or an aspect of it, usually by its perceived power and strength.

Solar deities and Sun worship can be found throughout most of recorded history in various forms.

The Sun is sometimes referred to by its Latin name Sol or by its Greek name Helios. The English word sun stems from Proto-Germanic *sunnǭ.[1]



This four-tiered cult stand found at Tanaach is thought to represent...Asherah... Note that on tier two, which is dedicated to Asherah, is the image of a living tree, often thought to be how the asherim as a cult symbol was expressed. Photo: © The Israel Museum, Jerusalem/Israel Antiquities Authority (photograph by Avraham Hay).




From the mentions in the New Testament, it was clear, "the Nicolaitans" were (1) Gentile and (2) Syncretists (they assimilated "paganism" as "part of" their "Christianity").

Naturally, the theological "descendants" of "Nicolaitanism"  claim they were "somebody else", because of the problem they are condemned by the Apostles in the New Testament.   But "Nicolaitanism" is not simply "identified" by a name, it is identified by the description of it's main characteristic, which was clearly "assimilation" of pagan roman festivals and customs.

As a result of their "theology" of "assimilation", the "Nicolaitans" were responsible for the creation of something else as well, that has become quite famous today...



The Shepherd of Hermas (Greek: Ποιμὴν τοῦ Ἑρμᾶ, Poimēn tou Herma; Latin: Pastor Hermae), sometimes just called The Shepherd, is a Christian literary work of the late first half of the second century, considered a valuable book by many Christians, and considered canonical scripture by some of the early Church fathers such as Irenaeus.[1] The Shepherd was very popular amongst Christians in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th centuries.[2] It is found in the Codex Sinaiticus,[3][4] and it is listed between the Acts of the Apostles and the Acts of Paul in the stichometrical list of the Codex Claromontanus. The work comprises five visions, twelve mandates, and ten parables. It relies on allegory and pays special attention to the Church

The following "mystical revelation" was written by the "brother" of the Pope of Rome in the 2nd Century.


3[11]:3 The tower, which thou seest building, is myself, the Church, which was seen of thee both now and aforetime. Ask, therefore, what thou willest concerning the tower, and I will reveal it unto thee, that thou mayest rejoice with the saints."





Medieval Sourcebook:
The Codex Theodosianus:
On Religion, 4th Century CE

C.Th. XV.v.1: On the Lord's day, (SUNday) which is the first day of the week, on Christmas, (Solstice) and on the days of Epiphany, Easter, and Pentecost, inasmuch as then the (white) garments symbolizing the light of heavenly cleansing bear witness to the new light of holy baptism, at the time also of the suffering of the apostles, the example for all Christians, the pleasures of the theaters and games are to be kept from the people in all cities, and all the thoughts of Christians and believers are to be occupied with the worship of God. And if any are kept from that worship through the madness of Jewish impiety or the error and insanity of foolish paganism, let them know that there is one time for prayer and another for pleasure. And lest anyone should think he is compelled by the honor due to our person, as if by the greater necessity of his imperial office, or that unless he attempted to hold the games in contempt of the religious prohibition, he might offend our serenity in showing less than the usual devotion toward us; let no one doubt that our clemency is revered in the highest degree by humankind when the worship of the whole world is paid to the might and goodness of God. Theodosius Augustus and Caesar Valentinian.

C. Th. XVI.v.1: It is necessary that the privileges which are bestowed for the cultivation of religion should be given only to followers of the Catholic faith. We desire that heretics and schismatics be not only kept from these privileges, but be subjected to various fines. Constantine Augustus.



How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

- Written to the "King" of BABYLON
This is the ONLY OCCURRENCE of the word "Lucifer"





[Saint] Lucifer first appears in history as an envoy from Liberius of Rome to the Emperor Constantius II, requesting the convening of a church council. At the Council of Milan in 354 or 355 he defended Athanasius of Alexandria against Arian attempts to secure his condemnation by Western bishops. It was reported that Constantius II, a supporter of Arian theology, confined Lucifer for three days in the palace, where Lucifer continued to argue vehemently. Along with Eusebius of Vercelli and Dionysius of Milan, he was exiled. He travelled first to Syria, then to Palestine and finally to Thebes in Egypt. While in exile, he wrote fiery pamphlets to the emperor in which he proclaimed himself to be ready to suffer martyrdom for his beliefs.  After the death of Constantius and the accession of Julian the Apostate, Lucifer was able to return from exile in 362. However, he would not be reconciled to former Arians. He opposed the Bishop Meletius, who came to accept the Nicene creed (and for that was driven out by Arians). Although Meletius had the support of many proponents of Nicene theology at Antioch, Lucifer put his support behind the Eustathian party which had unflinchingly stood by the Nicene creed, and prolonged the schism between Meletians and Eustathians by consecrating without licence a Eustathian, Paulinus, as bishop. After this he returned to Cagliari, where, according to Jerome, he died in 370.[1]  He may have been excommunicated, as is hinted in the writings of Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo, as well as Jerome, who refers to his followers as Luciferians. There is extant a work known as Libellus precum, which was written by two Luciferian clergy called Faustinus and Marcellinus. Jerome discusses Lucifer and his supporters in his polemic Altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi ("Altercation of a Luciferian and an Orthodox"), as well as describing the bishop's career in De Viris Illustribus 95- SAINT LUCIFER OF CAGLIARIA,


"Morning Star" was also applied as a title to Byzantine Emperor Nikephoros II in 968. Liutprand, Bishop of Cremona, reports that the emperor was greeted on his arrival at Hagia Sophia (Constantine's "Thea Sophia") with the chant: "Behold the morning star approaches, Eos rises; he reflects in his glances the rays of the sun – he the pale death of the Saracens, Nicephorus the ruler."






23. As for the fraternities, together with indulgences, letters of indulgence, dispensations for Lent, and masses, and all the rest of such things, let them all be drowned and abolished; there is no good in them at all. If the Pope has the authority to grant dispensation in the matter of eating butter and hearing masses, let him allow priests to do the same; he has no right to take the power from them. I speak also of the fraternities in which indulgences, masses, and good works are distributed. My friend, in baptism you joined a fraternity of which Christ, the angels, and saints, and all Christians are members; be true to this, and satisfy it, and you will have fraternities enough. Let others make what show they wish; they are as counters compared to coins. But if there were a fraternity that subscribed money to feed the poor or to help others in any way, this would be good, and it would have its indulgence and its deserts in heaven. But now they are good for nothing but gluttony and drunkenness.

- MARTIN LUTHER, Twenty-Seven Articles Respecting The Reformation Of The Christian Estate, Martin Luther (1483-1546):  Address To The Nobility of the German Nation, 1520




Mat 7:21-23

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Who are those "Many" that will say to him, "Lord, Lord"?

But do not know the real Christ?

They are "Christmas Christians" who were deceived into worshiping LUCIFER.

2Th 3:6 

Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.

Christmas is not the "Tradition" of the Apostles.

It is a "Delusion" that worships "LUCIFER".

Repent, if you wish to "be saved" by the real Christ.