THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think




What exactly is the "Spirit of Christmas"? It is a phrase that you will hear often repeated, and what is usually implied by it, is something "pleasant", usually embodied in a string of wonderful yet ambiguous adjectives produced by "free association".  You might try it. It goes like this... love, peace, joy, happiness, family, gifts, peace, did I say peace already? etc.,  But it is really intended to "conjure up" good memories, of whatever they "enjoy" doing, or perhaps whatever they think is generic "good" in the world.  

To some, that might be getting totally drunk and half naked or promiscuous  at wild parties. To others it may be "vacation time" from work. To others, it may be "eating", the very best cooking, until they feel like they are going to pop. To others, it may be "seeing their family".  These "fond memories" together with some generic adjectives of whatever is considered "good" in the world, are thrown together, and called "the spirit of Christmas". Usually the better the adjectives of "good", the better the answer.

And that's sort of the problem with the phrase. It's just mental propaganda. It doesn't really mean anything. It just means, "whatever is good you", think of that. That is the "spirit of Christmas". So it is sort of a mental blank space in a sentence, that you are supposed to "fill in" with your string of adjectives from "free association".

But there is a major "deception" taking place with that phrase. And it is actually revealed by the phrase itself. You see, "Christians" are told "Christmas" is all about "Christ". So, there really should be no need for the phrase; "The Spirit of Christmas".

What you would be saying is the "Spirit of Christ". (But nobody says that, do they?) Like, right before your fellow workers rush off to the "Christmas party" to get smashed face drunk, you don't say... "Yeah man, time to get into the Spirit of Christ!", do you?

Of course not. It would be "totally inappropriate". Why? Because it's not "Christ". But you would have no trouble saying..."Yeah man, time to get into "the Spirit of Christmas"! Everybody would agree, including those fellow workers, heading off to a drunken orgie. Everybody already "knows" it's "not Christ", ..but you.

So the the phrase, the "Spirit of Christmas", is a very effective mental manipulation tool, to invoke a person into "conjuring up" in their own mind, whatever "spirit" they associate with "Christmas". 

And it is no accident, that the same term "conjuring" is used for both "mental imagery" and for "spirits".  Because that is how both are done.

Most people are not aware, the rituals of "Christmas" are all about "conjuring up" "spirits". Not some of them, but virtually all of them. As people go through these rituals, year after year, they become "familiar" with them. And each "ritual" produces a "special feeling" for them. What they are "feeling", is known as "a spirit". "Spirits" produce "feelings". The stronger the "feeling", the stronger the "attachment" to the "spirit".  And they can even produce "spiritual experiences". (Acts 16:16,17)

Because Rome's "Christ-mass" was intended to be an occult ritual, that brought all the "spirits" in the empire, into subjection to Rome, it is "inclusive" of all "spirits", and thus why there is no definition in the blank. It can be your "Christ", or it can be your co-worker's Bacchus. It really doesn't matter, as long as it is in subjection to Rome. (Rev.18:2)

Whatever "spirit" you have been "conjuring up" on "Christmas" is "good to go". Because it is a "Christmas spirit". (Rev.18:2) That is why it doesn't matter objectively, what it is.  The only problem with all that, as you know, if you are a "Christian", "Christ" is not coming to the party. He doesn't "submit" to Rome. He doesn't even submit to Peter.  When Peter tried to pull that, Christ called him "Satan".(Mat_16:23; Mar_8:33)  His response to you, will be no different, when you do the same. (If  you have the real one)

But, the "Christ" that will show up, (as you saw in the "The Christmas Christ") is not the "Christ" of the New Testament. A "Christ" will come, if you insist. But, it just won't be the real one. It will be the one, that steps in to "take his place". (Rev.9:11 - the one who is "the sun", and who is being "worshiped" in these rituals)  And ...that is precisely, who you do NOT want to be "your Christ". (Matt.7:21-23) There is no "future" with that one.

Matthew 7:21-23

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.


As you saw in the section ”The Christmas Church”, the “Church” which synthesizes “Christ” with “the Sun”, [Rev.9:11] was prophesied in the Scriptures. One of the prophecies given about it, is found in Revelation 18:2 -

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the

great is fallen, is fallen, and is become (1) the habitation of devils,

and (2) the hold of every foul spirit, and a (3) cage of every

unclean and (4) hateful bird.
(1) the habitation of devils

The word translated as “habitation” is from the Greek word “κατοικητήριον”. It is only used 2 times in the entire New Testament. The first time it is used in Ephesians 2:22, and it is used by Paul “ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit. “ But John is using the same word, in direct contrast to what Paul said. John is calling this entity a “habitation for devils”. So there is a night/day contrast being used. An “opposite”.

“Devils” is translated from “δαίμων” and is defined by Strong’s Greek as “a supernatural spirit”. The “spirit of Christmas” is “precisely that” even if you take them at their own word. Precisely as shown in Charles Dickens, “Christmas Carol”. The “Christmas spirits” that “visit” Ebenezer Scrooge are certainly and definitely “supernatural”.
(2) the hold of every foul spirit

The term translated as “the hold” is from the Greek word “φυλακή” and is defined by Strong’s Greek as “a guarding or (concretely guard), the act, the parson”. A PARSON is defined by the dictionary as QUOTE: “a beneficed member of the clergy; a rector or a vicar.” END QUOTE – The etymology of the term is given as “Middle English: from Old French persone, from Latin persona ‘person’ (in medieval Latin ‘rector’).” The “Rector” of a Church.

The term “foul” as used in the phrase “foul spirit” comes the Greek word, “ἀκάθαρτος” and is defined as “morally (lewd) or specifically (demonic)):”.  There is certainly a lot of “lewd” activity associated with “Christmas”.  That “lewd” activity, is attributed to the influence of “demonic spirits” in the Scripture. Those “demonic spirits” have a “home” in the “Christmas-church”.
(3) a cage of every unclean

The word translated “cage” is actually the same exact word as used in #2. So there really shouldn’t be 2 different words here. It is the same word that translates as “Rector”.

“Unclean” is a common term used in the Scripture (194 times). It both refers to "unkosher" and in reference to the "spiritual effect" of  “idolatry” (and it's associated "demonic spirits").

Zec 13:2  And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the LORD of hosts, that I will cut off the names of the idols  ..I will cause the (false) prophets of the unclean spirit to pass out of the land. - KJV
“Idolatry” is simply the use of “images” or “statues”, in a worship or religious context. It is the normal “custom” in the “Christmas church” to add “idolatry” to it’s list of “sin” in these rituals.

Traditionally, actually even continuing to place the idols directly under the tree, as was literally the custom described by Isaiah. The “idols” have been renamed with a “Old English/French word” and called a “Creche”. (A delicate word for “idols”)

These "idols" produce "an unclean spirit".(One of "the many" "spirits" of "Christmas")
(4) and hateful bird

Bird. “Nikes” which are depicted as “Christmas angels”, are striking because of their “bird wings”. Biblical angels had no such “wings” associated with them.  They are described as being “indistinguishable” from “humans”. So much so, that a lack of “hospitality” might accidentally be, an “offense” against one of God’s “angels”. Cherubim and Seraphim, in the temple had “wings”, however, they did not have just 2 of them. They had six each. In fact, their faces are described as covered by the multiplicity of their wings. So while there were “wings”, that is where all similarity stops.
They were definitely not of the “bi-winged” variety, found on “birds”.  And that distinguishing characteristic, makes John’s prophecy unmistakable. A “Church” filled with “Nikes”. Precisely as we really actually do observe constantly and continually adored in “Christmas-churches”.


So, as you may have guessed by now, there is more than one "spirit" being "conjured up" at "Christmas". There are probably "legion". But we actually know what some of them are, because the designers and promoters of "Christmas" have even told you, that is what you are doing. They are really not very subtle in their language about it. But usually, the reference to the "spirits", is kept in a generic "symbolic" context, as you see done in Charles Dickens, "Christmas Carol".




The concept of "Spirits", comes from the experience of their "phenomenology". Meaning that they became "identified" as such, through the "experience" of them. As a modern "Christian", you might have "decided" that the "existence of spirits" is "superstitious".  That, the term was certainly used in that context, historically, so it is reasonable that one might come to that conclusion. Viola! Don't "bother me" with talk about "spirits"!

But the problem is, that whether you believe or disbelieve in their cosmological "existence", their "phenomenology" is still left a "reality". In other words, the "experience" (of them) still exists, regardless of, and quite apart from,  how you ultimately "define" that nature of "existence", theoretically or cosmologically.

You may "decide" "demons" do not exist. That it is a "superstition". But people are still "experiencing" the "demonic". Some are still even becoming "demonized". And when someone is "demonized", it does very little good, to give them a "lecture", what they are "experiencing" doesn't exist. (For them, it does, regardless of what your "cosmology" happens to be)

"Near Death Experiences" are another example of "spirit phenomenology". Consciousness is experienced, both after the body has ceased vital functions, and outside of it's physical locality. One's personal "Philosophy" about "existence", does not "stop it" from happening.(Because it is a "phenomenon") It even happens to Atheists, despite their "belief" it "doesn't exist".

"Spirits" are a class of reality, which belong to "phenomena". And in that classification, regardless of what you personally think, they are as real as rocks and trees. No matter what your "personal beliefs" about them, happen to be. Not believing in "rocks and trees" does nothing to "affect" their "existence" in your "experience".  The same is true of "spirits". Just because you do not "believe in them", does not mean they "disappear".  All that really happens, is that you personally, now become "unaware".

Theologically speaking, the use of the term "spirits" in a "multiple context" as a descriptive, is a reference to what is known in the New Testament as "demonic spirits". And if you take the modern-materialistic view that no such "spirits" exist, then why do you still cling to the major contradictory notion,  of belief in the existence of "God"? (Who is also said to be a "Spirit") by "Christ" himself, no less?

John 4:24 

God is a Spirit:
and they that worship him
must worship him
in spirit and in truth.
So either "spirits" exist, or they do not. But you cannot "pick and choose" when it is "convenient" for you (to decide when their "existence" is a "personal convenience" or when it is not).  There is no "on/off" "switch" that you get to flip, that lets you personally decide, when a "spirit" exists, or when it does not. (To serve at your personal convenience). "Spirits" are either a reality, or they are not. It is a "binary" conclusion. And since they are a "phenomenology", even if you dismiss their "existence" as "real", ...their "existence", as a "phenomenology" still "exists", in spite of your "belief", to the contrary.

The real problem is that most, who want to think of themselves as "Christians", do not want to acknowledge or admit, "spirits" are real when they are "guilty" of "trafficking" in them.  But then, want to claim they "believe in God" when Christ himself, said "God" was the very same class of being, called "a spirit", which they also tell themselves, does not "exist". (For their personal convenience)

If you are one of these "Christians", you want to pretend all this talk about "spirits" "mean nothing". Because if it DIDN'T mean "Nothing", then you know, you would be "in big trouble". In fact, you would actually be surrounding yourself with "demonic spirits". And you would even be "introducing" them to your own "Children". (Imagine that) Do you want to know why your own child is acting so "weird" and "demonic"? (Despite your efforts to force-feed them "religion"?) Well, don't you think exposing them to "flocks of demonic spirits" every year, might have something to do with it?

The fact is, these occult rituals have been practiced for thousands of years in the world, and the whole reason they continue to be practiced, is because they still "conjure up" these "spirits" (phenomenologically) . And the "spirits" that are "conjured up" through these rituals, are still "present" and "accounted for", whether you acknowledge they are there, or not. 

And there is factual real statistical evidence, that they are more than "efficacious"  in what they produce. They really actually do, "something" to you. (Whether you "believe in them" or not) It is not simply a "placebo" effect. It is a reality.  

The performance of the "ritual" is all that is required. It is both the "mechanism" and the "permission slip", that conjures up the "spirit".  In the past, Missionaries (which virtually no longer exist) were full of stories about how these ritual objects and ritual ceremonies, worked in primitive cultures . (Even in regard to "Christians") who continued to do them, after they became "Christian".  And the "demonic effects" that would be "produced" by them.

These spiritual mechanics are just as true and real, in an American suburb, as they are in an Amazon rain-forest.  In fact, many American suburban occultists, make trips all the way to the Amazon rain-forest just "to learn". (And what do you think they are "learning" if it all "means nothing" and "does nothing"?) And besides, if it all "means nothing" and "does nothing", as you claim, why then... are you doing it?






While many of these "spirits" will often be generational "iterations" of the same "thread", like viral mutations, each classification has distinctive traits which highlight different negative effects on it's victims, when "manifested". These are, in the Biblical theology of Christ, the apostles and the prophets, known as "demons".

1 Corinthians 10:20 

But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.
Since these "spirits" are actually "Demons", it might be best for you, to consider if your "fellowship" with them, is wise.  There is a reason they were "forsaken" by "gentiles" of the past. They didn't "get rid" of them, because they were all so "wonderful". They turned away from them, precisely because they WERE NOT.

(the 12 "Shedim" & "Se'irim" of the "Roman solstice ritual" erroneously called a "Christ-Mass")



Revelation 9:11 

And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

Apollo is -- 1. the god who punishes and destroys (oulios) ...(Hom. Il. i. 42, xxiv.605, Od. xi. 318, xv. 410, &c.; comp. Pind. Pyth. iii. 15, &c.) Various epithets given to him in the Homeric poems, such as hekatos, hekaergos, hekêbolos, ekatêbolos, klutotoxos, and argurotoxos, refer to him as the god who with his darts hits his object at a distance and never misses it. All sudden deaths of men, whether they were regarded as a punishment or a reward, were believed to be the effect of the arrows of Apollo; <> The circumstance of Apollo being the destroyer …believed by some of the ancients to have given rise to his name Apollo, which they connected with apollumi, "to destroy."


As you have seen in the  VIDEO SERIES on Revelation, Part 11-20, “Apollyon” is clearly and without doubt, John’s reference to APOLLO. (Whose “birth” [as the sun] was commemorated on December 25th).  The very reason, many will not acknowledge the clarity of the reference. For in so doing, they also “clarify” who they are, in the narrative.

 Apollo is a Nephilim demon, as is explained in the section “THE CHRISTMAS GOSPEL" . It craves residence in human flesh. It is a solar-deity. And it is famously attributed with the activity of “deluding” people. Causing them to “trust” in lies, and reject true prophecy.   (literally known as "THE CASSANDRA EFFECT") The effect of this “spirit” is “delusion”. The inability to see obvious truths.
...To fantasize religious falsehoods and become delusional and detached from reality. This Christmas "spirit" brings delusion, sickness, pestilence and sudden unexpected “death”.(Precisely the kind of deaths that occur at annual highs, every single year, for no explainable reason, at “Christmas”)  SEE: THE CHRISTMAS MAGIC for "Statistics"
What most “deluded Christians” are manifesting at “Christmas”, through their “nativity rituals” associated with the “Sun”, is none-other than the “deity of the antichrist’. The “bringer” of “delusion” and “death”. (Rev.9:11, 2 Thessalonians 2)



While "Apollyon" functioned as "the Sun of God:, "Baal" functioned as "the Father". "Baal'" was "a fertility god", closely associated with "sex" and "reproduction" and "growth". ("Baal" was the "Prosperity gospel" for ancient "Canaanites")

Baal, god worshiped in many ancient Middle Eastern communities, especially among the Canaanites, who apparently considered him fertility deity and one of the most important gods in the pantheon. <> The worship of Baal was popular in Egypt from the later New Kingdom in about 1400 BCE to its end (1075 BCE). Through the influence of the Aramaeans, who borrowed the Babylonian pronunciation Bel, the god ultimately became known as the Greek Belos, identified with Zeus.<> Ugaritic texts tell of other fertility aspects of Baal, such as his relations with Anath, his consort and sister, and also his siring a divine bull calf from a heifer. All this was part of his fertility role, which, when fulfilled, meant an abundance of crops and fertility for animals and mankind.

Baʿal was usually said to be the son of Dagan, but appears as one of the sons of El in Ugaritic sources. Both Baʿal and El were associated with the bull in Ugaritic texts, as it symbolized both strength and fertility.The virgin goddess ʿAnat is his older sister and wife. She is sometimes mentioned bearing his child <> worship of Baʿal spread to Egypt by the Middle Kingdom and throughout the Mediterranean following the waves of Phoenician colonization in the early 1st millennium BCE.[22] He was described with diverse epithets and, before Ugarit was rediscovered, it was supposed that these referred to distinct local gods. However, as explained by Day, the texts at Ugarit revealed that they were considered "local manifestations of this particular deity, analogous to the local manifestations of the Virgin Mary in the Roman Catholic Church".

( Baal) worship was to place golden balls on the tree which were representative of the testicles ...he was also considered a god of sex.

-ALL ABOUT "CHRISTMAS, 2000 B.C.E. to 2007 C.E.
by Ed Stevens, James Trimm & Baruch Ben Daniel
The word's biblical sense as a Phoenician deity and false gods generally were extended during the Protestant Reformation to denote any idols, icons of the saints, or the Catholic Church generally.[11] In such contexts, it follows the anglicized pronunciation and usually omits any mark between its two As.[1] In close transliteration of the Semitic name, the ayin is represented, as Baʿal.


While this "spirit" may drive "sexuality", "reproduction" and "multiplication", (outside of God's will), it also produces "out-of-control" "sexuality" and the indiscriminate "growth" of living things, such as flesh-eating bacteria, viral infections, pandemics, insect infestations, unwanted pregnancies, tumor growth and cancer.

When Elijah confronted the "prophets of Baal", his altar was lit, as the result of a lightening strike, described in Biblical language as "fire from heaven". (Meaning "lightening from the sky")  In other words, "Baal" (the lightening god) lit Elijah's altar with "lightening"! (This "manifestation of opposites", is a constant theme in the Scriptures, concerning the worship of "shedim")  "Lightening" was "produced", but certainly not the way the "Prophets of Baal" had intended.

Because the "spirit of Baal" is a "fertility god", (a sex god) it will produce "out-of-control" sexual perversions and addictions.  (It is a "bestial" spirit) Biologically it will produce imbalances in the body's chemistry such as obesity, addictions, cancer, and infectious diseases. Environmentally, it will produce the "out-of-control" growth of fungus, bacteria, viruses, and insect infestations. Atmospherically, it will precipitate the occurrence of atmospheric disturbances and weather disasters. (Lightening and storms with destructive flooding, hail, snow and wind) 

And of course, the "Tree" you bring into your home to "conjure up" this "demon" has on average, 25,000 insects living in it, which include such nice "parasites" as lice, mites, ticks, fleas, and venomous insects such as spiders, and biting flies. (25,000 a tree)

The CDC on diseases from insect "bites"

"Bugs, including mosquitoes, ticks, fleas, and some flies, can spread diseases such as malariayellow fever, Zika, dengue, chikungunya, and Lyme, all of which have risk of severe and lasting consequences."

And even if you "treat" your "Christmas tree" with "pesticides", many of the common household pesticides can be "toxic" to humans as well. Some times "reactions" can be produced from the "pesticides", that are actually even MORE DANGEROUS than the "bugs", themselves! And pesticides sometimes used on the trees, during farming, are known and probable carcinogens.
Three chemicals used as pesticides – arsenic, ethylene oxide and lindane – are among agents rated as Group 1 carcinogens, or conclusive causes of cancer, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), as is the chemical 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), which may occur as a contaminant in certain pesticides. ... ethylene oxide is used in three pesticides licensed for use... Six specific pesticides - captafol, ethylene dibromide, glyphosate, malathion, diazinon and dichlorophenyltrichloroethane (DDT) - are classed as a probable cause of cancer (Group 2A).Seven pesticides: tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, metolachlor, pendimethalin, permethrin, trifluralin and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) have been classified as possible causes of cancer (Group 2B). The use of household pesticides, such as insecticides, can expose people to pesticide residues in the home. Meta-analyses (i.e. analyses of multiple international studies) have shown an association between women exposed to insecticides in pregnancy and an increased risk of leukaemia in their children. 


In Jeremiah's time, Baal worship, was also cursed with earthquakes as well, during the months around and following, the Passover. (in "sun-worship" ecclesiastical systems, called "Easter") It is the "fore-runner" of the antichrist "spirit" in the Old Testament.

"Christmas-Christians" (including many "Christmas Pastors") who struggle with "sexual addictions" such as "pornography", are not aware that they are  ritualistically "manifesting" this "spirit" in their lives every year, at "Christmas"
(in their "Baal worship")

"Christian Pastors" are 7% more likely than the general population, and "Christian males" are 25% more likely, than the general population to view "porn".  That "trend" is no accident.  "Christmas Christians" are literally "manifesting" the "spirit" of Baal (within themselves) and permeating that "spirit" in the rest of society, wherever their "influence" and religious "custom" is felt.

Unfortunately, these "Christmas Christians" are also not "aware" that (1) they are not 'truly' "saved" (because in reality they have "exchanged" the Biblical "Christ" for "Apollyon" [Rev.9:11]) and (2) they're "real addiction" is that they are "addicted" to "Baal worship", and the "pornography addiction" they are now suffering, is just the current "symptom". "Fixing a symptom" will not "cure the root problem", certainly if "spirits" are a "real phenomena".

Even if you "go to counseling" and "take pills" to suppress the "symptom", the "spiritual sickness" which caused it, will remain and continue to spiritually "manifest", in other ways.  The "spirit of Baal" worship, will not leave, until you "repent" and "stop doing it".  Until then, there will not be the kind of "self-control", or "balance", you would expect  from "God's Spirit", because it is NOT "God's Spirit" that is being "manifested". Instead you are "manifesting" a "Christmas spirit". (The "spirit" of "Baal")

In short, this is not a "spirit" any "sane Christian" would want to have around their house, by "informed consent". And... worst of all, the "spirit of Baal", demanded the "sacrifice of children".

Parents with this "spirit", will find all kinds of "reasons", to "sacrifice their children". This is the "spirit" of "Baal", produced in "Christmas ritual" every year, through "the tree".  "The Tree" is a very important part of Baal worship, because he was a "fertility god" and "The Tree" is a "fertility symbol". Historically, "Baal worship" centered on "sacred groves" and his consort, Asherah, (the virgin goddess) was venerated by using a "sacred nativity tree" on the "solstice". Baal worship, centered around "The Tree".

"Baal" as the "horned god" depicted in the Bull, became the demonic poster child for visualizing "Satan". (Pictured with the horns of the Bull [of Baal]  on his head). Technically however, the Bull, was actually Baal's son, not Baal himself. But the associated symbolism was inseparable.

"Baal worship" is "alive & well" today, and practiced "ritualistically" every December 25th, as America's "Christian" "Suburban housewives" faithfully adorn Baal's symbolic tree penis, with magic Bull testicles, to "manifest" fertility, all outside the will of God. (While their "Christian" husbands" [with their "out-of-control" sex drives], are somewhere else in the house, watching their porn) 

Make sure and "get your tree up", in time for "Christmas! (the "spirit" of Baal needs it!) Yes, yes, ...and of course, ...they're "doing all this "conjuring up" of the "spirit" of "Baal", for Christ"! The one born on December 25th, that is. Whose real name, is "Apollyon".

If you are a "Christian" wife, and you want a "faithful husband" whose "sex drive" is not "out-of-control", the first thing you should do is, STOP manifesting the "demonic spirit" that produces it. Get rid of your "Baal Worship" and "repent" before the Lord. Your entire "home", will "change" as a result. (Until then, do not surprised by what "this spirit" produces, in your "home")

Num_22:41; Jdg_2:13; Jdg_6:25; Jdg_6:28; Jdg_6:30; Jdg_6:31; Jdg_6:32; 1Ki_16:31; 1Ki_16:32; 1Ki_18:19; 1Ki_18:21; 1Ki_18:22; 1Ki_18:25; 1Ki_18:26; 1Ki_18:40; 1Ki_19:18; 1Ki_22:53; 2Ki_3:2; 2Ki_10:18; 2Ki_10:19; 2Ki_10:20; 2Ki_10:21; 2Ki_10:22; 2Ki_10:23; 2Ki_10:25; 2Ki_10:26; 2Ki_10:27; 2Ki_10:28; 2Ki_11:18; 2Ki_17:16; 2Ki_21:3; 2Ki_23:4; 2Ki_23:5; 1Ch_4:33; 1Ch_5:5; 1Ch_8:30; 1Ch_9:36; 2Ch_23:17; Jer_2:8; Jer_7:9; Jer_11:13; Jer_11:17; Jer_12:16; Jer_19:5; Jer_23:13; Jer_23:27; Jer_32:29; Jer_32:35; Hos_2:8; Hos_13:1; Zep_1:4; Rom_11:4. (64 References)

Exo_34:13; Deu_7:5; Deu_12:3; Jdg_3:7; 1Ki_14:15; 1Ki_14:23; 1Ki_18:19; 2Ki_17:10; 2Ki_18:4;2Ki_23:14; 2Ch_14:3; 2Ch_17:6; 2Ch_19:3; 2Ch_24:18; 2Ch_31:1; 2Ch_33:3; 2Ch_33:19;2Ch_34:3; 2Ch_34:4; 2Ch_34:7; Isa_17:8; Isa_27:9; Jer_17:2;Mic_5:14.Gen_21:33; Deu_16:21;Jdg_6:25; Jdg_6:26; Jdg_6:28; Jdg_6:30; 1Ki_15:13; 1Ki_16:33; 2Ki_13:6; 2Ki_17:16;2Ki_21:3; 2Ki_21:7; 2Ki_23:4; 2Ki_23:6; 2Ki_23:7; 2Ki_23:15; 2Ch_15:16. (41 References)


Isa 14:8  Yea, the fir trees rejoice at thee, and the cedars of Lebanon, saying, Since thou art laid down, no feller is come up against us.

Isa 14:11  Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.

Isa 14:12  How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

Isa 14:13  For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

Isa 14:14  I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

Isa 14:15  Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.


The one thing that both the Masons and Roman Catholicism (secretly) "agree on" is that "Lucifer" is God. They have 2 different roads to get there, but that is where they both end up. So it is no accident, that "Christmas" which was "sponsored" by both of them together, and what led to their alliance in the English counter-reformation against the Puritans, has incorporated much of it's ritual, for the purpose of "conjuring up" the "Spirit of Lucifer".

While "Luciferians" practice the snobbery of personal superiority, the truth is, "Luciferianism" in both the Masons and the Vatican (is literally traced back to ancient "Babylon" [by their own sources]).  Thus the prophetic reference in John's writing to this "movement" and "institution" as "Mystery Babylon" (Rev.17:5).  While it was a constant warning by subsequent "Protestant reformers", the connection to the "spirituality" of ancient "Babylon" was not "invented" by the reformers. That "connection" had already been established by both of these "orders", themselves, in their own sources.

"Protestant reformers" simply warned, "Mystery Babylon" was therefore, what it was. (And what it "worshiped" was "not Christ". Any investigation into "Christmas" will reveal this "ugly fact". The problem comes, when genuine "Christian" families are "destroyed" as a result of the "occultism" in their "pseudo-Christian" Christmas ritual. (Which, in reality is focused on "Lucifer", rather than the New Testament "Christ")

In all three cases in the Scripture (1) Genesis 11, (2) Isaiah 14, (3) Revelation 17-19, the prophets of God warn, this "spirit" manifests the exact "opposite" of what it seeks and desires.  That is the "curse of God". It creates the "manifestation of opposites". The "mechanism" for why and how this occurs, is actually very logical.

If you "exchange" the "truth" about "God", for a "lie", you "break your spiritual compass". South becomes north, and north becomes south. (You create "an opposite") So when "spiritual" or "occult" techniques are employed, to create a "manifestation", what you GET, is an "opposite manifested", because that is your "definition" of God. Very simple. (And very logical) But the consequences, are very tragic.

In Genesis 11, they built a tower, "lest they be scattered". When "God" manifested, it "scattered them". In Isaiah 14 (written to the "king of Babylon"), he (like Lucifer) wanted his throne "exalted above the stars of God", but when God is "manifested", "Lucifer" (and the king), were brought down to the ground. In Revelation 17 & 18, it wants to be "recognized" as "the bride" and is "no widow". Yet when God is manifested, it's "destruction" comes in one day, and it is "burned", and the "smoke of it's torment ascends forever". In all three cases, what is "manifested" is the exact and precise "opposite" of what it desired, and what it claimed for itself. Because the very "definition of God" had been "changed" into it's "opposite". Thus, that is what it "manifests", the "opposite", when there is a "manifestation" of it.

 The way "Lucifer" is "manifested" through "Christmas ritual", is the two step ritual of "erection" of the "Tree of knowledge" (Gen.3, Isaiah 14:8), and then the "encircling" of the tree with a "Serpentine" representation (Genesis 3:2).  Since to "Luciferians", "Lucifer is LIGHT", the "encircling of the Tree", consists of actual LIGHTS.  They are usually called "Christmas tree lights". (i.e., Lucifer, the "light-bringer"). Recently, retailers have even picked up the name "Snake string lights" for this "merchandise".

And then the "Star" is placed at the top of the tree, in the symbolic "fulfillment" of Isaiah 14:13. (I will "exalt my throne above the stars of God"). You don't "have" to know that is what you are actually doing, for it to work. That is how most occultism is done. (It doesn't work through "informed consent"). It works these "rituals" in the absence of "informed consent", because obviously, very few "Christians" would be "stupid enough" to go along, and actually do them, if they were "informed" about what they were doing, first.

What does "manifesting" the "Spirit of Lucifer" do to people?

It has a "profoundly" negative effect on the "psyche" of people.  Because it involves the "definition of God" itself, it renders the "infected person" with a "reprobate mind".(A sort of "spiritual insanity")

The "spiritual compass" gets "broken". Good is evil, evil is good, lies are truth, truth are lies, up is down, down is up, etc., in every aspect of their life, this "opposite" is "manifested".

So naturally, the affected person, is also eternally damned, unless there is "repentance". It's pretty much a worst case scenario, "spiritually". Romans 1:18-32 describes the consequences of this "spirit". You should probably read it yourself. It's not very pretty, as nothing is left "off the list".

"Luciferianism" is how you get the very odd public spectacle, of "robe-wearing" klansmen and Neo-nazis, calling themselves "Christians" and "patriotic Americans", marching around publicly in the streets, calling for the "overthrow of the government" and it's replacement with "Nazis", and the defamation, persecution and killing of "Christians" and "pastors". (And they cannot even see the irony) 

"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire

Albert Pike's "Luciferianism", was spread throughout the south in the form of Jesuit "Valladolid Catholicism", which taught essentially the same doctrines, and were incorporated into "Klan" theology in the south.

The "Christ" of these groups, is the Roman "Apollyon" (the sun-god of the Roman empire). Not the "Christ" of the New Testament. It is "Luciferianism". They claim they want "a Christian country", but what they are "manifesting" is exactly and precisely the "opposite" of that.  That is what "Luciferianism" does to people.

Because "Luciferianism's" "spirituality, is basically "witchcraft", it also draws people into intentional "witchcraft" in amazing numbers. In fact, as "Luciferian" Christianity has ascended in America, self-identified "witches" have become more common, than "Presbyterians".  - SEE "The Christmas Magic" for details



Have you ever talked to someone about a completely calamitous situation that would potentially destroy a project, a business, an organization, or even put at risk life and limb, just over the horizon in time, and the person "in charge" just looks at you (with a blank stare in their eyes) as if they "couldn't care less" unless it affected them personally? Well, if you have, just met the "Christmas spirit" named "Kronos".

“Kronos” (Also spelled “Cronus”) and “Saturn” (as in the “Saturnalia”) are the Greek and Roman version of the same “demonic spirit”. “Kronos” being the Greek name, and “Saturn” being the Roman name. “Kronos” however, is also the Greek word for “Time”, from where we get the English word “Chrono-logical”.

“Father time” often displayed in New Years celebrations, is actually the Greek god (demonic spirit) “Kronos”. “New year’s” and “Christmas” are connected rituals, that is why they are held back to back. Most do not “take down their tree” until after “New Year’s”, and that is why. “Christmas” is the beginning of the ritual, “New Year’s” is the end of the ritual. It Is the same ritual.

 “Kronos” (a/k/a Saturn) is also a “fertility/prosperity” demon, that is why everyone is wishing themselves a “prosperous New Year”.  You could extend that “wish” on any day of the year, but it is part of the “ritual” of “New Year”. Cornucopias are ritualistically displayed around “New Year” as that was a “symbol” of the god “Kronos/Saturn”. (Also called “the horn of plenty”).

Unfortunately, the way this demon operates, is by stealing it’s “plenty”, from its children.
In Greek mythology, Saturn/Kronos gave birth to 3 children.  One of which was Zeus. (Or Ba’al, mentioned above). Ba’al gave birth to the Bull (thus the bull symbolism). The “Bull” was actually the symbol of the “Son of Ba’al”, cognate to the Greco/Roman “Apollo”. The interesting thing about the “spirit” of this demon, is that it “devours” it’s children, in order to “stay in power”. Thus the term “Crony”, from “Kronos”.  This is the demonic “spirit” that inspires, animates and drives an actual “complex” named after this demon.

As you will see (or have seen) in theVideo Series on Revelation, as with all of these "Christmas spirits", there is a "divine judgement" spoken against this "spirit" as well, in the Scriptures. God's judgement against this "spirit" is recorded in Revelation chapter 10, but the text got "lost in translation". The entire text of Revelation chapter 10 is a "contrast" against "Kronos", the same way chapter 9 was a "contrast" against Apollo.

The "judgement" against this "spirit" is cataclysmic disaster. In the prophecy in Revelation, it was the coming of the "Grote Mandrenke".(The largest flood in European history) It killed tens of thousands of people. God has a very clear disdain for those who choose to align themselves with this particular "Christmas spirit". Because it is a "murderous" spirit. It will not only "cost lives", but it will cost "eternities" as well.

The symptomatic “manifestation” of this demon, is called “Cronyism”. “Cronyism” “devours” the future of the next generation, leaving them with nothing. This is one of the central “spirits” of “Christmas”. And one of the most “demonic” in nature. It is the basic idea behind the inappropriate use of “Credit”, which is used frequently and compulsively in servitude to the spirit of “Mammon”, another “Christmas spirit”, we will get to below.

As “Kronos” is successfully “manifested”, the future for your children will grow bleaker and bleaker, because while it will “give you short-term prosperity”, it will do so, by destroying theirs. Some people refer to this “effect” in business and government as “making a deal with the devil”. In other words, you get what you want, at the expense, of something much more important and ultimately valuable. It is a “toxic” and “destructive” spirit. It will eventually “consume” even its benefactor, much the same way a parasite will destroy a host organism.

And this spiritual "principality" will operate the same way, in individuals, organizations, businesses, cities, or even nations.  The "manifestation" of this "spirit" always carries with it the same behavior, wherever it functions, in and through people.

A consistent thread you will find among "Christmas spirits" is that they "devour the children" or want "children to be sacrificed to them". All the "pretense" about "Christmas" being "focused on Children" is true. It is. Primarily because it wants to "devour them", or "molest them", or have them "sacrificed". (There is a reason the Scriptures calls these "spirits" demons) And it is not because they are so "nice".

 This “Christmas spirit” has completely eaten up Christianity in America. That is why it no longer has a “future”. It’s been completely “destroyed” by this demon, that Christian leaders have given themselves over to. They are completely eaten up with it, and they have “destroyed” the future for generations to come. Not to mention, genuine “salvation”.  (And they do not care in the least, this is the case) Because of the “Christmas spirit” (a/k/a demon) Kronos.


#5. THE "SPIRIT" OF "ASHERAH" addition to Astarte, she often took on attributes of Anat and Ishtar-Inanna as well. <> When not implying a goddess, the terms asherah/asherim in the Bible refer to cultic objects which were wooden poles, images, or trees associated with pagan worship and were supposed to have been destroyed by the Israelites. The verbs connected with asherah/asherim in the Bible are words often associated with wood, such as “fell”, “smash”, and “burn by fire.” It is possible that the asherim were originally living trees from which the wooden pole developed as a symbol of asherah to be placed beside an altar. In extra-biblical contexts as well, the goddess Asherah was often represented as a stylized tree.

Asherah, along with Astarte and Anath, was one of the three great goddesses of the Canaanite pantheon. In Canaanite religion her primary role was that of mother goddess. <> ...the goddess is called “lady of the serpent” in second-millennium b.c.e. inscriptions from the Sinai; the late-thirteenth-century b.c.e. Lachish ewer dedicated to Asherah is decorated with images of sacred trees.<> The Canaanite association of Asherah with sacred trees is also found in Israelite tradition. For example, one of the Canaanite epithets of Asherah, elat, “goddess,” is etymologically identical to the Hebrew word for the terebinth tree (ela). Another word for “terebinth” (alla) and two words for “oak” (elon and allon) are also closely related. Gen 2:4b–3:24 may further suggest the association of Asherah with sacred trees, ...Most significant, though, in demonstrating Israel’s association of Asherah with sacred trees are biblical materials that describe the asherah (singular) or asherim (plural), the cult object(s) that are associated with the goddess Asherah more than thirty times in the Hebrew Bible. These cult objects are generally described as being in the shape of a pole or stylized tree. Like a pole or tree, they can be said to be planted, stood up, or erected. Conversely, when destroyed, these cult symbols can be described as being cut down, hewn down, or uprooted; they can also be said to be burned, overturned, or broken. Both the Greek and Latin translations of the Bible, moreover, render the words asherah and asherim as “grove” or “wood.”



..often took on the attributes of Ishtar-Inanna

"...she is shown cupping her breasts. ...this is the universal gesture of a Babylonian prostitute.  ..she is not just an ordinary prostitute, she is a “temple prostitute”."


ISHTAR-INNANA - Inanna[a] is an ancient Mesopotamian goddess associated with love, beauty, sex, war, justice and political power. She was originally worshiped in Sumer under the name "Inanna", and was later worshipped by the Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians under the name Ishtar.[b] She was known as the "Queen of Heaven" and was the patron goddess of the Eanna temple at the city of Uruk, which was her main cult center. She was associated with the planet Venus and her most prominent symbols included the lion and the eight-pointed star. Her husband was the god Dumuzid (later known as Tammuz) and her sukkal, or personal attendant, was the goddess Ninshubur (who later became the male deity Papsukkal). Inanna was worshiped in Sumer at least as early as the Uruk period (c. 4000 BC – c. 3100 BC), but she had little cult before the conquest of Sargon of Akkad. During the post-Sargonic era, she became one of the most widely venerated deities in the Sumerian pantheon,[8][9] with temples across Mesopotamia. The cult of Inanna/Ishtar, which may have been associated with a variety of sexual rites, was continued by the East Semitic-speaking people (Akkadians, Assyrians and Babylonians) who succeeded and absorbed the Sumerians in the region. She was especially beloved by the Assyrians, who elevated her to become the highest deity in their pantheon, ranking above their own national god Ashur. Inanna/Ishtar is alluded to in the Hebrew Bible and she greatly influenced the Phoenician goddess Astoreth, (Ashera) who later influenced the development of the Greek goddess Aphrodite. Her cult continued to flourish until its gradual decline between the first and sixth centuries AD in the wake of Christianity, though it survived in parts of Upper Mesopotamia among Assyrian communities as late as the eighteenth century...



Greek historian, Herodotus, (ca.484-425 BC), THE HISTORIES

“Every woman born in the country must once in her life go and sit down in the precinct of Venus [Inanna, also known as Ishtar], and there consort with a stranger…. A woman who has once taken her seat is not allowed to return home till one of the strangers throws a silver coin into her lap, and takes her with him beyond the holy ground…. The silver coin maybe of any size…. The woman goes with the first man who throws her money, and rejects no one. When she has gone with him, and so satisfied the goddess, she returns home, and from that time forth no gift however great will prevail with her. Such of the women....who are ugly have to stay a long time before they can fulfill the law. Some have waited three or four years in the precinct.”
The implausibility of the story has prompted some modern scholars to doubt the existence of temple prostitutes. However, although it didn't involve all Babylonian women, there is ample evidence in Babylonian art and literature that confirms the practice of sacred prostitution... There is plenty of archaeological evidence as well.

Revelation 17:5, 18:4-8

And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. <> And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

Through numerous archeological discoveries, modern researchers have connected the above text to the "Harlot of Inanna", who was as the text suggests, the "Mother" of "Babylon's Temple Prostitutes". (The "mother" of all "whores")

But there were several "iterations" of this deity in the middle-east, as it's worship had been spread throughout the middle-eastern world and had been incorporated into localized pantheons under various names. Canaan was the region, which later became the Biblical lands of Jerusalem, Judea and Israel., nominally referred to as Biblical "Israel".

And the original inhabitants which were still present, continued to worship the "Harlot of Inanna" in the form of Asherah and Baal.  Among the Amorites, Asherah was said to be the "wife of El" or "Yahweh". Thus the reference to the claim "I sit a queen and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow".

This "spirit" claimed to have been "married" to "Yahweh" (and thus the conflicts with the Hebrew Prophets in the Old Testament).

In a struggle of civilizations, the Amorites attempted to attack and wipe out the Hebrews. The Hebrews retaliated under the leadership of Joshua (archtype of Christ in the Old Testament), and in a single day, uterally destroyed (wiped out) the Amorites.

The "claim" that Asherah was married to Yahweh, and that the Amorite (and their "Queen of heaven" [the "Lady of the Serpent"]) was the "true worshiper" of Yahweh, was "wiped out". Yahweh did not "favor", nor even "spare", the Amorite.




As noted above, "Asherah" (the "Lady of the Serpent"), assimilated attributes of Babylon's "Ishtar-Inanna"., who was the "Mother" of Babylon's "Temple Prostitutes". But simultaneously, "Asherah" also took on the attributes of "Anat".

Most readers will pass over that dual reference as unremarkable. But it is an amazing "synthesis" for a number of reasons. The most striking of which, is that while "Ishtar-Inanna" was the goddess of "Prostitution", "Anat" (on the other hand) was actually referred to in "ancient texts" as "the virgin". So in "Ashera" and the "tree veneration" of  her "Asherim", there was a "synthesis" of the "whore" and the "virgin".


Anath, also spelled Anat, chief West Semitic goddess of love and war, the sister and helpmate of the god Baal.Considered a beautiful young girl, she was often designated “the Virgin” in ancient texts. Probably one of the best-known of the Canaanite deities, she was famous for her youthful vigour and ferocity in battle; in that respect she was adopted as a special favourite by the Egyptian king Ramses II (reigned 1279–13 BC). Although Anath was often associated with the god Resheph in ritual texts, she was primarily known for her role in the myth of Baal’s death and resurrection, in which she mourned and searched for him and finally helped to retrieve him from the netherworld. Egyptian representations of Anath show a nude goddess, often standing on a lion and holding flowers. During the Hellenistic Age, the goddesses Anath and Astarte were blended into one deity...






But John's reference to this history of conflict, was not simply focused on the final outcome, which favored Israel. It also invoked the practices associated with this "spirit", of temple prostitution. Selling that which was saced "for money" accompanied by an arrogant self-righteous attitude, over what should have been considered completely shameful. (And would eventually come under the "judgement of God")

This "ancient spirit" is "conjured up "every "Christmas" in the rituals of "tree veneration" (Asherim) during the solstice. Literally, being the direct "reincarnation" of the Asherim, with the same "mother/child" motiff, the very same "idols placed under the tree", and the very same "solstice" practice of the "nativity" of the "Queen of Heaven's" infant child".

In other sections of this website, the theological "reasoning" for that intentional duplication is examined historically. But here, we are focused on what "spirit" these "rituals" are intended to "manifest". And the exact duplication of these rituals are historically connected, to the "Harlot of Inanna" (Babylonian) and the "Asherah" (Canaanite), being one and the same. The "Harlot of Inanna" being John's direct reference in Revelation 16-19. (Three chapters)

Thus, this "Christmas spirit", is none other than "the Whore of Babylon" literally, historically. Also known as "The Whore" and the "Holy One", which most "Christians" have mistaken for "Mary", the mother of "Christ". (Who is actually "Ashera" the wife of "Baal", mother of "the 70")

So when the "spirit" of the "Whore of Babylon" is "conjured up" every year at the "solstice", what is going to be "manifested" phenomenologically, in our selves, our families,  our churches, our cities, our nation.. when it happens?

1.  Political/legal "corruption" [Rev.17:2]
2.  Blasphemy [Rev.17:3]
3.  Abominations [Rev.17:4]
4.  Persecution of Christians [Rev.17:6]
5.  Hostility against Christ [17:14]
6.  Rise of violence [17:17]
7.  Manifestation of "flocks of demons" [18:2]
8.  Political, religious & spiritual "prostitution" [18:3]
9.  Sudden, natural disasters/catastrophes [18:8]
9.  Endemic & pandemic disease [18:8]
10. Deaths [18:8]
11. Fire [18:8,18]
12. Famine (crop destruction/economic disruption) [18:8]
13. God's Judgement [19:2]

This “spirit” is the very “spirit” of “idolatry” (idol worship). It is the “prostitution of spirituality for money”. It is the “spirit” which “sells God” for a commercial profit, and thus is the source of “corruption” of everything else in a society.

It not only causes “hostility” against what is truly “God”, and anyone who is associated with that, it leads to “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit” (a spiritual crime that is offered no redemption in the Scriptures [Mt.12:31]) save repentance.

This “spirit” leads not only to the ruin of society, but to the eternal damnation of a person’s individual soul, as well. When it is “institutionalized” as part of a State-church” system, and “enforced by compulsion”, it spreads it’s damnation across an entire nation. It is the most tragic “spirit” of all the “Christmas spirits”.

This is certainly not a "spirit" you want to be ritualistically manifesting in your home, with your "children". Unless of course, you have a very strange "hatred" for your "children".


#6. THE "SPIRIT" OF "BEELZEBUB" (And Belial)

Name of a demon mentioned in the New Testament as chief of the demons (Matt. xii. 24-27; Mark iii. 22; Luke xi. 15-18). The name "Beelzebub," written also "Beelzebul," which occurs nowhere else in Jewish literature, is a variant form of "Baal Zebub," the god of Eḳron, whose oracle King Ahaziah consulted during his illness, provoking thereby the wrath of God (II Kings i. 2-16); the name is commonly explained after the Septuagint and Josephus, "Ant." ix. 2, § 1, as the "Lord of Flies" (see Baal-zebub). Plagues being often ascribed to the influence of flies (Ex. xxiii. 28; Eccl. x. 1; Pliny, "Historia Naturalis," x. 28, 75; Pausanias," Description of Greece," v. 14, 1; Aelian, "Natura Animalium," v. 17, xi. 8; Usener, "Götternamen," p. 260), the god who dispelled flies (Apollo Apomyios) probably retained his popularity long after he had ceased to be an object of worship. In fact, the fly was regarded by the Jews in particular as more or less impure and demonic. "The evil spirit ["yeẓer ha-ra'"] lies like a fly at the doors of the human heart," says Rab, with reference to "the flies of death" in Eccl. x. 1 (Ber. 61a and Targ. Yer. to the passage). "A fly, being an impure thing, was never seen in the slaughterhouse of the Temple" (Abot v. 8), nor did one cross the table of Elisha; which fact, according to Rab, gave proof to the Shunammite woman that he was "a holy man" (II Kings iv. 9; Ber. 10b). The devil in German folk-lore also appears in the shape of a fly (Simrock, "Deutsche Mythologie," 1874, pp. 95, 479). Geiger ("Urschrift," p. 53) thinks that Baal Zebub, in his capacity as god of the hated Philistines, became the representative of the heathen power and consequently the arch-enemy, the foe par excellence, and therefore the name "Baal debaba" ("debaba" being the Aramaic form corresponding to Hebrew "Zebub") acquired the meaning of "hostility," the verb  with the sense of "hostile action" being derived from it. But neither this opinion nor a similar one expressed by Döderlein and Storr, and revived in Riehm's "Realwörterbuch," seems acceptable, as "Beel debaba" is the ordinary Aramean word for "calumniator." (Brockelmann, "Lex Syriæ.") What renders the name still more problematic is the form "Beelzebul," which the older manuscripts present, and which has given rise to a number of other conjectures, among them the following: (1)It has been suggested that the appellations Beelzebub and Baal Zebub are corrupt forms of what was originally "Baal Zebul" (Baal of the heavenly mansion, , Movers, in "Journal Asiatique," 1878, pp. 220-225), and afterward "Baal of the nether world." (2) The word "Zebul" (from "zebel," dung) is a cacophonic corruption of "Zebub," in order to give the name the meaning of "god of the dung." It is more likely that the name "Beelzebul" is a dialectic variation of "Beelzebub," as "Beliar" is of "Belial"; Jerome read and translated the name as "dominus muscarum" (lord of flies).


In the Testament of Solomon, chapter 6, Beelzebul appears as prince of the demons and says that he was formerly a leading heavenly angel who was associated with the star Hesperus, the Greek name for the planet Venus (Αφροδíτη) as evening star. This correlates with the traditional interpretation of Lucifer as the "morning star." Seemingly Beelzebul here is either identical with Satan/Lucifer or is his counterpart. Beelzebul claims to cause destruction through tyrants, to inspire men to worship demons, to excite priests to lust, to cause jealousy and murders, and to bring on war. Texts of the Acts of Pilate (also known as the Gospel of Nicodemus) vary as to whether they use Beelzebul or Beelzebub. Here term comes into use after Jesus has "laid hold on Satan the prince and delivered him unto the power of Hell." The name Beelzebul is then used by Hades—the lord or personification of Hell but not the devil himself—as a secondary name for Satan.


In theological sources, predominantly Christian, Beelzebub is another name for Satan. He is known in demonology as one of the seven princes of Hell. The Dictionnaire Infernal describes Beelzebub as a being capable of flying, known as the "Lord of the Flyers", or the "Lord of the Flies".


Beelzebub also was among the Demons blamed for Demonic Possession cases, among them NICOLE OBRY in Laon, France, in 1566, and the bewitchment of nuns in the Loudun Possessions and AIX-EN-PROVENCE Possession in France in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, leading to the executions of his accused lieutenants, Fathers Louis Gaufridi and Urbain Grandier.   One of the Demon’s most notorious acts was the EARLING Possession, in the early 20th century in Earling, Iowa. Beelzebub entered young Anna Ecklund at the behest of her father, Jacob, in retaliation for not engaging in incestuous sex with him. The Demon left on December 23, 1928, in a terrible roar of “Beelzebub, Judas, Jacob, Mina [Anna’s aunt and Jacob’s mistress]” followed by “Hell, hell, hell” and a terrible stench. Beelzebub rules gluttony, the fifth of the Seven Deadly Sins.-


This “spirit” referred to in the label of “Beelzebub”, is actually a two-fold reference, because the reference overlaps with another “spirit” identified as “Belial”. While there are differences in what each of these labels emphasize, the reference each is making is actually to the same “spirit”, therefore the use of the name “Beelzebub” to refer to both, including the second reference, “Belial”, also, under the same name. The two “aspects” are “different”, yet they are actually related, much the same way, two sides of the same coin, both refer to the same “coin”. In manifesting this “Christmas spirit”, both aspects, “Beelzebub” and “Belial”, are being manifested through the Christmas ritual. First we will examine the identities and definitions of what “spirit” these names referred to, how it is “manifested” through Christmas ritual, and what it “produces” as a “spiritual” phenomenon.

“Belial” and “Beelzebub” are two words in the Bible, that actually, in themselves, while having a “meaning” in the dictionary sense of the term, don’t really mean anything. They are “made-up” words. Their “meaning” was to serve as a derogatory reference to something else.

“Beelzebub” was an intentional corruption of the name “Baal Zebul”, which meant “god of the (House, Temple, Palace, Mansion)”. It was “changed” to Baal-zebel, “god of the dung”, then to “Baal-zebub”, god of the “flies”, as a derogatory reference. Thus, it didn’t really mean anything. It meant to insult something else. But after the name “Beelzebub” was coined, it took on a “life of it’s own”. Instead of “god of the flies”, it came to be thought of as, as the “god of the flyers, or “flying ones”. In recognition of the fact, that the “Baal” gods, for the most part, had “wings”. This was in contrast to the Hebrew God, who neither as a deity was pictured with “wings”, nor were his “messengers” (or, i.e., Angels). So “Lord of the flies” (or i.e., “flyers”), stuck.

The same development took place with the New Testament name “Belial”. It means “worthless”. It is used 16 times in the Old Testament. [KJV - Deu_13:13; Jdg_19:22; Jdg_20:13; 1Sa_1:16; 1Sa_2:12; 1Sa_10:27; 1Sa_25:17; 1Sa_25:25; 1Sa_30:22; 2Sa_16:7; 2Sa_20:1; 2Sa_23:6; 1Ki_21:10; 1Ki_21:13; 2Ch_13:7; 2Co_6:15.]

And one (1) time in the New Testament, [2Co_6:15] 

2Co 6:15-18

And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. 

So the Old Testament use of the term “Beelzebub” (god of the flies/flyers) and the New Testament use of the term “Belial” (Christian’s in idolatry) actually have something in common. They are both referencing the two sides of the SAME COIN.  Why is that?

Because "Belial" was actually once again, a derogatory reference, to a pagan polytheistic deity. Originally, the term “Belial” referred to a pagan Babylonian goddess by the name of “Beltis” or “Baalti”. If you trace the name back, you will find out the thread will run right back to “Ishtar-inanna” and from there to “Astarte”, “Ashteroth” and yes, “Asherah”.


"Manifesting" the "spirits" of "Beelzebub" and "Belial"

So how are the "spirits" of "Beelzebub" and "Belial" conjured up through "Christmas ritual"? And what happens when they are "manifested"?

There are 3 elements used to "conjured up" Beelzebub and Belial. (1) The first is the use of "Baalti" placed both on the tree and throughout the environment, both in "offices", "public facitities" and in "homes". These are statuary that serve the same funciton as ancient idolatry. (They are in fact, ritual objects) designed to "manifest" a "spirit".

(2) The second part of the ritual designed to "conjure up" Beelzebub, is the "feast", itself. Just as you saw above in Dicken's "Christmas Carol", the "spirit of Christmas present" was busy actually "gluttonizing" the entire time, as he was talking to Scrooge. In the movie, with his mouth also chewing the entire time.  He speaks in between his bites and chews only. Obviously, the "gluttony" scene was fully intentional.

(3) The third part of the ritual, is placing the "idols under the tree" as referenced in Isaiah 57:5.  This ritual is direclty related to "manifesting" the "spirit" of "Belial".

What are the "effects" of "manifesting" this Christmas "spirit"? If you manifest this demon in your home, with your "family" and "children",

(1) (Beelzebub) Because this "spirit" affects the control of "appetites" in the "hypo-thalamus" (the bride's chamber), the normal ability to regulate these "appetites" is physically "disrupted" in the body. Compulsive "eating", alcohol abuse, inordinate sexual appetites and addictions, sleeping rhythms can all be affected. "Insatiable" unsatisfied hunger can also be created, which can lead to serious eating "disorders", such as bulimia or morbid "obesity", as well. (Santa-Clause iconography actually displays the effect of the "spirit" of "Beelzebub" in it's very illustration of "morbid obesity" [i.e., "Santa" [the glutton] is always shown as "very fat", as in the "Christmas Carol" scene above])

(2) (Belial) "Belial" means "worthlessness". When this "spirit" is "manifested" (as a result of "idolatry") in the consciousness of a person, they are "plagued" with "episodes" of, or a chronic sense of, "worthlessness". That feeling of "worthlessness" can produce "depression" and in some extreme cases, suicidal thoughts and actions (even when no such "thoughts" or "actions" are "logical") or situationally induced.  The chronic feeling of "worthlessness" (Belial), can also cause a person to be "driven" by their subconscious mind to engage in risky "self-destructive" actions and "self-sabotage", ruining their educations, careers, marriages and thus, their futures.

Because the "phenomenology" of these "spirits" ARE real, the effects of these "spirits" actually do show up in real statistical data. See THE MAGIC OF CHRISTMAS

As you can now see, this is not a "spirit" you want anywhere near your "Children", if you "love them".



The Yule goat's origins go back to ancient Pagan festivals. While a popular theory is that the celebration of the goat is connected to worship of the Norse god Thor, who rode the sky in a chariot drawn by two goats, Tanngrisnir and Tanngnjóstr, it goes back to common Indo-European beliefs. The last sheaf of grain bundled in the harvest was credited with magical properties as the spirit of the harvest and saved for the Yule celebrations, called among other things Yule goat (Julbocken).[2] This connects to ancient proto-Slavic beliefs where the Koliada (Yule) festival honors the god of the fertile sun and the harvest. This god, Devac (also known as Dazbog or Dažbog), was represented by a white goat,[3] consequently the Koliada festivals always had a person dressed as a goat, often demanding offerings in the form of presents.[4] A man-sized goat figure is known from 11th-century remembrances of Childermas, where it was led by a man dressed as Saint Nicholas, symbolizing his control over the Devil.[2] Other traditions are possibly related to the sheaf of corn called the Yule goat. In Sweden, people regarded the Yule goat as an invisible spirit that would appear some time before Christmas to make sure that the Yule preparations were done right.[2] Objects made out of straw or roughly-hewn wood could also be called the Yule goat,... <> During the 19th century the Yule goat's role all over Scandinavia shifted towards becoming the giver of Christmas gifts, with one of the men in the family dressing up as the Yule goat.[7] In this, there might be a relation to Santa Claus and the Yule goat's origin in the medieval celebrations of Saint Nicholas.[2] The goat was then replaced by the jultomte (Father Christmas/Santa Claus) or julenisse during the second half of the 19th century and early 20th century, although he is still called the Joulupukki (Yule goat) in Finland, and the tradition of the man-sized goat disappeared.


 For hundreds of years, people in northern Europe had big festivals in December called Yule. Those traditions became part of Christmas celebrations in places like Sweden. One of those traditions was the Yule goat. The Yule goat was supposed to help deliver presents, so sometimes Santa Claus would ride a goat instead of his sleigh! (In fact, small goats made of straw are still one of the most popular Christmas decorations in Sweden.)


SATYR - In Greek mythology, a satyr [a] (Greek: σάτυρος, translit. sátyros, pronounced [sátyros]), also known as a silenus[b] or silenos (Greek: σειληνός seilēnós [seːlɛːnós]), is a male nature spirit with ears and a tail resembling those of a horse, as well as a permanent, exaggerated erection. Early artistic representations sometimes include horse-like legs, but, by the sixth century BC, they were more often represented with human legs.[4] Comically hideous, they have mane-like hair, bestial faces, and snub noses and are always shown naked. Satyrs were characterized by their ribaldry and were known as lovers of wine, music, dancing, and women. They were companions of the god Dionysus and were believed to inhabit remote locales, such as woodlands, mountains, and pastures. They often attempted to seduce or rape nymphs and mortal women alike, usually with little success. They are sometimes shown masturbating or engaging in bestiality.


ETYMOLOGY OF “SATYR” - The name may be related to the root sat-, meaning "to sow", which has also been proposed as the root of the name of the Roman god Saturn.

- Room, Adrian (1983), Room's Classical Dictionary: The Origins of the Names of Characters in Classical Mythology, London, England, Boston, Massachusetts, Melbourne, Australia, and Henley, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul, ISBN 978-0-7100-9262-5


SATURNALIA - The treatise Saturnalia by the fifth-century AD Roman poet Macrobius connects both the word satyr and the name Saturn to the Greek word for "penis"

- Riggs, Don (2014), "Faun and Satyr", in Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (ed.), The Ashgate Encyclopedia of Literary and Cinematic Monsters, New York City, New York and London, England: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 233–236, ISBN 978-1-4094-2563-2 5 


APOLLO - Macrobius explains that this is on account of satyrs' sexual lewdness.[53] Macrobius also equates Dionysus and Apollo as the same deity [53] and states that a festival in honor of Bacchus is held every year atop Mount Parnassus, at which many satyrs are often seen.[53]

- Riggs, Don (2014), "Faun and Satyr", in Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (ed.), The Ashgate Encyclopedia of Literary and Cinematic Monsters, New York City, New York and London, England: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 233–236, ISBN 978-1-4094-2563-2 5


The "Azazel Goat" was marked with ash on the forehead on the "day of atonement" and thrown from a cliff to symbolize the destruction of this "spirit".

AZAZEL (Scapegoat, Lev. xvi., A. V.):

The name of a supernatural being mentioned in connection with the ritual of the Day of Atonement (Lev. xvi.). After Satan, for whom he was in some degree a preparation, Azazel enjoys the distinction of being the most mysterious extrahuman character in sacred literature. Unlike other Hebrew proper names, the name itself is obscure.

In Lev. xvi. the single allusion to Azazel is as follows: On the tenth day of Tishri (see Atonement Day) the high priest, after first performing the prescribed sacrifices for himself and his family, presented the victims for the sins of the people. These were a ram for a burnt offering, and two young goats for a sin-offering. Having brought the goats before Yhwh at the door of the tabernacle, he cast lots for them, the one lot "for Yhwh" and the other "for Azazel." The goat that fell to Yhwh was slain as a sin-offering for the people. But the goat of Azazel (now usually known as the "scapegoat") was made the subject of a more striking ceremony. The high priest laid his hands upon its head and confessed over it the sins of the people. Then the victim was handed over to a man standing ready for the purpose, and, laden as it was with these imputed sins, it was "led forth to an isolated region," and then let go in the wilderness.

—In Biblical, Apocryphal, and Rabbinical Literature:
The Rabbis, interpreting "Azazel" as "Azaz" (rugged), and "el" (strong), refer it to the rugged and rough mountain cliff from which the goat was cast down (Yoma 67b; Sifra, Aḥare, ii. 2; Targ. Yer. Lev. xiv. 10, and most medieval commentators).Most modern scholars, after having for some time indorsed the old view, have accepted the opinion mysteriously hinted at by Ibn Ezra and expressly stated by Naḥmanides to Lev. xvi. 8, that Azazel belongs to the class of "se'irim," goat-like demons, jinn haunting the desert, to which the Israelites were wont to offer sacrifice (Lev. xvii. 7 [A. V. "devils"]; compare "the roes and the hinds," Cant. ii. 7, iii. 5, by which Sulamith administers an oath to the daughters of Jerusalem. The critics were probably thinking of a Roman faun).

Leader of the Rebellious Angels.
This is confirmed by the Book of Enoch, which brings Azazel into connection with the Biblical story of the fall of the angels, located, obviously in accordance with ancient folk-lore, on Mount Hermon as a sort of an old Semitic Blocksberg, a gathering-place of demons from of old (Enoch xiii.; compare Brandt, "Mandäische Theologie," 1889, p. 38). Azazel is represented in the Book of Enoch as the leader of the rebellious giants in the time preceding the flood; ...revealed to the people the secrets of witchcraft and corrupted their manners, leading them into wickedness and impurity;  ...The story of Azazel as the seducer of men and women was familiar also to the rabbis, as may be learned from Tanna d. b. R. Yishma'el: "The Azazel goat was to atone for the wicked deeds of 'Uzza and 'Azzael, the leaders of the rebellious hosts in the time of Enoch" (Yoma 67b); and still better from Midrash Abkir, end, Yalḳ., Gen. 44, where Azazel is represented as the seducer of women, teaching them the art of beautifying the body by dye and paint (compare "Chronicles of Jerahmeel," trans. by Gaster, xxv. 13). According to Pirḳe R. El. xlvi. (comp. Tos. Meg. 31a), the goat is offered to Azazel as a bribe that he who is identical with Samael or Satan should not by his accusations prevent the atonement of the sins on that day.

The fact that Azazel occupied a place in Mandæan, Sabean, and Arabian mythology (see Brandt, "Mandäische Theologie," pp. 197, 198; Norberg's "Onomasticon," p. 31; Reland's "De Religione Mohammedanarum," p. 89; Kamus, s.v. "Azazel" [demon identical with Satan]; Delitzsch, "Zeitsch. f. Kirchl. Wissensch. u. Leben," 1880, p. 182), renders it probable that Azazel was a degraded Babylonian deity. Origen ("Contra Celsum," vi. 43) identifies Azazel with Satan; Pirḳe R. El. (l.c.) with Samael; and the Zohar Aḥare Mot, following Naḥmanides, with the spirit of Esau or heathenism; still, while one of the chief demons in the Cabala, he never attained in the doctrinal system of Judaism a position similar to that of Satan. See articles Atonement and Atonement, Day of.


The Roman festival which the Nicolaitans "assimilated" into their version of "Christianity" was known as the "Saturnalia" festival.  As you saw above, the word "Saturn" is actually derived from "Satyr".  Saturn's earliest depictions show him as a "Satyr". The same type of "spirit" referred to in the Old Testament, translated as the word "Devils". It actually has the same meaning in Hebrew (Satyr/Goat).

When Paul told the Corinthians that he did not want them to be having "fellowship with devils", the "Satyr-nalia" festival (and it's Satyrs) is precisely what he was talking about. Although Nicolaitan "Christianity" claimed to have made all this "Christian" (and now is done for "Christ"), all the old elements (including all it's "old spirits") are still "retained" in it's "ritual". Including it's "satyrs", in the form of it's Christmas "goats". "Goats" obviously have nothing to do with the "birth of Christ".  But they do have quite a bit to do with the "birth of Apollo" (who was himself, a Nephilim).  The leader of the Nephilim, for millenia, was known to have been a "spirit" named AZAZEL. The head of the "Satyrs".(Devils) depicted as "goats".

There are (3) ways this Christmas "spirit" is "conjured up" through ritual every year. (1) The first is the "tree". Because "Azazel" is a "spirit of the wilderness", bringing a "tree in (from the wilderness) serves as not only a vehicle, but as a contact point. (2) The second way this "spirit" is manifested, is through ritual imagery of "goats" and "reindeer" (i.e.,deer) (both familiar "spirits" of Apollo, and the "high places" where he was worshiped), but more importantly invoking the "bestial" spirit of Azazel. [Neither of which had anything to do with "Christ's birth"] And the (3) third way this "spirit" is manifested, is in the entire seasonal solar feast ritual itself.

Manifesting the "spirit" of "Azazel"

Theologically, this specific topic is much deeper than will be dealt with here, but it should be noted, there is a virtual Encyclopedia of theology and eschatology, symbolized, demonstrated and fulfilled in this connection, between the "Azazel goat" and the "goat of Atonement" present in this symbolism. "Azazel" symbolized "apostacy".(The falling away), whereas the "Atonment goat" represented, the "real" Christ. The fact that the "Azazel goat" is the choice at Christmas, is an amazing "symbol" of it's "apostacy". (Which also prefigured the Antichrist in the Old Testament)

The "spirit" of "Azazel" is "conjured up"certianly in the incorporation of "goats" and "goat images", but also in the very festival itself as a whole. So the quesiton is, by "conjuring up" this Christmas "spirit", what is being "manifested" in one's state of "consciousness"? What IS the Christmas "spirit of Azazel", and what will it do, once it is "manifested"? How will it "affect" a person?

Everyone is "affected" differently and in different degrees by the "fellowship with devils" (as Paul called it). And they become affected in different areas of vulnerabilities. But the "spirit of Azazel" has several distinct qualities or traits to it. You can easily spot it's effect on someone, by what it produces in them.

"Azazel" is a "spirit" that is very "sexual" and very "aggresive" and very "hostile". It is the "spirit" of "rape". The "spirit" of "anger". The "spirit" of "arrogance". It's never wrong. It never shows humilty or repentence. It is "kinetic" meaning it can't be "still". There is a complete lack of "impulse control". It tries to "destroy" anything that gets in it's way. It is "bestial". It can be very connected to "Alchoholism", but not necessarily. It "interrupts", and is "excitable". It's manipulative. It violates boundries. There is a total disregard for normal "social" behavior. It uses lots of violent metaphors in language, and makes frequent use of profanity.

When someone is being influenced by this "spirit" they become foul mouthed. They force themselves onto others. They are overtly aggressive and threatening. And they are filled with lust, sometimes, even to the point of bestiality. (in both males & females).

It is once again, not a "spirit" anyone wants to be "feeding their children to" through "Christmas ritual" every year. It is not a "spirit", you would want anywhere near your home. Much less, in your "children".



If you do not already know what Krampus is, SEE "The Christmas Saint"

If you do know, then you know it is an "attendant spirit" of "Saint Nicholas". In otherwords, when you "ritually re-enact" the "visit" of "Saint Nicholas", he brings with him, some uninvited demons. Of course, now is a good time to remind yourself; ("the rituals are all "pretend" and "mean nothing" and "do nothing"). Right?

Because, if they actually do ritualistically "manifest" "spirits", then this is another "Christmas spirit" that "Christmas ritual", will "manifest". (And it's a seriel killer "spirit")

The purpose of this "spirit" is to "kill" children who are not sufficiently "Roman Catholic" enough, and make them "disappear". To "thin the herd" for Rome.

How bad does a "spirit" have to be, that even the genocidal torture loving Nazis are afraid of it? Well, this is it. The Nazis were consummate "occultists".  They understood the power of "occult ritualism". And despite the fact that "Krampus" was a very very "German" "spirit", and it was at the center of  veneration of their "spiritual Saint", the Nazis themselves banned "Krampus". Probably because they knew the intended "purpose" of it, was to  "murder" German children through "occult ritual", for the sake of Rome.  And while Hitler himself had "aspired" to become a Roman Priest, he probably didn't want Rome doing that to his little "aryian" German children.

But maybe what Hitler didn't realize, since he didn't spend to much time in the New Testmanet, is that his "fellowship with devils" in is "re-enactment ritual" of the Nicolaitan "Saint Nicholas", included "Krampus" his "attendent spirit" anyway, whether Hitler officially threw him the welcome party, or not.

We are Legion (and come with "Saint Nicholas")



 Krampus’ primary function is to at least threaten 

Krampus beats those who are naughty...
He is said to eat them or take them to hell.
...children awaken to find their gifts or nurse their injuries


In days gone by, the Krampus were seriously feared by smaller children, who were tossed into the sack and then dragged through the snow.


He’s the half-man, half-goat who comes around every year to chase naughty children and maybe even drag them to hell. European versions of St. Nicholas have long had scary counterparts like Belsnickle and Knecht Ruprecht who dole out punishment. Krampus is one such character


The demonic character is a crucial part of the holiday season. ... through town in a Krampuslauf (Krampus run), frightening and sometimes beating bystanders.

In other words, it’s time for presents for all the little girls and boys … that is, all the ones who haven’t already been beaten, damned, or drowned.

At times we were chased, jostled and struck, but compared with the brutality we witnessed, it was obvious we had been spared the full brunt of what Krampus could muster.

This writer went to Krampuslaufs in three cities and described “savage beatings” to people’s thighs and shins, as well as a Krampus chasing down and sitting on a teenager

Krampus: a half-goat, half-demon, horrific beast who literally beats people

they also feared his menacing counterparts

Krampus's name is derived from the German word krampen, meaning claw, and is said to be the son of Hel in Norse mythology

Krampus, in contrast, would swat "wicked" children, stuff them in a sack, and take them away to his lair.

He visits houses all night with his saintly pal.

misbehaved kids are beaten

..can disappear, stuffed into Krampus' sack and hauled off to his lair to be tortured or eaten.


have faced a truly terrifying Christmas

created to strike terror in the hearts and minds of small children — and quite a few adults, too

The fact that the Krampus can be heard before he can be seen makes him even more frightening

The Krampus tradition also has an element of establishing social order, Bothe said: “It wasn’t until the 17th century that it evolved to become more focused on children. In its earliest incarnations in pagan societies, if adults were greedy, indecent or too strict, they were also visited by Krampuses, so it definitely had an underpinning of general social control.”

Krampus was an old and popular myth in the Alpine parts of Central Europe and seems to be most prevalent in areas influenced by the Holy Roman Empire.

Krampus is part of a colorful bunch called the ‘Companions of Saint Nicholas’ which act as a mischievous foil to the saint himself. Aside from the Krampus, there are other mythical companions.


This "spirit" is violent and murderous. It uses "terrorism" to get its way. It is the very "spirit" of child abuse, racism, violent alchoholism, and murder.

If you "manifest" this "spirit" in the life of your child through Christmas ritual involving the veneration of "Saint Nicholas", you might not have your child much longer. If your child has this "spirit" in them, they might become a violent alcoholic wife and child abuser. (If they mange to survive it themselves) This is the actual "spirit" that causes "Christmas" to be the most "deadly" day of the year (every year). See "The Christmas Magic"

This is definitely not a "Christmas spirit", that you want anywhere near your children, or yourself for that matter. (It doesn't just take "the children". It takes "adults" as well) You "give it authority" to "manifest" in your life, by performing the rituals of "Christmas". It is a "Christmas spirit" conjured up by the Nicolaitan sorcerer, "Saint Nicholas". It is attached to the festival for which he is the "ruling spirit" (patron saint) of, and which he founded, as a syncretistic practice of "Nicolaitanism". "Krampus" (whether it is seen or unseen) is the very "purpose" of Christmas ritual. It is a ritual of malevolent sorcery, that literally kills people. You or your children, might be next.



When we come to the next “spirit”, which is the “spirit” of “Moloch”, some explanation is in order.  Moloch is, as are all these "Christmas spirits", another "Solar-deity" from polytheistic "sun worship", that Nicolaitan Rome attempted to "synthesize" into it's "empire version" of what it called "Catholic" Christianity. Moloch was one of those "deities". (i.e., "demons") Moloch is a particular favorite "demon" of "Luciferians", because of it's "ancient" pedigree.

Modern “devil worshipers” do not “see themselves” as “devil worshipers”, or as Paul put it more discretely, “having fellowship with devils”.  When most people engage in the “worship” of something no matter what “ritual” they are performing, they usually reserve the term “worship” for a very conscious act of their own volition, in a specific intended expression, that they have pre-labeled “worship”. Therefore they “only worship God”. 

But the term “worship” was never used that way in Biblical literature. “Worship” could be something you did, without even knowing you were doing it. (In fact, most of the time, that is how it happened) because "devil worship" is usually spread through "deceit". So the prophets and apostles of the Scriptures, used that term in a very different way, than “modern Christians”. All you really had to do to be a “devil worshiper” (without even knowing it), was to “adopt” the “forms of worship” that those who “worshiped a devil” did. That is “imitate” their “ritual”. This is how the Scriptures defined “devil worship”. Meaning it was a ‘form” or “ritual” used to “worship” a devil. Viola! “Devil worship”.  Satan asked Christ to "bow" (a ritual of submission), not "think" a certain thing.

There was some very sound logic behind the Biblical usage, because the “rituals” used in “devil worship”, were all that was required to “manifest” the “spirit” of that particular “devil”. Even today, modern witchcraft often invokes ancient “rituals”, thought to “conjure up” these “spirits”. Reproducing the “ritual”, is what “conjures the spirit”.(Nobody thinks they are “worshiping” anything) Biblically speaking however, performing the “ritual” what was called “devil worship”.

What is causing all these people to be deceived into these behaviors, is the basic belief which has been spread by the “counter-reformation”, that all “religion” is the “same”. It all “leads to” the “same place”. In the vast majority of cases, that would be probably true. (Unfortunately) but it is not where they think it is.

All “religions” are actually not the same, anymore than all “math” is the same, just because it’s “math”. If you used that approach with any other form of knowledge on earth, it would create a total disaster. (Just like it really actually does in “religion”) Would you let a "Magic herbalist" perform "surgery" on you because it's "all medicine"?

The truth is, you really do not "want" to be a “devil worshiper”. First because those “devils” really are "devils", and whatever you think you are going to get from a “devil”, you could get from “God”, in a much better way, if you only understood why and how. (But unfortunately, when 90% of America’s “ministers” are now “devil worshipers” themselves, that “knowledge” is vastly missing today) There is a spirital "ignore-ance".

So the average American is left with nothing but books on “witchcraft” to “fill the void”. Not much better off than a “native” in a tropical south Asian rain forest somewhere, with a shrunken head on the wall, and a bone through their nose. (Spiritually speaking) In some respects, perhaps even actually worse.  (Because, the head hunter at least knows what a “spirit” is and how they are "conjured").

Today, if you say someone is a “devil worshiper”, they may have an idol of Baphomet (Azazel) right in front of them, that they are literally praying to, and be outraged you called them “a devil worshiper”, because they will tell you, first of all “Azazel, the prince of devils” is not a “devil”, he’s just a deity from another religion, and secondly, they are not “worshiping” it because it only “counts” as worship, when they “say so”. But, none of that is how the Scriptures viewed that question.

Part of the etymology of the English word “Devil” which is never listed in the etymology of the English word “Devil” is that it is related to the same word in English that is translated as “Devi” and “Deva”. (Same word) The root of the term “Devil” and “Devi” and “Deva” is “Div” (and means “shining one”). 


To “Luciferians”, anything that mentions “shining” or “light”, is like catnip, regardless of what it is. You could tell a "Luciferian" a pile of "dog poop" was secretly the "shining one", and they would take it home, and frame it.

The English term “Dev+il” is a conjunction of “Div” (shining one) and “il” which means “in”. – (il- assimilated form of Latin prefix in- used with words beginning in l-; see in-.) -

So “Luciferians” are definitely, simply the “old fashioned devil worshipers”, of years gone by. A fact that they do recognize about themselves. (But, unlike with "Satanists", prefer to keep as one of their big "secrets". That includes the devil, named “Moloch”.

Moloch is an extremely nasty “devil”. It had an appetite for “children”, which it demanded the sacrifice of, in order to be “satiated”. The preferred method of satiating that appetite, was by burning them. So nobody likes to be called a “Moloch devil worshiper”, even if that is what they are. It is considered “offensive”. (Although it really should not be, considering the term “devil” is simply “div”+”il”). To be “In” a “shining one” is precisely the “goal” of “Luciferian” spirituality. So being a “devil worshiper” should not be something a “Luciferian” should really be “ashamed of”. (Of course, the terminology is “confusing” to their seduced and deluded “Christian” members) many of whom are “Pastors” of “Churches”. Maybe even yours, as a matter of fact.

The point is, the “ritual itself” is what “manifests” the “spirit”. (The “spirit” of a “Div”, that you want to be “in”) And once again, that includes “Moloch”. Modern “devil worshipers” of “Moloch” do not “burn children alive to Moloch” anymore (at least the vast majority of them). But they use “ritual” to “reproduce patterns” of “Moloch worship”. Mostly “symbolic”. But these patterns are used to “manifest” this “spirit”. Modern occultists never miss an opportunity, to include another “ritual” to “manifest” one of their dearly lost ancient “devils”, in Christmas “ritual”. And “Moloch” is no exception to that rule.  Why would a  “devil worshiper” want to “manifest” this “spirit”?

Well, because “Moloch” was a “fertility” demon. It promised “success”, “abundance” and yes, “fertility”. Who doesn’t want to be “successful”? That’s one of the chief goals of a “Luciferian” in business. So how do they “fulfill” the “rituals” of “Moloch” without also getting “arrested” for burning children? They do it through “symbolic ritual”. Meaning a “ritual” designed to “fulfill” the “literal act”, without actually literally doing it. It has long been suspected and asserted (by masonic researchers)  that the Shriners "Burn hospitals" are used in some role in ritualistically "manifesting" the "spirit" of Moloch, without actually having to do the "burning" anymore. They are "offered up" ritualistically and symbolically, as the "offering", rather than literally.

So to understand the “Moloch rituals” in Christmas, we will first have to look at what the “Moloch rituals” actually were.

Below is a series of excerpts from articles, that discuss what “Moloch ritual” involved.




The etymology of Moloch is uncertain: most scholars derive it from the root mlk "to rule" but with the vowels of bōšet "shame" (first advanced by Abraham Geiger in 1857) or as a qal participle from the same verb.[1] R. M. Kerr criticizes both theories by noting that the name of no other god appears to have been formed from a qal participle, and that Geiger's proposal is "an out-of-date theory which has never received any factual support."[2] Paul Mosca similarly argued that "The theory that a form molek would immediately suggest to the reader or hearer the word boset (rather than qodes or ohel) is the product of nineteenth century ingenuity, not of Massoretic [sic!] or pre-Massoretic tendentiousness."[3] Scholars who do not believe that Moloch represents a deity instead compare the name to inscriptions in the closely-related Punic language where the word mlk (molk or mulk) refers to a type of sacrifice, a connection first proposed by Otto Eissfeldt (1935).[4] Eissfeldt himself, following Jean-Baptiste Chabot, connected Punic mlk and Moloch to a Syriac verb mlk meaning "to promise," a theory also supported as "the least problematic solution" by Heath Dewrell (2017).[5] Scholars such as W. von Soden argue that the term is a nominalized causative form of the verb ylk/wlk, meaning "to offer, present," and thus means "the act of presenting" or "thing presented."[6] Kerr instead derives both the Punic and Hebrew word from the verb mlk, which he proposes meant "to own, to possess" in Proto-Semitic, only later coming to mean "to rule"; the meaning of Moloch would thus originally have been "present, gift," and later come to mean "sacrifice".[7]

- Holm, Tawny L. (2005). "Phoenician Religion [Further Considerations]". In Jones, Lindsay (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. 10 (2 ed.). Macmillan Reference. pp. 7134–7135.

Kerr, R.M. (2018). "In Search of the Historical Moloch". In Kerr, R.M.; Schmitz, Philip C.; Miller, Robert (eds.). "His Word Soars Above Him" Biblical and North-West Semitic Studies Presented to Professor Charles R. Krahmalkov. Ann Arbor. pp. 59–80. (



[TOPHET] Over a hundred tophets have been identified. The earliest examples were established at Carthage, Malta, Motya in western Sicily, and Tharros in southern Sardinia, when the Phoenicians first settled in these areas in the ninth century BCE. The largest known tophet, the Tophet of Salammbô at Carthage,[29] seems to have been established at this time and continued in use for at least a few decades after the city's destruction in 146 BCE.[46] The stone markers first appeared at Salammbô around 650 BCE and spread to Motya and Tharros around 600 BCE.[47] Between the fifth and third centuries BCE, tophets became more common in southern Sardinia and the Carthaginian hinterland, as Phoenician settlement expanded. In Sicily and Sardinia, tophets slowly went out of use in the third and second centuries BCE, following the establishment of Roman control in the First Punic War. In the same period in North Africa, a large number of new tophets were established particularly in inland Tunisia. Many of these tophets remained in use after the fall of Carthage in 146 BCE. In the late first and second centuries CE, migration resulting from military deployment patterns led to the establishment of new tophets in Tunisia and eastern Algeria.[48] In the Roman period, inscriptions name the god to which the monuments were dedicated as Saturn.[35] In addition to infants, some of these tophets contain offerings only of goats, sheep, birds, or plants; many of the worshipers have Libyan rather than Punic names.[43] Their use appears to have declined in the second and third centuries CE.[49] There is no consensus on the etymology of tophet, a word which only occurs eight times in the Masoretic text.[1] The word may be derived from the Aramaic word taphyā meaning "hearth", "fireplace", or "roaster",[2] a proposal first made by W. Robertson Smith in 1887.[3] Some have suggested that the word has been altered via using the vocalization of bōsheth "shame."[1] Others derive the word from the Hebrew root špt "to set (on fire)", cognate with Ugaritic ṯpd "to set."[4] A new proposal has been made to interpret the term as "place of vow" by Robert M. Kerr.[5] The topheth's description as a place of punishment derives in part by the use of the word in Isaiah 30:33, in which Yahweh ignites a large tophet to punish the Assyrians:

For a hearth [tophet] is ordered of old; yea, for the king it is prepared, deep and large; the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of the LORD, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle it.

The location of the tophet, the valley of Gehenna, subsequently became a place of punishment in the eschatology of Jewish Apocalypticism, something found in the 3rd- or 4th-century BCE Book of Enoch (1 Enoch 26:4; 27:2–3).[28] The Talmud, discussing the passage in Isaiah, states that whoever commits evil will fall there (Eruvin 19a).[6]


The "Church of the Nativity" created in Constantine's day, was built over a "Mithra Cave", and the alleged "spot" where he was born is marked by the very strange facade of a FIREPLACE.

"Fire" and "Fireplaces" were considered "Sacred" in Persian "Sun worship" religions such as Mithraism and Zorasthianism.  (Flames = Sun) Witches in the middle-ages considered Chimney's a "conduit" to the "spirit-word" (and are shown in medieval art work "flying" out of their Chimney's on 'brooms")



“Underneath the spreading chestnut tree

I loved him and he loved me

There I used to sit up on his knee

´Neath the spreading chestnut tree.”


– “The Chestnut Tree” by Glen Miller 1939

“In every Bavarian village,” he said, “you will always find three things:  a Maypole, a church, and right next to the church a chestnut tree under which is a Biergarten.”



Their humble nature may be key to the Christmas connection: on Martinstag, or the Feast of St. Martin, the poor receive a symbolic gift of chestnuts for sustenance.



Agrippa’s Philosophy of Natural magic discusses that horse chestnut is tied to Jupiter, and so, we might assume that chestnuts of others kinds are also under the dominion of Jupiter.


Chestnuts were also a magical and auspicious resource within popular tradition. For this reason they were considered a precious gift when a child was baptised... 



Also known as Jupiter’s Nut,... Chestnuts carry masculine energy and resonate with the fire element and the planet Jupiter. The chestnut tree is associated with the God Zeus. Chestnuts can be eaten to encourage fertility and desire and may be carried as a charm by women who wish to conceive.


"Chesnuts" are symbolic of "children" because they portent "fertility" for women, the conception, birthing and baptism of "children".




The U.S. dioceses (of the Roman Catholic church) have tallied complaints from 17,000 children and have paid out $4 billion in compensation to abuse victims, since the 1980s. That number is expected to double as a result of new legislation involving the reporting of child abuse.


While using your child as a "prop" to "manifest" the "demon" Moloch, might be "great fun" for parents who are themselves "devil worshipers", it is really viewed as a form of "child abuse" by God, even if it is just a "symbolic" ritual. The "demonic spirit" they are being used as "props" to "manifest", is called "Moloch"

No "Christian" parent in their right mind, would ever participate in this "occult ritual" using their "child" as a "prop", by "informed consent". (And that is precisely why it's never asked for)

The "spirit of Moloch" is another "wonderful" "Christmas spirit", you really do not want anywhere near your "children", if you love them. It is no "accident" that many children, in the "innocence" of their own "spirit", scream bloody murder, the first time their parents do this to them. (Because ritualistically, that is precisely what it is)

It is truly a shame, that these innocent defenseless children, know more about what's going on to them spiritally, than the "parents" that would do this to them. (And worse yet, some parents actually think this is "funny") It's certainly not "funny" to these children.

Before you leave this section, take a good long look at the faces of the children in those "Santa photos", and see if you can "imagine" the kind of "terror" they were feeling, when that was done to them.

Ask yourself, if you would want God to treat you that way? (for a few "laughs") Because that is precisely the kind of "God" you are "manifesting". (Not only just for your "children", but yourself as well) 



“Jezebel” had nothing to do with (1) “equal rights” (2) female assertiveness (3) Female “temptation” to commit immorality (3) male patriarchy (4) and only very very “loosely” with “sex” (and perhaps not even at all). 

In fact, it is entirely possible, the reference to “Jezebel” in Revelation (may not have even been to a “female” at all, despite the clear feminine references). But what “Jezebel” clearly DID have something to do with, is completely “ignored”.  Sadly, that intentional "igore-ance" may not be entirely accidental.

Almost all the common sources (which obsess over the reference to "Jezebel"), are usually and ironically, very busy PROLIFERATING, promoting, propagating and “enforcing”, the very thing that “Jezebel” actually did (and for which the bad reputation was earned)!  They are themselves, actually doing, precisely what "Jezebel" did.

The “spirit” of “Jezebel” is often, actually coming from these very same “male” religious leaders, making these sermons and videos about “Jezebel”!?! And the “louder” they yell “Jezebel”, the more often, they actually have “‘the problem” themselves. (i.e., the problem of the “spirit” of “Jezebel”)

Revelation 2:20-24 


Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works. But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden. 


The use of terms in this text, in the Greek, are a very interesting set of words, that are usually overlooked. The change in words in key parts of the text indicate John was making reference to something other than simply sexual "seduction" in the modern English sense of the term.

First, it must be noted that the Greek word "Gune'" (Pronounced "Goo-nay"), refers to a "married woman". As noted in Strong's specifically "A Wife". Secondly, the term "Seduce" is not the kind of "seduction" that is associated with "Sex", but with "FRAUD". Like the kind of "seduction" that is used by a "Con-artist", or a "lying sales-person", who sells you a product or contract, based completely on "Fraud".


Thirdly, there is a change of reference as to the kind of sexual action to which John is referring, which indicate his reference was not literal. (1) He calls her a "Gune'"(Married woman) (2) But claims she commits "fornication" and then (3) Those who commit "fornication with her" (are themselves committing "Adultery"). Changing the reference to the "kind" of sexual action committed. For THEM, they are committing "Adultery". But for her (despite the fact she is "married", she is committing "fornication") a sexual "act", a genuinely "married person", doesn't actually commit.

John's change of terms, indicate he does not consider her "marriage" to be a "genuine" marriage. Why is that important? Because, the controversy over "Jezebel" in the Old Testament, involved precisely that "controversy".  The "controversy" was not over "sex". It was over "covenant". Who had the "genuine" covenant? Was it "Jezebel" and her 500 "prophets of Baal" worship, or was it "Elijah" and his "Yahweh"? The "numbers" were clearly on the side of "Jezebel". So "religion" by the State, and by "consensus", was clearly on the side of "Jezebel". The problem was however, that according to Israel's "Constitution", in order for "Jezebel" to "pull that off" (she had to LIE about "identity"), about "history", and even about "the Law". She had to engage in "bold faced lying" for "propaganda" purposes.  And in order to "enforce" that deception, she had to "go after" Israel's real "prophets" and have them "eliminated". (That was "Jezebel") And what "earned" her such a despicable reputation.

"Jezebel" was never recorded as having been "unfaithful" to King Ahab. She is never recorded as having "committed adultery". She is never recorded as ever having done anything "sexual" outside of all the norms and customs of the day. There is virtually no reference to "Jezebel" and sexuality, in the Old Testament story. She is said to have "painted her face" right before her demise, that in all probability, she knew was coming. (That's it)

So where does this reference to "sexuality" and "fornication" and "adultery" come from, in reference to "Jezebel", then? "Jezebel" was a Phoenician. Phoenicians worshipped "Asherah and Baal". Ahab married "Jezebel" to solidify an alliance with Phoenicia. But she refused to "accept" the religion of Israel. (Ahab conceded to her request).  Being the highest ranking devotee of "Asherah and Baal" in Israel, she both had a temple constructed to "Asherah and Baal", and served as its "high priestess". But that is not all that "Jezebel" did. She began a campaign of "converting" the nation of Israel TO "Asherah and Baal" worship, by claiming "Yahweh" and "Baal" were the same deity. That "Asherah" was "married" to "Yahweh". "Yahweh" was a "male deity", and "Asherah" was his female "wife". In reality, "Asherah & Yahweh", were simply "Jezebel & Ahab", echoed as "divinities". (It was a very balsphemous worship)

The "constitution" of the nation of Israel (the Torah), forbade any association of "Yahweh", with any other entity, and especially anything "physical", such as an "Idol". (See Exodus 20:2, Deuteronomy 5:6)  "Asherah" was the "Canaanite" version of "Ishtar of Inanna" (The actual historical literal "Whore of Babylon").. and this along with the "idolatry" are where all the "sexual references" come from. It was the "form" of the "religion" itself (not "Jezebel" personally).

This "controversy" was a well known chapter in "Jewish history", to which John was making reference, to in his use of the term, in Revelation 2:20-24.  Thus why the change in terms. To "Jezebel" (she committed "Fornication") because she had "no covenant" (even though he calls her a "Gune'" [married woman]). But for those she was "seducing" (through a fraudulent claim of "covenant"), they were "committing adultery" (meaning they were "breaking" their own "covenant", which they really had).  The "claim" that "Asherah" was "Yahweh's wife" was a "fraudulent claim" which openly "violated" Israel's long established "covenant" (i.e., Constitution), given in the Torah.

It had nothing to do with "make up", "female assertiveness", "male patriarchy", "equal pay", "personality traits" or even "sex" on "Jezebel's part". Absolutely nothing. It had to do with what was GENUINE and what was FRAUDULENT.  And the means by which that national "FRAUDULENCE", was violently enforced.

"Jezebel" became the "symbol" of a "false religious leader", that nearly completely destroyed the nation of Israel (from within).  The "religion" itself which was seeking to REPLACE Israel's "constitutional" religion, was a "Solar-cult", that centered around the "veneration" of a "sacred tree" celebrating the "Solstice-nativity". (No such thing existed in Israel's religion)  "Jezebel" was attempting to "pass-off" her "solar-cult" worship of "Asherah", as genuine "Israel". (Just as "Christmas-ministers" do "Christmas" with "Christians" today)  That is the "spirit of Jezebel".  And their use of "compulsion" and "force" to do ENFORCE that FRAUD, is precisely what "Jezebel" did, in Israel. 

So that brings us to John's use in Revelation. Who was he describing in his reference?




It is always assumed that because the name “Jezebel” is invoked, and there is a reference to “fornication” and “adultery”, John’s reference was to a immoral “female” who claimed to be a prophet and was using “sexual seduction” with the people to “convert them” to her teaching.

There is nothing intrinsicly wrong with that assumption and it is consistent with the surface language of the text. But if you start to dig into the text, there are all these “details” that point to another possibility. That possibility is that this was a “religious leader” who had gathered a “following” in “Thyatira”. And the main “appeal” of their teaching had nothing to do with “sex”, and everything to do with assimilating practices from Roman paganism. The "head" of that group of "prophets" was called "Jezebel", because "Jezebel" was the legal and religious "head" of the "prophets of Baal" that opposed Elijah, in the Old Testament. Another "member" of that group is mentioned in reference to the "Nicolaitans" in 2:14,15. That "prophet" is called "Balaam", and the "immorality" that is mentioned there, involved "male" sons.

The use of the feminine gender to refer to this person as “Jezebel” may have in fact, been a derogatory reference. And the use of the feminine gender throughout the rest of his references, may have been John’s literary choice to remain consistent with the Old Testament person of “Jezebel”, who was female, rather than as an actual identifier, of the gender of the person he was addressing.

That John’s feminine reference was actually a descriptor of the person to whom he was referring, has to remain “an assumption”. It is possible the reference was entirely derogatory. And the “gender” of the person being rebuked, was actually a male. A "male" who was the "head" of the "Nicolaitan" prophets (the same as mentioned in Rev. 2:14,15), just previously.

But, even if the “assumption” is correct, that the person being referred to was literally “female”,  rather than a male, and the feminine “gender” was used precisely because it was a “female”, and his invoking the name “Jezebel” was precisely because who he was referring to, was “also” a female, that is as far as "female" gets in this text.

There is no “make-up” involved. The “seduction” was not “sexual seduction”, it was doctrinal. The aberrant “beliefs” involved the “Deep things of Satan” (which was more likely than not, some early version of what we now know as “Luciferianism”) And the switch in terms using “fornication” for Jezebel, and “Adultery” for those he/she was misleading, and his reference to “her children”, were all indications the “immorality” being engaged in, was concerning the assimilation of the Roman practice of “idolatry”, and the observance of Roman feasts, where the food was ritualistically offered to the gods of the idols before consumption. John was not referring to literal "children" (as in physical off-spring), so there is no reason to assume his reference to the "femine gender" was also not just as "symbolic" in the text, as his use of the term "children".

No “information” is given about his switch in the “sexual” terms of “fornication” versus “adultery”. AND ...If it were the kind of “adultery and fornication” that occurred with Old Testament Jezebel (which was in terms of “religious practice”, not with “Jezebel” herself personally or sexually)... If John was following that usage consistenly, then the “seduction” that was occurring in Thyatira was the same kind that took place in the Old Testament, and was the assimilation of the foreign pagan Roman “solar-cult” into the “Christian” community at Thyatira, under the false pretense of being the authentic “Bride of Christ”. (i.e., "married") When in reality, there was no “covenant” there at all, as he speaks of the “Mystery Babylon”, who also falsely "claims" to be "the bride",(but is not)  in chapter 17 and 18. But, either way, the "Depths of Satan" (v.24) was what they were being "seduced" into, (not literal "sex", producing literal phsyical "children").

The "spirit of Jezebel" when "manifested" in Christmas ritual is the propagation of the worship of "Satan" under the false "pretense" and "fraud" that it is "God" or "Christ". If you manifest this "spirit" in your "Children", they will literally not know the difference between God and Satan. (Is that a "spirit" you wish for your "Children"?) Or yourself?




“Elves” are another “Christmas spirit” that is intentionally “manifested” through Christmas ritual. Of course, everyone knows that “elves” are not “real”, but then if they are not real, why use Christmas ritual to “manifest” them? Elves” are “spirits” and just because something is “invisible” does not mean it is not “real”. And as a “phenomenology”, whether you personally think they are cosmologically or materially real or not, is quite beside the point. Elfs, without question, do “exist” as a “phenomenology”. So what are they? Where do these “spirits” come from? What do they do, when they are “manifested”? It might be a good idea to know the answer to these questions, before you waste a great deal of time and money attempting to “manifest” them through Christmas ritual.

But before we get to those questions, it might be good to understand what kind of “Christianity” spends it’s time “manifesting” elves? “Elves” are not part of the “gospel message”.  There aren’t any that “manifest” during the events surrounding the birth of the real Christ, in the New Testament. So what “Christ” is associated with “elves” and is “surrounded by them” at his “birth”? The answer to that question is easily seen and understood, when you discover what “elves” really are.  There is no question that the “Christ” that is ritualistically born every December 25th, is surrounded by “elves”. That is obvious to everyone that simply opens their eyes and looks around at Christmas time every year. In fact, “elves” are becoming more and more popular as each year passes. And it is completely understandable why this trend would exist.

Christmas is not just a “holiday”, it is a “religion”. It’s patron saint is “Nicholas” of the “Nicolaitans”, and the religion being “spread” by the ritual of “Christmas” is “Nicolaitanism”. Along with all it’s other many “demonic spirits” that it “manifests” is a “spirit” called an “elf”. The term “Elf” is simply the product of “language”. It is specific kind of “spirit”. There are certain regions of the world that take “elves” extremely serious. These regions of the world “experience” the “spirit” they refer to as an “elf” on such a common basis, that their reality is a standard common “cultural” assumption. And these parts of the world, are not really known for their “belief” in “ignorant superstitions”. In fact, one example is the nation of “Iceland”.   See: Iceland's Atheist demographic

Iceland has one of the largest populations of “Atheists” in the world. Yet, side by side with it’s “Atheism”, exists it’s “belief” in “elves”.  “Elves” are not just the “plaything” of Iceland’s “superstitious” and “Neo-pagan”. “Elves” have made their way into the very “theology” of the country in its “counter-reformation Lutheran [i.e.,German] Churches”. These “churches” are “called Lutheran”, but are in reality “German counter-reformation”, not “Lutheran”, as in “Luther”. And in keeping with German “counter-reformation” Christianity, it has “adopted” the basic tenets of “Nicolaitanism” as its primary religious view-point. Including their occult assimilation of “elves” into their theology.  In Iceland, there is a rock formation known to have been a location of frequent “elf” encounters in it’s history. In fact, there had been so many “encounters”, they named the area, Alfaborg, which is Icelandic for “Elf city” and even erected an “historic marker” pointing its location out for “tourists”.

The rock is called Álfaborg or the City of the Elves as it was a common belief that the rock was the manor of the highest-ranking amongst the elves, such as chieftains and the King and Queen of the elves in East-Iceland. In this area, it is believed to be a myriad of elves. <> The local church, Bakkagerðiskirkja, is located next to Álfaborg. Its altarpiece is one of the most remarkable altarpieces in Iceland, painted in 1914 by Iceland's most noted painter, Jóhannes Sveinsson Kjarval, who grew up in this area. The altarpiece depicts Christ delivering the Sermon on the Mount - from the top of Álfaborg! 


Ironically, real “Protestants” who taught “reformation” Christianity, including both “King James” of the “King James Bible” and “Martin Luther” himself, understood “elves” within the context of New Testament theology, as “demons”. And that was not all. They both also viewed “elves” as a particular kind of demon, that brought “sickness”. “Elves” were an “unclean spirit” that brought both “sickness” and “death” to those it “afflicted”. Martin Luther is on record as having believed his own mother had been the victim of such paranormal activity. - Edwards, Cyril (1994). Thomas, Neil (ed.). Heinrich von Morungen and the Fairy-Mistress Theme. Celtic and Germanic Themes in European Literature. Lewiston, N. Y.: Mellen. pp. 13–30.

So obviously no “Lutheran church” which “assimilates” it’s theology, with what Luther himself considered to have been “demons”, is actually, in reality, “Lutheran”. So that would be a sort of fantastic “false advertising” (on behalf of the German “counter-reformation”) to hang his name on their “Elf temples”.

But there is much more the to the “elf” story than just “sickness” and “death” and “demons”.  “Elves” functioned as “familiar spirits” for the practice of “witchcraft”.(Which was their primary function in the middle-ages) And thus, their ‘resurgent” popularity today. As the “masses” are being “converted” to “Nicolaitanism” (away from Reformation Christianity), there is naturally a popular explosion in the practice of witchcraft. There are now more self-identified “witches” in America, than Presbyterians. (Thanks to the work of the “counter-reformation” now in the United States)

The label “not Christian” must honestly be applied to these “Nicolaitan” churches and their “theologies” of pagan assimilationism. Not to hurt or offend anyone, but the distinction must be made, to “save” those who are "lost"(and spiritually "lost" is precisely the correct word to describe this). The “Christ” of “Christmas” who is surrounded by “elves” is NOT the “Christ” of the New Testament. It is no better than “belief” in any of the “fictions” it spreads. It is based on a lie. And a “lie” will not “save” anyone, but Rome, politically. (At everyone else’s expense) Like the spirit of “Moloch” it sacrifices the future of it’s young, for its own comfort and convenience. (Without care or concern, what that does to them)

Within the tradition of “elf” pneumatology, “elves” are said to procreate with humans. This places “elves” clearly in the category of the “Nephilim”, under the control of the “spirit” known as “Azazel”.  They are thus related to “Satyrs” and thus why they “populate” around the “Christmas-Christ”, who is in reality “Apollyon”(Rev.9:11), the “Christ” of the damned, who follow the “Antichrist”.  The real “deity” (and substitute Christ) of the “Nicolaitans”.

So you have a “Pastor” that teaches you to worship Satan as Christ, and play with Demons to “celebrate” and “honor” his "birth"? Do you really think this “Pastor” is teaching you about the “real Christ”? Do you really think he is a “real Christian”? Do you think “belief” in this “religion” he is teaching you, or the “Christ” he is giving you, will lead to your real  “salvation”? Please consider the "consequences" of what you are "supporting".

When you “manifest” this “demonic spirit” in your home, with your children, you manifest their own “delusion”, their “sickness” and possibly even, their “death”. As with all the other “Christmas spirits”, It’s not really a “spirit” you want to be “playing with”.  Thinking an “elf” is a “cute” plaything, is like thinking a “cobra” is something to hand to your child.

If you have “accepted” the “Christmas-christ” (who is known as “Lucifer” among the Masons) into your “heart”, it might be time to “repent”, if you want to be “saved”. Apollyon, surrounded by “Satyrs” in the “Satyr-nalia”, will not be “saving you”. His purpose is to “deceive you” and drag you to hell. It might be good to think about if, that is really where you want you and your children “to go”.




Matthew 6:23 - 24 

But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darknessNo man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.


The United Nations estimates that it would need $116 Billion dollars (a year) to permanently “end” starvation in the entire world.  Who has $116 “Billion” dollars to “throw away”? Oh, that’s right. “Christmas-Christians” do. In fact, they just recently spent 1 Trillion dollars on “Christmas”. That was a “spike” figure, as usually it’s only around 847 “Billion” dollars. Meaning if everyone just “skipped” Christmas and sent the money they would have spent on "Christmas",, to the UN to end “world hunger”, not a single child left on earth, anywhere in the world, would die of starvation again FOR SEVEN YEARS! But hey, what’s that compared to plastic “Christmas” junk, under a tree filled with 25,000 parasitical bugs?


Most people do not think of the reference by Christ to two “Masters” as involving anything but 1 entity. But the text clearly refers to “Mammon” as a “Master”.  This led many Christians throughout history to perceive “Mammon” as a “spirit”. Namely a “demonic spirit”. If “Mammon” is a “demonic spirit”, then there is no time of the year, like the “Nicolaitan” festival of devil worship, as a “Christ” Mass, for the “spirit of Mammon” to be “manifested”.  There is ample evidence that there is a demonic “spirit” which bears the name “Mammon” in “Phenomenology”. 

The first evidence is Christ’s own reference to it, as a personified “Master”, which rivals “God” in it’s demand for “loyalty” and “obedience”.  That certainly is true of physical wealth, without any “spirit” involved, but the idea this is a real “demonic spirit” finds support in Biblical texts reaching all the way back to “Gan Eden”, and Eve’s temptation that the “tree of knowledge” was good for food, to be desired, and would make one “wise”.  The “spirit” of the “serpent” in some interpretations was actually the same “spirit” Christ was making reference to, in his use of the term “Mammon”.

Paul referred to the “love of money”, as the “root of all evil”. That would have been the qualitative use of the Greek in that text, meaning more literally, “the root of (all kinds) of evil”. Paul considered the “love of money” to also have been the “source” of “all kinds of evil”.(A vast majority of it)

The “spirit” of “Mammon” is actually a demon that lovers of money, throughout history, in western civilization, have actually intentionally tried to “conjure up” and “use” to make themselves “rich”. (In fact, it's still going on) Since there is no statistical data available to know the “efficacy” of their “spiritual pursuits” to obtain this demon, one would have to speculate, that far more became successfully “demonized”, than they ever did “rich”. Most people do not “realized” you can become “demonized” through “money”. But there are “testimonies” to that effect.

One such “testimony” was related to this site, that the “demon” “Mammon” actually manifested in someone’s home, and was seen by family members simultaneously, when it happened. It appeared in the air as a grayish-luminous form, and as having “tentacles” or the “roots of a tree”, that reached out across ceiling of the room. Ironically, although this was a spontaneous “phenomena” occurred with no previous impressions or even “beliefs” that “Mammon” was actually a real “demon”, it’s form, looked amazingly like some illustrations, that depicted the same “tentacle” form.

The “Spirit of Christ” would obviously be a complete “opposite” in nature, to the “spirit of Mammon”.  The “spirit of Christ” is “self-sacrificing”, whereas the “spirit of Mammon” would be completely selfish.  The “Spirit of Christ” would “beat the money changers in the Temple”.  The “spirit of Mammon” would beat “Christ”, to get the money into the Temple. “Mammon” would be the “demon” behind all idolatry, and thus why Christ contrasted it as the “Master” in direct opposition to God. Placing the acquisition of wealth and material things, even above the very “will of God” in someone’s life. It becomes their real “god”.

Matthew 7:13 

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Christmas as a “social ritual” is all about “Mammon” from start to finish. Over $847 Billion dollars a year, are spent on “Christmas”.  It is considered the main “driver” of the Christmas season. The main “justification” for its “promotion” is “money”. People spend “money” they do not even have. They physically and sometimes even violently fight each other on “Black Friday” to get “the special deal”. Robberies of cars and homes spike.  Credit cards are “maxed out”. “Giving” is done in front of TV cameras, so all the world can “see” it is done “for Christmas”. Not a single command given by Christ concerning one’s finances, are remembered or observed. And if anyone dare bring them up, they will be spurned with utter hate and disgust. (But, yes, this is all “supposedly” a “Christ” mass?) It is more like a “Cursed” Mess, than a “Christ” Mass.

Will the “spirit of Mammon” actually “make you rich”? Not exactly. It is much more likely to “make you poor” and “miserable” and “enslaved” (and demonized) than “rich”. Because “Mammon”, like everything “demonic” is based on a “Lie”. It may “promise” to make you “rich”, but it is much more likely, to simply make you both “demonized” and a “liar”. Since most people “serve Mammon”, all you have to do, to see what it really does, is just look around at the world. It starves people, it deceives people, it enslaves people, it rapes people, and it kills people… for money. It is the “root” of “all kinds of evil”. It is the lust for “Money” that it never has “enough of”, no matter how much it ever has. It is "financial anorexia". Is that really a “spirit”, you would ever wish for your “children”? And of course, if you believe in “Christ”, it also leads to damnation. And only the “real Christ” (of the New Testament), can “save you” from it’s “eternal damnation”. (The Christ who had and continues to have, NOTHING to do with the “spirits” of “Christmas”) That Christ. The one you DIDN'T ask to "come into your heart" at "Christmas".