THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think





"Christmas Apollo-gists" crusade the internet informing people an embarrassing reference in Jeremiah to a Tree being cut down, placed in a stand, and decorated with silver and gold have "nothing to do with the Christmas tree".  And while there may have been no "stand" in a modern living room, there certainly was a sacred tree, and a solstice ritual, and idols placed beneath it, and possibly even a "stand".  And this practice was in fact, precisely what the prophets were protesting in ancient Israel.  The historical practices of the winter solstice in the Middle East are well documented by modern archeologists.  The fact is that Mithraic practices were being assimilated into Israel [known to all historians] and reflected in the texts of the Tanakh, where both the ancient festival and its modern practice is thoroughly denounced in scores of texts.  The arguments that dismiss this text's relevance to the modern practice of today's "Christmas tree" are patently and documentably untrue, and fall apart on several levels when closely scrutinized.  The New Testament in keeping with their predeccessors, openly called these solstice-worship practices (which originated in ancient Babylon and Persia) the cause of separation from God, the practice of Apostates and the unmistakable mark of one's potential future damnation. Prophets warned if you mix the worship of God with the lake of fire in the sky, that is where you will go when you die.  It is a worship the prophets warned God does not accept, and is a dangerous deception. 




The modern practice of the Solar-Mass Serpent's Tree Was Imported To Europe Through The Vikings
And Adopted Into "Christianity" As Part Of "THE MYSTERIES" Under Constantine
It's Practice IS Thousands Of Years Old
Existed In The Time Of Jeremiah Who Condemned It
And Is Still Promoted In The West By The Vatican And The Masons
Who Fully Know Of It's Ancient And Demonic Origins
It's Modern Incarnation Has Retained Virtually Every Detail
Even Down To It's "Custom" of Idolatry
Which Places The Same "IDOLS" Jeremiah Was Condemning (Along With The Tree)
Under The Tree
(A Custom Thousands Of Years Old Originating In Ancient Persia Called "The Yalda Tree" Practice)




And it does not "remember, symbolize or honor" him
when you erect one in your living room.

 "Offerings were placed by the folk on sacred trees, because the trees were the abode of spirits or divinities." -Tree and Plant Worship; Chpt XIII D'Arbois, Les Celtes, 52.

"In Rome...the festival of Saturnalia...people ate big dinners, visited friends, exchanged gifts, especially dolls for children, they brought bows of laurel and green trees into their homes and lit them with candles and lamps to drive out the spirits of darkness."-The Reason for the Season , David R. Weissbard, 1997 


Isa 57:5 Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree,

IDOLS: [Tranlsated from] אל, 'êl, ale, Shortened from H352strength; as adjective mighty; especially theAlmighty (but used also of any deity): - God (god), X goodly, X great, idol, might (-y one), power, strong. Compare names in "-el."


Eze 6:13  Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols...under every green tree, ...the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols. 

IDOLS: [Translated From] עצב, ‛âtsâb, Pronounced aw-tsawb', From H6087; an (idolatrous) image: - idol, image.

Hos 14:8  Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols? I have heard him, and observed him: I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found.

IDOLS: [Translated From]  gillûl gillûl, ghil-lool', ghil-lool', From H1556properly a log (as round) [yule log]; by implication an idol: - idol.

QUESTION: If the "Christ" Mass Tree is the Tree That Doesn't Come From Him? What TREE Is It?


A Very Old Mystery...

A Mystery That Stretches All The Way Back To Ancient BABYLON

[TOP]      [NEXT]






When you try to explain that Babelists are actually secretly working to institute forced Shamash devil worship onto the world, (by whatever means necessary, including overt deception) it is hard for the naive to believe this is actually true.  The "grief process" begins with "Shock", then "Denial", and that is as far as most can go with it. The claim sounds to harsh to possibly be really true, in that what kind of sick mind would wish such a demonic thing on the world, much less to force it onto innocent children through the public school system?  And do so under the cover of "A Minister"???  The extent of the depravity of this is accurately appreciated by the "uninitiated", it is unimaginable.  That is why the behavior and it's secret teaching are protected through a various assortment of gruesome death oaths that involve slitting the throat or cutting out the toungue, etc.  

Nowdays, however, the internet has made "control" of that "secret" information (i.e., and it's accompanying disinformation) a virtual impossibility (a least for now), and there are not too many secrets left not actually already made fully public somewhere, by someone.  That "ministers" would be involved in this kind of activity though, is truly mind-boggling to faithful students of the Scriptures.  That such "ministers" traitorously bearing the name "Christ" of course, would be involved is beyond comprehension, but the proof of these facts can be seen daily.  All you have to do is simply turn on the TV and "Pay attention", rather than choose to be "ignore-ant", as so many "Christians" unfortunately do. 

One of the more BIZARRE things that one will observe about this "holy day" for which it is demanded that all pay homage, is the strange and inexplainable spectacle of alleged "Christian" leaders trying to convince their "flocks" that they should be vigilant in demanding homage to what is admittedly a pagan ritual, by the rest of society.  It is in this strange MIX of admitted paganism and Christianity, that one can begin to observe the REAL nature of these "Christian" political leaders.  

These illogical contradictions expose the fact, there is an agenda operating in these people which is not the one that they make public.  They "front" as "Christian leaders" when in reality, they are "leading" people into something quite the opposite of Christ.  And perhaps there is good reason their "secrets" were protected by threats to "slit throats" and "cut out tongues".  One can only assume the obvious hypocrisy is fully intentional as no other explanation is actually logical.  The obvious and public contradictions expose the real religion (and it's agenda) that is at work (and cannot be actually hid from even casual observation)

BABEL: "Con+Fusion"


Watch a "TV Christian" say they need to "PRAY" for more "Teutonic paganism" right in front of their audience!  ...and one of America's most famous "Christian leaders" in the Religious Reich-Wing admit he is promoting the worship of Odin and Thor.  Seriously.  He does this right in front of his "Christian audience" on National TV, and no one even blinks an eye!  And he actually tries to call "Christians" who object to it, "New Agers" hung up on "Political Correctness"! It is truly sad that this is what is "LEADING" America's "Christians" today. If you are the unsuspecting victim of one of these kinds of ministries, as mentioned above, you need to leave yesterday, or risk an eternity in the Lake of Fire, you are being taught to worship as a false "Christ".

THIS IS NOT A CASUAL SUGGESTION                                         

Rev 18:4  And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. 

Rev 18:7,8   ...she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow But ...she shall be utterly BURNED WITH FIRE: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her. 

[TOP]        [NEXT]





Jer 10:21  For the pastors have become stupid, and they have not sought Jehovah. Therefore, they shall not be blessed, and all their flock shall be scattered. (LITV)

THE CHRIST-MASS TREE IS directly referenced in Jeremiah 10. THE PRACTICE is not only referenced DIRECTLY IN THE TEXT ITSELF, but THE ENTIRE THEOLOGY THAT JUSTIFIES IT IS OPENLY, OVERTLY AND BLATENTLY CITED AND CONDEMNED AS BLASPHEMY.  Now as you have already seen above, there is an entire theology that surrounds this corrupt practice, it is not just "A Tree", it is A THEOLOGY.  But obviously THE TREE is an unmistakable, obvious, and prominent aspect of it's "worship" ritual as are it's IDOLS.  So naturally, BOTH ARE MENTIONED DIRECTLY.  YES, IT IS MENTIONED DIRECTLY.  And the PROOF of that reference will be laid out here in as graphic detail as any honest person needs to see it's presence in not only the text itself, but confirmed, verified and ILLUSTRATED IN STONE, just in case you are stupid enough to believe all the excuse making the Nicolaitan Babelist minister offers, in defense of his intentional corruption of you.

It is said that a PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS.  That is particularly true when it comes to understanding THE TEXT OF SCRIPTURE.  It is always easy to choose in a translation from the list of words which are always multiple, the exact words YOU LIKE.  The precise and exact word, from the list of possibles, that FIT what you WANT to make people think.  BUT when the ACTUAL PRACTICE is depicted in STONE, complete with both ancient and modern commentary on the behavior, and it's known presence as the historical context of the passage in question, then only deceit and the desire to be deceived, and deceive others, remain.  Lawyer-lying your way through the "interpretation" of Biblical text will do nothing but assure your own destruction, and those who are stupid enough to indulge your counsel.

And not only do you see TO THE LEFT that the HISTORICAL CONTEXT is not SIMPLY  an IDOL, but an ENTIRE PRACTICE, and a THEOLOGY, that included IDOLS (Just as the very practice today does), it is CENTERED AROUND A TREE!! A "SOLSTICE-TREE" ! AND IT IS SPECIFICALLY CALLED A "NATIVITY-TREE" IN PERSIAN !!! (YALDA)


The JEREMIAH 10 prohibition extends to the entire theological system of the Gentile, all of their customs, all of their "doctrines", and all of their observances.  It is inclusive. So that pretty much renders the scope of the text way beyond just IT'S SOLSTICE TREE PRACTICE,  but it definitely INCLUDES the DAMNED TREE.  And it is "Damned" because that is what God said about it from the beginning, literally the Genesis, of it. (Gen.3)

QUOTE: 1909: The "MAZDA" name was first used by General Electric. The name was taken FROM PERSIAN MYTHOLOGY: the female Ahura Mazda being the god of light. It was soon licensed by Westinghouse as well, and became accepted by the buying public as a sign of quality and long life." END QUOTE - THE ANTIQUE CHRISTMAS LIGHTS MUSEUM

But, it is not enough that your minister is simply misinforming you about what this text does in fact, historically, grammatically, and contextually REALLY REFER TOO.  They add insult to injury, by INTENTIONALLY LYING TO YOU.  Yes, that is precisely what is being done. It is not simply a "disagreement", that is had here.  Who could complain about an honest disagreement? Obviously, even when there is a disagreement, that does not invalidate any correct or incorrect conclusions.  2 Plus 2 is still 4, even if some think it is 3.  But the error is age appropriate to children in first grade, and does not impugn their character. But the claim is coming from a college Professor, who simply wants someone to push button 3 instead of 4 to make some extra money or get a promotoion, and is willing to tell whatever lie necessary to get them to do it, there is not much good that can be said about it.  And There is INTENTIONALLY DECEIT on this same level, about the contents of JEREMIAH 10.  That deceit is both INTENTIONAL and CONTRIVED.  And where-ever there are lying cheating whored out Masonic or Roman Babelist ministers to offer their "Lawyer-lies" to obfuscate this text, they will do so, whether it is at the seminary, or on the TRANSLATION BOARD ITSELF.  And that is what makes this deceit so completely despicable.  It is unconscionably and intentional.

How do you KNOW they are telling you are bold faced, rotten, immoral LIE?  The evidence is overwhelming.  THE VERY ORIGIN OF THE PRACTICE ITSELF FROM PERSIA, (the same being referenced by JEREMIAH, in JEREMIAH 10) has been plastered all over THE MARKETING OF IT !!!  So aside from being complete bumbling idiots, which these often educated men are not, there is no logical way to excuse THE BLATENT CONTRADICTION !  And you are just PLAIN STUPID if you SEE THIS, and still believe THEIR LIES, or at least you are complicat in the deception.

Obviously, if you stick right on the PACKAGING LABEL, under the word INGREDIENTS, the word ASHERAH, and point it to ancient Persia, it's rather disengenuous to claim AFTER THE FACT, there IS NO CONNECTION, and never has been.  In fact, the claim, is a bold faced lie.  It was probably due to the very text of Jeremiah 10, being cited by humble evangelical clergy, with not much more education than is necessary to simply BE HONEST, and see THE OBVIOUS, that these very terms WERE EVENTUALLY REPLACED.

THE PERSIAN ORIGIN of these practices are documented in Rome's OWN CATACOMBS which contain the oldest "Nativity Scene" ever discovered by Archeologists.  The "3 Youths" from "Babylon"  ARE DRESSED IN PERSIAN CLOTHES !!!  PERSIAN CLOTHES !!!

So when you hear "Solar-mass" APOLLO-gists claiming these things are not "connected" to Ancient Persia, the Solstice Tree isn't a Yalda Tree, and these are exactly and precisely what Jeremiah was condemning in Jeremiah 10, you need to understand you are talking to a person who simply prefers non-reality to truth.  The PERSIAN CONNECTION is illustrated throughout this page, from the oldest Nativity scenes in the world, to the modern 1909 MARKING PACKAGING of CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTS, these connections to PERSIAN SUNWORSHIP were FULLY KNOWN, and there are SIMPLY LIED ABOUT by "Religious Leaders" who are FRAUDS AND LIARS.


And just in case you think this "over-sight" is just the result of the innocent "ignorance" of a few incompetent people, rather than fully intentionally planned deceit (that you actually have to THINK ABOUT in order to PULL OFF), all you have to do is look at the "New Translations" that are being cranked out by the Bible-merchants these days in their "new translations".  A "translation" is supposed to reflect the words of a text in the original language, not actually REPLACE them with other words (you like better) and that "fits your political agenda".  That's simply lying for propaganda purposes... or money, for propaganda purposes by people paying the money.  Either way, it's pretty despicable.  One translation researcher went so far as to actually call them "conniving snakes".  (Which is probably a nice word)

When you are a secret Devil worshiper posing as a "Christian" and you run across a text that embarrasses you (or "exposes you" as more accurately the case), since you are a Devil worshiper in reality, you have no problem with lying because after all, what you worship is a liar, and a lie.  But because you are also a blasphemer, you ease your conscience by calling it "God".  It's a very old religious trick the Masons and the Vatican learned from their favorite source of spiritual inspiration, ancient Babylon.  Of course it's not lying when they do it, because they are better than you. ("chosen", "enlightened", _____ fill the in the blank)  And when they worship the devil it's really not the devil.  Just like liars are never dishonest, gluttons never get fat from eating like hogs, convicted criminals are all innocent, and devil worshipers really aren't devil worshipers.

So when these kinds of people are "in charge" of "translation boards", they simply corrupt the text with complete disrespect for what's actually in it, because they do not care.  If they could re-write the entire Bible with their own speeches,, they would do it, but they realize it wouldn't "sell" as many copies that way, and most people would have enough sense to simply ignore them.  So they just "creep it into the text" (for you). Because they know much better than you (and God), what you actually need to or ought to do.(because they are so "wise" and "enlightened" worshiping the Devil as "Christ, God or Lucifer" depending on which day it is.

But the new translations do some wonderful things for the public in their corruption. They do DOCUMENT the fact that millions of Christians, and thousands of Christian Churches have filth ridden lying devil worshipers in charge of what is going on in them.  Now this charge sounds very fundamentalist, but that is not exactly where this is coming from, because the fundamentalists are just as guilty, swallowing the Masonic camels, as fast as they can shove them down their own throats (for "political reasons").(without of course, forgetting to choke on all the gnats).  It is a spiritual condition that transcends "liberal or conservative". (And in case you haven't realized this yet, a "conservative devil worshiper" is not any better than a "liberal devil worshiper", they both worship the same devil).  Now of course the term Devil worshiper might be offensive to some, but profanity would not be appropriate, and their designation theologically as "devil worshipers" is Biblically "correct" (and thus an important distinction to note) for people who wish to understand these matters Biblically. (Which is after all, the whole point of this discussion) More will be documented and demonstrated on this fact below.



1. It can't be referring to the Daytona 500, because it specifically mentions a race car.           TRUE or FALSE 
2. It obviously has nothing to do with a Bakery, because the text is talking about pastries.      TRUE or FALSE
3. It's not about money, because a twenty dollar bill is specifically referenced.                       TRUE of FALSE

If you answered FALSE to the three questions in the LOGIC TEST above , then you have demolished the entire controversy over Jeremiah 10 because that is precisely the claim USED by every Christmas APOLLO-GIST concerning JEREMIAH 10, and the Solar-Mass tree practice.  Precisely.  GOOGLE "Jeremiah 10" and watch what you pull up in page after page after page of denounciations and delcarations:


Jeremiah 10 and Christmas Trees (Evangelical)

An important key to understanding any passage is to pay careful attention to its context. Verses 2 through 4 of Jeremiah 10 are part of a larger context. That larger context is verses 1 through 16. ...Jeremiah is not condemning Christmas trees. He is condemning idolatry. The trees in Jeremiah 10 are cut down to carve them into worthless idols that will later be decorated with gold and silver. Jeremiah says nothing about Christmas trees. That custom originated in northern Europe, not in ancient Palestine.

That custom originated in northern Europe, not in ancient Palestine - FALSE 

The custom originated in ancient Mesopotamia, 5000 BC

Jeremiah 10 and the “Pagan” Christmas Tree (Lutheran)

A number or well-meaning readers of the "Origin and Meaning of the Christmas Tree" article have written me with questions or accusations based on Jeremiah 10. These readers state that Jeremiah 10 proves that the Christmas tree is a pagan custom and is forbidden by God. Therefore, they argue, all those who decorate a Christmas tree in their home are sinning in God's sight. This is quite the serious charge. Let us briefly examine Jeremiah 10 and the argument based upon it to see if there is any merit to this argument. ... "Aha!" these readers say. "Jeremiah is talking about the Christmas tree!" But closer examination reveals that he certainly is not! .. First, there is the immediate context of this passage. The very next verse, 10:5, goes on to say, "Like a scarecrow in a melon patch, their idols cannot speak; ...From the foregoing, it is abundantly clear that the "decorated tree" to which Jeremiah 10 refers is an idol, very likely the Asherah. Therefore, it is very superficial Bible interpretation and pure silliness to understand this passage as directly referring to the use of a fir tree for Christmas! If, and I repeat, if those who set up a Christmas tree fall down and worship it as a god or goddess, complete with altars and incense stands, then Jeremiah 10 applies here. ...But apart from these exceptions, I think it is abundantly clear that Christians who erect Christmas trees are NOT worshiping them as gods or goddesses, nor are they loving them more than their Savior Jesus Christ. They are simply using the Christmas tree as a fun custom, one that can remind them of Jesus who is the branch of David (Jeremiah 23:5; 33:15), the root of Jesse (Isaiah 11:1). One that can remind them of the tree that led Adam and Eve to sin, but more importantly, the tree on which Christ Jesus died to make atonement for the sins of the whole world (Acts 5:30; Gal. 3:13; 1 Peter 2:24). ...Christians should know that they can use a Christmas tree with a good conscience. It is unfortunate and wrong when well-meaning Christians call something sin that is not sin, and enslave the consciences of their fellow believers with imaginary sin!

If, and I repeat, if those who set up a Christmas tree fall down and worship it as a god or goddess, complete with altars and incense stands, then Jeremiah 10 applies here - FALSE

Jeremiah 10 is prefaced with an all inclusive opening remark, "the way of the Gentile", and specifically, their "customs of worship" (which included the solstice tree ritual he specifically mentions)

Can believers, whether Messianic or Gentile, use a Christmas tree with a good conscience? (Messianic Judaism)
However, if one takes into account to whom this chapter is written, the resulting object in question, and the fact that Christmas trees were unheard of during this time in history, it becomes abundantly clear that verses 1-4 is NOT referring to a Christmas tree as we know, and a careful reading of Jeremiah makes it clear:

the fact that Christmas trees were unheard of during this time in history - FALSE
As repeated above solstice trees are an ancient ritual that dates back thousands of years before Christ in the Middle-east

Jeremiah 10 and the Christmas Tree (Unidentified [Fundementalist?])

There are a number of people who believe that Jeremiah chapter 10 speaks of the Christmas tree. At first glance it would appear that is what Jeremiah is referring to, but further examination of the text it becomes clear that is not what Jeremiah is referring to.  ...When one seriously examines the full text of Jeremiah chapter 10 and compares it with scripture one should easily conclude that Jeremiah chapter 10 is not a “proof text” against Christmas trees in general but rather Jeremiah condemning idol worship.  

Jeremiah chapter 10 is not a “proof text” against Christmas trees in general but rather Jeremiah condemning idol worship - FALSE
Jeremiah 10 is prefaced with an all inclusive opening remark, "the way of the Gentile", and specifically, their "customs of worship" (which included the solstice tree ritual he specifically mentions)

OF COURSE, these opinions are all posted by people who are busy erecting "Christmas Trees" in their homes in honor of the SOLAR-MASS, and justifying their "custom" by looking for "technicalities" in the text to dismiss any apparent condemnation of the practice.  And that obviously should probably be the first question that should be asked. Someone who indulges the practice, is like a television "Stock analyst" telling you how great a stock is going to do, who just happens to be heavily invested IN THE STOCK.  In fact, the last one cited, gives a link at the bottom of the page, which takes you to a page where he is signing songs to the tree, and cites "Saint Bonifice" as the "origin of the Christmas Tree". How utterly ridiculous.

What they all CITE as PROOF, JEREMIAH 10 is not about their "Christmas Tree, is that fact that IDOLS are also described. THEREFORE they reason, IT CAN'T BE ABOUT MY CHRISTMAS TREE! (and they are always quick to point that they do not "worship" the tree). Of course, never bothering to "define" the word "worship" using a dictionary or a lexicon to make the claim. But they are quit sure they do not do it, no matter how it is defined.  There is simply a patent lack of honesty going on here.  And the fact that they can over-whelm the public with these claims, by stacking up compromisers and apostates on top of each other to reinforce their shoddy exegesis and excuse making, gives them the undeserved air of integrity.  Because their arguments are as stupid as the three examples given to the reader above. Yes of course, Idols are condemned in the text BECAUSE THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT YOU ARE INVOLVED WITH !

Now if you can see how stupid their logic  is in the above LOGIC TEST sentences, then you should be able to very easily understand how deceptive and ridiculous the claim is that Jeremiah 10 does not prohibit the heathen practice of solstice-tree veneration, which is 4000 years old, was being practiced in Jeremiah's time, was being assimilated into ISRAEL, and to which he addressed his prophetic condemnations.

The reason you can so easily see foolishness of the logic in the simple illustration above, is that you are familiar with the three things involved in the discussion. (Daytona 500, a Bakery, and Money).  But imagine trying to answer that question with no clue as to what a Daytona 500 is, a Bakery is, or what Money is?  It wouldn't be so easy to see through, would it?  In fact, a con-artist might very easily take advantage of you and make that argument to you.  The only thing that would separate a "Con-artist" from a "fool" parroting a stupid comment of which they have no personal clue about, is whether or not they had knowledge about those three things used in the comparison.

THE ASHEROTH TREE                                                                

(uh sshee' rah) A fertility goddess, the mother of Baal, whose worship was concentrated in Syria and Canaan and the wooden object that represented her. The King James Version translated Asherah “grove” and the proper noun “Ashtaroth.” The Hebrew word for Asherah occurs 40 times in the Old Testament. “Asherah” has been translated in a variety of ways because of uncertainty concerning its meaning. The association of the word with pagan worship is unquestioned by scholars. Most modern translators of the Bible have treated “Asherah” as a proper noun. The writers of the Old Testament referred to the image of Asherah as well as to “prophets” belonging to her and to vessels used in her worship (1 Kings 15:13, 1 Kings 18:19; 2 Kings 21:7, 2 Kings 23:4; 2 Chronicles 15:16). Over half of the Old Testament references to Asherah can be found in the books of Kings and Chronicles. Deuteronomy 7:5; Deuteronomy 12:3 instructed the Israelites to cut down and burn up the Asherim (plural form of Asherah). Deuteronomy 16:21 prohibited the planting of a tree as an “Asherah.” The writers of the Old Testament did not provide an actual description of an “asherah” or the origin of the worship of Asherah. Other religious writings from the Ancient Near East indicate that “Asherah” was the Hebrew name for an Amorite or Canaanite goddess who was worshiped in various parts of the Ancient Near East. The biblical writers sometimes did not make a clear distinction between references to Asherah as a goddess and as object of worship. According to ancient mythology, Asherah, the mother goddess, was the wife of El and mother of seventy gods, of whom Baal was the most famous. Asherah was the fertility goddess of the Phoenicians and Canaanites. She was called “Lady Asherah of the Sea.” See Canaan.  Scholars who have studied art work from the Ancient Near East have suggested that some figures in drawings could be representations of the fertility goddess Asherah. Drawings of plain and carved poles, staffs, a cross, a double ax, a tree, a tree stump, a headdress for a priest, and several wooden images could be illustrations of an Asherah. Passages such as 2 Kings 13:6; 2 Kings 17:16; 2 Kings 18:4; 2 Kings 21:3; and 2 Kings 23:6,2 Kings 23:15 have been interpreted as a definition of an asherah as a wooden object constructed or destroyed by man. The object stood upright and was used in the worship of a goddess of the same name.  The Asherah existed in both the Southern and Northern Kingdoms of Israel. Jezebel of Tyre apparently installed Asherah worship in the north when she married King Ahab (1 Kings 18:18-19). The principle cities in which the objects were located were Samaria, Bethel, and Jerusalem. According to 1 Kings 14:23, the people “built for themselves high places, and pillars, and Asherim (plural) on every hill and under every green tree.” See Baal; Idolatry. - HOLMAN'S BIBLE DICTIONARY

The dichotomy between an IDOL and a TREE is completely false because THEY ALWAYS WENT TOGETHER just as the PRACTICE still continues THE CUSTOM TODAY.  In fact, the whole point of mentioning the ritual of the tree cutting is to associate it with it's practice of IDOLS and CONDEMN IT. The fact you might have the Idol without the Tree, or the Tree without the Idol, or the Solstice ritual without the Tree or the Idol, or the Tree and the Idol without the Solstice, is all irrelevant, because Jeremiah's known intent of this text, was to condemn it ALL. (No matter how you re-arrange it's parts)  The only proper way to worship God is to worship him the way he told you to worship him. What is so complicated about this? Nothing.

The creeps in our society promoting this deceit, know full well what they are up to, as demonstrated factually above, with THE MARKETING PACKAGING of the very LIGHTS FOR THE TREE.  They depend on the apathy, ignorance, naivete and gullibility of shallow Protestant "Christians" who don't mind drinking the kool-aide without asking questions and demanding honest, credible and sincere logical answers.  In fact, because the whole point of the practice is SYNCRETISM, if it had not been done that way, they wouldn't today be IMITATING IT, and INCORPORATING IT into their worship.  The significance of this fact is lost on the common Christian not familiar with the conceptual design of Rome's THEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, the whole point of which was admittedly to INCORPORATE pagan practices, supposedly to "convert the pagans".  Of course, if you take "Christians" and start teaching them pagan practices, you haven't "converted pagans" to Christianity, you have "converted Christians" to paganism.  Masons adopted the practice of SYNCRETISM from Rome, prior to the reformation, and still retain Rome's theological paradigm inherited ultimately from Cerinthus, the Nicolaitan, who first synthesized the Roman solar-mass with  "Christian" vocabulary.


(1) We incorporated THE SOLAR-MASS worship RITUAL from PAGANISM, to "SAVE THE PAGANS" (Even though we known CHRIST & THE APOSTLES said these rituals worship THE DEVIL)

(2) The SERPENT TREE VENERATION that is a part of it, we now call a "Christ" Mass Tree. (Calling the Devil "Christ" of course, is Blasphemy) Therefore now it is not the Devil, but "Christ". (Even though this is the very definition of Blasphemy)

(3) And it is NOT BLASPHEMY, because we do not THINK it is BLASPHEMY in our heads when we do it.  Therefore it doesn't matter what the Bible says. I am THINKING it is CHRIST, so to me, IT IS. (Even though by definition, it's BLASPHEMY)

The ASHERAH TREE is not an ASHERAH TREE, the IDOLS are not IDOLS, and the worship of the SUN, is not really the worship of the SUN, these are all things other than what they are, because we THINK THEM SO, in our HEADS?

And THAT is the very definition of DELUSION.

Main Entry: De·lu·sion 
Pronunciation: \di-ˈlü-zhən, dē-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin delusion-, delusio, from deludere
Date: 15th century

1 : the act of deluding : the state of being deluded
2 a : something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated b : a persistent false belief ...that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contraryalso : the abnormal state marked by such beliefs

Main Entry: De·lude 
Pronunciation: \di-ˈlüd, dē-\
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): de·lud·edde·lud·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin deludere, from de- + ludere to play — more at ludicrous
Date: 15th century

1 : to mislead the mind or judgment of : deceive, trick


derek, pron. deh'-rek, a road (as trodden); figuratively a course of life or mode of action, often adverbially: - along, away, because of, + by, conversation, custom, [east-] ward, journey, manner, passenger, through, toward, [high-] [path-] way [-side], whither [-soever]. from dârak, pron. daw-rak' From a primitive root; to tread; by implication to walk; also to string a bow (by treading on it in bending): - archer, bend, come, draw, go (over), guide, lead (forth), thresh, tread (down), walk.

Rome intentionally incorporated THE WAY OF THE GENTILE, (particularly the Roman gentile) into the 'creation" of it's version of "Christianity".  But it went actually much farther than simply "bring alongside of", to the extent of actually REPLACING the monotheistic Judaism found in the Antiquities of Scripture, with it's own MIX or SYNTHESIS of Imperial religion within it's empire, placing the name "Christ" over the various aspects of it's solar gods, and cognate "saints" over the rest of it's old pantheon.


1Ki 15:13  
And also Maachah his mother, even her he removed from being queen, 
because she had made AN IDOL in a grove [for an ASHERAH]
and Asa destroyed her idol, and burnt it by the brook Kidron.(KJV)

The VERY FIRST MENTION of the word IDOL in the singular, in the entire BIBLE, begins with a direct association TO THE ASHERAH TREE, and the WORSHIP OF "THE MOTHER-GODDESS", who "gave birth to THE SUN".  Intellectual "Christian" Liberals like to get gender progressive over the depraved worship of this female deity, overlooking the fact, those who worshipped her, were predominantly males, involved with child sex-slavery and child sacrifice, and if this all were not enough, they were worshiping THE SUN.  (The Lake Of Fire) The Devil.  There are a lot of ways to find gender promoting symbolism, and egalitarian theology without resorting to justifying sex-slave traffickers, child-killers and devil worshipers to do it. Just because these perverted ancient middle-eastern men worshiped a woman's vagina, doesn't mean they didn't also degrade women, just as many of these same kind of men still do today. Yes, they will worship their mothers, and beat their wives, and just because they are saying prayers to an ancient vagina, or the Virgin Mary, instead of God, doesn't soften the drunken blows one bit.

The Latin culture of Mother veneration has not diminished in any capacity, the practical male-dominant behavior of Machismo and wife abuse in the least. In fact, exactly opposite is true. In Latin Machismo cultures, where the mother-goddess is venerated and worshiped, males routinely compensate with aggressive male-dominant behavior, both toward their children and spouses, and old-fashioned male dominant behavior is found at it's peak.  


                                                                                 WHY NOT "SHE"?

"God" was defined in the Hebrew scriptures, in male symbolism, because genetically the male chromosome includes both male and female.  It was (and still is) the closest use of gender symbolism to egalitarianism, apart from the word IT, (which inappropriately communicates object status) that can be used. This was referenced in the creation of Eve from Adam, coming from his "rib", not by way of dominance, but mono-anthropomorphism.  Male dominance and subjugation is clearly given the label symptomatic of THE CURSE.  The Hebrew word "rib" is the word for "plank", which is precisely what Chromosomes look like when you view them under a microscope.  Chromosomes had not been discovered yet, and prophetic symbolism uses "pattern similarities" to discuss future unknown realities.  That is how prophetic communication works, and precisely the point of the story in Genesis. If God were "female", there would be no "male" Chromosome represented in the use of the gender. If God is expressed in male gender, both are equally represented in terms of origins.  And this was the idea for the usage.


In most other accounts of the paradise story, only the "enlightened male" caste is present. In Genesis, both male and female are represented.  It is claimed that Genesis blames the woman, but Genesis, actually does quite the opposite, it actually holds Adam responsible because he is the one who received the command, and it was his responsibility to keep it.  Eve's error was not remaining unified with her husband in defending their paradise.  But the greater guilt was laid squarely at Adam's feet. So much so that the messianic prophecy was that the "seed of the woman" (who would be free from the "Adamic nature") would be the one to bruise the "head" of the "serpent". Both however are presented with shared responsibility and a shared failure, which resulted in a shared conseuqence.

But for people who hate the God of the Bible, no amount of explanation on earth will resolve these matters.  They would much rather defend a vagina worshiping pervert who beat his wife, sold his daughters into forced prostitution, worshiped the lake of fire, and damned everyone who followed in his footsteps, than find the truth of any matter to be reasonable or acceptable.  Such antagonisms against the ancient prophets of monotheism are to be expected, but not from so-called "Christians", or "Jews", theologians, ministers, or rabbis, who masquerade the labels, but obsessively and compulsively serve, defend and promote it's opposite. They should be honest enough with the public to publicly oblige themselves the same label that goes with it.


The bizarre contradictions over this subject never cease.  It is the basic premise of science itself, that effects have causes, and the same people who promote the worship of the Mother of God, goddess worship, like to then claim they do this so that it will help bring spiritual "equality", claiming on the one hand that this spiritual cause will have an effect.  But then when it is pointed out that where this kind of worship dominates, there is also a profusion of gender confusion, and higher than average levels of homosexuality, all of a sudden, the practice has no effect? (And whatever effect of gender confusion is being produced is completely mysterious and random without cause?) So obviously, you cannot have it both way.  Either it has no effect, and there is no point in promoting it, or it does have an effect, and that effect is a documented increase in gender confusion, in both the male and female populations. What kind of sick twisted mind would want to do this intentionally to children?

The Bible simply puts forth a very logical and scientifically sound thesis on this issue, whether anyone on earth likes it or not, effects have causes in human consciousness. And nothing will have as much an effect on a person's psyche, than what they "worship".  If you worship a god with only one set of chromosomes, you will create a half-gendered culture of people (either masculine or feminine) full of GENDER CONFUSION. If you worship the Sun, you get global warming. What do you honestly expect the Bible to say? It doesn't matter what you worship? Anything will do? 

Obviously, Jeremiah 10, in any capacity would preclude the Roman model of religion entirely as something the real Jeremiah would have certainly condemned, including it's practice of the empire's Solstice worship rituals, and certainly, the practices associated with it's Solstice sacred trees which were directly associated with Apollyon (Apollo) directly mentioned in Rev. 9:11.


The ACTUAL TEXT of Jeremiah 10 itself, having said that is not as clearly absent of THIS TREE as is claimed.  Primarily because the Hebrew grammatical construction is not reflected in the English translations.  What the general public is not aware of, is that this text has long been a battle ground and target of Roman and Freemason rejection.  And that rejection extends well beyond the attempt to merely claim the obvious reference to Tree Cutting, that is mentioned within it's texts, actually does not refer to a Tree being cut.  The Hebrew scholars Keil and Delitzch take time to defend the actual authenticity of the text itself from charges it was a latter interpolation and not authentic to Jeremiah.   Keil and Delitzch show the basis of the charges made by Movers (de utr. rec. Jer. p. 43), de W., Hitz., and Näg, to be without merit resting on nothing more than faulty historical assumption, easily disproven in scores of other texts in and even prior to, the same time-frame as the Prophet.

That this text would become the target of such hostility is clearly understandable, especially if the entire RELIGION of your particular "Church" revolves around THE WAY OF THE GENTILES (Which it overtly condemns).

This is addressed to the house of Israel, i.e., to the whole covenant people; and "house of Israel" points back to "all the house of Israel" in Jer_9:25. עֲלֵיכֶם for אֲלֵיכֶם, as frequently in Jeremiah. The way of the heathen is their mode of life, especially their way of worshipping their gods; cf. ἡ ὁδὸς, Act_9:2; Act_19:9. לָמַד c. אֶל, accustom oneself to a thing, used in Jer_13:21 with the synonymous עַל, and in Psa_18:35 (Piel) with לְ. - Keil and DelitzchCommentary on the Old Testament, Jeremiah 10.

Despite the claim that the text does not refer to the SOLSTICE TREE PRACTICE by many, it will be shown that the text does in fact refer specifically to this very practice, and the objections created to nullify the intent of the text, which is the prohbition against observing the Solar-cult practices of the Gentiles, is unaffected by the claim by the "Apollo-gists" of Babelism.

The simple and truthful fact of the matter is that virtually all evangelical "Christian" Bible scholars for 5 centuries have clearly understood that the Bible from Genesis to Revelation consistently condemns the practice of SYNCRETISM, primarily because ASSIMILATION was precisely what JEWS were historically struggling against to void their own genocide for literally millenia under the oppression of Gentile Empires.  Anyone who does not admit this overly redundant, overly repeated, fact from the texts of the Bible has literally not just taken a "single text" out of context, they have taken an entire record of Judeo-Christian monotheistic civilization out of HISTORY! (All to justify the ritualistic veneration of damned snake tree, and the lake of fire it worships)



"Context" without "text" is simply "Con".  Context is obviously critical to interpreting any text correctly, but appeals to "context" that ignore, erase or dispense with actual concrete facts of grammar and text to do it, leaves nothing but a "Con" job in it's wake.  Whenever an error is confronted with the plain straightforward facts of Biblical text, the first thing the pig will do is start squealing "context", never bothering to actually establish the fact of what the context actually is, other than some flimsy excuse making to avoid what the text is clearly spelling out in it's language, grammar and history.  It is as though, some professor somewhere taught all of these professional excuse-makers in the same class, instructing them to immediately say the word "Context" whenever they get caught lying about anything, and it will magically grant "absolution" for the error no matter how egregious or spectacular the twisted logic gets.

Jeremiah 10 does in fact, have a context, but it's CONTEXT, is not a modern minister finding any excuse he can squeeze out of thin air to excuse a practice that is openly condemned in the Bible.  No, that would not be the "context" of Jeremiah 10.  And whenever a Solar-Mass Apollo-gist begins talking about "Context", he is the very first to ignore it, redefine it, or pretend it doesn't actually exist.  There are ambiguities inherent in language.  A single statement can in fact accurately mean many different things, even with a fully known iron-clad context as contemporaneous as a current Newspaper, but the honest goal of interpretation is to accurately understand what they author was actually addressing.  Not what we can make his words squawk out like a finger puppet, in order to lawyer-lie our way through a problem.  And that is the real true problem Apollo-gists have with Jeremiah 10. They begin with the unmovable position, the unquestioned resolve to continue their "Christmas" practices, in reality, no matter what any text in the Bible, or any part of it, might say, not just Jeremiah 10.  Why do they harp on Jeremiah 10? Because that is obviously a very embarrassing text, and if you are going to ignore it and do what you want to do anyway, you have to find a way to excuse or justify it, while you simultaneously tell your congregation the "Bible is the Word of God".  Catholics have no such problem, they just ignore it happily (as they do with all the rest of their practices) pointing to the Pope as their "God" on earth, who speaks his "word" to them in the form of his papal decrees, which today might be pray to Mary, and tomorrow might be,  drink poison kool-aide or go kill everyone that disagrees with us. And in either case, it will be "the Word of God" to the faithful Catholic, who doesn't need a Bible, but a Pope to justify any practice on earth.

Nicolaitan Protestants are caught in a delima which is irreconcilable.   They have a practice from the Pope, and  a Bible from the Apostles, which condemn the practice of the Pope. So rather than repent, they begin "spin-doctoring".  First it's one, two, three texts, then it's dozens, scores, hundreds, and before it's over the entire book.  So singling out Jeremiah 10, when the weight and argument of the entire Book, is against it, is really missing the point, not only of Jeremiah 10, but the entire monotheistic tradition spanning thousands of years and multiple continents.  And yet, this is precisely what the Jeremiah 10 Apollo-gist does, when he begins his whining about "Context".  He himself, the violator-in-cheif of all, when it comes to actual "context".  He extracts the entire book out of it's known historical and cultural "Context" to then micro-manage 1 verse to his liking, using the word "CONTEXT", and then display the chutzpah, to act patronizingly condescending to those who point out his hypocrisy with this text.

But when the word "Context" is invoked, it like any other word, is limited by what it actually means in a dictionary.  It is not an ink-blot that one gets to imagine whatever "free-association" that pops into their head. Context is DEFINED.  It has RULES.  They are relatively easy to follow, and relatively easy to determine if you are giving it an honest effort to do so.  


(1) Grammer

(2) Definition

(3) Usage

(4) Historical setting

(5) Idiom

(6) Culture

(7) History of interpretation

In all 7 of these categories, the actual and real CONTEXT of JEREMIAH 10 is fully known, and DOES NOT SUPPORT THE CLAIMS OF THE SOLAR-MASS "APOLLO-GISTS".  IT CONTRADICTS THEM, AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW:  But their appeals to "CONTEXT" are done in hopes their audiences are not FAMILIAR with those facts, and their air of intelligence and superiority are enough to satisfy their insecurities.  Obviously not a very honest approach to the question.



The structure of Jeremiah's argument against the SOLSTICE TREE PRACTICE is shown below.  It incorporates the ENTIRE RELIGION of the GENTILE SOLSTICE-CULT, not simply THE TREE.  It mentions THE TREE, THE IDOLS, THE MASS (Libation), even the ASTRONOMICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the observance.  The words marked in GREEN are the [Primary] and LITERAL HEBREW WORDS found in the text itself.  And while section (5)-(9) may or may not refer to Idols, as the text is clearly not so obvious in Hebrew, Babel's "Apollo-gists" intentionally ignore everything else in the text, some of which calls them out by name, and clearly points to THE SOLSTICE TREE. Anyone who patronizingly pats you on the head, and tells you this text does not in any way refer to the SOLSTICE TREE CULT among the Gentiles, is simply lying to you, or ignore-ant enough that they should not be teaching anyone.


Jer 10:1  Hear the Word which YHVH speaks against you, house of Israel. 

Jer 10:2   YHVH says, LAMAD/[goad/teach] not the DEREK/[Course/path] of the GOY/[Herded] and do not CHATHATH/[Prostrate/worship] at the OTH/[Appearing] of the SHAMAYIM [heavens/Astrological bodies]   - LITERALLY "DO NOT DO AS THE GENTILES DO, DO NOT WORSHIP AT THE SOLSTICE"

Jer 10:3  For CHUQQAH/[Ordinance] of the  'AM/[Congregations, from Aw'mam, Association, Hidden]  are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the TYA'AR/[Tree Grove]the work of the YADIM [Order/Ministry] of the CHARASH/[Mason/Craftsman], with the axe. 



Jer 10:4  They YAHPAH/[Brighten]  it with silver and with ZAHAB/[Shimmering]they fasten it with MASMER/[Pegs] and with MAQQABAH/[Mallets], that it WAVER not. 

Jer 10:5 They are MIQSHAH/[Tied up/Encircled/Surrounded] like the TOMER/[Palm's Trunk], but DABAR/[Arranged] not: they must needs be NASAH/[Lifted/raised Up], because they cannot TSA'AD[Step]Do not YARE/[Revere] them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good. 

Jer 10:6 Nothing compares with YHVH, thou art great, and thy SHEM is greater in FORCE

Jer 10:7 Who does not revere the king of the Goyim?  Because it is suitable that among all the wise men of the Goyim, and among their dominion, there is none like this.

Jer 10:8 But they are ECHAD/[tied together/bundled] BA'AR/[Kindle/fire wood] and KASAL/[Fat] .  [Thier TREE] is a MUSAR/[Doctrine,Chastisement] of vanities. 






Using primary definitions and Transliterations

Jer 10:9 Silver plates are imported from Tarshish, and golden things from Uphaz,  the work of the Masons and the Yadim of their founder, they wear blue and purple, and it's all the work of cunning men.

Jer 10:10 But YHVH is the true Elohim, and he is living Elohim, and a concealed Royalty.  Because of his wrath, he will splinter the land shaken [Earthquake], and the Goyim will not be able to contain his fury.

Jer 10:11 This shall you say unto them, the Elohim that did not make the Shamayim and the Earth, shall be destroyed by the earth, and from under these (same) Shamayim.

Jer 10:12 It is he who has made the Earth by his force, and established the world by his wisdom, and bends the Shamayim by his reason

Jer 10:13  When He utters His voice, there is a noise of waters in the heavens. He causes the vapors to go up from the ends of the earth; He makes lightnings for the rain and brings forth the wind out of His storehouses. 

Jer 10:16  The Portion of Jacob is not like these. For He is the Former of all things; and Israel is the tribe of His inheritance; YHVH of Hosts is His name. 


Jer 10:14 Every man is brutish in his knowledge: .......................................................................TREE (Ge.3)

Jer 10:14 every founder is confounded by the graven image: .......................................................IDOLS (Ge.6)  

Jer 10:14 for his LIBATION [i.e., Mass] is untrue, and there is no RUACH in them....................TOWER (Ge.11) 

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PASSAGE (dual reference again)

Jer 10:15 They are vanity, and the work of delusion: ............................. Jer 10:8 [Thier TREE] is a doctrine of vanities. 

Jer 10:15  in the time of their visitation they shall perish...........................Jer 10:8  they are altogether BEASTIAL and foolish: KJV




If SECTIONS 1-4 [Referencing Cutting a Tree], cannot or does not invalidate SECTIONS 5-9 [Referencing an Idol], then how is it that a dual reference to Idolatry, and Cutting a Tree, eliminates the reference to the cutting of a tree?  IT DOESN'T.


1. If you are using CONTEXT, to erase the reference to the TREE PRACTICE, then why do you have to ignore the CONTEXT (from history which documents the practice, archeology which illustrates the practice, and dozens of other references in Biblical text that also refer tot he practice) in order to "define" your "CONTEXT"?

2. If the text of Jeremiah 10, is not about the cutting of the tree, but simply the idol, why you do have grammatical dependency in verse 4, which refers back to verse 3?  Verse 4 contains undefined references BECAUSE it is referring back to verse 3.  Apollo-gists, take those ambiguities, which are textually directed at verse 3, and insert their own "interpretation" as to what is meant. Why? How can this legitimately be done, and then claim, you are being "accurate" with the text? No such thing is happening.  The grammatical rules of the text's own reference is being violated in order to pull that off.

3. Why are "pegs" and "mallets" used to keep these supposed "idols" from "wavering", when the idols Jeremiah was addressing were the kind placed under trees (i.e.,"under every green tree"?), the teraphim? No more than at the most a foot or two high? An idol 12 inches high? Needs to be "fastened" with pegs so that it does not "waver"?  


Jer 2:20  For of old time I have broken thy yoke, and burst thy bands; and thou saidst, I will not transgress; when upon every high hill and under every green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot. 

Jer 3:6  The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot. 

Jer 3:13  Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD. 

Isa 57:5  Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clifts of the rocks? 

So, and idol figurine (which we do in fact have archeological remains of) which is only 12 to 36 inches high, need to be "fasted" so that they "waver not"? Really? How imaginative?


(1) Jeremiah doesn't prefce his comment with (this is ONLY about the "idols"). He prefaces the comments with 'LEARN NOT "THE WAY" of the Gentiles. He specifically applies what he is saying to their "entire way". Jer.10:1,2 This includes 'everything they are doing (Including cutting down the tree), and specifically their "calendar".

(2) The IDOLS he does mention, specifically are said to be placed "under the tree" (just as the practice is done today) Jer. 2:20, 3:6,13

(3) the Yalda Practice included "passing through the fire" (Jer. 32:35) Today it is retained as "Shanbeh Suri".

(4) There are no "large Idols" ever found in Israel that match the claims of how idols are being made in this text of the size they are claiming. Not a single one. (Large golden idols were national treasures, very rare and expensive to make) Also "large idols" regardless of material were so heavy, they needed no anchoring as described in V.4.

(5) The "angels" on the Ark were only 9 inches tall. (And do not "illustrate" the practices that are claimed by Apollo-gist described in this text) 



Jer 10:3  For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. (KJV)


Jer 10:4  They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (King James Version)

Jer 10:4  They decke it with siluer and with golde, they fasten it with nayles, and with hammers that it mooue not.  (King James Version 1611)

Jer 10:4  They adorn it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and hammers, so that it will not wobble.  (Modern King James)

Jer 10:4  They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it may not move.  (Webster Bible)

Jer 10:4  They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.  (American Standard Version)

Jer 10:4  With silver and with gold they beautify it, With nails and with hammers they fix it, And it doth not stumble. (Young's Literal Translation)

Jer 10:4  He hath decked it with silver and gold: he hath put it together with nails and hammers, that it may not fall asunder. (Dhouay-Rheims)

Jer 10:4  And another decketh it with siluer, and with golde: they fasten it with nailes, and hammers, that it fall not. (Geneva)

Jer 10:4  They adorn it with silver and with gold; they make them strong with nails and hammers, so that it will not wobble. (Literal Translation Holy Bible)

Jer 10:4  They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (Revised Version)

Jer 10:4  They make it beautiful with silver and gold; they make it strong with nails and hammers, so that it may not be moved.  (Bible in Basic English 1965)

Jer 10:4  They couer it ouer with golde or siluer, they fasten it with nailes and hammers, that it moue not.  (Bishops Bible 1568)

Jer 10:4  they deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.  (Darby Bible 1889)

Jer 10:4  They decorate it with silver and gold; they fasten it with hammer and nails so that it cannot move.  (English Standard Version)

Jer 10:4  and decorated with silver and gold. It is fastened down with nails to keep it from falling over.  (Good News Bible)

Jer 10:4  They deck it with silver and with gold, they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (Jewish Publican Society [Tanakh])

The consistent TRANSLATION of this text has been throughout history to REFLECT

Jer 10:4  ἀργυρίῳ καὶ χρυσίῳ κεκαλλωπισμένα ἐστίν ἐν σφύραις καὶ ἥλοις ἐστερέωσαν αὐτά καὶ οὐ κινηθήσονται (LXX Greek Septuagint)
They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it not move.

Jer 10:4  argento et auro decoravit illud clavis et malleis conpegit ut non dissolvatur  (Latin Vulgate)
  silver and gold, decked it with nails and with hammers, they may not totter

Jer 10:4 und schmückt sie mit Silber und Gold und heftet sie mit Nägeln und Hämmern, daß sie nicht umfallen. (German Luther Bible)
and decorated with silver and gold, and fastened it with nails and hammers, that it does not fall over.




In order to get the word IT to refer to IDOLS (plural) instead of THE TREE (singular), you have to VIOLATE IT'S GRAMMATICAL CONTEXT in order to do it.  That is why VIRTUALLY ALL TRANSLATIONS have the word IT in this verse. IT is the ONLY WAY this text can be accurately translated into ENGLISH. IT means IT(The Tree-singular) not (The IDOLS-plural).

Verse 4 is said to be strictly about an idol. Verse 3 is admittedly a tree.  Verse 4 contains grammatical dependencies on Verse 3, meaning the ACTUAL CONTEXT GRAMMATICALLY of VERSE 4, is in fact, VERSE 3, not some imagined scheme outside of the text, inserted into it.  The fact is anyone may "suppose" it refers to IDOLS.  In fact, it doesn't change the prohibition against solstice-worship one iota if it did, because the prohibition is against the ENTIRE WAY OF THE GENTILES (EVERY PART OF IT), but the fact that this GRAMMATICAL CONTEXT IS IGNORED, to arbitrarily assign it's value to a definition which violates both it's GRAMMATICAL NUMBER, and it's clear GRAMMATICAL DEPENDENCY, is not at all staying within THE CONTEXT, within any stretch of the "rules" whatsoever.  So "Context" is nothing more than a verbal INKBLOT for FREE ASSOCIATION, to mean whatever you wish to "con" people with.  Becaause GRAMMATICAL CONTEXT does NOT support the Solar-Mass Apollo-gist's argument. In fact, IT CONTRADICTS IT! WITH AN "IT".

If you simply insist on going outside the verse to do isogesis, rather than exogesis, then THIS IS THE CONTEXT OF THE BOOK, AND IT'S AUTHOR

Jer 3:6  The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot

Jer 3:13  Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD. 


The modern perversions hide this warning by perverting this passage by disguising the adorned tree as an ordinary idol. I have seen many Christmas trees through the windows of churches all across America, even Baptist churches. This is as strong a statement that they could make about what kind of church they are, and should be a warning to all with any spiritual discernment at all. The International Children's Bible does not want poor little Christian children of being involved with the fun of celebrating the pagan holiday like their non-Christian classmates, so they presented it this way: "The customs of other people are worth nothing. Their idols are nothing but wood from the forest. They are made by a worker with his chisel..."In order to force this obscuration of the verse they deceive their readers by translating "matsad", meaning axe, as chisel. A wooden idol may be chiseled, but not cut down with an axe as a tree is. What conniving snakes!  NIV: ...they cut a tree out of the forest, and a craftsman shapes it with his chisel. The pornographers who own the NIV obscure the verse even worse. Here the tree is cut down and then it is carved as an idol. This requires an axe and a chisel both when there is only one tool in the verse. It is bad enough to lie about the chisel, but to interject both adds a level of incompetence that is mind boggling. The ever silly Living Bible perverts the verse even more.  "They cut down a tree and carve an idol..."The Amplified Bible finds a different way to use deceit to obscure the significance of the verse: "... it is but a tree which one cuts out of the forest [to make for himself a god], the work of the craftsman with the ax or other tool"  Or other tool? Make a god? Where is any of that in the Hebrew?  The NLT has the following display of foolishness: "... They cut down a tree and carved an idol."   DISTORTING TRANSLATIONS by DR. JOHN HINTON Ph.D.



"This text is not talking about a Christmas Tree. It is talking about IDOLS which were CARVED from the TREE, then covered in PLATES of gold and silver and metal.  They were carved out of wood, and because the idols were large and made of wood, they were secured with PEGS so that they would not FALL OVER." - Solar-Mass Apollo-gist

Where are they?  They love to go into wonderful speculations about why verse 4 is not talking about THE TREE, (that it refers to in it's actual grammar), but instead these really large IDOLS, that are COVERED in PLATES OF METAL.  Aside from the fact their explanations are pure fantasy, offered with an attitude, where are these idols? Where are they?

Speculations in the text are either confirmed or contradicted by Archaeology.  Archaeology is part of defining what THE CONTEXT actually is in ancient texts.  Scholars have spent centuries "speculating" about texts, only to have egg on their face, with nothing more than the turn of a shovel in a ditch in the middle-east.  Once archaeological information does come to light on a subject, the time for speculation for honest brokers of sacred texts come to an end.  But here, you will find no such thing happening.  Archaeology has illustrated the customs being condemned in this text with tremendous clarity for modern readers.  Yet, the "speculators" passing off theories about the meaning of this text constructed over a century ago, are still being passed around as the "hottest thing off the press"? So, if you do choose to reject the archeaology of this text, to hang on to a much older "Christmas Apollo-getic" speculation about it, then the question must be asked? Where are these "idols" that you describe? Where are they? Why is it not a single idol in the middle-east, and we are literally talking about NOT ONE, has ever been found they way it is being made in this text, nor found in the location, nor in the manner, Jeremiah is describing them. Not a single one? Not even one.








There ARE NO huge idols, made of wood, and covered in plates of metal found in the middle-east. Not a single one.  NOT ONE.  And this fact is so bizarre, that all the excuse making one might think cannot really either excuse or explain this anomoly. Because obviously, if one interpretation has piles of archeology stacked up behind it, and the other interpretation has literally NOTHING. (And this is simply not a dismissal of a few small finds, which could be interpreted as "insignificant", we are talking about NOTHING. LITERALLY NOTHING that matches their descriptions based on their explanations of this text.  Then you simply have to explain this discrepancy with observed reality, unless one is content with being a liar or a fool? You have to explain this discrepancy?




Were there SOME idols made out of wood? Probably. Were there some that might have even been large? Of course. But here is the problem.  Jeremiah is addressing a proliferation of idolatry. A common practice that people knew about, and Jeremiah was condemning.  There is no evidence of a proliferation of wooden idols in the middle-east. And there are virtually none large enough of the the kind that require being "fastened" with pegs so they do not "waver".  Where are the remains of these METAL PLATES? They DON'T EXIST! Wood can be claimed to deteriorate, although they often have no problem claiming wood from Noah's ark, from 7000 years ago is still sitting on a mountain in Turkey, and for some miraculous reason large ancient wooden idols in a very humid and moist Europe managed to survive to this day. Yes to be fair, it must be granted, that wood and moisture produce deterioration.  But you are being asked to believe the highly unprobable thesis, all wood everywhere in the arid middle-east deteriorated & magically disappeared when it cam to "large wooden idols", and none of these idols are now left to be found.  Not even one. Not even in a cave or buried in a sand dune. Not a single one, anywhere on earth in the middle east, but they did just fine in the bog fields of Europe. As irrational and unprobable as this claim may be, let's grant it for the sake of argument here. BUT... according to the SOLAR-MASS APOLLO-GIST, these WOOD IDOLS WERE "COVERED IN PLATES OF METAL"!?!?!

And not a single one, not one alleged "Metal Plate" for a large wooden Idol, has ever been found. Not a single one. Yes, everything else on earth has been found. The Bamah houses, the altars, the stone tablets, the engravings, the amulets, rings, cups, vases, plates, even cult dildos, the details of virtually everything one could possibly even begin to imagine, including papyri texts thousands of years old, and TONS of TERAPHIM, PILES AND PILES, of STATUARY the SIZE OF WHICH VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL to MODERN "NATIVITY SCENE" FIGURINES, perfect for PLACING UNDER A TREE. Literally PILES OF THESE IDOLS. BUT... NOT A SINGLE SOLITARY IDOL, in the manner described by the SOLAR-MASS APOLLO-GISTS !!!! NOT A SINGLE ONE !!!!

Isn't the answer a little MORE than obvious here? They haven't found any BECAUSE THEY DO NOT EXIST !  AND NEVER DID !  In fact, "wooden idol making" wasn't even the primary way of making Idols for this part of the world.  It was to make them out of CLAY, or CARVE THEM OUT OF STONE.  That's simply what the arcehological record demonstrates in the Middle-East.  That is NOT the case in ENGLAND, or NORWAY, or EUROPE, where most of these SOLAR-MASS APOLLO-GISTS were getting their ideas of how IDOLS were made.   In those parts of the world, surrounded by TREES, it was quite natural to make everything from their TEMPLES to their IDOLS out of WOOD. And that of course brings up an interesting contradiction to their claims? If you claim none of these "Wooden idols" survived because the "wood" deteriorated, (and the metal plates just magically disappeared, every single one on planet earth) despite the dry arid climate in the middle-east, WHY DO YOU FIND THESE KINDS OF WOODEN IDOLS IN EUROPE? THOUSANDS OF YEARS OLD? BUT NOT THE MIDDLE-EAST?  BECAUSE THEY WERE MADE THAT WAY IN EUROPE, NOT THE MIDDLE-EAST!

 But in the arid middle-east, where trees do not grow all over the place, and the kind of trees that DO usually grow well, do not have huge massive trunks in them, but rather knarly little shrub like bases, these dogmatic speculative explanations (in the complete ABSCENCE of their ACTUAL EXISTENCE) in the archeological record in the middle-east, is pathetic desparation accepted by Christians, who would believe anything told to them, so long as they could keep singing to their tree, calling it "Christ", on the Satyr's Solar-Mass.





1 KING 14:23 QUOTE:"... and groves on every high hill, and under every green tree; that is, set up idols, and temples for idols, amidst groves of trees, and under all green trees; as was the custom of the Heathens, who sacrificed on the heights of hills and tops of mountains, as was particularly the custom of the Persians, as both Herodotus (m) and Xenophon (n) relate; and with the Getae, a people in Thrace, was a mountain they reckoned sacred (o). 

(m) Clio, sive, l. 1. c. 131. (n) Cyropaedia, l. 8. c. 45. (o) Strabo Geograph. l. 7. p. 206.



And IDOLATRY is precisely what the Roman Solar-Mass now called a "CHRIST" MASS (and it's tree practice) is STILL all about.  It was the celebration of the birth of the Idol, that symbolized the rebirth of the Sun, that was (and still is) being worshiped through these "festivities".  So if you had nothing in Jeremiah at all, but a condemnation of Idolatry, Solar-mass keepers would still not be off the hook with Jeremiah 10. (Even with the most minimalist interpretation even feasibly possible)

The Minervalia are as much Minerva’s, as the Saturnalia Saturn’s; Saturn’s, which must necessarily be celebrated even by little slaves at the time of the Saturnalia. New-year’s gifts likewise must be caught at, and the Septimontium kept; and all the presents of Midwinter and the feast of Dear Kinsmanship must be exacted; the schools must be wreathed with flowers; the flamens’ wives and the aediles sacrifice; the school is honoured on the appointed holy-days. The same thing takes place on an idol’s birthday; every pomp of the devil is frequented. Who will think that these things are befitting to a Christian…? 

- (Tertullian. On Idolatry, Chapter X. Translated by S. Thelwall. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 3. Edited by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright © 2004 by K. Knight).

No matter how you wish to re-arrange the contents of this text, and no matter which parts of it you wish to claim in reality are or are not there, it DOES directly CONDEMN THE PRACTICE OF THE ROMAN SOLAR-MASS WORSHIP now called a "Christ" Mass.

And that is simply the honest and undeniable fact of the matter.  There are many who claim to be "ministers" who simply do not care that it does, and are willing to tell whatever story it takes to get around what it says.  There are ministers (believe it or not) who have said with their own mouths, they would rather die, than give up their "Christmas", and nowhere is that more evident than when they begin explaining (or hiding) Jeremiah 10.  The ROMAN SOLAR-MASS to APOLLYON now called a "Christ" mass, is at it's very core, ABOUT IDOLATRY.  Which is pretty much the "nature" of putting A TREE above the will of God in your life, anyway.  It is what it is, by definition, Idolatry. And Jeremiah 10, both coming and going, condemn this "heathen" SOLAR-MASS practice.



And as you saw from THE ANTIQUE CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTS MUSEUM, quote above, WHY THE DENIALS today? If there is NO PROBLEM in admitting where it really comes from [i.e., PERSIA, and the YALDA TREE practice]?  Why such extreme attempts to deny the most obvious connections today, if not only Jeremiah, but the entire body of teaching in the Bible, does not implicate the practice?  And at one time, a substantial population of Biblically literate Protestants to make it an embarrassment? Obviously it does, and people responsible for the changes in terminology recognized the problem they were creating with the original use of their allusions to the original source of the practice in Persia. THAT WAS 1909. Over a hundred years ago now.

The bottom line of everything is not how Dr. Suess "interprets" Jeremiah 10, nor Rabbi Wolfawitzy, nor Professor Peabody, nor Pastor Pottymouth.... it is in the end, what God meant when he said what he said to the Prophet Jeremiah. And God is perfectly able and willing to make his intention fully known to the world, and anyone who has eyes to see.  Look around yourself during this high-holy Mass to Apollyon every year,  and that is pretty much all you really have to do if you are honest with yourself and know God in any way shape or form.  Watch what God does, and you will see what he thinks of it. It's pretty self-explanatory if you want to know the truth.  It's not the most deadly, tragic, depressive, disastrous time of the year, every year, because God loves it so much.  Quite the contrary, and the obvious nature of this "revelation" of his "wrath" from heaven, is a virtual promise in the Scripture, which zooms way past all the propagandizing and lying some religious leaders can do with an ancient text from a Prophet, thousands of years ago.

Jer 10:3,4  For the customs of the people are vain; for one cuts a tree out of the forest with the axe, the work of the hands of the workman. 

They adorn it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and hammers, so that it will not wobble. 

Jer 10:10  Jehovah is the true God, He is the living God, and the everlasting King. 

At His wrath the earth shall tremble (QUAKE), 






2Ki 17:9  And the children of Israel did secretly those things that were not right against the LORD their God,         

Sometimes, rather than simply repent, which can be done in the blink of an eye, people who wrongly think of themselves of "Christians", including and following the example of the "Goats" of high-place worship, that call themselves "Christian ministers", the argument then proceeds to "Well, what's so wrong with the WAY OF THE GENTILES anyway"?  This comment is followed by a lot of really nice diplomatic sounding phrases that sugar coat their open rejection of what God and his very own real Christ, has commanded (not requested) of them.  And really any "Christian" minister who claims to hold himself out to the public in that role, who says such a thing, ought to (if it were legal, moral and ethical, which it is not) be publicly slapped in the face, if not beat with the same whip Christ used on the merchants in the Temple.  That is the nature of such a comment from one who claims to know better.

To people who are biblically literate, it is a very stupid comment that needs no explanation or rebuttal, but to the vast majority of the "ignorant masses" that Nicolaitan ministers prey upon daily from their TV screens, it all sounds very reasonable and intelligent.  Of course, the ironic thing about this strange behavior is that it is often offered from the lips of "Evangelical" impostures like the Pat Robertson TV celebrity types, who spend most of their time, denouncing the same thing, they now suddenly employ to their defense?  Thus demonstrating to the theologically and biblically educated, they are self-confessed frauds.  The fact is, they are government sponsored frauds, financed by wealthy tycoons and corporations who want the public brainwashed with a certain political view that favors their mercantile interests (using "Jesus" and "Christ" and "God") to do it to them.  They are blatant frauds.

And for Nicolatians who INTENTIONALLY MIX the worship of GOD WITH SATAN, naturally, they would not care in the least, which is which. In fact, it's basic to their entire theological paradigm.  So what if it is "the way of the Gentiles" or the "way of the Jews" or the 'way of the eskimos", who gives a flip?  But that attitude reflects a lack of education, both theologically and historically, not the presence of one.

The "way of the Gentile" is not simply bad because it's different than a "Jew".  It wasn't condemned by all the prophets of Monotheism (some of whom were even/are called "Gentiles" themselves) such as Melchizadek.  It was that the "Gentiles" (meaning the masses of the empire) [the "goy", the "herd"] had chosen the "Bad Way".  Now, this needs to be made very very clear to the reader.  In other words, it wasn't "The Way of the GENTILES", it was "THE WAY of the gentiles".  Gentile was not the problem, it was THE WAY, the Gentile empires HAD CHOSEN.  And what WAY? Was that?  It was to worship the Devil, or Satan, the Serpent.  That is simply the real history of the matter.  Gentile (i.e., imperial) religion, had chosen Satan worship as it's primary operational system.  At the root of every branch of it, was the Serpent, it's enlightenment, it's veneration of occult knowledge, the deification of the self, expressed in it's ultimate incarnation, the emperor, who was to have all rights, and his conquered subjects, absolutely none, except those he felt magnanimous enough to extend on any given day.

Now, that is not simply a narrow-minded little snip at noble pagan religions, which have a proud and glorious past, created by indigenous people and their indigenous cultures, each reflecting their unique respect for nature.  The latter is the story that the Vatican is pushing these days, because it is in the interest of the Vatican to propagate that myth. Since people are beginning to realize the Vatican itself has simply institutionalized it's own Roman paganism through compulsion of imperial law on the world.  So naturally, getting the world to convert itself to their way of thinking, serve the interests of Rome, and of course it's emperor, the Pope.  And thus, like everything else Rome pushes, making itself the measure of all things, this is what shall now be told, regardless of whether it was ever true or not.

But... there needs to be a little reality check concerning some of these propaganda ploys.  Gentiles are the ones who abandoned the "way of the Gentiles", and created such a momentous movement toward monotheism, it threatened the stability of the Roman empire.  Gentiles turned to God, to the scriptures, to the prophets and apostles, recognizing instinctively the truths that were spreading from house to house, throughout the empire.  They weren't abandoning their glorious noble pagan past, they were abandoning being lied too, tricked, deceived, and oppressed, followed by declarations from the ruling elite, it was all "good".

These gods were venerated not because they were so noble, moral, caring, compassionate, and had so much respect for nature, they were being venerated because they lied, cheated, raped,  killed and maimed, on such a colossal level, they were "gods" for doing it. (And it was "good")  That's why it was called "devil worship".  These "gods" were devils.  They were the meanest, biggest, baddest in the land.  Thus a "god".  This was the religious system promoted by the Empire, that THE GENTILES, were even fed up with.

Now whether you are an atheist or a pagan, you have to understand, that before the monotheistic "God" became the sole copyrighted property of the Roman empire, to be then turned into the very same thing, with some new words, believing in "God" as opposed to "gods", and in particular, it's imperial "priests", was a very revolutionary act that catapulted any person who "believed" into an entirely new way of looking at the world.  A way of seeing the world, perhaps for the first time for many, through the eyes of intrinsic human rights, granted to all men on earth, by a creator, that was way above the exaltation and arbitrary selfishness of a Roman emperor, even if he was the "son" of one of it's gods.  It was a rejection of the emperor and all that he stood for, his fascism, his egotism, his lack of accountability, his lying, cheating, killing, deceit, arrogance and selfishness.  Now, even the emperor had something to fear.  It was a way of putting an arrogant, spoiled, selfish, human ruler in his place, which is UNDER heaven (like everybody else), not IN CHARGE OF IT.

The reformed Judaism being spread in the New Testament was intrinsically a people's movement. It was even hated by Jewish Rabbinical institutionalist's, who were themselves simply those who had jumped into bed with Rome, and sought nothing more than to benefit from Rome's continued power, as the official appointed puppet-masters in Israel.   So naturally the solution to all this for Rome, was simple. Confiscate it, redefine it, and control it for Rome, which is precisely what Rome did.  And why now, the more Roman "Christianity" get's, the more it's not worth a damn to anyone including it's own believers.

But there are some very real very objective sociological FACTS about why THE WAY of the SERPENT, was bad. Obviously if worshiping the devil, led to a great life here on earth, and then to a wonderful afterlife in heaven, perhaps everyone really ought to worship the devil. Perhaps that IS the best thing for the individual and for all of humanity?  If that were really the case, then who could complain?  But unfortunately, it is not.  It is not from a political point of view, from a sociological point of view, nor from a spiritual point of view. And in fact, it is so against the self-interest of the individual, and the collective community of humanity, the only way it can be justified, is through deceit, which it openly uses (and must).  Spiritually, all things return from where they come.  That is a simple spiritual fact. If you worship the Lake of Fire, that is where you s go. End of story. And THIS is why GENTILES, began converting to Monotheism.  But what was good for an oppressed Roman, wasn't necessarily good for the Roman Empire. And thus the need for Rome to get involved and in control of it.  But Rome never forsook it's devil worship, nor the deification of it's emperor, and both remain untouched thousands of years later, with nothing more than some "Christian" words plastered on the face of it, to justify it.  And the same veneration it had for the deceit, trickery, murder and marauding, in the name of it's old gods, it now does in the name of it's new one, and it's "Church fathers" and it's "Saints" and it's imposter "evangelicals" on American TVs.  And thus why so many are now convinced even devil worship was better than this.

The fact is Rome never stopped worshiping the devil. It just gave it's devil a face lift, and a new name.  (And killed everyone else that remembered who it really was)  And if you turn to "THE WAY"of the EMPIRE, you are still worshiping the devil today, as much as you would have back in 33 AD, when it crucified what it now claims to worship.  The fact,that insult was added to injury, and the Jewish name Yeshua was contorted into German, and plastered onto it's Latin speaking, German blonde Apollo with Blue eyes, does not "absolve" the sin of it's devil worship one bit, but rather just makes it all that much more deceitful, hypocritical and disgusting to watch. Whether it be the pedophiles in Rome, or it's surrogate imposter "evangelical" frauds on American TV.  And nothing on earth more, than calling the Solar-mass worship of Rome's old devil Apollo, a "Christ" mass, illustrates it's blasphemy and hypocrisy within itself, and all of it's fraudulent allies, more than this.  It is the true "line in the sand" between the real Christ, andRome's devil Apollo, God and Satan, heaven and hell, salvation and damnation, and why it's secret treasure is guarded with such ferocity.




Jer 10:8  THEIR TREE IS A DOCTRINE of הבל . (Trans. "Vanity") (Lit)

Exo 20:7  Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in  הבל






COMMANDMENT #1 Do not have any other gods before me.(Ex.20:3)


COMMANDMENT #2 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.  (Ex.20:4-6) 


COMMANDMENT #3 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.




הבל    הבל
hebel  hăbêl
heh'-bel, hab-ale'
From H1891; emptiness or vanity; figuratively something transitory and unsatisfactory; often used as an adverb: -  X altogether, vain, vanity. from הבל, hâbal, haw-bal', A primitive root; to be vain in act, word, or expectation; specifically TO LEAD ASTRAY: - be (become, make) vain.

As mentioned earlier in the site, the incorporation of the worship of OPPOSITES as THE SAME resulting from theological monism in Roman syncretism, brought the idea that opposites were to be incorporated into patterns of worship.  Jeremiah mentions that THEIR TREE IS A DOCTRINE OF HEH'BEL, referring to the same practices then, that we observe today as "Christmas", practices being assimilated through Israel's contact with Babylonia and Persia.  While the missionaries of Mystery Babylon (Secret Babelism) from America's secret socieities will loudly claim, and often persuasively argue that Jeremiah was talking about Idolatry, and not a Solstice tree, a close examination of the text, and it's historical context demonstrate he was in fact referring to both.  Not only did he simply make the reference to both, but defined their relationship as part of an operative system of teaching, a "doctrine", which establishes the fact there is much more than simply a tree involved.

As one traces the developement of what would come to be the Babylonian system in the Tanakh, in Genesis 3, 6, and 11, one can easily see that THE TREE was an integral part of IT'S DOCTRINE.  The practice is given the Hebrew perspective in the Tanakh, where it's presence is noted in all 3 major developments (1) the Tree of Blasphemy [Ge.3], (2) the Tree of the Nephilum [Ge.6], and (3) the Tree of the Bamah house (high place) [Ge.11].  At no point in the path to apostacy is THE TREE not mentioned.  So far from being a single reference in Jeremiah to the solstice tree, you will actually find it throughout the pages of the Tanakh, and always associated with apostacy and what we would colloquially call today, "Devil worship".  

Rome, and subsequently by way of simple inheritance, English Freemasonry, made note of these texts, and picked up the practices to fulfill it's concept of monism, or as it is later called "Mystery Babylon",i.e.,Theological Babelism.

The universal sentiment of the Masons of the present day is to confer upon Solomon, King of Israel, the honor of being their "first Grand Master".  But the "Legend of the Craft" had long before, though there was a tradition of the temple extant, bestowed, at least by implication, that title upon Nimrod, the King of Babylonia and Assyria. - History of Freemasonry, Chapter 12, p. 63

Consequently, ministers in America with associaitons or membership in the Masons, intentionally promote these practices, and generally understand the truth about their origins, but feel no particular conflict of conscience lying about their origins to their congregations who would naturally take offense to incorporating Devil Worship into their routines as "Christians", without the "training" (or indoctrination as the case may be) of the esoteric sophistry of ancient Roman monism.  In Roman theology, of course, this is the native practice to begin with, and as the Mormon founder Joseph Smith was also a Mason, and incorporated much of this theolology into the creation of the Mormon Church, it is also present as part of it's Church's DOCTRINE, there as well.

Jeremiah, unforntuately makes referance to the "Doctrine of the Tree" in his own day, and labels it "Heh'bel", translated "vain", but actually means TO LEAD ASTRAY, or in others words, Deception, Apostacy or Delusion. Using God's name in reference to the DOCTRINE OF THE TREE, is actually a rather blatent and bold breaking of the very first 3 Commandments written in stone by the reported finger of God himself (1) You shall have no other gods before me  (2) You shall not make for yourself an idol (3) You shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in HEH'BEL (HAH'BAL)

Of course, as a secret Babelist, that is precisely the reason you actually do it. But unfornately, taking God's name in Hah'bal comes with the 
promise you will be held accountable "For the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain". And the word "Naqah" has 
some rather serious implications in Hebrew.
Deu 5:11  Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain: for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain

GUILTLESS = nâqâh naw-kaw' A primitive root; to be (or make) clean (literally or figuratively); by implication (in an adverse sense) to be 
bare, that is, extirpated: - acquit X at all, X altogether, be blameless, cleanse, (be) clear (-ing), cut off, be desolate, be free, be (hold) guiltless, be 
(hold) innocent, X by no means, be quit, be (leave) unpunished, X utterly, X wholly.

The above definitions indicating that the normative exercises in Levitical sacrificial atonement would not apply, foreshadowing the same 
sentiments found by the writer of Revelation, who also declared that those granting the attributes of Christ (the true messianic king) to 
Apollyon, Rome's imposter sun-god king whose image would be instituted for worship by a future man by the name of three sixes (later 
Pope Sixtus III, 432 AD), would also be by definition disqualified from atonement, due to the fact THE NAME would be given to a false 
(and vain) identity.



Gen 3:1-5  And the serpent was cunning above every animal of the field which Jehovah God had made. And he said to the woman, Is it true that God has said, You shall not eat from any tree of the garden? And the woman said to THE SERPENT,  We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden,  but of the fruit of THE TREE in the middle of the garden, God has said, You shall not eat of it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.  And the serpent said to the woman, Dying you shall not die, for God knows that in the day you eat of it, even your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. 

CONSEQUENCE: Separation from God's Voice, Eternal Damnation in the Lake Of Fire (the sun),
Environmental Damage, Genetic damage


Gen 6:2,4  The sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were good, and they took wives for themselves from all those whom they chose. [4] The Nephilum were in the earth in those days, and even afterwards when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore to them; they were THE HEROES (idolized, the Idols) which existed from ancient time, the men of name. 

nephı̂yl  nephil
nef-eel', nef-eel'
From H5307; properly, A FELLER, [i.e.,Axeman] that is, (a bully or tyrant):

Main Entry: 2feller [fell]
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English fellan; akin to Old English feallan to fall — more at fall
Date: before 12th century
1 a : TO CUT DOWN, knock, or bring down <TO FELL A TREE> 

CONSEQUENCE: Continual violence in the Earth, Idolatry
Genetic damage, Environmental disaster 


Gen 11:3,4  And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and A TOWER, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make ourselves a name,lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. 

Gen 11:7-9  Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.  Therefore is the name of it called Babel

CONSEQUENCE: Blasphemy, Confusion of God and Satan, Confusion of Salvation and Damnation, Political Imperialism & Religious Fascism, Manifestation of Unintended Opposites, Sexual Addiction, Social Disintegration, Religious Deception, Contagious Disease

[TOP]      [NEXT]



Why The Idols If It Is The "Tree of Life"?

The people who promote the LIE of "Christ-Mass", i.e.,  which is in Biblical terms is actually a deception that seduces the innocent into sun-god devil worship, will often claim THERE WERE NO ANCIENT CHRISTMAS TREES.  Ironically, they will also be the same people to claim, what they do today, with their statues and figurines surrounding their ancient solstice tree practice, is NOT IDOLATRY.  And of course, because Babelist share a particular philosophy that approves of utilitarian deciet, they have a very long history of lying to justify it.  So it should not be surprising to find that their claim is a lie, and one that is actually a known lie [even by them].  They know it is a lie, probably even more than you do, but do not consider "lying" to manipulate the general public into their practices, to actually be objectionable.

Even so-called "Protestant ministers" will be found practicing the art of deception and censorship to keep the victims of their fraud from becoming aware that this is what has been done to them.  But the truth is, that not only did ANCIENT SOLSTICE TREE practice exist, but it is also true that what they are doing today is modern Idolatry, and they pretty much know it is Idolatry.  It is Idolatry that is actually not much more dignified or noble, [nor pleasing to the real God or real Christ of the Bible] than those practices from the ancient past.  And, in fact, the practice today is simply more subtle, but just as degenerate.

Below you will see the photographic proof ANCIENT CHRISTMAS TREES existed before Christ, and modern Babelists are Idolatrars just like their ancient counter-parts.

[NOTE: Christmas clergy insist this does not refer to the ancient Yalda tree practice as documented in Persia ]


However, the Solstice fir tree practice was ALWAYS associated WITH IDOLATRY just as it is today.  The TREES were cut down to MAKE IDOLS.  It was a CELEBRATION OF IDOLATRY in honor of SHAMASH, the sun-god "CHRIST" OF BABYLON.  The verse THEY LEAVE OUT which CLEARLY CONNECTS THE TWO:

Jer 10:8  But they are BOTH FOOLISH and BEASTIAL; THEIR TREE IS A DOCTRINE of הבל . (Trans. "Vanity") (Lit)

Exo 20:7  Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in  הבל



Of course, they work feverishly to create plausible denials over this verse.  It is blatent in it's condemnation. But there are literally scores of such condemnations.





Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. 

This is the precise and exact ORIGIN of THE CHRIST-MASS SPIRIT.  It is a demonic SPIRIT that emerges OUT OF THE TOMBS.  And it is also by no accident, that the prophecy concerning the coming Antichrist, and his image to be worshipped by COMPULSION was said to be coming in the future to the world, FROM THIS VERY PLACE!

Rev 9:11  They have over them as king the angel of the abyss: ...Apollyon. [ASV]

Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit...Apollyon [endless grave] [KJV]

Rev 11:7  ... THE BEAST that cometh up out of the abyss shall make war with them,  

Rom 10:7  or, Who shall descend into the abyss? (That is, to bring Christ up from the dead.


"The Saturnalia, New Year, Midwinter festivals, and Matronalia are frequented by us! Presents come and go! There are New Year's gifts! Games join their noise! Banquets join their din! The pagans are more faithful to their own sect. For, even if they had known them, they would not have shared the Lord's Day or Pentecost with us. For they would fear lest they would appear to be Christians. Yet, we are not apprehensive that we might appear to be pagans" - TERTULLIAN, A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs, 1998, p. 342

UNCLEAN, Hebrew: טמאה ,Pronounced, ṭûm'âh, toom-aw'
From טמא; religious impurity: - filthiness, unclean (-ness).

טמא , Hebrew: ṭâmê', pron. taw-may'
A primitive root; to be foul, especially in a ceremonial or moral sense (contaminated): - defile (self), pollute (self), be (make, make self, pronounce) unclean, X utterly.

The "Unclean Spirit" is defined in the Hebrew as a "polluted, filthy, foul" SPIRIT.  It is directly connected to the issue of IDOLATRY.  The specific KIND of Idolatry, this text is addressing is mentioned throughout the Old Testament, and to most people's surprise, it is specifically the kind of Idolatry that is practiced on the Solstice, and placed UNDER THE EVER GREEN TREE.

This Idolatry is given the description an "Unclean Spirit", but when one traces the use of this term through the rest of the Bible, into the New Testament writings, one will discover that the UNCLEAN SPIRIT of Idolatry, is much more specific in it's meaning to the Jewish community in New Testament Israel.  It was understood to include the meaning of THE DEMONIC... or in other words A DEMONIC SPIRIT.

STRONG'S #G169, GREEK: ἀκάθαρτος, Pron. akathartos, ak-ath'-ar-tos
From G1 (as a negative particle) and a presumed derivative of G2508 (meaning cleansed); impure (ceremonially, morally (lewd) or specifically (demonic)): - foul, unclean.


Mat 12:43-45  When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none. Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished. Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation. 

Mar 5:2-13  And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains: Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him. And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones. But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him, And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not. For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thouunclean spirit. And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many. And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country. Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding. And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea. 

Num 19:13  Whosoever toucheth the dead body of any man that is dead, and purifieth not himself, defileth the tabernacle of the LORD; and that soul shall be cut off from Israel:

It is by no accident that the oldest "nativity scenes" uncovered by Archeologiests on earth, are not found in the warm fuzzy living rooms of early Jewish Christians, but in the Tombs of Rome, where communal seances with the spirits of the dead were performed, and veneration of dead corpses by the likes of Rome's Saint Ambrose, for spiritual power (a/k/a Necromancy) were the practices.  For centuries Rome attempted to pass this debacle off as the unfortunate but necessary "hiding place" of "Christians", only to be fully exposed by modern research as a bogus fraudulent claim.  They type of "christians" meeting in these "catacombs, were necormancers, having seances with the dead, and were not there to hide from anything.

In the midst of these necromancy practices, are found the very first (allegedly Christian) "Nativity scenes" on earth. They depict not a Jewish Messiah at all, but a synthesis of Helios and Apollo, with what the Vatican claims is "Christian" iconography (as though these two words actually even go together). The point is, it is "Christ" as the "Sun-god", cognate to APOLLO, (NT "Apollyon", Rev.9:11), which was prophesied by the Apostle John to "come up from the Abyss" (a reference to the tombs). Which is precisely and exactly where the FIRST SOLAR-MASS SOLSTICE TREES ARE FOUND, associated with the Roman synthesis "Christ".(Literally from "the Abyss", the "tombs")

2Pe 2:15  Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following THE WAY OF BALAAM (Sun-god worshipper) the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness; (Using religion for commerce)

Jud 1:11  Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the ERROR OF BALAAM for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. (Opposing God's people, Using religion for money)

Rev 2:14  But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold THE DOCTRINE OF BALAAM, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel (Antisemitism), to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. (Syncretism with "pagan gods")

Rev 2:24  But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not THIS DOCTRINE, and which have not known THE MYSTERY OF SATAN, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden. (Monism between God and Satan)

Rev 2:6  But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of THE NICOLAITANS, which I also hate. (Saturnalia)

Rev 2:15  So hast thou also them that hold THE DOCTRINE of THE NICOLAITANS, which thing I hate. (Saturnalia)

Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name APOLLYON (Roman sun-god). 



In the same excavation as was found the earliest known Christmas "Nativity scene" on earth, hundreds of years after Christ, Christ as Apollo, the good shepherd, is pictured in the reddish-orange circle {sun} flanked by two sacred solstice trees.  All three of these scenes, (1) Balaam and the Virgin Mary, (2) Christ as Apollo, and (3) the three Youths from Babylon finding the real Shamash, are all found in ROME, in the "Tomb of Priscilla" in the "Catacombs", initially by tradition, where Christians "hid from persecution", but recent archeology has demonstrated they were holding "funerary meals" (communion with the dead) or i.e., in other words, "seances", a practice from Necromancy openly known and taught by another of Rome's famous "Church fathers" Ambrose.  "Christian symbolism" that is used in these syncretisms, is simply integrated within the framework of Roman Empire's gods and goddesses and their customary practices of sun-god worship, divination and necromancy.  In other words, a religion which is intrinsicly NOT CHRISTIAN.




1 Kings 14:22-23, "And Judah did evil in the sight of the LORD, and they provoked him to jealousy with their sins which they had committed, above all that their fathers had done. For they also built them high places, and IMAGESand groves, on every high hill, and UNDER EVERY GREEN TREE."


Isaiah 57:5, "Enflaming yourselves with IDOLS UNDER EVERY GREEN TREE, ..."


Deuteronomy 12:2, "Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree:"


PLEASE NOTE: The phrase "under every green treecan also be translated "under any ever-green tree". [See Strong's H3605, H7488]

Isa 57:5 Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree,

IDOLS: [Tranlsated from] אל, 'êl, ale, Shortened from H352strength; as adjective mighty; especially theAlmighty (but used also of any deity): - God (god), X goodly, X great, idol, might (-y one), power, strong. Compare names in "-el."


Eze 6:13  Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols...under every green tree, ...the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols. 

IDOLS: [Translated From] עצב, ‛âtsâb, Pronounced aw-tsawb', From H6087; an (idolatrous) image: - idol, image.

Hos 14:8  Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols? I have heard him, and observed him: I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found.

IDOLS: [Translated From]  gillûl gillûl, ghil-lool', ghil-lool', From H1556properly a log (as round) [yule log]; by implication an idol: - idol.


From H1556properly a log (as round) [yule log]


TERAPHIM: Plural word of unknown derivation used in the Old Testament to denote the primitive Semitic house-gods whose cult had been handed down to historical times from the earlier period of nomadic wanderings. The translation of the term "teraphim" by the Greek versions, as well as its use in the Scriptures, gives an excellent idea of the nature of these symbols. Thus Aquila renders the word by "figures"; the Septuagint in Genesis by "images," in Ezekiel by "carved images," in Zechariah by "oracles," and in Hosea by "manifest objects" (δῆλοι). The Authorized Version often simply transcribes the word, as in Judges xvii. 5, xviii. 14 et seq., and Hos. iii. 4, but frequently translates it "images," as in Gen. xxxi. 19 et passim. The rendering "images" occurs in I Sam. xix. 13 also, "idols" in Zech. x. 2, and "idolatry" in I Sam. xv. 23.The form of the word in Hebrew must be regarded as a plural of excellence. Just as "Elohim" denotes "gods" and "God," the form "teraphim" is applicable to each single object as well as to the entire class (comp. I Sam. xix. 13 and Gen. xxxi. 19).—Biblical Data: That teraphim were really images of human shape and of considerable size is plainly seen from I Sam. xix. 13, where Michal, the daughter of Saul, places one in David's bed in order to conceal his escape from her enraged father. It is furthermore evident that they were not too large to be easily portable, inasmuch as Gen. xxxi. 19 mentions that Rachel, without her husband's knowledge, stole the teraphim which belonged to her father, Laban, and, when she wished to conceal them, placed them among the camel's furniture and sat upon them (Gen. xxxi. 34).











Mat 7:17-19  Thus every good tree produces good fruit, but a rotten tree produces evil fruit. A good tree cannot produce evil fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit. Every tree not producing good fruit is cut down and cast into the fire. [EMTV]



As was mentioned in the beginning of this site, there is a conscious intentional employment of deception when it comes to this "holy day" and it's practices.  The easiest way to spot the deceptions, is simply watch the mutually contradictory claims which come out of the same one mouth, as was illustrated above in the speeches being given by Pat Robertson.  You will observe the same kind of double-speak when it comes to Rome's accounts of it's own holy day, and it's practices.  One of the things you will likely run across is the claim often made that "Martin Luther" invented the "Christmas Tree", and this demonic practice is the result of the "Protestants". Oh my! The "Protestants" did it!

The only problem of course with this convenient lie, is that the biggest advocate of "Tree Displays" today is Rome itself.  Not to mention the fact, that Rome had already invented and propagated it's own original lie for why they were already doing "Christmas Trees" long before Martin Luther wet his first diaper.  When you ask a Catholic source about "history", you might as well just sit in a room and make believe anything complimentary to Rome that pops into your head.  That is in fact, how most of it's "history" gets written, and it is rather unconscionable that this kind of free-association myth making gets into print in any Encyclopedia, but it often does.

Thus when you begin to actually dig into the "history" of the "Christ-Mass" Tree, this is what constitutes the bulk of what you will read.... blatent lies. Lies of course, Rome likes to refer to as "pious lies", as though there is anything pious about intentionally deceiving people and hiding the truth?  The following is an example of this kind of stupidity:

The tradition of the Christmas tree as it is today known is fairly young. It was established by Martin Luther as a Protestant counterpart for the Catholic Nativity scheme. Luther estabilished the Christmas tree as symbol of Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden. The Christmas Tree, Wikipedia, 2-6-2010

Of course, in the same article, is the following:

According to Christian lore, the Christmas tree is associated with St Boniface and the German town of Geismar. Sometime in St Boniface's lifetime (c. 672-754) he cut down the tree of Thor in order to disprove the legitimacy of the Norse gods to the local German tribe. St. Boniface saw a fir tree growing in the roots of the old oak. Taking this as a sign of the Christian faith, he said "...let Christ be at the center of your households..." using the fir tree as a symbol of Christianity.- The Christmas Tree, Wikipedia, 2-6-2010

So within one article, next to each other, we have an example of what was being discussed above.  Then of course, is the high society version of history, which now revolves around Riga, Latvia in the year 1510. (Along with a commercial produced by the bureau of TOURISM about all the great hotels and resteraunts) Obviously in need of some Tourism business.  What perhaps the commoners do not understand is that "myth-making" has long been a gimmik to create business.  In fact, that actually was one of the primary functions of Idolatry, the sell of famous Idols, hyped by local myths of how they came to be.  This habit is customary for the Roman Church which has continued the tradition it inherited without pause or interruption from it's past up to the present day...including to the extent of it's insertions into history books and Encyclopedias, whenever possible.

While the tale that Riga, Latvia was the site of the "First Christmas Tree" might be good for much needed "Tourism" it too, is historical fiction.  Better (meaning more believable) obviously that what had been given in the past by these sources, but still nothing more than nice fiction to promote the newly invigorated city of the Catholic Archdiocese for the Baltic.


The lack of basic respect with which these lies get passed off to the public, by either the ignorant or the deceitful, whichever the case may be, is one of the most offensive things to watch in modern church history.  The lies will contradict each other on the same page, and apparently the people spreading them have either no clue, or no concern that they do.  Obviously, if you actually really want to know where the modern practice of Christianized tree worship comes from, you'll have to assume it's been buried underneath a lot of disinformation (and the term "worship" is used there on purpose because according to the dictionary definition of the word in English, that is precisely what is being done).

So, not only do you have to ask where the tree ritual really originated, but why is there such a dedicated attempt to hide it's origin? And are these two observations related?  As mentioned above, and previously in this site, there is a very large network of "secret society" promotion of these activities, and apparently, if not obviously, they feel their private information about the true source of these things is proprietary information.  They are not doing anything but spreading disinformation publicly about them (even within our Churches).  But you have to logically ask why?  What do they have to hide?  The answer goes back to the same old same old that these secret societies have as their stock in trade, self-deification and esoteric devil worship. (Of course, they are way to "sophisticated" to actually call it that, that's just what the followers of Christ called it in the New Testament, but what do they know? Right?)

There is perhaps no greater example of this filth, than the bogus lies spread about Martin Luther and the Christmas tree that he allegedly invented, lighted, brought to his home, and spent hours lecturing about the glories and wonders of to teach the ignorant protestant peasants.  All of which are bogus mythology no greater in dignity than Washington chopped down a Cherry tree.  Ministers don't get up in pulpits and give sermons based on Washington and his cherry tree, but they apparently do not mind doing the same with Luther and his Christmas tree.  If you trace these mythologies, back to the people spreading them, you will always find the same weird connections under the covers that always consistently pop up promoting this garbage, and of course not surprisingly, they always point to the same people, with the same private habits, and the same private associations.

There is absolutely no truth whatsoever Martin Luther ever did anything with Christmas trees other than blend into his German culture, without profuse objections to them overtly.  But Luther's all consuming point of reference was not the total reform of the Church, but what he considered it's most critical corruption, that being salvation by grace through faith.  Did he re-arrange the entire ecclesiastical calendar and dispense with Christmas and Easter? No, he did not, that much must be admitted. But did he offer these practices carte blanc endorsements for all time as "Christian" and "evangelical"? No actually, he didn't do that either. So Luther is like the space between Jeremiah 10:3 and Jeremiah 10:4, that Solar-mass Apollo-gists like to fill in with their fantasies.

But Luther confessed his own current Church practices were not "truly evangelical" and described in his own words what a "truly evangelical church" would look like, and what he described was a far cry from a Lutheran Cathedral holding a Solar-mass communion service. He described the "truly evangelical Church" as one made up of believers who met in a home and did not more elaborate than simply keep the the Christian sacraments found in the New Testament.  Since that is obviously not what he was doing, it is clear he never made the goal of his work to be considered the finished product, but only the beginning of much more to come, carried on and completed in future generations.

To further underscore the fact this was the real situation, and not the Martin Luther Christmas tree Santa-Clause hybrid promoted by worshipers of Apollyon on the Solar-mass, one of Luther's closest associates was a fellow excommunicated monk by the name of Martin Brucer. Many historians consider Martin Brucer's work to have been the real founding of the German state Church which eventually adopted the name "Lutheran".  Brucer rode horseback across the entire country of Germany uniting Protestants into a singular movement today we now call "The Reformation". It was Brucer, not Luther, who crafted the VERY FIRST CONFESSION of the REFORMED CHURCH, and it was Brucer who brought Luther together with Zwingli, to create that movement.

Martin Brucer's opinion of Christmas was made obnoxiously clear in his own statements on the subject, and those statements were never statements either taken exception to by Luther, or denounced.  What did Brucer say about Christmas? He said the very name itself frightened him, obviously referring to the act of blasphemy in it's pronunciation.  And that is just about as strong a condemnation offered these holy days from Rome you will find among any reformer, including the Puritan's own John Calvin.  There was in fact a broad consensus among all the reformers, even those in Germany, that the solar-mass to Apollyon as  "Christ" mass, like everything that came out of Rome, was blasphemous hogwash. Hogwash being the nicer term of the one they actually used.





See the TREE?

See the TREE in the STAND?



See the SNAKE?

Which TREE is this? Can you tell?

The truth is that the "Solstice Tree" has been honored and decorated for thousands of years, it has been cut and placed in stands, it has been decorated with tinsel (originally strings of food or flowers), and it has been observed on Solstice complete with a "Mass" (a/k/a Libation), just as it is today.  The truth is, it even had Reindeer associated with it, before "Christianity" ever even became a religion in Rome.  (And all of this, ROME is fully aware of, and censors).  In fact, what you actually cannot find in reality, concerning the "Christmas Tree" is any actual real "date and place" where it "began".  Practices in certain countries can easily be traced to certain influential rulers or kings, but if you keep following the trail, all the way back where it leads, you will run out of "beginnings".  Because the original "Christmas Tree" is not found in the west.... at all.  It is found Ancient Persia, and it is thousands of years older than the entire city of Riga, Latvia, founded by Rome's Crusaders, and ruled by Rome's modern Archdiocese in need of some Tourism.
The Biblical story about this tree distinguishes itself, despite all the haranguings, charges and criticisms against Genesis, there is one fact, that even it's critics are forced, no matter how begrudgingly, to admit.  Genesis takes the opposite postion.  Syncretism does not work with Genesis because it was written from the beginning to distinguish one thing from another, not mix them all together.  This difference in philosophy is at the heart of what makes the Biblical paradigm hated by the world's empires.  It is simply uncooperative with Babel's plans for the world, and always has been. It stands alone as the critic.

Even given anyone's hypothetical dates of origins, it is still impossible to nullify the content with one fell swoop, and a truck-load of inuiendos that are as imaginary as a tooth fairy.  The Communist Manifesto may have been written before anyone ever wrote it's rebuttal, but that hardly invalidates it's rebuttal, and proves the Manifesto is more true.  Often the need to object never occurs, before the perversion is stated first.  But one thing that everyone does agree on, even if they wish to castrate Genesis to justify their faith in the busty Fairy God-mother and her snake ...there is admittedly a disagreement.  And that, no one, not even the most biased modern critic today, can deny. And that is the most important fact, that cannot be dismissed.  There is a disagreement.  Whatever else you wish to charge, you are forced to admit there is a disagreement, and over that disagreement you must take "SIDES".

Genesis was put together as a legal code for the nationalization of Israel.  It was an Israel that was coming out of slavery to Egypt, where all they had been taught from the time they were born, centered around Egypt as the center of the universe.  The Egyptian god was Amon-Ra, the Sun.  His divine presence on earth was Pharaoh, who bore the Cobra, Serpent of Enlightenment on his forehead, and 
whose head-dressed was literally the flare of the Cobra ready to strike.  Pharaoh was the Serpent-god incarnate.  The birth of his incarnation, symbolized in Horus and Isis, was on the Winter Solstice. This arrogance, selfishness, and human conceit is turned upside down in the Genesis story.  Instead of the Cobra being "enlightenment", it is "deception", instead of Pharaoh being a "god", he is a fallen man.  Instead of being a pure-bred "descendent of the gods" (Nephilum) who controlled the world, which entitled him to his throne, he is the descendant of a bunch of half-breed demonic thugs which nearly destroyed the earth and were virtually wiped out in something as simple as a flood.  Instead of their towering temples being the "gate of the gods", they are made the "gate" of nothing more than "confusion" and the worship of a LIE.  It is quite the reverse in every measure.  And one of the reasons it is so hated by the Empire.  It challenges every claim, and reduces them to "SIN", "Error" and "mistake in judgement", and the inevitable disintegration and "ruin" of humanity. Because the point of reference in Genesis is not the power of the earthly Empire, and the "enlightenment" and "deification" of it's earthly ruler, it is the source of all things, the universal one that lives in and through all things, the one real true eternal life, from which all things have come.

The Biblical warning concerning self-deification was that it was in the end a deception, an empty illusion, that leads to separation from the universal eternal one and his voice within the self.  Obviously if you make yourself "god", the "voice of god" within you, will never be anything other than you talking to yourself.  You will have "put to death" both the presence and the communication of that universal one, that you have replaced with your self.  Obviously, the symptomatic psychological characteristics are distinct as well, as one becomes "egotistical" and "selfish", the other becomes humbled and made very aware of "others".  One works well within the paradigm of the force, violence, deception and oppression of the empire, the other is always a bit "out of place" with such practices, and is constantly having to "negotiate" it's way around them.  And while Imperial "Christians" seem to be the "disproof" of that truth, as you will see, these "Empire Christians" are actually quite far from being who you think they are. And generally speaking, often the more "rich and famous" as "Christians" they are, the more true this truth, actually is.

Blasphemy, on it's own right is a serious enough mistake, in that it does irreparable harm to the very nature of the human psyche, and unfortunately is it harm, most are not even aware they have done.  But to add to that, the extension of self-deification through sun-worship ritual or esoteric "magic" foisted on unsuspecting participants, that literally lead people spiritually to the "Lake of Fire" in the sky, is inexcusable. It is in reality a very tragic mistake built upon an even greater and most cruel one, with dire ultimate consequence for all.  And thus the Jewish message of "Salvation" was born to the "Gentiles".  It is not the serpent, the sun, the idol, and the fig tree that is the way to god-consciousness and eternity, it is the to obey God's voice, his commandments are a Tree of Life, and his redemption, and his blood of the lamb, will heal you from the damages and deceptions of this system.

Ironically, even today, there is only one method on earth to create anti-venom that saves the lives of people, once bit by deadly snakes.  It is through the production of antigens created in Lamb's blood.


It is freely admitted even by the "cover-story", that the "Solstice-Tree" practice was heavily observed in Nordic countries in western Europe, and particularly in Germany, and Germanic peoples.  This is usually as far back as they will admit the practice,  That limited admission is done on purpose to hide it's origin, which they know the general "Christianized" western public would find rather appalling. Rome has known where the Solstice-Tree practice really came from since the beginning, as does many of it's "missionaries" among the Masons.  But explaining these troubling origins is something they would prefer not to do.  So instead they simply tell lies.  And if anyone contradicts their lies, they will become animated with protests and denunciations knowing personally the act is to do nothing more than deceive those who actually do not know any better and would simply like to know where the practices originated from.

With but a few days of investigation, one will be able to track down the matter fairly conclusively, but unfortunately most people in the "general public" are no more motivated to understand the real nature and origin of the things they do, than even that, and would much rather be satisfied with watever lie get's offered them in the form of plausable deniability from their local Babelist, Roman or otherwise.


The sun Mithra is setting low on the western horizon.

Sky serpent swallowing him once more

Shabe Yalda (Yule night) has arrived; sun's longest slumbers.


We eat and drink all that is red

Wine, pomegranate and watermelon,

The colour of dawn, a reminder of what we eagerly wait for.


Shamash, Marduk

Descending immortals, you'll rise again

Apollo, Ra salutations to you.


Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,

Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!

An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up onto the sky.


Mithras born of a rock and out from the cave,

Becoming sol invictus and turning the wheel

Darkness, now a fading memory.


Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain

Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.

          Drink up your wine.- - Shabe Yalda, Yule, By Payam Nabarz

Payam Nabarz - Author of ‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian World’ (Inner Traditions, 2005), ‘The Persian Mar Nameh: The Zoroastrian Book of the Snake Omens & Calendar’ (Twin Serpents, 2006), and Divine Comedy of Neophyte Corax and Goddess Morrigan (Web of Wyrd, 2008). He is also editor of Mithras Reader An academic and religious journal of Greek, Roman, and Persian Studies. Volume 1(2006), Volume 2 (2008) and Stellar Magic: a Practical Guide to Rites of the Moon, Planets, Stars and Constellations (Avalonia, 2009) 

The fact is that Rome (and it's splintered group, the Masons) has known the origin of it's practices for a very long time, long before "Saint Bonifice" dated to the 7th century even lived.  Why? Because Iran, formerly ancient Persia was the source of it's incorporation of Mithraism, and in part the reason for the selection of December 25th, back in 435 AD.  Rome had already had half a millenia of the imported practices in existence, before December 25th was officiated by Pope Sixtus III, in honor of the combined Apollo-Christ nativity of Rome's Sun-god.  All that it has told since then, has been basically a lie to hide the truth about what they have done.

The fact that it is admitted these practices were originally known and attested to among what they call the "pagans" in the Germanic countries of Europe, is the beginning of the truth.  But what is usually intentionally obscured is that the Nordics and Germanics of Europe are known to have MIGRATED from across the CAUCASUS MOUNTAINS, thus the origin of our modern word "Caucasians".  Europe's CAUCASIANS are INDO-EUROPEAN, meaning they came originally from the EAST.

Where in THE EAST, did these tribes originate from?  ODIN, a central figure in the observance of "Christ-Mass" ritual came from what was ancient Northern PERSIA.  Where is the YALDA TREE practice still observed to this day? Modern IRAN.  Where is there carved in stone actual pictures of the SOLSTICE-TREE practice being observed, predating the time of Christ by as much as 2000 years? Modern IRAN/ Ancient PERSIA.

Now, if that is not interesting enough, and remember all this has been known for thousands of years, and particularly by ROME, the actual location of the Biblical "Garden Of Eden" where "Adama" chose the Serpent Tree in order to become "a god", against God,  was actually NORTHERN PERSIA.  This of course, has been made clear as a result of the findings of modern archeology, but students of the Scriptures have known about this connection to Persia, since the text was written, for the simple fact, that the term itself GAN EDIN is A PERSIAN PLACE-NAME.  So while modern archeology has made the identification of this area hard to lie about, it did nothing more than confirm what was long understood and believed by many who paid attention to these details in the texts.  Modern Archeologists who have made these discoveries did so by reading the text, and following the clues they discovered in Cuneiform tablets in Sumer, Mesopotamia, and ancient Babylon.  

The word paradise is not Greek; in Arabic and Persian it signifies a garden, a vineyard, and also the place of the blessed. The Mohammedans say that God created the Jennet al Ferdoos, the garden of paradise, from light, and the prophets and wise men ascend thither. Wilmet places it after the root farada, to separate, especially a person or place, for the purposes of devotion, but supposes it to be originally a Persian word, vox originis Persicae quam in sua lingua conservarunt Armeni - Adam Clarke's Commentary Of The Bible, 1831 

The actual TRADE ROUTE to GAN EDIN was discovered and retraced.  All of the locations of GAN EDIN, it's four rivers, the Land of Nod mentioned in reference to Cain, even the ancient excavation mines for various precious stones and minerals mentioned in the text have been positively identified.  People who prefer that not to be the location simply refuse to accept it, and others, as stated previously enjoy the obfuscations created by lying about it.  But there is really not much left to debate about it.  It's location is Ancient PERSIA, just as the term itself, IN PERSIAN, suggests.

The Jerusalem Report, February 1, 1999, 

Ten miles from the sprawling Iranian industrial city of Tabriz, to the northwest of Teheran, says British archaeologist David Rohl, he has found the site of the Biblical garden . . . "As you descend a narrow mountain path, you see a beautiful alpine valley, just like the Bible describes it, with terraced orchards on its slopes, crowded with every kind of fruit-laden tree," says Rohl, a scholar of University College, London, who has just returned from his third trip to the area, where mud brick villages flourish today.

“The Biblical word gan (as in Gan Eden) means `walled garden,’ ” Rohl continues, "and the valley is indeed walled in by towering mountains."  The highest of these is Mt. Sahand, a snow-capped extinct volcano that Rohl identifies as the Prophet Ezekiel’s Mountain of God, where the Lord resides among `red-hot coals’ (Ezekiel 28:11-19).  Cascading down the once-fiery mountain, precisely echoing Ezekiel, is a small river, the Adji Chay (the name of which also translates in local dialect as ‘walled garden’). 

Which now brings us to an interesting convergence of origins.  According to Norwegian legend the first Norwegian king, later worshiped as a god,"Odin", led his people from the land called Azer. (Today's Azerbaijan, which is also Northern old Persia, and just north of Gan Edin by only a few miles)  The actual historical ORIGIN of ODIN, is known to be the actual Persian GAN EDIN area.  And ODIN'S "WORLD TREE", admitted by historians, the origin of Europe's Solstice "Christ-Mass" tree.  The only problem of course, is that in Genesis, the "tree of the gods of the Sun", is one and the same tree that damned humanity because of it's blasphemy and sun-worship (Lake of Fire).(Which are simply true factual observations about what it teaches, not some form of writhing narrow-mindedness or fundementalist zeal)  Those are simply the hard facts of what is being discussed.
Main Entry: blas·phe·my 
Pronunciation: \ˈblas-fə-mç\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural blas·phe·mies
Date: 13th century
(A) he act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God  (b) The act of claiming the attributes of deity

Obviously, something the good ole king Odin, unfortunately chose to do.  Thereby endangering the spiritual welfare of all those who followed in his footsteps thereafter.

EVEN the NORDIC use of the term "YULE" as in "YULE+TIDE" is from the PERSIAN WORD "YALDA":

As you may know the word Christmas is almost in all non-English speaking countries called Yule, forexample in most of European countries. For instance, in Finnish Christmas is called Joulu (pronouncedYowlou i.e. Yule), in Swedish the Christmas day is called Juldag pronounced Youldag (Jul+dag, where dag= day). These all have its roots in Persian tradition Yalda (Yal=Yule, da = day), which has beencelebrated for several thousands of years in Iran since the birth of Mitra/Mehr. - Christmas Is an Old Tradition From Perisa, Birth of Mehr/Mithra/Jesus, by B.Vazvan


"Christ-Mass" Apollo-gists who believe that it is good to "lie" to promote the absolute dictatorial rule of their "Church" over all society, like to mis-inform the Public that "Hitler tried to take Christ out of Christ-mass".  But the fact is that Hitler, and his Nazis who were infatuated with the idea of the "Nordic race", simply realized "Christ" was never part of it to begin with.  And alluded to it's "pre-christian" origins as a "racial institution" among Teutonic pagans which they saw themselves as the proud descendants of (even if it were actually the worship of the Biblical Devil).  

Despite this public acknowledgement however, Hitler never once (as is falsely claimed) tried to take "Christ" out of "Christ-Mass".  Hitler was quite proud of his "Apollo-Christ" and even made him the object of his personal paintings and famous speeches.  And this particular lie, (that Hitler tried to take Rome's Christ out of his solar worship day) is one of the most bogus lies offered up on the sacrificial altar of deceit to the head goat, they perpetrate.  Hitler's devotion to his Catholic Church never wavered, and was strong enough to have motivated him to consider pursuing the Catholic priesthood.  These denials are so deceitful they are worse than immoral.

In fact, Hitler rightly understood the historical connection between "Caucasion", the "Caucus mountains", the Nordic religion, and his own Swastika, from whence came Yule-tide to begin with, marked by the same Swastika adopted for his own Nazi party and his "Nordic Man, all wrapped in Roman "Christianity".  How else do you propose to restore the "Holy Roman Reich" without it's STATE RELIGION?

QUOTE: At Adolf Eichmann's trial in Israel in 1961, Eichmann clearly stated that both he and Reinhard Heydrich were answerable to the Popes (White Pope-Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli and the Black Popes-Jesuit General Wvladimir Ledochowski S.J. a Polish Jesuit) for the "Final Solution decree of the Vatican Third Reich of Europe using Four Roman Catholic Dictators Hitler,Pavelic,Mussolini and Franco!

On December 7th 1941 (Pearl Harbor)the Nazi Catholic Stormtrooper SS began GAS VAN OPERATIONS in Lodz and Chelmno regions of Poland, Jews were herded into Catholic Church in Chelmno until the next morning the hundreds of GAS VANS arrived escorting the Jews from the Roman Church directly into the GAS VANS once the measured drive to the remote forests the Jews were dead via carbon monoxide!! (source: "Shoah" documentary, Claude Lanzmann) 

HITLER: We demand liberty for all religious denominations in the State... The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity

HITLER: My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior 

HITLER: In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord 

HITLER:  As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself 

HITLER:  For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.... 

HITLER: ...then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago 

HITLER: Except the Lord built the house they labour in vain.... The truth of that text was proved if one looks at the house 

HITLER: That strength the Almighty has given us to use; that in it and through it we may wage the battle of our life

HITLER: The others in the past years have not had the blessing of the Almighty-- of Him Who in the last resort, whatever man may do, holds in His hands the final decision

HITLER: Lord God, let us never hesitate or play the coward, let us never forget the duty which we have taken upon us.... We are all proud that through God's powerful aid we have become once more true Germans. -Adolf Hitler,speech, March 1933 

HITLER: The National Government regard the two Christian Confessions as the weightiest factors for the maintenance of our nationality

HITLER: It will be the Government's care to maintain honest co-operation between Church and State; the struggle against materialistic views and for a real national community is just as much in the interest of the German nation as in that of the welfare of our Christian faith

HITLER: The Government of the Reich, who regard Christianity as the unshakable foundation of the morals and moral code of the nation, attach the greatest value to friendly relations with the Holy See and are endeavouring to develop them. 
-Adolf Hitler, in his speech to the Reichstag on 23 March 1933 

HITLER: We ask not of the Almighty 'Lord, make us free'!-- we want to be active, to work, to agree together as brothers, to strive in rivalry with one another to bring about the hour when we can come before Him and when we may ask of Him:  -Adolf Hitler, prayer in a speech on May Day 1933 

HITLER: The fact that the Vatican is concluding a treaty with the new Germany means the acknowledgement of the National Socialist state by the Catholic Church. This treaty shows the whole world clearly and unequivocally that the assertion that National Socialism [Nazism] is hostile to religion is a lie. 
-Adolf Hitler, 22 July 1933, writing to the Nazi Party 

HITLER: We were convinced that the people needs and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out. 
-Adolf Hitler, speech Berlin,24 Oct. 1933 

HITLER: ...we have not only brought thousands of priests back into the Church, but to millions of respectable people we have restored their faith in their religion and in their priests. The union of the Evangelical Church in a single Church for the whole Reich, the Concordat with the Catholic Church, these are but milestones on the road which leads to the establishment of a useful relation and a useful co operation between the Reich and the two Confessions. 
-Adolf Hitler, in his New Year Message on 1 Jan. 1934 

HITLER: We have experienced a miracle, something unique, something the like of which there has hardly been in the history of the world. God first allowed our people to be victorious for four and a half years, then He abased us, laid upon us a period of shamelessness, but now after a struggle of fourteen years he has permitted us to bring that period to a close. It is a miracle which has been wrought upon the German people.... It shows us that the Almighty has not deserted our people, that He received it into favour at the moment when it rediscovered itself. And that our people shall never again lose itself, that must be our vow so long as we shall live and so long as the Lord gives us the strength to carry on the fight. 
-Adolf Hitler, speech at Munich, 19 March, 1934 

HITLER: The National Socialist State professes its allegiance to positive Christianity. It will be its honest endeavour to protect both the great Christian Confessions in their rights, to secure them from interference with their doctrines (Lehren ), and in their duties to constitute a harmony with the views and the exigencies of the State of to-day
-Adolf Hitler, 26 June 1934, to Catholic bishops 

HERMAN GORING: Although he himself [Hitler] was a Catholic, he wished the Protestant Church to have a stronger position in Germany, since Germany was two-thirds Protestant. 
-Hermann Göring (Trial of The Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1945, Vol.9) 

HERMAN GORING: The Führer wanted to achieve the unification of the Protestant Evangelical Churches by appointing a Reich Bishop, so that there would be a high Protestant church dignitary as well as a high Catholic church dignitary. 
-Hermann Göring (Trial of The Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1945, Vol.9) 

HERMAN GORING: With the Catholic Church the Führer ordered a concordat to be concluded by Herr Von Papen. Shortly before that agreement was concluded by Herr Von Papen I visited the Pope myself. I had numerous connections with the higher Catholic clergy because of my Catholic mother, and thus-- I am myself a Protestant-- I had a view of both camps. 
-Hermann Göring 

RUDOLPH HESS: No matter what human beings do I shall some day stand before the judgement seat of the Eternal. I shall answer to Him, and I know he will judge me innocent. 
-Rudolf Hess, in a statement to the Nuremberg Tribunal, (Hitler's Elite, Shocking Profiles of the Reich's Most Notorious Henchmen," Berkley Books, 1990)

RUDOLPH HESS: We believe that the Fuhrer is fulfilling a divine mission to German destiny! This belief is beyond challenge. 
-Rudolf Hess, speech, 20 June 1934 (Reden, Munich. 1938, p. 25) 

RUDOLPH HESS: With all our powers we will endeavour to be worthy of the Fuhrer thou, O Lord, has sent us! 
-Rudolf Hess, address to political leaders, Munich , 21 April 1938 (Rolf Tell, Sound and Fuhrer) 

RUDOLPH HESS:  my father took a religious oath at the time of the birth of my younger sister, dedicating me to God and the priesthood, and after that leading a Joseph married life [celibacy]. He directed my entire youthful education toward the goal of making me a priest. I had to pray and go to church endlessly, do penance over the slightest misdeed-- praying as punishment for any little unkindness to my sister, or something like that. 
-Rudolf Hoess (Hitler's Elite, Shocking Profiles of the Reich's Most Notorious Henchmen," Berkley Books, 1990) 

JOSEPH GOEBBELS: We have a feeling that Germany has been transformed into a great house of God, including all classes, professions and creeds, where the Fuhrer as our mediator stood before the throne of the Almighty. 
-Joseph Goebbels, in a broadcast, 19 April 1936 

ROBERT LEY: The Führer in Nuremberg said: "Woe to him who does not believe!" He who does not believe has no soul. He is empty. He has no ideals. He has nothing to live for. He has no sunshine, no light, no joy in life. He is a poor, poor man. What is wealth? What are possessions? What does it all mean? Problems come despite them, only faith is left. Woe to him who does not believe! 
-Robert Ley, 

DEAN ECKERT: Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. The way has been shown to us by the Fuhrer. 
-Dean Eckert, sermon at Tegel, North Berlin, 10 February 1935 (Rolf Tell, Sound and Fuhrer) 

HANS FRANK: We are under the great obligation of recognizing as a holy work of our Volk's spirit the laws signed by Adolf Hitler's name. Hitler has received his authority from God. Therefore he is champion, sent by God, of German Right in the world. 
-Hans Frank, Frankfurt-am-Main, 30 October 1935 

Hitler wanted to "Take Christ Out Of Christ-mass"? Yes, of course, and "Black is White, and white is black"!!  Another LIE from ROME'S admittedly (willing to tell whatever lie) Jesuit APOLLO-GISTS. Hitler was a devout Catholic who LOVED his "Christ-Mass" exactly because of it's Nordic devil worship and implicit "Aryan" racism.  Of course, we shouldn't leave the racist German Lutherans out of this equation.  They had their head up this sewer for centuries, and still do for the most part.  They were one of the only remaining Protestant Church during the reformation that refused to "give up" their worship of the Pope's Idol on Christ-Mass.  And it was direclty because of Martin Luthers's rancid racism, that convinced the Nazis, the Luthern's contributions to Antisemtism should not be over-looked, but brought into the Nazi party in one great "ecumenical movement" which would be a virtual orgy of hate, racism and genocide..
JULIUS STRIECHER Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1945, 
QUOTE Anti-Semitic publications have existed in Germany for centuries. A book I had, written by Dr. Martin Luther, was, for instance, confiscated. Dr. Martin Luther would very probably sit in my place in the defendants' dock today, if this book had been taken into consideration by the Prosecution. In this book The Jews and Their Lies, Dr. Martin Luther writes that the Jews are a serpent's brood and one should burn down their synagogues and destroy them... 
-Julius Streicher, (Trial of The Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1945, Vol. 12)'''

OBSERVATION: For years, Rome told the public Hitler was a number of different things (anything and everything but Catholic). After a number of documentary works were released including photographic evidence of the direct collaboration between Hitler and the Vatican, the Vatican now no longer denies the claim, it just argues now, that it shouldn't have to give back it's gold confiscated from those it helped to exterminate. - VATICAN BANK CLAIMS, Vatican refuses to return Vast Gold holdings stolen from Holocaust Victims





The remains of humanity in Africa that date to 200,000 BCE do not argue for an "African Eden" because the Biblical "Eden" does not date to 200,000 BCE.  Young earthers ARE correct in locating the time period of Eden to be 10,000 - 5,000 BCE.  But they are incorrect in assuming that means the beginning of the world or even humanity.  Thus the confusions. Humanity arose in Africa 200k. Eden was 5-10k years ago. Both are correct. And this is found true in the "ancient earth" veiw, which modern science and archeology confirms. "Gan Edin" a PERSIAN NAME, has been found, just as the name itself suggest IN PERSIA.  So what's the problem?  The struggle for power, nothing more.

Where did they get the idea to interpret Genesis within the paradigm of a "ancient earth"?  Within the Bible itself. Genesis's use of the word "Yom" without a Sun require a non-solar day interpretation, but if you did not even have the book of Genesis to begin with, you would still find the same "ancient earth" view

Remember both of these texts emerge during Israel's golden age, during the height of the Davidic monarchy, when both the Prophetic and the Scribal class were integrated in Israel and produced advanced military intelligence, and enlightened understanding of the world around them.

Even among the later ancient rabbis, it was held that the "ancient earth" view based on these very texts, concluded hummanity to have had 974 generations before Adam existed, (since there had been 26 generations up to MOSES, AT the time mentioned in the text from Adam) for which Adam then was the final or pinnacle "culmination".  This idea was taken from what David wrote (who was ALSO the father of Solomon!)  So the claim is made that the principle figures of the Davidic Monarchy did not believe in a "young earth" veiw, and interpeted Genesis (in their day) meaning to be Yom = ages, not Yom = 24 hour days.  The fact is.... there is no "Sun" in the text in Genesis until the 4th day, making it really impossible to interpet consistently as "24 hour days". (Along with many many other things in the text itself)

(1) No "Sun" until the 4th Yom
(2) Cain marries and moves to the city of Nod
(3) "Adama" means "Humanity" or "mankind"
(4) Jews had prolific "traditions" about "Lilith" (Adam's first wife?)

The midrashim state that the "first week" of Creation lasted for extremely long periods of time. Anafim on Rabbenu Bachya's Sefer , Ikkarim chapter 2 verse eighteen; Midrash Bereshit Rabbah 9.  Talmud, Chaggiga 13b through 14a states that there were 974 generations before God created Adam. 

In the Bible a "generation" before the flood was recorded as being 200 years.  Meaning that Jewish rabbis estimated that the approximate age of hummanity based on the Yom equal age reading of Genesis was 195,000 years old before Adam. If of course, Adam was 5000 years ago, the Biblical "age of humanity" is literally identical to the modern estimate, not in conflict with it at all.  

Thus Humanity DID arise 200,000 years ago in Africa, and Adam WAS 5000 years ago, and the GAN EDIN IS IN PERSIA, as the TEXT ITSELF CLAIMS IN THE USE OF THE WORD!!!  And all of the truths, that each hold onto to make their argument, are really true, but not apart from the other points of truth as well.  The Biblical text does not teach a "young earth" as is claimed because that requires a "Sun" to be present from the very first "Yom", and it is not.  Genesis was written to repudiate the worship of the Sun as practiced in Egypt, thus claiming the universe existed, much less the earth, before the great Amon-Ra, was quite a repudiation to Egyptianism.  Most do not realize even today that modern science does in fact date the age of the earth itself to be virtually equal to, if not older than the actual "Sun" of this solar-system, itself. (More about this discussion will be examined in a later Appendix on Genesis)

Suffice it to note here, that an accurate reading of Genesis agree with modern science and archaeology, both on the age of humanity, and the location of Eden.  In other professional fields, this would be considered confirmation of the accuracy of a hypothesis.  Unfortunately, in theology dominated by degenerate practices concerning epistemology imported among Protestants, Christmas-clergy are still insisting "white is really black, and black is really white". 

Despite the fact all this is really quite plain, straightforward in the text, and even confirmed by modern science and archaeology, they STILL hide the truth about this facts from Biblical history (and that "hiding" is not done without ulterior motive).  In fact, there are some very strange and unexpected connections, to be found between the commonly held fundamentalistic insistence that only a "young earth" interpretation of Genesis is Biblical, and Freemason esoteric teachings which apparently have infiltrated and over-run them.  It is NOT the Bible, but Freemasonry, that created the infamous SCOPES TRIAL.  And surprisingly, solar-mass syncretism "Christmas Theology" has been "secretly" at work here too!  CLICK HERE to see: THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF "YOUNG EARTH CREATIONISM"




The solstice cult according to Biblical cosmology, spread across the earth as a result of it's "missionaries" from ancient Babel, where it was brought to the pinnacle of power in the form of THE EMPIRE.  Modern historians do not acknowledge the historicity of any of the Scriptures, primarily because of the extreme abuses of such policy by ecclesiastical "authorities" from the past, who held their own dogmatic interpretation of texts to be more authoritative than any element of observable reality, including medicine, science, history, archeology, geology or anything else you might imagine.  But while the Biblical record may suffer the normal limitations and perceptual biases found in any historical account, including modern American history itself, it is a mistake to relegate the entire body of literature to the label "myth" and simply ignore it's content.  The very reason the British Archeologist was able to recover the location of Gan Edin was because he did incorporate the details of the Biblical text, along with external sources,  into the body of evidence considered in his search plan.  An approach that has been repeatedly used by the famous pioneers of archeology like Nelson Gluek and William F. Albright.  This approach distinguishes itself from the other two polar extremes of Minimalism and Maximalism, to a mature approach which accounts for all realistic historic possiblities and incorporating information from all sources, thereby known as "realism".

One of the things modern minimalist historians completely fail to adequately explain is how and why these patterns are found throughout the world in amazing repetitive detail, far too similar in detail, to be attributable to simply generalized common "psychological' factors.  The odds by mere probability that actual common source migrations do account for many common words, common DNA, and even common Temple-cult practices, are far more reasonable and thereby "scientific" than irrational statements of denial, wherein sociological effects have no sociological causes, and DNA links in cross population comparisons from completely opposite ends of the earth, even among relatively isolated aboriginal populations, find perfect marrow matches from completely opposite racial and cultural population groups.

In Biblical cosmology, as the Solstice-cult transversed the earth in migrations, it's common practices were carried with them.  In Gan Edin, the original tree of the Enlightenment Serpent was recorded as being THE FIG TREE.  

Gen 3:7  And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. 

But obviously, at first glance, the Solstice-tree, today, usually a FIR TREE, is not a FIG TREE.  So how did the FIG TREE come to be a FIR TREE?  The answer to this question, while possibly having much more elaborate explanations than are provided briefly here, are reduced to the undeniable fact that the Botanical genus of FIG TREE is simply not universally available in all the various climates and among localized plant life, that migrations may have traversed from it's historical source. However it should be noted that wherever THE FIG TREE remained available, THE FIG TREE was in fact retained as the primary genus of tree.

The oldest known living tree on earth is claimed to be the Bhodi Tree.  It is also THE FIG TREE, that Buddha recieved "enlightenement" in the presence of a Cobra, thus becoming "enlightened" and realizing his own self-deification. The pattern is once again virtually identical as Genesis 3 minus the role of an Eve.

The Bodhi Tree, also known as Bo (from the Sinhalese Bo), was a large and very old Sacred Fig tree (Ficus religiosa) located in Bodh Gaya (about 100 km (62 mi) from Patna in the Indian state of Bihar), under which Siddhartha Gautama, the spiritual teacher and founder of Buddhism later known as Gautama Buddha, achieved enlightenment, or Bodhi. In religious iconography, the Bodhi tree is recognizable by its heart-shaped leaves, which are usually prominently displayed. It takes 100 - 3,000 years for a bodhi tree to fully grow. The term "Bodhi tree" is also widely applied to currently existing trees, particularly the Sacred Fig growing at the Mahabodhi Temple, which is allegedly a direct descendant of the original specimen. This tree is a frequent destination for pilgrims, being the most important of the four main Buddhist pilgrimage sites. Other holy Bodhi trees which have a great significance in the history of Buddhism are the Anandabodhi tree in Sravasti and the Bodhi tree in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. Both are believed to have been propagated from the original Bodhi tree. - Wikipedia, 2-2010

No matter which polytheistic tradition one wishes to trace back, at the root of it will be a variation of this story.  The same is true from the more relatively modern Jainism, to the ancient schools of Eyptian polytheism, ancient Greece polytheism, and even ancient Roman polytheism, centered around Romulus and Remus.  The story is virturally the same. A FIG TREE, A SERPENT, ENLIGHTEMENT, and viola, a "god" to be worshiped, or followed, or believed in.  But of course, it is always a "god" which knows nothing of the "one true universal God" of all creation, and his voice within.  It is the "god" of selfishness, and "deified kings", and crafty deceit, and Sun-worship, and last but not least, the IDOL.

Fig trees have profoundly influenced culture through several religious traditions. Among the more famous species are the Sacred Fig tree (Peepul, Bodhi, Bo, or Po, Ficus religiosa) and the Banyan Fig (Ficus benghalensis). The oldest living plant of known planting date is a Ficus religiosa tree known as the Sri Maha Bodhi planted in the temple at Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka by King Tissa in 288 BC. It is one of the two sacred trees of Islam, and there is a sura in Quran named "The Fig" or At-Tin(سوره تین), and in East Asia, figs are pivotal in Buddhism, Hinduism and Jainism. Siddhārtha Gautama, the Supreme Buddha, is traditionally held to have found bodhi (enlightenment) while meditating under a Sacred Fig (F. religiosa). The same species was Ashvastha, the "world tree" of Hinduism. The Plaksa Pra-sravana was said to be a fig tree between the roots of which the Sarasvati River sprang forth; it is usually held to be a Sacred Fig but more probably seems to be a Wavy-leaved Fig (F. infectoria). The Common Fig tree is cited in the Bible, where in Genesis 3:7, Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with fig leaves. The fig fruit is also included in the list of food found in the Promised Land, according to the Torah (Deut. 8). Other important plants reported included: wheat, barley, grapes, pomegranates, olives, and dates (representing the honey). Jesus cursed a fig tree for bearing no fruit (Mark 11:12-14). The fig tree was sacred in ancient Cyprus where it was a symbol of fertility. - Fig Tree, Wikipedia, 2-2010

The FIG TREE is the NATIONAL TREE OF INDIA. A country which is also home to the majority of the world's remaining polytheistic religions today.

What most people are not aware of is that THE FIG TREE is actually AN EVERGREEN TREE.  And while there are 850 different varieties, today, of FIG TREES which grow primarily in Tropical climates, some grow in sub-tropical climates, and many of these species are actually classified as EVERGREEN TREES. 


Though the Yggdrasil was said to be a giant Ash or Yew Tree, it was considered an Evergreen Tree, but the only problem of course, is that the actual Ash Trees found in Europe, wither and die for the winter.  The way this anomoly is explained today, is in the following:

During the winter celebrations the (Yggdrasil) tree was represented by an evergreen such as the fir.  This made it easy for the Catholic church to connect the Scandinavian Yggdrasil with the Judea-Christian inerpetation of the biblical Tree of Life, also thought to be a fir or pine. - The Solstice Evergreen: History, Folklore and Origins of the Christmas Tree, Sheryl Karas

As you can see even in their own positive explanations, these two "trees" are admittedly equated and Combined into one, though the Tree of Self-Deification and "Knowledge" is as far as one could possibly be from the "Tree of Life", they are literally in two different eternities.  But the positive explanations are more public relations than accurate recounting of historical events and developments, anyway.  But even in this, even in it's most positive explanations, one can clearly see the TREE OF BLASPHEMY, is equated and COMBINED, with the TREE OF LIFE, and made one and the same.  50% Blasphemy, and 50% Life, what an interesting combination?  How much "Blasphemy" does one actually have to have before it counts as "Blasphemy"? 51%?

The truth is that, what is referred to "esoterically" in Babelism, as the "WESTERN TRADITION", made this "adaptation" from FIG TREE to FIR TREE, long before ROME made any "decisions" about merging the Yggdrasil with anything from a "Judea-Christian" Bible.  And by "Judea-Christian" what is really meant is "THE WESTERN TRADITION" (i.e. Western Babelism), in contrast to the SAME RELIGION in the EASTERN TRADITION (Eastern Babelism).  Neither of which have anything to do with "Christ" or "God" or Jews or Abraham or anyone or anything else, from the Bible.  These are actually the ancient "Devil worshipers" the BIBLE actually condemns, in the harshest most obscene and adamant terms possible in the human language.


Deu 12:2  Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree

1Ki 14:23  For they also built them high places, and images, and groves, on every high hill, and under every green tree

2Ki 16:4  And he sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree

2Ki 23:5  And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun

2Ch 28:4  He sacrificed also and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree

2Ki 17:9  And the children of Israel did secretly those things that were not right against the LORD their God, and they built them high places in all their cities, 

...the Heathens used to place idols under green trees, and worship them, whom the Jews imitated, Jer_2:2. - John Gill's Exposition Of The Bible

1Ki 14:23...and groves on every high hill, and under every green tree; that is, set up idols, ..under all green trees; as was the custom of the Heathens, who sacrificed on the heights of hills and tops of mountains, as was particularly the custom of the Persians, as both Herodotus (m) and Xenophon (n) relate; and with the Getae,  - John Gill's Exposition Of The Bible



Unlike THE LIE You've Been Told, 

High alttitude plant growth as well as natural wildlife became hallmark symbols and incorporated into the rituals of the "Bamah" movement.  The Bamah movement was simply the importation of the religion of the EMPIRE into Israel.  It is recorded as having been been finalized as a religious form in Genesis 11, incorporating Genesis 3 [The Tree], Genesis 6 [The Idol], and .Genesis 11 [The Tower], with it's focus of worship THE SUN, and the deification of it's Emperor.

As you can see from the pictures above, that the FIR TREE would become the primary expression of THE SOLSTICE TREE, is simply logical necessity required by the natural elements of it's practice.  FIG TREES are not high elevation plant growth, but they are EVERGREENS.  And they do resemble the CONIFER FIR TREES in their trimmed GARDEN VARIETIES, and which also produce the Red Berries so often seen in "Christmas" greenery themes.

But that is not all you will find associated with the HIGH PLACES imported from ANCIENT BABYLON.

Along with the "Christmas" FIR TREES, on the HIGH PLACES of the ancient Mediterranean, you will find an abundance of DEER.  DEER thus became associated with BAMAH ritual and symbolism.  Because the BAMAH places sought to find the HIGHEST POINT, it became natural to associate that location with the idea of the "Highest Place" on "earth", i.e., THE NORTH POLE.  The Yggdrasil practices found in the ODIN tradition was very connected to the NORTH POLE, also because among the ancient seafaring people such as the Vikings. the POLE STAR was also used for navigation.

GOATS were also a WELL KNOWN animal found among THE HIGH PLACES, or BAMAH HOUSES in the ancient Mediterranean world.  The RELIGIOUS LEADERS of this system, are identified in the teachings of Christ, as "GOATS" headed for "EVERLASTING FIRE"

Mat 25:32-34,41  And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the leftThen shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels


The actual HEBREW word DEVIL itself comes from the very word GOAT which was from it's earliest usage BY THE PROPHETS, associated with THE HIGH PLACES

Lev 17:7  And they shall no more offer their sacrifices unto devils, after whom they have gone a whoring.
2Ch 11:15  And he ordained him priests for the high places, and for the devils, …
Deu 32:17  They sacrificed unto devils, not to God…

DEVILS - sìâ‛îyr  sìâ‛ir, Pron. saw-eer', saw-eer' From H8175; shaggy; as noun, a he goat; by analogy a faun: - devil, goat, hairy, kid, rough, satyr. A goat-man - Strong's Exhaustive Concordance


Satur is the goat-legged half man half goat 'deity' headed by Pan (a representation of satan) sometimes spelled 'satyr' in English. The Oxford dictionary identifies it as 'Saturos' in Greek. The Saturs and their leader Pan are also known as "Goat-gods". The early Babylonians called the sun "the Goat" and said that the "Goat-god" was the "Sun-god". Isaiah 13:21 identifies the Saturs as belonging to Babylon. The scapegoat Azazel of Leviticus 16 was a figure of satan (Christianity and Mythology J.M. Robertson pp.319-325). This is also confirmed by the Church Father, Origen.  A deity with two goat-legs has always been identified as satan. The names Satur and Saturn therefore are camouflaged references to Satan. (Hislop and Jacob Grimm)  HEBREW ROOTS, Neglected Commandments, Satan's Birthday - Wikibooks

OBVIOUSLY, therefore "Ministers" involved in the promotion of the "worship" of the deity of this "Holy Day Season" are in actuality, (in Biblical terms) Devil worshipers, and they are referred to as "the angels (messengers) of Satan".  Do you really think  you should be "giving money" to the work of "Satur" in the earth? Or listening to a "messenger of Satur" tell you about "Christ"?  What in the world do you think you will possibly hear? The "Truth"?


The REAL RELIGION Actually Believed in And Promoted By THE VATICAN And It's Network Of "SECRET SOCIETIES"
Who All Without Exception Lie About, And Promote, "Christ-Mass" In America In Violation Of The U.S. Constitution
Many Of Whom Are In Now In Complete Control Of America's Historically Protestant & Evangelical Denominations and Institutions

2Ki 17:9  ..(they) did SECRETLY those things that were not right against the LORD their God, and they built them BAMAH HOUSES in all their cities, 


Variant(s): also bi·ma /'bE-m&/
Function: noun
Etymology: Yiddish & Late Hebrew; Yiddish bime, from Late Hebrew bImAh, from Late Greek bEma raised platform -- more at BEMA: a raised platform in a synagogue...
One entry found for bema.
Main Entry: be·ma
Pronunciation: 'bE-m&
Function: noun
Etymology: Late Latin & Late Greek; Late Latin, from Late Greek bEma, from Greek, step, tribunal, from bainein to go -- more at COME
1 : the usually raised part of a church containing the altar
2 : (see) BIMAH
BEMA: Area around the altar of a church for the clergy and choir; often enclosed by a lattice or railing - WordWeb
BEMA, bemae:
Latin. A structure of brick or mortar rising by steps or stages to an elevated platform  - Glossary - Mithraism In Archeology And History

More will be discussed about these ecclesiastical origins in the section entitled THE CHURCH.

If you are getting the distinct impression by now that your LOCAL "CHRISTMAS MINISTER" is actually really a SECRET DEVIL WORSHIPER
You are VERY VERY SLOW to "catch on".

but... better late than never.






APOLLO comes from the Hurrian and Hittite divinity, Aplu, who was widely evoked during the "plague years". Aplu, it is suggested, comes from the Akkadian Aplu Enlil, meaning "the son of Enlil", a title that was given to the god Nergal, who was linked to SHAMASH, Babylonian god of the sun.  - de Grummond, Nancy Thomson (2006) "Etruscan Myth, Sacred History, and Legend". (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology) & Mackenzie, Donald A. (2005) "Myths of Babylonia and Assyria" (Gutenberg)

In the Tanakh, the prophetic patterns of Babylon are repeated, and prophesied as being equally applicable to Babylon's continued SPIRITUAL practice which would be picked up by the Roman empire and brought into an apostate form of religion, that would "come in Christ's name" but actually be a betrayal of him, replaced by a false Christ from Babylon that would lead it's followers into an eternity in the LAKE OF FIRE.  The False Christ, as you have seen in the previous section entitled THE CHRIST, is nothing more than the replacement of the real Biblical-Historical Yehushoa, with Shamash (Rome's Apollo) from Ancient Babylon, the very FALSE CHRIST mentioned by name in the same prophecies.  
Read for yourself how the Scripture veiws this secret religion, and what it will do to those who embrace it as their own.

Isa 14:4-24  That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased! 
Isa 14:5  The LORD hath broken the staff of the wicked, and the sceptre of the rulers. 
Isa 14:6  He who smote the people in wrath with a continual stroke, he that ruled the nations in anger, is persecuted, and none hindereth. 
Isa 14:7  The whole earth is at rest, and is quiet: they break forth into singing. 
Isa 14:8  Yea, the fir trees rejoice at thee, and the cedars of Lebanon, saying, Since thou art laid down, no axman is come up against us
Isa 14:9  Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations. 
Isa 14:10  All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us? 
Isa 14:11  Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee. 
Isa 14:12  How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations
Isa 14:13  For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 
Isa 14:14  I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 
Isa 14:15  Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. 
Isa 14:16  They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; 
Isa 14:17  That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners? 
Isa 14:18  All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house. 
Isa 14:19  But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet. 
Isa 14:20  Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. 
Isa 14:21  Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities. 
Isa 14:22  For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD. 
Isa 14:23  I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the LORD of hosts. 
Isa 14:24  The LORD of hosts hath sworn, saying, Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand: 


Rev 17:4  And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 
Rev 18:1  And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. 
Rev 18:2  And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and isbecome the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. 
Rev 18:3  For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. 


Rev 18:4  And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. 
Rev 18:5  For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. 
Rev 18:6  Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double. 
Rev 18:7  How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow
Rev 18:8  Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her. 

In both "Testaments", New and Old, Babelists were assigned to an eternity in the LAKE OF FIRE.  precisely because their worship focused on it as deity.  What logic suggests that what you worship is not where you should also spend your eternity?  This was the observation made by every prophet in the Bible up to, including, and even beyond the New Testament CHRIST.

Babelists today are "Outside the Covenant" with God.  Despite what they claim, no matter how many times they may mouth the word "Jesus", and no matter how much esteem they may be granted by the Empire, they do not represent, serve, speak for, or teach anything about the real God of the Scriptures.  They are Apostates who are lost, trusting in a false Christ that cannot save, but can certainly damn one's eternal soul.  Anyone who really belongs to God, is commanded, not requested, but commanded to come out from among them, and reject their system of religion, or else be burned along with it. (At least that is what the Bible, it's Christ, and it's Apostles and Prophets, say)  of course, they could be wrong, but then, why would you call yourself a "Christian" if you believed that? ...other than to deceive a lot of very innocent people?

The truth is that Babelists could care less about "Christ" or the Bible, or it's Apostles and Prophets.  These are seen as just social and ideological tools used to deceive the naive and accept their practices.  Their practices are much more important to them than anything God, would have ever said to anyone, anywhere at any time, and when their error is pointed out to them, they have no interest in "repenting" (as anyone who is sincere about their faith would do).  They simply look for better ways to hide what they do, and persuade the gullible into their practices.  They are actually referred in the Scriptures as "The Devil and his Angels" (messengers), the Devil of course, being the real god of ancient Babylon, carried forward in time through the practices of Secret Babelism, or i.e., "Mystery Babylon". 

 I am all in all and above all, so that God himself and I, the vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do all that God can do.- The Bull Unam Sanctam, POPE BONIFACE VIII 


2Th 2:3,4  Do not let anyone deceive you in any way, because that Day will not come unless first comes the falling away, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, the one opposing and exalting himself over everything being called God, or object of worship, 

The reason Babelists do not (actually ideologically) cannot repent over something "God" has said, is because part of their delusion is that they ARE GOD (Elohim).  Thus whatever they said in the past, they are at liberty to change (or do) as they please in the present.  The belief that they are the "Elohim" is even referenced in Jeremiah 10, who observed their practices half a millenia before Christ was ever born in Israel.  His description of them then is explicit in detail, and has served as one of the most hated and contorted texts in the entire Bible, by Babelists., who are clearly exposed within it's content.  

While this doctrine is the hallmark of Rome's Babelism, most openly declared from the balconies of the headquarters of it's Empire in Vatican City, Rome, it is also unbeknownst to many Christians, a formal doctrine within all forms of Babelism, which masquerade as "Christianity".  It is part and parcel of the "Delusion" of this theology, and a necessary component of it's functional system of Blasphemy which ultimately causes "believers" who think they are "believing" to die and spend eternity in what they have been deceived into worshiping as "Christ".... which is in reality, the Lake of Fire, headed by a man who is teaching blasphemy as a doctrine, "twisting scripture to their own destruction". 2Pe 3:16 

2Pe 3:16  As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable 
pervert, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction

Because Babelism, from Rome, was imported into many of these ecclesiastical splinter groups, now known as other "Churches" and a variety of "secret societies" often co-mingled, the damage and deceit of this apostate system has traveled with them, wherever it has gone.  From the first English Masons who retained it's occultism from their split with Rome, to the later Mormons who emerged from Masonry and incorporated much of it's Temple-cult theology, all the way to today's so-called American "Evangelicals" and "Charismatics", who have been seduced by Rome's worship of Shamash, and it's apostate doctrines of self-deification straight from the ancient TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL, that Adam (be it symbolical or literal) warned all subsequent humanity of, as the very TREE of eternal damnation.

Gen 3:1-5  Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:  But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman (Rome's "Mary mother of god"), Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. 

The multiple twists and turns of Biblical symbolism to get people to end up in the wrong place, passes itself off as a conceited form of "enlightenment" and esoteric theology, that supposedly grants their many unfortunate victims "secret revelation" or "spiritual power", but leaves them as deceived as the first and original deluded sinner, Adam. who realized his mistake only after doing irreparable harm to the human race.  Their many claims and perversions of theology will be addressed in this site in the section entitled THE CHURCH.  But it should suffice the religious consumer of the many commercial "products and services" they offer, to know here, that they are intentionally lying about much of what is said to the public.  And their intentional use of Utilitarian deceit from the secret society itself, to the spawn of the Empire-Church, should be enough to warn anyone with half a brain left to steer clear.  When is the last time, after buying a commercial product or service, when you found out the salesman had been intentionally telling you a lie, it worked out well for you? And you were thankful they lied to you? Lying is always done for the benefit of the liar, and at the expense of the deceived.  The alleged benevolent practice of deception at Christ-mass designed to teach acceptance of Utilitarian deceit. is but one of many things wrong with Babelism, it's "Tree doctrine", and ultimately it's very definition of "God" as well.

All of the warnings. instructions, and contrasts, used in the Bible by the Prophets to lead people away from Idolatry and Sun-worship get turned into their exact opposites, and used as justification for the continuance of these very practices. If the Bible says "Stop worshiping the Sun, because God is the TRUE SUN", they take the same text to claim, God really is THE SUN? But of course, reserve this great wisdom for their "initiates", who for the most part could care less what God is, the Sun, the Devil or anything else, as long as it made them money, or granted them power. (And somehow think with this traitorous spiritual attitude the great "mysteries" of God's kingdom are revealed exclusively thereby to them alone?)

If you are sitting under the "ministry" of a Babelist, who has built a 'tower to heaven' to "make a name for himself and is spreading (and in some cases demanding) the devil-worship of Babylon's Shamash (courtesy of Rome), you need to leave without condition or hesitation,  ...if you wish to be "saved" by the God or Christ of the Bible, both of whom have openly stated, this work, and it's "ministers" are not only the enemies of God in heaven, but are damned to an eternity in the same Lake of Fire, they secretly and deceptively spread the worship of. (At least that is what the Bible says)  It is the very text, where the fall of Satan from heaven, and the famous five "I WILL's" of Satan, are spoken, that the HEAD of BABELISM, is himself, in the flesh, identified as Lucifer, the Devil.... who thinks he is the equivalent of God.  In other words, you are sitting under the "ministry" of Satan, and do not realize it, and you need to leave yesterday.  And just because you think your minister is a "good man" does not mean what you just read is not true about him too, despite your affections and admirations:

Mar 8:33  But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men. 


Rev 18:4  And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. 

Rev 18:7,8  ..for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.  But.. she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her. 

Do you really think an eternity in a Lake of Fire, is worth your support of the ego of a famous religious leader
Who has been deluded by Satan into thinking he is Elohim? And you need to be deceived into the devil-worship of Shamash, his real god, from Ancient Babylon? 

Do you really believe that?

Mat 16:26  For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? 

[TOP]      [NEXT]



In most ancient cultures, including Persia, the start of the solar year has been marked to celebrate the victory of light over darkness and the renewal of the Sun. For instance, Egyptians, four thousand years ago celebrated the rebirth of the sun at this time of the year. They set the length of the festival at 12 days, to reflect the 12 divisions in their sun calendar. They decorated with greenery, using palms with 12 shoots as a symbol of the completed year, since a palm was thought to put forth a shoot each month. SHABE YALDA,The 12 Days Of Christmas,

"Garden Variety" figs, which do produce fruit, but are not considered commercially "edible" because of their smaller size and bitter taste, have some amazing qualities.  In the middle-east, as mentioned above, the fruit from these FIG TREES, is considered FOOD FOR GOATS.  But there is another amazing fact about these garden variety fig trees, the small red fruits, similar in appearance to "red berries" (a prominant theme in Christmas greenery), such as those found on THE WEEPING FIG,(Ficus Benjamina) are a particular favorite source of food for TURTLE-DOVES. (Brown birds in the pigeon and "dove" family)

In European Art and literature, the Turtle-Dove was also the symbol of "Love" being the "Devoted partner" of THE PHOENIX/  The PHOENIX of course, a mythical bird which actually SYMBOLIZES THE SUN.  The song "THE TWELVE DAYS OF CHRISTMAS", have some rather fascinating meanings, all of which however, make it clear that what is being sung about have nothing to do with a Biblical conception of God.  Quite the opposite.  One of the reasons, the early Protestants opposed "Christmas" was it's demand that the STATE be EMPLOYED in granting not only a License, but funding of state-sponsored IDOLATRY, which is in no uncertain terms, completely condemned throughout the entire Scriptures.  The Vatican, despite denials by it's American Apollo-gists, know full well it's practices, including those of "Christmas", blatantly engage and spread Idolatry.  They justify this rebellion against God, by citing the fact that Jews in Israel did it too. (As though that actually matters, Israel did a lot of apostate things under the sabotage, and it's agents, of the Empire)  And they cite the fact that Solomon's temple had statues of Cheribum and Seraphim in the Holy of Holies.  But that too is a rather lame excuse.  No one was ever allowed to see the "Holy of Holies" in the Jerusalem temple except the high priest only once a year, and even then, he had to go in, in the DARK.  These aesthetic specifications, hidden away in the dark, no one ever even saw, hardly justifies the practice of EYE-DOLLS, (teraphim) which are venerated, adored, attributed with magical powers and even prayed to in the case of Rome.  

But, having noted that, it must also be said, it is not without coincidence that Babelism gravitates to Solomon and his temple, even among the Masons.  For the Bible records it was Solomon, the great apostate, who infected Israel with the filth of heathen gods and their worship, and of which eventually led to the destruction of the entire country. Solomon was an apostate.  And it is no accident that apostates build their entire theology around him and his "practices" rather than the Prophets who spent most of their time, their prophecies, and their lives, confronting the residual affects of what Solomon had done .  AND it is no accident that the very number 666, was chosen as the sign of the ANTICHRIST, who would also emulate and point to Solomon.  666 is only used twice in the Tanakh, both instances refer to the building of the Jerusalem temple, and the primary, and most well known use of which, is THE AMOUNT OF GOLD RECEIVED BY SOLOMON FROM the QUEEN OF SHEBA, a sun-god worshipper, who "seduced" Solomon into apostasy after the building of his temple.  It was the very numerical symbol of Solomon and his apostacy over this very temple.

1Ki 10:4  And when the queen of Sheba had seen all Solomon's wisdom, and the house that he had built, 
1Ki 10:13  And king Solomon gave unto the queen of Sheba all her desire, whatsoever she asked, beside that which Solomon gave her of his royal bounty. So she turned and went to her own country, she and her servants. 
1Ki 10:14  Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold, (666)

And just in case, you "fall" for the lies from the Babelists, that all this was really secretly "good" or somehow what God had either intended wor wanted, the matter is made graphicly clear by the Apostles of Christ himself in the New Testament who confronted the Jewish leaders in Israel over this very controversy.  The same of which the New Testament apostles, and original first generation disciples of Christ,  pointed to and said:

Act 7:47  But Solomon built him an house. 
Act 7:48  Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, 
Act 7:49  Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest? 
Act 7:50  Hath not my hand made all these things? 
Act 7:51  Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye. 

ἀντιπίπτω, antipiptō, an-tee-pip'-to, to oppose: - resist. from "ἀντί", anti,  an-tee', A primary particle; opposite, that is, instead or because of (rarely in addition to): - for, in the room of. Often used in composition to denote contrast, requital, substitution, correspondence, etc. + πίπτω, πέτω, piptō  petō, pip'-to, pet'-o
The first is a reduplicated and contracted form of the second (which occurs only as an alternate in certain tenses); probably akin to G4072 through the idea of alighting; to fall (literally of figuratively): - fail, fall (down), light on.

Origin, as well, of the very prefix "ANTI" as in "ANTI-CHRIST", who is identifed by the name "666" by John in Revelation.  The reader can find much more on this subject in the section entitled THE CHRIST: Christ or Anti-Christ?  

Thus it is NO ACCIDENT, that the very NAME of the man who made this the law of the land in Ancient Rome, was literally named POPE SIXTUS III (Literally in Latin, Sixth III).  A name the reader should be reminded HE ACTUALLY CHOSE upon becoming ROME'S POPE, and for the very and exact reason the meaning of that name is intended to convey.  THE ANTICHRIST.

A Symbol Of Daidalos's Revenge Against Perdix

Who Was Daidalos?

"This is the workshop of Daidalos,and about it are statues, some with forms blocked out, others in a quite complete state in that they are already stepping forward and give promise of walking about. Before the time of Daidalos, you know, the art of making statues had not yet conceived such a thing." - Philostratus in Immagines (1.16), 

The fact that now throughout America, state and federal budgets, as well as public facilities, must often accommodate the public display and promotion of Idolatry, to satisfy the demands of ROME and it's "angels", in America, is really spiritually unacceptable from a Biblical world-view, and without excuse on every level, Christian or otherwise. And Biblically speaking, this is an issue more important to the actual God of the Scriptures than even "abortion".

Eze 6:13-14  Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols. So will I stretch out my hand upon them, and make the land desolate, yea, more desolate than the wilderness toward Diblath, in all their habitations: and they shall know that I am the LORD. 



(And a whole lot of other people did too)

The "Christ-mass tree" is not observed because it is "the tree of life", it is observed precisely because it is not, because it is exactly, historically, and precisely because it is THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE from the Garden of Eden (Gan Edin).  And it is no accident, that the more materialistic, hedonistic, selfish, and egotistical one may be in life, they always come to the cause of "Christ-Mass" even occassionally attending "Church services" at the local Babelist temple to show their moral support of the corrupt solar "high holy day", and it's psuedo "Apollo-Christ".
The "Tree" was known from the beginning by Rome to be a continuation of the Tree from Perisa's "Gan Edin", thus why during the middle-ages, long before they even admit there were "Christmas trees" to the public, the Medieval Church was observing the "Feast of Adam and Eve", and just guess how they observed it?  By hanging "Apples" and "Candles" on evergreen trees in homes on December 24th.  Remember of course, this is long before, the alleged first "Christmas Tree" has been supposedly invented.  And despite it was allegedly the "Feast of Adam and Eve", there was only one tree present, and it was the one with the apples on it. (which they ALSO ate), in keeping with all Rome's practices of Syncretism concerning God and Satan, still seen most obviously today, in Rome's practices of "All Hallow's Eve" or "Halloween".
Back in the 14th Century, churches presented Miracle Plays—religious plays used to educate the illiterate public. Traditionally on December 24, the church presented The Paradise Play, the story of Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden. And in place of an apple tree—as they weren’t available in winter—they fastened apples to the branches of a pine tree. Using a pine to represent the Tree of Good and Evil became a common practice among churches and they began incorporating the tree into their Christmas displays each year. But it didn’t stop there. Following the church’s example, people began assembling pine trees in their homes and decorating them with red apples. This act introduced two modern traditions: the Christmas tree and our seasonal colors, green for the pine tree and red for the applesThe Origin Of Christmas Colors, By Nicole Skutelnik, Cultural Anthropology online

ROME'S doctrine of "syncretism" (rejecting the Jewish idea of "kosher" and intentionally choosing it's opposite) "fused" the TREE OF KNOWLEDGE with CHRIST (and the "Tree of Life") so that they would be ONE AND THE SAME.  So in other words, when the Pope practice's SELF-DEIFICATION and makes himself "a god", in the manner of Lucifer (king of Babylon) it is "one and the SAME".

The "Christ-Mass Tree" has been from it's very beginning in Ancient Persia's "Gan Edin, both in it's "pagan" form (as they say) among the Germans and Nordics, and in it's Romanized version centuries later, been both understood and intended to be THE TREE of "ENLIGHTENMENT", described in the Tanakh as THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL, the very tree of eternal damnation, and an eternity in the Lake Of Fire, the same "Lake Of Fire" in the sky, which it erroneously worships in an act of Blasphemy against the creator, and the self-deification of the already egotistical human king.


The story is the typical narrative of who killed who and who slaughtered who, they call "history" in Rome, but one of Rome's "founders" in the consolidation of it's HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE over Scandinavia is "Saint Olaf" who was probably aside from Ignatius Loyala, and his "Holy Inquisitions", and Hitler himself,  one of the bloodiest characters in European history, who placed his Imperial hopes with the Roman Empire, against Norway's already "Christian" King, and the thousands of it's already "Christianized" citizens.  "Saint Olaf" executed an "ethnic cleansing" or as it is called today "genocide", of all dissenting forces within Scandinavia, which included thousands upon thousands of Finnish, Norwegian, Danish and Swedish, "Christians" and "pagans" (as they say).  For this regional rampage of Butchery on behalf of Rome, before his body was even cold in the ground, he was made a "Saint" within a year after his death, and entitled "Norway's Eternal King".  Though "officially" not until 1888 because, like "Saint Nicholas", he was venerated prior to the official canonization processes being formulated and finalized. 

The title, "Norway's Eternal King", of course, is nothing short of an act of Roman blasphemy which should really infuriate anyone who is really Norwegian. (Move over "Jesus", Rome just gave your throne away to one of it's butchers).  Ironically, despite the fact he is one of the greatest traitors of Norwegian sovereignty in the entire history of Norway, and one of the greatest mass murderers in European history, he is promoted every year by the "Christ-mass" missionaries, as an ethnic symbol for a "Scandinavian Christmas", offered to appeal to people of Scandinavian descent (who actually should be literally outraged and throwing tomatoes and rotten eggs at his effigy)   But of course, such are the ways of THE CHRIST-MASS LIE. Satan is God, the Tree of Death, is the Tree of Life, evil is really good, and genocidal mass murderers are "Saints", and the people they slaughtered should "venerate them".  The CHRIST-MASS LIES literally never end.

In gratitude for all his slaughtering and butchering, and to help gain the favor of those left he did not kill, Scandinavian "traditions" were incorporated heavily into the ecclesiastical regalia of the new Roman Empire religion.  The Solstice tree was among one of the gestures incorporated, along with various representations of Norway's national god Odin, originally "Julenisse" (Odin) and his "nisser" (elves) transposed onto "Saint Nicholas", who is now our American "Santa Clause".  As though, this would somehow make up for the thousands of Odin worshipers, "Saint Olaf" actually slaughtered and butchered, or possibly mock and psychologically demoralize into depressed submission.  

The cartoonish character of "Santa Clause" is as much an insult and mockery of the real Odin, perhaps, as the "Jesus" it likewise stole from "Jews" and corrupted through a similar unrealistic caricature, and whom it also slaughtered "in masse".  Thus finishing off the last elements of it's current "ecclesiastical" practices now associated with the "High Holy Day" birth of it's Apollo-Christ, sun-god Shamash. A mockery cartoon of the Norwegian Odin, a mockery cartoon of the Jewish Christ, taken from those they slaughtered, a mass murderer of Scandinavians, "Saint Olaf", an apostate gentile "Saint Nicholas", a Persian enlightenment Solstice Tree from Gan Edin, the solstice Libation of Apollo, all thrown together to honor the birth of Babylon's Shamash, the Roman Apollyon, to merchandise religion in the name of God (which is actually forbidden by the cartoon Jesus [violently with whips no less] in the book it pasted together from the confiscated documents of it's Jewish victims).  Merry Christmas. Peace on earth, Goodwill toward men? What a mockery of God and hummanity.

"Christ-mass" missionaries actually have the nerve to call this "multi-cultural", when in reality, it is really nothing short of "multi-deceptional", "multi-offensive", "multi-oppressive" and "multi-genocidal".  If all of these various "cultures", wish to "celebrate" those who betrayed them, "murdered them", stole from them,  and created mockeries and cartoons of their sacred rites and properties, to enforce subjection and domination from Rome, then it could be claimed "Christ-Mass" is "multi-cultural", but with these kinds of definitions at work, Jews would be "celebrating" Hitler, and African-Americans would be "celebrating' the birth of the Klan, and Rome itself should be "celebrating" Karl Marx and Stalin.  The claim "Christ-Mass" is multi-cultural is patently absurd, and really to anyone familiar with it's history, such an incredibly stupid comment, it is down-right offensive.  There is only one culture on earth represented in "Christ-Mass" and it is the culture of Roman Fascism, which was built on the grave of every culture it stomped it's Iron boot upon.

And "conservative Christians" deceived as deceived can be, are being manipulated and used as innocent pawns to make the honor of Rome's deified Pontifex Maximus (and his historical butchers) through this day , compulsory on all Americans, in violation of their own U.S. Constitution, their own history, their own founding fathers, and in many cases even their own religions. (All for the expansion and establishment of a Holy Roman Reich their own father's fought and died against in World War II!)


                               THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE 
                                               OF GOOD AND EVIL

KNOWLEDGEknow (n½) v. knew (n›, ny›), known (n½n), know·ing, knows. --tr. [Middle English knowen, from Old English cn³wan. See gn½- below.] --know"a·ble adj. --know"er n.


 gn½-. Important derivatives are: know, can1, cunning, uncouth, notice, recognize, noble, diagnosis, narrate.

gn½-. To know. Contracted from *gno…- as in "Gnostic". 1. Variant form *gn-, contracted from *gn…-. KNOW, from Old English cn³wan, to know, from Germanic *kn(w)-. 2. Zero-grade form *gö…-. a. CAN1, CON2, CUNNING, from Old English cunnan, to know, know how to, be able to, from Germanic * 5. Suffixed form *gn½-dhli-. NOBLE, from Latin n½bilis, knowable, known, famous, noble. 6. Reduplicated and suffixed form *gi-gn½-sko-. GNOME2, GNOMON, GNOSIS; AGNOSIA, DIAGNOSIS, PATHOGNOMONIC, PHYSIOGNOMY, PROGNOSIS, from Greek gign½skein, to know, think, judge, with gnosis (< *gn½-ti-), knowledge, inquiry, and gn½m½n, judge, interpreter. 7. Suffixed zero-grade form *gö…-ro-. NARRATE, from Latin narr³re (< *gnarr³re), to tell, relate, from gn³rus, knowing, expert. 8. Traditionally but improbably referred here are: a. NOTE; ANNOTATE, CONNOTE, PROTHONOTARY, from Latin nota, a mark, note, sign, cipher, shorthand character; b. NORM, NORMA, NORMAL; ABNORMAL, ENORMOUS, from Latin norma, carpenter's square, rule, pattern, precept, possibly from an Etruscan borrowing of Greek gn½m½n, carpenter's square, rule. [Pokorny 2. ªen- 376.]



THE Carpenter's SQUARE is the symbol of FREEMASONRY [builders of the Gothic Cathedrals of the Middle Ages], who trace their origins through Roman Catholicism to Nimrod, the founder of the Temple.

The universal sentiment of the Masons of the present day is to confer upon Solomon, King of Israel, the honor of being their "first Grand Master".  But the "Legend of the Craft" had long before, though there was a tradition of the temple extant, bestowed, at least by implication, that title upon Nimrod, the King of Babylonia and Assyria. - History of Freemasonry, Chapter 12, p. 63



 (1) ...from Latin nota, A MARK

 (2) ...from Latin norma, CARPENTER'S SQUARE




in defense of the state's observance of Christ-Mass, it was openly declared and publically recorded in our own Public Congressional Record (Congressional Record E13461 December 14, 1971), that Christ-Mass was neither a "Christian" holy day, nor begun by Christianity.

"As Christmas comes down to us today it is a rich heritage of customs, traditions, folklore, and legend, drawn from many lands and people --- The idea of celebrating on or about December 25 was born among ancient people long before the birth of Christ.  In Rome, it was the 'dies natalis invieti solis'- the birthday of the unconquered Sun." 

And if you are an Evangelical/Protestant "Christian"
The whole world is laughing at you behind your back.
As it worships your devil, ...and tells you it is your "Christ"
And the really sad thing about it is...
You are so stupid (i.e. "Stupor"), you actually believe them.
Because you can't even tell the difference.

Rev 17:2, 18:3  With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. 

Worshiping THE LAKE OF FIRE and "accepting it" into THEIR HEART as THEIR CHRIST
And it is 
Mary Christ Mass



GOOGLE SEARCH: Results about 39,600,000 for "the magic of christmas".

Most do not realize that the intentional use of the phrase the "Magic of Christmas" is secretly intended literally, as "magic" or "sorcery" is in fact the point of the entire annual ritual, we call "CHRIST" Mass.  Which is obviously pretty outrageous to begin with.

Act 8:9-11  But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one: 
To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, This man is the great power of God
 And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had bewitched them with sorceries

But obviously not the first time it would have happened in history.  The odd thing about now however, is that there is an entire country full of "born-again" Protestant Christians worshiping Lucifer, and talking about the "Magic of Christmas", thinking they are going to heaven and "following Christ".  The rest of the country knows they are so full of excrement, as to not be worth the time of day, other than the wrist action they provide crooked politicians at election time.

But if any of that variety are accidently reading this article, let this website have the honor of being the first to point out that your "Magic of Christmas" (buying a selling God for money,i.e., making merchandise of the things and people of God) virtually assures you that you have NO PLACE in the kingdom of God, meaning Heaven. (At least that is what the Bible says)

(To Simon) Act 8:20-23  But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. 
Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. 
 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. 
 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity

2Pe 2:3  And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. 

There. I hope that clears up the matter for you. But don't worry, your Christmas minister who secretly thinks he is god at his local secret Lucifer club, will be happy to use his knowledge to show you God did not say, do not eat this fruit, because he knows you will really become a god.

The "magic" of "Christ-Mass" is not complete without "Christ-Mass Tree ornaments" because after all, the tree without the ornaments, is just a smelly pine(i.e., evergreen) tree that will be dead in a couple weeks.  What makes the tree "magic" is it's "ornamentation", in much the same way that sticking pins in a VooDoo doll is supposed to put a "spell" or "curse" on someone.  The Voodoo doll is not complete without the pins.  So the TREE of knowledge of good and evil, is not complete with a few "decorations" designed to conjure up the "Spirit" that helped Adam and Eve's make the decision to become gods, and damn the human race.  But don't feel bad about being damned over Adam and Eve, you get your chance to do the same thing every year! Lucky you! Isn't that "fun"!

Obviously Protestant Christians who wish to participate in this yearly ritual of ROMAN blasphemy and Witchcraft, and pretend they are not conducting "witchcraft" or the "magic of Christ-Mass", are simply in denial, or perhaps in a STUPOR.  But think afor memoment, what exactly would you think if one of your teen-age children bought a VooDoo doll, fashioned it after you, and every morning at breakfast told you how much they "loved you" and then stuck a "pin" in the doll? Right in your eyeball?  Or perhaps heart? And whenever you tried to talk to them about it, all they said was, "Oh, don't be silly, It doesn't mean anything, I just do it for "fun""?  Really? That is "fun" to you?

As you will see, once you get out of your STUPOR and wake up to what you are doing, you will probably decide to either go join a coven, or repent and get saved.  Because you will realize your decision will be pretty much just that, and in reality always has been even though you have not known it.

Here are the dictionary definitions for THE "MAGIC" of Christ-Mass.  They START with SORCERY and keep referring back to another word, until you finally end up with the words DRUNK and STUPID. Obviously no accident.

Main Entry: 1mag·ic 
Pronunciation: \ˈma-jik\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English magique, from Middle French, from Latin magice, from Greek magikē, feminine of magikos Magian, magical, from magos magus, sorcerer, of Iranian origin; akin to Old Persian maguš sorcerer
Date: 14th century
1 a : the use of means (as charms or spells) believed to have supernatural power over natural forces b : magic rites or incantations
2 a : an extraordinary power or influence seemingly from a supernatural source b : something that seems to cast a spell : enchantment
3 : the art of producing illusions by sleight of hand

One entry found.

Main Entry: sor·cery 
Pronunciation: \-rē\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English sorcerie, from Anglo-French, from sorcer sorcerer, from Medieval Latin sortiarius, from Latin sort-, sors chance, lot — more at series
Date: 14th century
1 : the use of power gained from the assistance or control of evil spirits especially for divining : necromancy
2 : magic 2a

Main Entry: en·chant·ment 
Pronunciation: \in-ˈchant-mənt, en-\
Function: noun
Date: 13th century
1 a : the act or art of enchanting b : the quality or state of being enchanted
2 : something that enchants <the enchantments of sailing>

SEE to En*trance

Main Entry: 2en·trance 
Pronunciation: \in-ˈtran(t)s, en-\
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): en·tranced; en·tranc·ing
Date: 1541
1 : to put into a trance
2 : to carry away with delight, wonder, or rapture <we were entranced by the view>
— en·trance·ment  \-ˈtran(t)-smənt\ noun

Main Entry: 1trance 
Pronunciation: \ˈtran(t)s\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English traunce, from Anglo-French transe death, coma, rapture, from transir to depart, die, from Latin transire to cross, pass by — more at transient
Date: 14th century
1 : stupor, daze
2 : a sleeplike state (as of deep hypnosis) usually characterized by partly suspended animation with diminished or absent sensory and motor activity
3 : a state of profound abstraction or absorption
— trance·like  \-ˌlīk\ adjective

Physician-reviewed articles on trance on Healthline.
1. Alternative medicine - pain relief (1 image)
Alternative medicine refers to treatments that are used i...

Main Entry: stu·por 
Pronunciation: \ˈstü-pər, ˈstyü-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin, from stupēre
Date: 14th century
1 : a condition of greatly dulled or completely suspended sense or sensibility <a drunken stupor>
2 : a state of extreme apathy or torpor resulting often from stress or shock : daze
synonyms see lethargy
Physician-reviewed articles on stupor on Healthline.
1. Consciousness - decreased
Decreased consciousness is reduced alertness or awareness...

See Stupid

Main Entry: 1stu·pid 
Pronunciation: \ˈstü-pəd, ˈstyü-\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle French stupide, from Latin stupidus, from stupēre to be numb, be astonished — more at type
Date: 1541

1 a : slow of mind : obtuse b : given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless manner c :lacking intelligence or reason : brutish
2 : dulled in feeling or sensation : torpid <still stupid from the sedative>
3 : marked by or resulting from unreasoned thinking or acting : senseless <a stupid decision>
4 a : lacking interest or point <a stupid event> b : vexatiousexasperating <the stupid car won't start>


Because SATURN was the god of "Agriculture" the OX, COW, and BULL, all animals of agriculture, became of primary importance to observance of this deity, which represented wealth and power in the ancient world, in the same way "stacks of dollars" or "gold bricks" represent the same in modern culture.  In fact, often the BULL was made with gold or gold-plating to emphesize this aspect of "wealth".  This was the original god of the "properity gospel" and thus no accident why "prosperity gospel" preachers, or preachers seeking "political power", give great and sacred homage to this god on the winter solstice.

Cognates throughout the world, spinning into variations from it's original deity in ancient Babylon, Anu or Ninib.  Saturn was associated with HARVEST, and BOUNTY, and is often shown in association with the "Horn of Plenty".  Paying him homage, at the turn of the year was considered "good luck" for the fortunes of the coming year.  As has been mentioned earlier, Saturn is associated by way of etymology with the Satur, or Satyr, mentioned in the Hebrew Tanakh, that is translated as the word "Devil".
in the very region where the Chaldean Mysteries were originally concocted,--that Adversary who was ultimately the real father of all the Pagan gods,--and who (to make the title of Kronos (Saturn), "the Horned One," appropriate to him also) was symbolised by the Kerastes, or Horned serpent. All "the brethren" of this father of the gods, who were implicated in his rebellion against his own father, the "God of Heaven," were equally called by the "reproachful" name "Titans"; but, inasmuch as he was the ringleader in the rebellion, he was, of course, Titan by way of eminence. - Alexander Hislop

The male reproductive organ was of tremendous importance in the Mystery Religions representing, no doubt, power and fertility. Trees were common phallic symbols connected with the sun god.the Ball shaped ornaments, representing testicles were hung all around the phallus. 

-- Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th edition, 1973

Families gather together in anticipation and delight when the obelisk (treetop ornament) is placed in its position of honor. Among symbol historians, it's origins are said to have initially represented the sexual union between the Babylonian mother-goddess and her SON, whom she took as her husband, (Nimrod).  It is a complete and "perfect opposite" to the "marriage supper of the LAMB" also referenced in the Bible.

Part of Tammuz (i.e., Baal) worship was to place golden balls on the tree which were representative of the testicles of Tammuz, as he was also considered a god of sex. -ALL ABOUT "CHRISTMAS" 2000 B.C.E. to 2007 C.E. by Ed Stevens, James Trimm & Baruch Ben Daniel


Most Christians openly know "Christmas" is a lie.  But they assume, since this "lie" is promoted by their "Church" it is a "harmless" one.  Especially if the minister (often a religious-right conservative) assures them they are ignoring its roots, and simply "focusing" on "Christ".  This site, along with the scriptures, challenges that perspective. 

In fact, as you have seen, that is possibly the most DANGEROUS perspective of any, to take toward this Roman holy day.  CHRIST-MASS is a "Rotten Tree".  And it is precisely the plea to just "focus on Christ" that this "delusion" was intended to accomplish when it was first introduced to "Christians" to start with.  But the "Christ" you will be "focusing on" at CHRIST-MASS is precisely what the scriptures explain in no uncertain terms, will send you to hell, with no apologies, and no conditions.  Because IT IS NOT CHRIST.  Sorry. That's what it says. And what nearly every Protestant group in America in near unanimous consensus, easily and without controversy, once understood.  

Mat 7:17-19  Thus every good tree produces good fruit, but a rotten tree produces evil fruit. A good tree cannot produce evil fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit. Every tree not producing good fruit is cut down and cast into the fire. [EMTV]



Christians are TOLD like "dumb sheep" this is supposed to "Symbolize Christ"!

Do you think the CHRIST of the Bible

would have taken the sacred tree of the high place and stuck it in his living room?





You will not find "THIS CHRIST" anywhere in YOUR BIBLE. 

(Other than under the headings of "FALSE CHRIST" & "LAKE OF FIRE")

Sorry. That's the truth.

Jesus said - "On judgment day...I will reply, `I never knew you. Go away; the things you did were unauthorized.' "

(Matthew 7:22,23) 






The male reproductive organ was of tremendous importance in the Mystery Religions representing, no doubt, power and fertility. Trees were common phallic symbols connected with the sun god.the Ball shaped ornaments, representing the womb were hung all around the phallus. Today, families gather together in breathless anticipation and delight when the obelisk (treetop ornament) is placed in its position of honor. When you learn that it represents the sexual union between the Babylonian mother-goddess and her sungod, son/husband (Nimrod), it becomes an object of disgust.-- Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th edition, 1973

Part of Tammuz worship was to place golden balls on the tree which were representative of the testicles of Tammuz, as he was also considered a god of sex. -ALL ABOUT "CHRISTMAS" 2000 B.C.E. to 2007 C.E. by Ed Stevens, James Trimm & Baruch Ben Daniel

When God looks at your "Christmas Tree", 

do you think he doesn't see any of this, just because you don't?

"Do not bring a detestable thing INTO YOUR HOUSE or you, like it, will be SET APART FOR DESTRUCTION.  Utterly abhor and detest it, for it is set apart for destruction." (Deut 7:26 NIV)

"...I will punish those who....introduce pagan....practices; And I'll punish all who import pagan superstitions...."

(Zephaniah 1:8,9 MSG)





"The man...COMPROMISES with worldlings, and to quiet his own conscience, he invents a theory by which such compromises are justified, even commended.  He receives the praises of the judicious, but he has, in truth, GONE OVER TO THE ENEMY." -(C.H. SPURGEON., 1888, Sword and the Trowel) 


[TOP]    [NEXT]




KNOWLEDGE, know (n½) v. knew (n›, ny›), known (n½n), know·ing, knows. --tr. [Middle English knowen, from Old English cn³wan. See gn½- below.] --know"a·ble adj. --know"er n.


 gn½-. Important derivatives are: know, can1, cunning, uncouth, notice, recognize, noble, diagnosis, narrate.

gn½-. To know. Contracted from *gno…- as in "Gnostic". 1. Variant form *gn-, contracted from *gn…-. KNOW, from Old English cn³wan, to know, from Germanic *kn(w)-. 2. Zero-grade form *gö…-. a. CAN1, CON2, CUNNING, from Old English cunnan, to know, know how to, be able to, from Germanic * 5. Suffixed form *gn½-dhli-. NOBLE, from Latin n½bilis, knowable, known, famous, noble. 6. Reduplicated and suffixed form *gi-gn½-sko-. GNOME2, GNOMON, GNOSIS; AGNOSIA, DIAGNOSIS, PATHOGNOMONIC, PHYSIOGNOMY, PROGNOSIS, from Greek gign½skein, to know, think, judge, with gnosis (< *gn½-ti-), knowledge, inquiry, and gn½m½n, judge, interpreter. 7. Suffixed zero-grade form *gö…-ro-. NARRATE, from Latin narr³re (< *gnarr³re), to tell, relate, from gn³rus, knowing, expert. 8. Traditionally but improbably referred here are: a. NOTE; ANNOTATE, CONNOTE, PROTHONOTARY, from Latin nota, a mark, note, sign, cipher, shorthand character; b. NORM, NORMA, NORMAL; ABNORMAL, ENORMOUS, from Latin norma, carpenter's square, rule, pattern, precept, possibly from an Etruscan borrowing of Greek gn½m½n, carpenter's square, rule. [Pokorny 2. ªen- 376.]




THE Carpenter's SQUARE is the symbol of FREEMASONRY [builders of the Gothic Cathedrals of the Middle Ages], who trace their origins through Roman Catholicism to Nimrod, the founder of the Temple.





 (1) ...from Latin nota, A MARK

 (2) ...from Latin norma, CARPENTER'S SQUARE






"THE BEAST" is a term used of "THE SERPENT"



Act 28:4  And when the barbarians saw the venomous beast hang on his hand, they said among themselves, No doubt this man is a murderer, whom, though he hath escaped the sea, yet vengeance suffereth not to live.
Act 28:5  And he
shook off the beast into the fire, and felt no harm.






Rev 18:23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

5000 years ago, in ancient Egypt, the Egyptian Osiris road across the night sky in a Chariot.  After his death an Ever-green tree grew full size from a dead stump overnight, symbolizing Osiris's rebirth and immortality.  The birth of Osiris was December 25th.  This symbolism is retained in the operative system of Freemasonry, a medieval splinter group from Roman Catholicism.


Because ancient Rome, when creating the modern religion we call "Christianity" today, was attempting to create a synthesis of pagan religions in the Empire along with Judaism, into a single "universal" system, it incorporated many practices from the Greco-Roman "mystery religions" (a/k/a "mysteries") into it's system.  The rites, rituals, customs, temples, and even gods, in many cases,  were simply given "Christian names" and continued with a new sign in front of their Temple.

In Egypt, as in Persian Mithraic mysteries, the use of narcotic chemicals to create "enlightenment" was part of their practice.  The word "Sorcery" that is mentioned in the text above, is the Greek word φαρμακεία, "pharmakeia" from which we get the word "Pharmacy",

“There are a number of hieroglyphic depictions of plants (many of which are psychedelic) on walls and within texts throughout Egypt. This is to be expected, yet this goes undetected or dismissed by most who are studying Egypt and its religious writings … The pillars that are at every temple in Egypt are shaped like giant mushrooms. These are shaped like the Amanita some are shaped like Psilocybe. Others look like tree fungus and are decorated with pictures of an incredible variety of plants.” - James Arthur, “Mushrooms and Mankind” (44 & 53)

In Egypt countless pillars are shaped like huge mushrooms with tall stems, umbrella caps, and mushroom engravings all up, down, and around them. In the Egyptian Book of the Dead they are called “the food of the gods,” or “celestial food” and “the flesh of the gods.”  In Egyptian temples there are many pictures of gods/neters feeding humans the “ankh” cross/circle symbol which is said to represent the water of life and immortality. This also suggests the mushroom as it has been called “the Elixir of Immortality” and “the Fountain of Youth.”

All this of course, is directly connected to the "Rotten Tree" of Babelism, we call the "Christ-Mass" Tree today.



Not only was the ever green tree sacred to Babelism because it uniquely grows in the "high places" where other trees do not, but also, perhaps to no lesser degree, because there is a particular sacred plant which grows under it.  The plant was used to make a drug that was ingested by ancient shamans of the Babel cult all over the world.  The chemical in the plant is a naturally occuring chemical in the penial gland and as most students of world religion know, the penial gland is associated with self-deification practiced in the eastern schools of polytheism known as "enlightenment" and associated with (The serpent).  The same "Serpent" metnioned in Genesis 3 to be specific.  Moses writing to liberate the Jews under the hand of the religious poly-theistic solar-deity system of Pharaoh, specifically his claim of self-deification and the Cobra of his "enlightenment".


Normally, "enlightenment" is acheived through the ardious practice of meditation, which if done as needed, consumes ones entire life time (every waking moment) for possibly years, thus why the practice became normative that eastern aspirants would "renounce the world" and go sit in caves for years until they "achieved enlightenment".  The process of "enlightenment" involved a variety of different "mind altering" mental techniques, depending on the school, to reach a state of what the New Testament actually describes as being "demonized", or more specifically having a "spirit".


Act 16:16  And it came to pass in our going on to prayer, a certain maid, having a spirit of Python, did meet us, who brought much employment to her masters by soothsaying,
Act 16:17  she having followed Paul and us, was crying, saying, `These men are servants of the Most High God, who declare to us a way of salvation;'
Act 16:18  and this she was doing for many days, but Paul having been grieved, and having turned, said to the spirit, `I command thee, in the name of Jesus Christ, to come forth from her;' and it came forth the same hour.


The oldest form, which historically, all the eastern "self-deification" schools can be traced back to, is today referred to as "Kundalini" (wherein the "Serpent energy" [i.e., "spirit"] is drawn up from the base of the spine into the brain).  It "comes out" on the top of the head and the center of the forehead (pineal gland) opening the "third eye" which is referred to as "enlightement" (opening of the eyes).


Gen 3:5  For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened,


In ancient Egypt, this was symbolized on Pharaoh with the Cobra coming out of his forhead, on his head dress.  Another aspect to this process of "self-deification" however is that it can be acheived through chemical means as a "short-cut" requiring no time consumption or rigious discipline.  This method would have been important for "rulers" who would need to have the alleged advantage of "englightenment" without the common requirements of time consumption.


The use of these poisons to induce Megla-mania is actually so common, they even have given these types of chemicals an official  name.  They are called "Entheogens", En+Theo+Gen, a greek compound word which means to "generate the god within".


There are a number of toxic poisons that scramble one's brain and induce a permenant state of mental illness referred to as Megla-mania in clinical psychology, but one particular poison, secret-soceity Babelists are historically fond of, is found exclusively under the ever-green tree.


The Amanita muscaria is the red and white magic mushroom that grows almost exclusively beneath Pine trees. One of the active substances in the hallucinogenic mushroom is DMT, an entheogen naturally produced in the brain’s pineal gland.  “The Pine tree is one of the well-known central relics of Christmas. Under this tree is where those who are deemed good find their reward in the form of a present. A big red and white rounded mushroom grows under the very tree we are to look under on Christmas morning to find our gift.”

–James Arthur, “Mushrooms and Mankind”


Green, red, and white as Christmas colors comes from the evergreen tree and the red and white mushrooms underneath. The word Christmas originally comes from the Egyptian KRST (oiled/anointed one) and Mes, the sacred cakes annually made/ingested by the Egyptians. This Eucharist was originally made from Amanita muscaria.



“Although most people see Christmas as a Christian holiday, most of the symbols and icons we associate with Christmas celebrations are actually derived from the shamanistic traditions of the tribal peoples of preChristian Northern Europe. The sacred mushroom of these people was the red and white amanita muscaria mushroom … These peoples lived in dwellings made of birch and reindeer hide, called ‘yurts.’ Somewhat similar to a teepee, the yurt's central smoke hole is often also used as an entrance.  After gathering the mushrooms from under the sacred trees where they appeared, the shamans would fill their sacks and return home. Climbing down the chimney entrances, they would share out the mushroom's gifts with those within … Santa also dresses like a mushroom gatherer. When it was time to go out and harvest the magical mushrooms, the ancient shamans would dress much like Santa, wearing red and white furtrimmed coats and long black boots.”  - Dana Larsen, “The Psychedelic Secrets of Santa Claus” Cannabis Culture, Marijuana Magazine, Dec 18th, 2003


Pictures of winged Babylonian and Sumerian gods are shown feeding pinecones to humans. The Amanita muscaria is the red and white magic mushroom that grows almost exclusively beneath Pine trees. One of the active substances in the hallucinogenic mushroom is DMT, a chemical  naturally produced in the brain’s pineal gland.


“There are a number of hieroglyphic depictions of plants (many of which are psychedelic) on walls and within texts throughout Egypt. This is to be expected, yet this goes undetected or dismissed by most who are studying Egypt and its religious writings … The pillars that are at every temple in Egypt are shaped like giant mushrooms. These are shaped like the Amanita some are shaped like Psilocybe. Others look like tree fungus and are decorated with pictures of an incredible variety of plants.” In Egypt countless pillars are shaped like huge mushrooms with tall stems, umbrella caps, and mushroom engravings all up, down, and around them. In the Egyptian Book of the Dead they are called “the food of the gods,” or “celestial food” and “the flesh of the gods.” - James Arthur, “Mushrooms and Mankind” (44 & 53)


Critics of the Vatican have long claimed these practices continue in the inner circles of the Roman Church.  The Pine-Cone, the source of the red and white Amanita Muscaria entheogen chemical, are found throughout the Vatican's architeture, and even on the Papal staff itself.  Perhaps even the origin of the "doctrine" of the Pope's own Self-deification, could be traced back to these residual practices from the Babylonian mysteries, and it's red and white, Christmas magic-mushrooms.


As has already been mentioned, the modern word "Church" (having nothing to do with the New Testament Greek word "ecclesia/karaim") was actually replaced by the name of the Roman sorceress "Circe", and Circe was directly linked to practices involving Entheogenic poisons.


"In the entrance way they stayed

 To listen here, insider her quiet house

 They heard the Goddess Circe

  Low she sang

  In her beguiling voice, while on her loom

  She wore ambrosial fabric sheer and bright

  By the craft [sorcery] known to the Goddesses of heaven".

- Homer, Book 10 of the "Odyssey",8th Cent.BCE





The "Christ-Mass" tree, as you will see is the Sacred "ever-green" that the Biblical prophets railed against in the "High Places" under which apostate Israelites placed their Idols.  But beyond this simple connection to the "High Place" is it's connection to herbal toxicology to concoct poisons that chemically induce brain damage in the victims creating clinical states of megla-mania, misinterpeted historically (and spiritually) as "enlightenment".


The custom of the Tree itself however, and it's ornamentation has not actually changed for thousands of years, unlike what you are told by either well intentioned but ignorant, or intentionally deceitful "Christ-mass" apologists who erroneously attribute the whole practice to the 1800s.   The pattern of ornamentation itself is an ancient invocation to the Serpent God of englightment, who the Solar-Deity born on this day, actually was, and in whose honor the tree is erected in the home.


The custom of placing "strings" of ornamentation "around" the tree spiraling upward toward the top, at which point a light is placed, is a replication of the pattern of Serpentine Enlightenment, that Moses confronted in Pharaoh, who (like the modern Pope) considered himself God on earth (i.e., institutionalized megla-mania)... or "blasphemy" if you prefer the spiritual name.


Rev 18:23...and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee:


Most educated Protestants, familiar with "religious phenomenology" are familiar with the Protestant doctrine from evangelicalism and revivalism, found undeniably throughout both history and the scripture, of "hearing God".  The concept is expressed in religiously metaphorial terms, and does not involve actually hearing a physical voice, as mockers from dead European State-theologies often like to intentionally distort. 


It refers to the process of intuitive feedback that occurs within a Biblical state of consciousness and is expressed neurologically and translated psychologically as autonomic "self-talk".  In other words, self-talk that doesn't come from the self, and often results in information indicative of procognition (i.e., the Biblical concept, "prophecy" or "words of knowledge").  This phenomena is one of the central experiences promised to "believers" in the Bible and is often referred to as the "gift of the Holy Spirit" or even the technical phrase, the "word (i.e., speaking) of God".


Gen 3:8-10  And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.   And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?  And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, ...and I hid myself.


In self-deification, this process is put to a permenant end, as the self is all that is left present within the consciousness.  That is not to say that the "self" cannot be "self-intuitive" and "self-directed" through "knowledge" and decision making based on "self-righteousness" of "good and evil".  This certianly does occur in the Biblical text, per example the "Spirit of Python" referred to in Acts.  However, the communication with God, is no more because the "Spirit of Python",and the "Spirit of Self-Deification" is incompatable with the "Spirit of God".  One or the other will be short-circuited and cease to exist.


Thus why "knowledge of good and evil" (religious judgementalism) becomes the operative concept of this path.  Thus the text mentioned above that the "voice" is no longer heard within Mystery Babylon apostates or it's leadership.  Meaning God's personal will for the individual is no longer known.


What evidence do we have that the Papacy has indulged this "sorcery" (Pharmakia) which results in "self-deification" (i.e., Blasphemy)?  The conclusions are fairly simple to make although obviously speculative.  The Roman Pope was (and still is) given the official title "Pontiff Maximus", which is literally the head of all the religion in the Empire.  That means the ancient "mysteries" as well. 


These "mysteries" (which both prepared and ingested the magic Christmas mushrooms) as well as induced the chemically prescribed forms of clinical Megla-Mania "enlightement".  Since these "mysteries" were "incorporated" into the Roman system of religion we now call "Christianity", their symbols, as well as their secret rites, there would be no way to avoid the conclusion these were not continued in some secret form as well, at the very least certainly for some transitional time... and possibly even up to the present day?


The fact that splinter esoteric groups from Roman Catholicism, such as the Masons, know about this information as well, and the fact that the Phenomenology of "hearing God" is literally completely absent in not only in Rome's theological paradigm, but the personal experience of many of it's priests, saints, and the most "holy" man of all Roman Catholicism (the Empire) the Pope himself, is evidence that the foundation of Roman theology is self-deification, and that the "Mystery" religion from Babylon is certiainly experientially present and dominant. 


Psa 95:7  For he is our God; and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand. To day if ye will hear his voice,



The institutionalized doctrines of "Self-Deification" are directly rebuked by the consciouness experienced in the "voice of God" phenomenology, which is markedly absent.  Whether this abscence is the result of the historic doctrines of self-deification of the Papacy now institutionalized, or the direct product of it's past use of Entheogens involving chemically induced megla-mania for Papal initiates in history, perhaps still secretly observed, (which in turn led to it's doctrines) is obviously something no outsider would ever know.  But the speculations are that these practices in some form are still observed.


There is no doubt, as far as the Biblical text is concerned, that "Mystery Babylon" is involved with the use of Entheogens to create chemically induced states of self-deification (i.e., "enlightenment").  Another by-product of drug use is clinically described as "disorientation".  This sounds fairly benign as a clinical description however, in terms of "spirituality" it means often interpeting God as the devil, and the Devil as God within one's own consciousness.  This is not "clinically" considered a big deal, because religion is veiwed as irrelevent by clinicians.  But obviously this is a very real and very serious problem spiritually.  Getting God and Satan mixed up within one's own subconscious psyche is of no small consequence.


Historically, the "doctrine" that denounced, condemned, and then eventually criminalized the prophetic, and the lesser but equally important phenomology of "hearing God" is easily dated to the 4th and 5th centuries.  It's "abscence" as a personal individual phenomenology in the Vatican, the vast majority of it's officials, and it's official theology, is openly known.


The "Cup of abomination" associated with "Pharmakia", is clearly seen in the elements of "Christ-mass" from it's magic mushrooms, to it's self-deification in the Serpent's tree. The "rotten Tree" referred to by Christ, is LITERALLY the same Tree mentioned here:



Gen 3:4  And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5  For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Gen 3:6  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Gen 3:7  And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.


And it is the same one mentioned here:


Jer 10:2-4  Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a TREE out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.  They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. 


And while it is not the same botanical genus of tree, (as the first is a Fig Tree and this is an Ever-green) it is in fact, the same tree spiritually, and comes literally from the same conceptual, symbolical and ritualistically historical linage.


The standard procedure for Babelism to justify it's demonic rituals to "Christians" is to do exactly what the word "Babel" says it does, that is "mix", create "con-fusion" (put the two together).  In other words, "mix" Satan worship with the worship of God, and call it "esoteric wisdom".  But if you go beyond first glance, their claims will easily fall apart in the scriptural text, leaving only the naive and Biblically illiterate impressed.  The "esoeteric" Babelist explanation for this obviously demonic Solar-Serpent Tree ritual, is to compare it to the "brazen serpent" that Moses lifted up in the wilderness that brought "healing" when the Israelites looked upon it.  And then to point out that Jesus was said to have been "made sin" and "hung on the tree" for "our sins". 


But this obvious theological excuse making for mixing ancient Satanic ritual with Christian practice falls apart on several points. (1) Even granted every point made without argument or debate, Christ never commanded people to erect solar-serpent trees in their living rooms on the solar-solstice.  So that observation is enough to end the discussion for the intelligent objective observer. (2) Jesus was never called "the serpent", in fact, he was called the exact OPPOSITE of the serpent:


Gen 3:15  And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.


And even though he is said to have been "made sin", he is never said to have been made "The Serpent", he is called THE LAMB, not the SERPENT.  Anti-venom is made only from Lamb's blood, and this obviously is no accident.  (3) The Brazen Serpent that healed people when they "looked upon it" was symbolical of "admitting" or "confessing their SIN", it was not the SERPENT, it was "looking at", i.e., "admitting", confession of SIN, that brought the "healing".  The Serpent was still symbolic of SIN.  But no one was being commanded to DO SIN.  Quite the opposite.  In fact, the same "Brazen Serpent" was later erected in Israel and people began to RITUALIZE it!  Look what happened:


2Ki 18:4  He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan.


No matter where you go with that argument, you end up having to admit, if anything, it teaches you should go "break in peices" your "Christ-mass" tree!  (It's hardly justifies this Demonic occult ritual practice)









Eze 9:4 And the LORD said unto him, Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof.




Ezekiel 8:16 And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD's  house, and, behold,...their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they WORSHIPPED THE SUN toward the east.


[This was APOLLO to the Romans honored on Dec. 25th]


"It was to the rising sun that Christians alike in East and West turned in prayer, whether in congregational worship or in private devotion. IN TERTULLIAN'S DAY THERE WERE ALREADY SOME WHO THOUGHT THE SUN TO BE THE CHRISTIANS' GOD". - Norman H. Baynes, History Constantine The Great and the Christian Church,2nd edition, Oxford, 1972, P.95


When asked about the era before the liturgical changes of the mid-1960s, Catholics who lived through it often bring up exotic tales of Masses celebrated by a priest with “his back to the people,” sometimes wistfully, sometimes not. In these reveries, the Second Vatican Council inevitably becomes the event that turned the priest around and broke the altar away from the wall. Until then, the celebrant had typically faced the apse or rear wall of the church, ostensibly appearing to be “away from the people.” This practice was described for symbolic and historical reasons using the Latin phrase, ad orientem, “to the east,”  - Light from the East:The Orientation of Christian Worship in Light of Modern Scholarship by Matthew Alderman



Eze 8:13 He said also unto me, Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations that they do.

Eze 8:14 ...and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.   [Tammuz Was The Babylonian "Spring" SUN-GOD -]


[This was called ISHTAR TIME, he ressurected, was celebrated in PASSION PLAYS and COLORED EGGS.

The ISHTAR BUNNY was the appearance of the constellation, THE HARE, on the horizon]


JEREMIAH was the other prophet who prophesied during the same time frame as EZEKIEL!


Jer 10:3 For the customs of the people are vain: for one CUTTETH A TREE out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

Jer 10:4 They DECK IT WITH SILVER and with GOLD; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.



 "the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations" Eze 9:4


Do you “sigh and cry” over the LIE OF CHRIST-MASS?


Or do you have “THE MARK” of the BEAST? And worship his DEC.25TH ICON?





(1) Worshipping BAAL, THE SUN GOD, i.e., a/k/a the Roman Apollo, Dec. 25th

(2) Observing ISHTAR TIME.

(3) Cutting down & decorating TREES with SILVER & GOLD [associated with Teraphim figurines] in his HONOR




Eze 8:18 Therefore will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them.







The Christmas celebration in Germanic lands is not an invention of the Christian Church but of our forefathers. The day of the Winter Solstice was holy to our ancestors and the period around the Winter Solstice was filled with the fairyland magic (sorcery) of the Nordic soul. In this period gifts were exchanged without an indecent hind-thought of … Heaven...  The Nordic man did not think of a reward for decent deeds. For us therefore, even the Christian Christmas  REMAINS a festival of Germanic love, Germanic ways and Germanic benevolence.— Nazi Governor Wilhelm Kube








2Co 6:15  And what concord hath Christ with Belial?

2Co 6:16  And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

2Co 6:17  Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,

2Co 6:18  And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.







´li-al, bēl´yal (בּליּעל, belīya‛al; Βελίαρ, Belíar): This name, occurring very frequently in the Old Testament, has the sense of “worthlessness” (compare 2Sa_23:6 margin); accordingly in such phrases as “sons of Belial” (Jdg_20:13; 1Sa_10:27, etc.), “men of Belial” (1Sa_30:22; 1Ki_21:13, etc.), which the English Revised Version usually retains, the American Standard Revised Version more correctly renders, “base fellows” (so “daughter of Belial” 1Sa_1:16, “wicked woman”). There is here no suggestion a proper name. Afterward, however, “Belial” became a proper name for Satan, or for Antichrist (Thus frequently in the Jewish Apocalyptic writings, e.g. in XII the Priestly Code (P), Book Jubilees, Asc Isa, Sib Or). In this sense Paul used the word in 2Co_6:15, “What concord hath Christ with Belial?” (Beliar). Bousset thinks that Paul's “man of sin” in 2Th_2:3, where some authorities read “man of lawlessness,” is a translation of this term. The sense at least is similar. See ANTICHRIST; MAN OF SIN.








Which Is It ? ? ?



Act 28:31 PREACHING [KERUGMA] the kingdom of GOD [THEOS], and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence...


Rev 16:2 ....the men which had the MARK [CHARAGMA] of the BEAST [THERION], and upon them which worshipped his IMAGE [ICON].

1504 eikon {i-kone'} ENGLISH "ICON" from 1503; TDNT - 2:381,203; n f AV - image 23; 23 1) an image, figure, likeness – STRONG’S EXHAUSTIVE CONCORDANCE





Exo 20:4  Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:




 2Co 6:15-18  And what concord hath Christ with Belial? (Literally "anti-christ") And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.  Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.


Honoring the KING OF THE JEWS, by making "IDOLS" “ICONS” AND TERAPHIM of him [called “Nativity scenes”]?   


Really? How odd?

Is anyone really stupid enough to believe this?

Unfortunately, yes. By the millions.

It's called the "Icon of the Beast" and is prophesied to decieve the nations of the earth.

(Which is precisely what it does)  But you do not have to be one of them.



It is by no accident, that the occultism of Religious Babelism propigated by the Freemasons and the Roman Empire "Church", is an intentional attempt to do exactly what the BIble promises damnation and divine judgement for.  The twisted corrupted theology from oriental syncretism attempts to "mix" Satanism with the worship of God, in an "esoteric" system of Knowledge that is privy only to their secret initiates.  This spiritual perversion began as far back as the New Testament itself:

Rev 2:24 But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the deep things of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.

The bogus seduction used by Babelists to suck people into these things (who should know better) is the claim that these forms are "spiritually powerful" and grant "power" to those who known how to "use them" properly.  But since the ignorant masses are so developmentally retarded, they are "forbidden" to them, because they would not "use" them properly without the "great wisdom" of their particular "masters".  They then simply take all the demonic stuff listed in the Bible, and create long complex excuses for doing it, either literally or in some "symbolic form" to basically conjure up the "spirit" of the Devil, which they perfer to refer to as "Lucifer" (Light Bringer)instead of as "Satan".(as though it actually makes a difference?)

In the end, it boils down to some pretty lame drawn out excuse making for committing intentional blasphemy which is openly damned in the scriptures with eternal hell-fire, and calling it a "wisdom".  They are in effect, making themselves, devil worshippers, and spreading this "delusion" among THE CLERGY who run America's Churches.  PAT ROBERTSON is on Time Magazine giving a Masonic hand sign, and Jerry Falwell tells people to vote for Satan before a Democrat.  As hard as it is to believe, these men are identified as literally "cursed and confused" devil worshippers dressed in "spiritual drag".(at least according to the same Bible they claim to preach from)




Eze 16:46 And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters. Yet hast thou not walked after their ways, nor done after their abominations: but, as if that were a very little thing, thou wast corrupted more than they in all thy ways.


What's worse, a preacher who is really a Devil Worshipper, or a Homosexual who thinks they are a sinner?

And who is more likely to be recieved into God's heaven first !!!!


Luk 18:10  Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.
Luk 18:11  The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.
Luk 18:13  And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
Luk 18:14  I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.






THE CHRISTMAS LIE - It's Bigger Than You Think!